Councillors promise to urgently address safety fears at London's top tourist food market
Tap above to watch video report by Simon Harris
Councillors say they will take action to address fears over safety at London's top tourist food market - Borough Market.
Crowds of shoppers often pour out of one hall into another and run the gauntlet of cars and vans as they cross Bedale Street.A report by crowd control experts estimated shoppers pause for vehicles - or drivers hit the brakes to avoid pedestrians - 800 times a week.The report calls them interactions.
"We commissioned the report because we know that Borough Market can be very busy at peak times," said Shane Holland Chair of Borough Market Board of Trustees.
"The safety of everyone who comes to the market and all of our traders is paramount.
"We commissioned an independent survey to look at how we can mitigate some of those issues," Mr Holland explained.At one end of the market Stoney Street was closed to traffic after the London Bridge terror attacks in 2017 and the concrete bollards were meant to be temporary.But at the other end of the market in Bedale Street there are no bollards so visitors and vehicles jostle for space.Local MP Neil Coyle thinks that needs to change.
"There are too many near misses - there are far too many people trying to use a road and pavements that is not managed very well," Bermondsey & Old Southwark MP Mr Coyle said.
Borough Market is no local street market but a significant landmark on the London tourist trail.
The market's popularity as a destination for both foodies and tourists grew rapidly after the Covid lockdowns.
The area now attracts 30 million visitors a year.It's also become hugely popular on social media - in particular Instagram and TikTok.Dominic McCourt has been a butcher at the market for a decade and thinks Southwark Council's traffic management policies have made matters worse.
He said: "They are closing roads all around the surrounding area, they are narrowing roads and taking away loading bays so they are forcing more traffic to come here."
There are problems for cabbies too.
Ikea opens Oxford Street store amid rejuvenation of West End shopping area
Steve McNamara from the Licensed Taxi Drivers' Association said: "The more roads you close, the more traffic you put on other roads.
"London is already Europe's most congested city - are we going to make that worse?"
Southwark Council told us it was urgently working with the police TfL and the market to look at safety.
Councillor James McAsh from Southwark Council's said: "The safety of our residents, visitors and traders is a top priority for us.
"We're urgently working with the Metropolitan Police, Transport for London, Borough Market Trust and traders to look at safety at Borough Market.
"We will ensure all parties are kept informed of this work as it progresses."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Out
2 hours ago
- Time Out
These are the most Instagrammable attractions in the U.S., per a new study
Let's face it: Few people travel days without taking photos destined to wind up on social media (you know, whenever they finish putting them through several rounds of filters). And even if you're not planning to post 'em to Instagram, you still want to snap beautiful shots, and an amazing backdrop is half the battle. So how do you get a wonderful background to stand in front of? You pick your destination from the most Instagrammable attractions in the U.S. Created by the French online casino comparison company Lucky-7-Bonus, the picturesque list was formed by starting with Tour Scanner's round-up of the 100 best tourist attractions, each of which was then scanned on Instagram to learn how many hashtags it earned. For instance, the number one destination on the resulting list—unsurprisingly, the most magical place on Earth, a.k.a. Walt Disney World—was hashtagged 11,345,400 times by Insta users. Walt Disney World in Orlando, Florida features many places to take a fantastic photo across its huge complex, which includes multiple theme parks—with the iconic Cinderella castle and chances to take photos with beloved characters—plus water parks and more than two dozen official Disney resort hotels. But the true winner of this list is New York City. No fewer than six of its attractions land on this top 10 list. And if we expand it from New York City to New York state, a seventh destination gets added! Clearly, New York dominates, including nabbing the second-place spot with Central Park, which has 8,912,000 hashtagged posts. The stunning 843-acre park includes views of wild landscapes (we love the Ramble with its twisting woodland paths) with skyscrapers on the horizon. Don't forget to take a photo at the Belvedere Castle, too. An NYC destination is also third on this list: Broadway, with 7,432,800 hashtags. The avenue is famous for its theaters and getting a photo with a marquee showing the name of the stage production you saw is a tourist favorite. New York State also captures the no. 4 (Times Square), no. 5 (Wall Street), no. 8 (Brooklyn Bridge), no. 9 (Niagara Falls) and no. 10 (Empire State Building) spots on the ranking. So, if you're an influencer, New York has to be on your photo-snapping itinerary! Here's the full list of the top 10 most Instagrammable attractions in the U.S.: 1. Walt Disney World: Florida 2. Central Park: New York 3. Broadway: New York 4. Times Square: New York 5. Wall Street: New York 6. Venice Beach: California 7. Grand Canyon: Arizona 8. Brooklyn Bridge: New York 9. Niagara Falls: New York 10. Empire State Building: New York
Glasgow Times
5 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Independent Glasgow restaurant closes after 10 years
Jist Misto Bistro, which served classic and contemporary dishes, has closed and will be replaced by a new business. Located on Paisley Road West, the eatery was opened in 2015 and was described as a "heart-warming, friendly restaurant". READ NEXT: Takeaway says key to success is treating customers 'like family' The Jist Misto Instagram page which states the restaurant is closed (Image: It is not clear what date the restaurant closed, but the bio on an Instagram page for the eatery simply reads: "Closed". The last post shared on the page was on March 26. In a post about the closure shared on Facebook group Craigton, Glasgow Residents Information Group one person commented: "That's a shame. Really enjoyed JM every time I've been in." READ NEXT: Fast food chain announces 'long anticipated' location to open next month (Image: Colin Mearns) Pictures taken of the unit today (June 11) show signage has gone up for a new restaurant and takeaway called Angheeti by Masterchef contestant Sagar Massey. It will serve "true Indian flavours" according to signage, which also suggests it will open "soon" on Tuesday, June 17. Jist Misto has been contacted for comment.
Wales Online
7 hours ago
- Wales Online
Company linked to Tory Peer Baroness Mone should pay back £121m for ‘faulty' PPE, High Court hears
Company linked to Tory Peer Baroness Mone should pay back £121m for 'faulty' PPE, High Court hears PPE Medpro is being sued for an alleged breach of contract over the supply of PPE during the Covid pandemic, with the Government claiming the gowns were unusable The company in court is linked to Baroness Mone (Image: PA Archive/PA Images ) A company linked to Tory peer Michelle Mone should pay back more than £121 million for breaching a Government contract for 25 million surgical gowns during the coronavirus pandemic, the High Court has heard. The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) is suing PPE Medpro for allegedly breaching a deal for the gowns, with lawyers for the Government telling the court they were "faulty" because they were not sterile. The company, a consortium led by Baroness Mone's husband, businessman Doug Barrowman, was awarded Government contracts by the former Conservative administration to supply PPE during the pandemic, after she recommended it to ministers. Any wrongdoing has been denied. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here The Government is seeking to recover the costs of the contract, as well as the costs of transporting and storing the items, which amount to an additional £8,648,691. PPE Medpro said it "categorically denies" breaching the contract, and its lawyers claimed the company had been "singled out for unfair treatment". Opening the trial on Wednesday, Paul Stanley KC, for the DHSC, said: "This case is simply about whether 25 million surgical gowns provided by PPE Medpro were faulty. Article continues below "It is, in short, a technical case about detailed legal and industry standards that apply to sterile gowns." Mr Stanley said in written submissions the "initial contact with Medpro came through Baroness Mone", with discussions about the contract then going through one of the company's directors, Anthony Page. Baroness Mone remained "active throughout" the negotiations, Mr Stanley said, with the peer stating Mr Barrowman had "years of experience in manufacturing, procurement and management of supply chains". But he told the court Baroness Mone's communications were "not part of this case", which was "simply about compliance". He said: "The department does not allege anything improper happened, and we are not concerned with any profits made by anybody." In court documents from May this year, the DHSC said the gowns were delivered to the UK in 72 lots between August and October, 2020, with £121,999,219.20 paid to PPE Medpro between July and August that year. The department rejected the gowns in December, 2020, and told the company it would have to repay the money, but this has not happened and the gowns remain in storage, unable to be used. In written submissions for trial, Mr Stanley said 99.9999% of the gowns should have been sterile under the terms of the contract, equating to one in a million being unusable. The DHSC claims the contract also specified PPE Medpro had to sterilise the gowns using a "validated process", attested by CE marking, which indicates a product has met certain medical standards. He said "none of those things happened", with no validated sterilisation process being followed, and the gowns supplied with invalid CE marking. He continued that 140 gowns were later tested for sterility, with 103 failing. He said: "Whatever was done to sterilise the gowns had not achieved its purpose, because more than one in a million of them was contaminated when delivered. "On that basis, DHSC was entitled to reject the gowns, or is entitled to damages, which amount to the full price and storage costs." In his written submissions, Charles Samek KC, for PPE Medpro, said the "only plausible reason" for the gowns becoming contaminated was due to "the transport and storage conditions or events to which the gowns were subject", after they had been delivered to the DHSC. He added the testing did not happen until several months after the gowns were rejected, and the samples selected were not "representative of the whole population", meaning "no proper conclusions may be drawn". He said the DHSC's claim was "contrived and opportunistic" and PPE Medpro had been "made the 'fall guy' for a catalogue of failures and errors" by the department. He said: "It has perhaps been singled out because of the high profiles of those said to be associated with PPE Medpro, and/or because it is perceived to be a supplier with financial resources behind it. "In reality, an archetypal case of 'buyer's remorse', where DHSC simply seeks to get out of a bargain it wished it never entered into, left, as it is, with over £8 billion of purchased and unused PPE as a result of an untrammelled and uncontrolled buying spree with taxpayers' money." He also said there was a "delicious irony" that Baroness Mone was mentioned in the DHSC's written submissions, when she had "zero relevance to the contractual issues in this case". Neither Baroness Mone nor Mr Barrowman is due to give evidence in the trial, and did not attend the first day of the hearing on Wednesday. A PPE Medpro spokesperson said the company "categorically denies breaching its obligations" and will "robustly defend" the claim. Article continues below The trial before Mrs Justice Cockerill is due to last five weeks, with a judgment expected in writing at a later date.
