logo
Row over Renfrewshire Council's garden waste permit as Reform UK councillor hits out at scheme

Row over Renfrewshire Council's garden waste permit as Reform UK councillor hits out at scheme

Daily Record27-06-2025
Jamie McGuire, who recently defected to Nigel Farage's party, criticised the charge which was first rolled out in July 2023.
A war of words has broken out over Renfrewshire Council's garden waste permit after a Reform UK politician branded the scheme "as unfair and illogical as ever".
Councillor Jamie McGuire, who defected from Labour to Nigel Farage's party earlier this month, has hit out at the charge which was first rolled out in July 2023.

The annual fee for the service rose from £40 to £47 for 2025/26 and will increase further to £52 in 2026/27 and £57 in 2027/28 after a pricing strategy was voted through in January.

Councillor McGuire, who represents Renfrew North and Braehead, blasted the policy as "nonsense" and a "stealth tax" as he took aim at the SNP administration.
He said: "The £47 charge for garden waste collection isn't new but it remains as unfair and illogical as ever.
"Introduced by the SNP-led administration in Renfrewshire, this policy continues to hit ordinary residents in the pocket for using the same brown bin they've always had.
"Let's be clear, this is not a new or improved service. It's the same bin, the same lorry, the same route but now, if it contains garden waste without a paid permit, it won't be collected.
"Food waste? No problem. Grass cuttings? £47, please. It's nonsense. This charge is yet another example of how out of touch the SNP administration has become.
"Instead of making life easier for hard-working families, they've chosen to impose a stealth tax on people who take pride in their gardens and their communities.

"At a time when households are struggling with rising costs, this is the last thing people need. It punishes responsibility and risks encouraging fly-tipping – problems that will cost the council more to deal with in the long run."
Unlike food waste, which people can continue to present on its own in brown bins for uplift free of charge, the collection of garden waste is not a statutory service and, therefore, not one the council is required to provide.
However, an exemption on payment is offered to householders entitled to full or severe mental impairment council tax reduction.

Responding to Councillor McGuire, SNP council leader Iain Nicolson, who represents Erskine and Inchinnan, said: "The garden waste permit scheme has been in operation now for two years and has proven to be popular with the uptake in permits maintaining at a steady level.
"The garden waste permit is an optional choice for those who own gardens if they wish us to collect their garden waste.
"There are alternative options which include taking the waste to one of our civic amenity sites or reusing and recycling within gardens as compost or mulch.

"It is not a statutory obligation on the council to provide this service but we continue to offer it as a service on the same principle of bulk waste collections which is also an optional choice.
"Councillor McGuire has been known to misunderstand what garden waste is and why we introduced a small annual fee. The reason for the fee is the cost of disposal of the waste which the council must pay an external contractor to treat and dispose of.
"These costs are not within the control of the council. Faced with a choice between a small service fee for some services or we use our resources to support the most vulnerable, we chose to support our most vulnerable unlike Reform which are about millionaires, privatising our health services and reducing hard-won workplace rights and benefits."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Russia launches missile attack on Ukraine as Zelensky seeks security guarantees
Russia launches missile attack on Ukraine as Zelensky seeks security guarantees

Rhyl Journal

time6 minutes ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Russia launches missile attack on Ukraine as Zelensky seeks security guarantees

The attack mostly targeted western regions of the country, it said. The strikes killed at least one person and injured 15 others, according to officials. Ukraine's foreign minister, Andrii Sybiha, said Russia struck a 'major American electronics manufacturer' in western Ukraine. He provided no further details. Western parts of Ukraine are far from the battlefield's front line in the east and south of the country. Much of the military aid provided by Ukraine's Western allies is believed to be transported and stored there. It was Russia's third largest aerial attack this year in terms of the number of drones fired and the eighth-largest in terms of missiles, according to official figures. The strikes occurred during a renewed US-led effort to reach a peace settlement in the three-year war following Russia's invasion of its neighbour. Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky condemned the attack, saying it was carried out 'as if nothing were changing at all'. Moscow has shown no signs of pursuing meaningful negotiations to end the war and urged the international community to respond with stronger pressure, including tougher sanctions and tariffs, he said. Russia 'wasted several cruise missiles against an American business', he said, noting it was a regular civilian enterprise producing domestic utilities, such as coffee machines. 'And that too became a target for Russia. Very telling.' Earlier, Mr Zelensky said Ukraine will hold intensive meetings to understand what kind of security guarantees its allies are willing to provide after receiving signals that the United States would back reinvigorated discussions seeking an end to war. The details are being hammered out among national security advisers and military officials and Mr Zelensky thinks they will take clearer shape within 10 days. He then expects to be ready to hold direct talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin for the first time since the full-scale invasion. The talks could also be conducted in a trilateral format alongside US President Donald Trump, Mr Zelensky said. 'We want to have an understanding of the security guarantees architecture within seven to 10 days. And based on that understanding, we aim to hold a trilateral meeting. That was my logic,' Mr Zelensky said, speaking to reporters on Wednesday after his trip to Washington along with Europe's top leaders. Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov said working on security arrangements in Ukraine without Moscow's involvement would not work, according to state news agency RIA Novosti. 'We cannot agree with the fact that it is now proposed to resolve collective security issues without the Russian Federation. This will not work. We have already explained more than once that Russia does not overstate its interests, but we will ensure our legitimate interests firmly and harshly,' Mr Lavrov said at a news conference on Wednesday.

People have ‘every right' to protest asylum hotels
People have ‘every right' to protest asylum hotels

Rhyl Journal

time6 minutes ago

  • Rhyl Journal

People have ‘every right' to protest asylum hotels

Chris Philp named three Conservative-led councils which are considering taking legal action against hoteliers whose property is being used to house asylum seekers. His party's leader Kemi Badenoch has written to Conservative council leaders 'encouraging' them to follow Epping Forest District Council's footsteps by launching bids to shut these hotels, if their 'legal advice supports it'. Epping Forest District Council in Essex secured a High Court temporary injunction this week, blocking the use of Epping's Bell Hotel as accommodation for asylum seekers on planning grounds. Mr Philp told BBC Breakfast that Borough of Broxbourne Council in Hertfordshire, Reigate and Banstead Borough Council in Surrey, and Hillingdon Council in London were each considering taking similar legal action. 'So, I think there are many up and down the country who are looking at this following the Epping ruling,' he said. Mr Philp added: 'I think these councils are, you know, sick and tired of having these asylum hotels housing predominantly young men who entered the country illegally in their communities. 'They want to see them closing down and that is why I think they're rightly looking at legal action.' Asked whether there was a 'risk' the High Court's decision 'will encourage more protests and problems in communities outside these hotels', Mr Philp told BBC Breakfast: 'People are understandably angry about the Government, the Labour Government's failings, the border crisis they're presiding over. 'They do have the right to peacefully protest – I do stress the word 'peacefully'. Peaceful protest is lawful, it is every citizen's right to do that. 'Of course, if it isn't peaceful, that is wrong and that should be dealt with by the police, but where protest is peaceful, people have every right to engage in protest.' He had earlier claimed that 'reporting says hundreds of charges have been laid against illegal immigrants being accommodated in these hotels'. At the High Court this week, lawyers for the Home Office warned that a temporary injunction in Epping 'runs the risk of acting as an impetus for further violent protests' elsewhere, after several demonstrations outside the Bell Hotel. Edward Brown KC, for the Government, also warned the move would 'substantially interfere' with the Home Office's statutory duty in potentially avoiding a breach of the asylum seekers' human rights. Speaking on Thursday, minister Catherine McKinnell said Labour had 'inherited a terrible mess from the last government when it comes to the immigration system and particularly the processing of asylum claims – massive backlog'. The education minister told Sky News: '(I) absolutely recognise the concerns that local communities have and we want to work with local communities to find solutions.' Pressed on the speed of Government efforts to close asylum hotels, Ms McKinnell said: 'What we've done is doubled the number of asylum claims that have been processed. 'So, that is reducing the number of people who are requiring this accommodation, but also returning people that shouldn't be here. 'We're also committed to ending the use of asylum hotels by the end of this Parliament. 'So, it will take some time to clean up the situation that we've inherited, but, you know, it's really important that we continue to both manage the accommodation that people are currently in and also speed up the process.' A Labour spokesperson described Mrs Badenoch's letter as being a 'pathetic stunt' and 'desperate and hypocritical nonsense from the architects of the broken asylum system', and added there were now '20,000 fewer asylum seekers in hotels than at their peak under the Tories'. The Conservative leader told her party's town hall leaders that whether or not to block a hotel from housing asylum seekers 'will depend on individual circumstances of the case' and continued: 'But it is the Labour Government which is trying to ram through such asylum hotels without consultation and without proper process.' Richard Biggs, Conservative leader of Reigate and Banstead Borough Council, told the PA news agency: 'We are studying the judgment with our lawyers to understand it and if a similar action would work for us. 'We have had some impact and we had a protest outside our hotel in August which was local people having a peaceful protest to express their concerns.' He added that 'wider infrastructure has to be considered when determining planning'. Broxbourne leader Corina Gander previously told PA the decision in nearby Epping appeared to set a 'massive precedent' and the borough council is now seeking advice. Leaders at Labour-led authorities in Tamworth and Wirral have said they are considering the High Court's decision in relation to hotels in their areas. Reform UK leaders in Staffordshire and West Northamptonshire are also considering further action.

Number of asylum seekers in hotels up 8% in first year of Labour government
Number of asylum seekers in hotels up 8% in first year of Labour government

ITV News

time6 minutes ago

  • ITV News

Number of asylum seekers in hotels up 8% in first year of Labour government

The number of asylum seekers living in UK hotels has risen by 8% under Labour compared to the same point last year, despite falling slightly since March this year. The figures come after the government's plans to reduce the asylum backlog have been frustrated in recent days by a High Court issued an interim injunction barring the housing of migrants at a hotel in Essex. The judgement has led to many other councils considering their own legal action over asylum hotels - ITV News understands 24 local authorities are looking into potential legal challenges. The latest Home Office data, published on Thursday as part of the usual quarterly immigration statistics, covers Labour's first year in office. They show there were 32,059 asylum seekers in UK hotels by the end of June. This was up from 29,585 at the same point a year earlier, when the Conservatives were still in power, but down slightly on the 32,345 figure at the end of March. The government has promised to end the use of hotels to house asylum seekers by the end of this parliament. The latest number is still below the peak of 56,042 asylum seekers in hotels at the end of September 2023 under the Tories. The statistics also showed the average number of people on each small boat has increased every year to 56 people per boat in the year ending June 2025 compared with 51 people per boat in the year ending June 2024. The month of June 2025 saw the highest monthly average on record, with 65 people per boat. A total of 43,000 people came to the UK by small boat in the last year, an increase of 38% on the previous year, but slightly lower than the peak in arrivals at 46,000 in 2022. The statistics on the number of asylum seekers arriving via small boats and staying in hotels will be unwelcome news for the government after the major High Court ruling on the Bell Hotel in Essex this week. The request to issue the injunction was made by Epping's Conservative-led council and has sparked a chain reaction of other authorities across the whole political spectrum, signalling they will pursue similar courses of action. These include Labour-run Tamworth and Wirral councils, Tory-run Broxbourne and East Lindsey councils and Reform's Staffordshire and West Northamptonshire councils. ITV News' Paul Brand said that sources within the party feel that councils are going to waste taxpayers' money fighting a government that is already working to end the use of hotels by asylum seekers. On Wednesday, Kemi Badenoch wrote to Conservative-led councils, urging them to follow the same route as Epping council, "if your legal advice supports it.' Reform UK leader, Nigel Farage, has also indicated that all Reform-led councils will explore the same legal route.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store