Pip rebels mulling confidence vote in PM say 'don't threaten us with good time'
Labour MPs breaking with No 10 over cuts to benefits are weighing the likelihood of a confidence vote in Keir Starmer if a vote on Tuesday goes ahead.
More than 120 rebels have signed on to a 'reasoned amendment' calling for the government's flagship welfare bill to be scrapped – more than enough to overturn Labour's huge majority.
If the upcoming vote on the bill takes place as planned and it is defeated by a groundswell of Starmer's own MPs, his leadership could be at risk.
One backbench Labour MP told Metro colleagues were asking if leaders who refused to listen to their concerns were really who they wanted taking them into the next election.
In short, they said the message to those voicing fears over Starmer's future was: 'Don't threaten us with a good time.'
However, the same MP said such an eventuality was not 'what anyone wants to see' less than a year after the last general election.
Craig Munro breaks down Westminster chaos into easy to follow insight, walking you through what the latest policies mean to you. Sent every Wednesday. Sign up here.
Ministers have been in conversation with many of the MPs leading the opposition to the welfare bill, to explore what tweaks – if any – could be made to secure their support.
One backbencher who recently met with Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said the conversation had been 'really positive', though no agreement had been reached.
Last night, the Telegraph reported Downing Street was preparing to table its own amendment to the bill with the aim of winning over some of the more persuadable holdouts.
Among other measures, the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill would make it harder for people to claim the Personal Independence Payment (Pip) disability benefit.
The government argues it is needed to encourage people back into work, stem the increase in the UK's benefit bill, and fix the welfare system.
But it has been met with opposition by disability campaign groups and charities.
Ross Barrett, Policy Manager at the MS Society, described Pip as a 'lifeline not a luxury' and said the proposed cuts would be 'devastating to disabled people, including many with MS.'
He added: 'By speaking up about these harmful benefits cuts, MPs are showing that they are listening to disabled people. It's now time for the government to follow suit and drop the Welfare Bill.' More Trending
Stepping in for Starmer at Prime Minister's Questions yesterday, Deputy PM Angela Rayner was unequivocal that the vote on Tuesday would be going ahead.
But several rebels told Metro they were confident the government would end up with no choice but to scrap it and go back to the drawing board.
Nadia Whittome, one of the Labour MPs who signed the reasoned amendment, said: 'The government can insist all it wants that the votes are proceeding, but I don't think that position is tenable.
'They need to listen to backbenchers and withdraw this bill.'
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Sleeper cells are lurking in the UK — experts reveal how worried we should be
MORE: This is where Keir Starmer will go if World War Three comes to London
MORE: Emily Eavis addresses Kneecap backlash after calls to axe their Glastonbury set
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
an hour ago
- Glasgow Times
Barrhead, Liboside and Uplawmoor by-election date revealed
Cllr Betty Cunningham, Labour, passed away on Saturday, May 31 at the age of 79 after a period of ill health. Following her death, tributes flowed in from across the political spectrum, with the council stalwart, who was first elected in 1999, described as a 'formidable' fighter for Barrhead. East Renfrewshire Council has now revealed it intends to hold a by-election for the Barrhead, Liboside and Uplawmoor ward on Thursday, August 21. READ MORE: 'Her death is a massive loss': Heartfelt tributes paid to long-serving councillor The council is currently led by a minority Labour-independent administration, which includes independent councillor Danny Devlin. There are now four Labour councillors, three independents, five SNP and five Conservatives. At the last election in 2022, Cllr Devlin picked up the most first preference votes in the ward (1,753), followed by the SNP's Angela Convery (1,639). Cllr Cunningham and Cllr Chris Lunday, SNP, were also elected. Cllr Cunningham — a former Provost from 2003 to 2007 — received an OBE from the Queen in the New Year's Honours List of 2011 for services to East Renfrewshire and Malawi, having first travelled to the African country in 2007. Her charity, the Betty Cunningham International Trust, built a health clinic and nursery schools. She was also handed a Lifetime Legend award at the Local Government Information Unit (LGIU) annual councillor awards last year. READ MORE: Bus boss tells MSP to 'get on his bike and leave transport to the adults' Council leader Owen O'Donnell, Labour, previously said: 'Social justice and the sense of what is right and wrong was ingrained in Betty's DNA. 'She was a ferocious fighter for the people of Barrhead and beyond and would leave then Prime Minister Tony Blair and First Minister Jack McConnell trembling in her wake! 'She had the biggest heart but was also great fun and someone you wanted to spend time with.' Provost Mary Montague, Labour, added: 'Strong in character and often in her language, she was formidable in fighting for the best interests of Barrhead and East Renfrewshire. 'She was a determined champion for a just cause and, for anyone who found themselves in a difficult situation and asked Betty for help, they got it.'
Rhyl Journal
an hour ago
- Rhyl Journal
Reynolds: Port Talbot plant does not meet US rules to get steel tariff exemption
The steel industry faces uncertainty over the US-UK trade deal finalised this month, which slashed tariffs on aerospace and auto sectors, but left levies on steel standing at 25% rather than falling to zero as originally agreed. Negotiations are ongoing to secure the outstanding tariff agreements. The executive order signed by Mr Trump suggests the US wants assurances on the supply chains for steel intended for export, as well as on the 'nature of ownership' of production facilities. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has insisted the ownership structure of the British Steel plant in Scunthorpe does not need to change to complete the deal with the US. 'The issue with the implementation of the steel agreement is the melt and pour rules, which is the US interpretation of rules of origin around steel,' Mr Reynolds told reporters. He said that applies to the Port Talbot plant, where semi-finished products come into the UK and then go to the mills for processing to keep the business going. 'That doesn't meet their existing implementation of that in the US.' The British Steel plant is controlled directly by the Government, but is still owned by Chinese firm Jingye. Asked if British Steel's ownership was part of US trade talks, he said it 'comes up in the context of the US (being) very supportive of what we did' to take control of the plant. 'On British Steel, we have to resolve issues of ownership separate to issues around US trade,' he said. The ownership is something that needs to be resolved 'regardless' of the US talks. The Government plans to class Britain's steel and energy sectors as 'nationally important' to UK security under new procurement rules.
South Wales Guardian
an hour ago
- South Wales Guardian
Starmer seeks to win round welfare rebels with promise of ‘fairness'
The talks ahead of Tuesday's Commons showdown come after 126 Labour MPs publicly backed a move to block it. Sir Keir told MPs he wanted the reforms, which will restrict access to sickness and incapacity benefits, to demonstrate 'Labour values of fairness'. The Prime Minister told MPs there was 'consensus across the House on the urgent need for reform' of the 'broken' welfare system. 'I know colleagues across the House are eager to start fixing that, and so am I, and that all colleagues want to get this right, and so do I,' he said. 'We want to see reform implemented with Labour values of fairness. 'That conversation will continue in the coming days, so we can begin making change together on Tuesday.' The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill has its second reading on Tuesday, the first opportunity for MPs to vote on it. If the legislation clears its first hurdle, it will then face a few hours' examination by all MPs the following week – rather than days or weeks in front of a committee tasked with looking at the Bill – with a plan for it to clear the Commons a little over a week later on July 9. Ministers have said they will listen to suggestions to improve the legislation, but opposition appears entrenched and the swift timetable for the Bill could add to critics' concerns. Commons Leader Lucy Powell told MPs: 'As the House would expect, the Government actively engages with parliamentary opinion throughout a bill's passage, as we are doing intensively with the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill.' Overnight, six more Labour MPs added their names to the rebel amendment that would halt the legislation in its tracks. The reasoned amendment argues that disabled people have not been properly consulted and further scrutiny of the changes is needed. The new names take the total number of Labour backbenchers supporting the amendment, tabled by Treasury Select Committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier, to 126 out of a total of 162 backers from all parties. The plans restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limit the sickness-related element of universal credit. The Government hopes the changes will get more people back into work and save up to £5 billion a year. One backbencher preparing to vote against the Bill told the PA news agency: 'A lot of people have been saying they're upset about this for months. 'To leave it until a few days before the vote, it's not a very good way of running the country. 'It's not very grown-up.' They said that minor concessions would not be enough, warning: 'I don't think you can tinker with this. They need to go back to the drawing board.' The Daily Telegraph reported that potential concessions being considered include a commitment to speed up payment of support to help people back into work and offering assurances that reviews of policies in this area will be published. Meanwhile, The Times reported some MPs opposed to the plans had blamed Sir Keir's chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney and suggested the time had come for 'regime change' in Downing Street. Asked if Sir Keir had confidence in his chief of staff, the No 10 spokesman would not comment on Downing Street staffing matters. Analysis by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) think tank indicated that 800,000 fewer working-age people are expected to receive a Pip daily living award in 2029–30 as a result of the reforms. The tighter criteria are set to lead to 430,000 new applicants – who would have received an award without reforms – receiving no award, and 370,000 existing claimants losing out following reassessment. Most of the 800,000 losers will receive £3,850 per year less in Pip. The 2.2 million existing claimants of the health element of universal credit who are expected to still be claiming in 2029–30 are estimated to see a £450 real decline in their support in that year because of the freezing of the payment. There are also set to be 700,000 new claimants who will typically receive £2,700 a year less than they would have done under the current system, the IFS said. NEW: Government's benefit reforms could reduce annual spending by around £11 billion in the long run – but still leave health-related benefit bill far above pre-pandemic levels. Read @TomWatersEcon, @LatimerEduin and @matthewoulton's new report: — Institute for Fiscal Studies (@TheIFS) June 26, 2025 It will be well into the 2030s before the reforms are fully rolled out and, in the long-term, the savings could amount to around £11 billion a year, the IFS said. A little over a quarter of the public are supportive of the proposed reforms, according to polling published on Thursday. Of 2,004 people surveyed by More in Common over the weekend, just 27% said they supported the planned changes to the benefits system and half (51%) said they believe the cuts would worsen the health of disabled people. A similar proportion (52%) said the cuts would increase pressure on the NHS while six in 10 said the Government should look at alternative cost-saving measures instead. Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey said the Government should pull the Bill and 'go back to the drawing board' instead of 'cutting vital support from thousands of vulnerable people'.
