Which countries will pick sides in a US-China conflict over Taiwan?
reported that the US had been putting pressure on Japan and Australia to clarify what role they would play in such a situation.
Advertisement
It appears that there would be few countries on China's side. China's only treaty ally is North Korea. A 1961 treaty
obliges the two sides to take 'all necessary measures' to oppose any country or coalition of countries that attack either nation unprovoked. Although North Korea
sending soldiers to fight for Russia in Ukraine could raise the same prospect one day, and Beijing certainly matters much more than Moscow to the survival of a country under extensive international sanctions, currently China's ties with North Korea appear less warm than those between
Russia and North Korea
Pakistan
has been described as an 'iron brother' of China. Given its almost unsalvageable relationship with India, Pakistan might seriously consider following through if China asked it to help take on India in a worst-case scenario. However, Islamabad joining a war to assist China against the US – which is a major provider of aid to Pakistan – is highly unlikely.
China's most useful strategic partner is unquestionably Russia. Their closeness is reflected in their regular air and sea exercises. But why would Russia choose to get involved in a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if China has not provided Russia with military assistance in the Ukraine war? Presumably Russia would continue to
sell China oil and gas , just like China is
still selling Russia non-military items, but that's probably all.
On the American side, not more than a handful of countries would provide military assistance to the US in a conflict with China, and each would do so half-heartedly at best. The Economist article seems to share this view as it quotes a recent paper from the Centre for a New American Security (CNAS), though the paper's analysis is not entirely convincing.
02:57
Shandong aircraft carrier moves into Taiwan response zone ahead of PLA drills
Shandong aircraft carrier moves into Taiwan response zone ahead of PLA drills
Its first conclusion is obvious: if the US stays out of the war, its allies will, too. The second is that if the US does step in, its most affected allies would be Japan and the Philippines. Japan's participation would be unlikely to go much further than submarine patrols or missile strikes. The Philippines would be more cautious, the CNAS paper said, but if Chinese forces were bogged down, it might be tempted to advance its claims in the South China Sea.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
23 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
Groups seek 30% pay rise for Hong Kong domestic helpers to HK$6,500 a month
A coalition of domestic worker unions has demanded an immediate 30 per cent pay rise for Hong Kong's 370,000 helpers to HK$6,500 (US$833) a month and for their food subsidy to be doubled. Advertisement The Hong Kong Federation of Asian Domestic Workers Unions on Sunday blamed current government policy for having left many helpers in a 'hungry and malnourished' condition. Federation representatives raised the demands at a meeting with Labour Department officials. 'The value of our work and our contribution to the economy has to be reflected in our wages,' federation chairwoman Phobsuk Gasing said. 'So many women in Hong Kong are able to pursue their careers because we take responsibility for household duties and care work. Inflation affects our families too, and token adjustments to the [minimum wage] are insulting. 'It is basically like almsgiving.' Advertisement The minimum wage for foreign domestic helpers was raised to HK$4,990 a month last year, up from HK$4,870. Employers must provide their helpers with free food or they can choose to pay an allowance of not less than HK$1,236 a month instead.
South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Bangladesh protest victim, witness gives evidence in ex-PM Hasina trial
The first witness in the trial of Bangladesh's fugitive ex-prime minister Sheikh Hasina gave evidence on Sunday, a man shot in the face during protests that toppled her last year. Hasina, 77, who has defied court orders to return from India to attend her trial on charges amounting to crimes against humanity, is accused of ordering a deadly crackdown in a failed bid to crush the student-led uprising. Up to 1,400 people were killed between July and August 2024, according to the United Nations. The first witness, among the 11 cases that the prosecution is expected to present to the court, was Khokon Chandra Barman, whose story reflects the violence of the protests. The 23-year-old wears a mask to conceal his face, which was ripped apart by gunshot during the culmination of the protests on August 5, 2024, the same day that Hasina fled Dhaka by helicopter. 'I want justice for the ordeal I've been going through, and for my fellow protesters who sacrificed their lives,' he told the court.
South China Morning Post
3 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Drone use signals India and Pakistan need new norms of engagement
On July 21, reports confirmed that militant groups in Pakistan have begun using small quadcopter drones to target security forces. While this may appear to be a mere tactical shift, it reflects a deeper and more alarming transformation in South Asia's strategic arena. The growing convergence of non-state actors, emerging technologies and external enablers is eroding traditional conflict thresholds and obscuring accountability. Advertisement Drawing lessons from the Russia-Ukraine and Iran-Israel conflicts, where low-cost drones were used for strategic disruption, this emerging threat paradigm in South Asia introduces new risks of inadvertent escalation, especially between nuclear-armed rivals . Without clearly defined red lines and mutual restraint regarding the use of proxies and low-cost precision systems against strategic assets, India and Pakistan are headed towards a phase of strategic ambiguity that will undermine crisis stability and complicate deterrence efforts. Before attacking Iran, Israeli operatives reportedly smuggled parts of small armed drones into the country using civilian vehicles. These drones were deployed to inhibit Iran's air defence systems, enabling continued Israeli bombardment . Ukraine's drone operations deep inside Russian territory, which involved 117 drones using Russian cellular networks, reportedly destroyed a third of the Kremlin's strategic bombers on the tarmac of four airfields. This heralds a troubling trend in modern warfare: the use of infiltration paired with the strategic utility of low-cost weapons systems. Pakistan faces a similar trajectory of threats. In April, security officials said they had uncovered a terror plot to attack Masroor Airbase, one of the country's most sensitive military sites. Such an attack would not be unprecedented. Witnesses to a 2011 attack on Mehran Naval Base said militants destroyed P-3C Orion aircraft essential for anti-submarine warfare and maritime surveillance. The 2012 attack on Minhas Airbase in Karma resulted in damage to early warning defences. Such attacks, previously conducted through militant infiltration, now risk being supplemented or replaced by drone-based incursions launched from within Pakistan's territory or border regions. The complexity is further deepened by India's evolving approach to covert operations. Advertisement Since 2021, Indian intelligence services have reportedly orchestrated a campaign of targeted assassinations inside Pakistan using Pakistani and Afghan nationals rather than Indian operatives. These operations, conducted with the help of intermediaries in the United Arab Emirates, indicate efforts to establish deniable operation channels. Similar tactics have reportedly been applied in Canada.
