
How Did Bill Gates Become Successful?
In his memoir Source Code, Bill Gates explains a great deal about his early years. In doing so, we have a window into his unique characteristics and fortuitous circumstances that would lead to his eventual success. Without a doubt, Gates is an unusual person who had remarkable talent, drive, focus, ambition, and willingness to work that led to his achievements. And yet, he also explains how he had an unusually supportive family with unique skills—such as a father who was a seasoned lawyer, and a mother who structured his social development, which also provided a platform for that success to even be a possibility. Here I've pulled out some quotes that highlight how Gates was clearly a mathematically precocious youth who had a strong interest in coding, the ability to hyperfocus, exhibited extraordinary personal energy, had the willingness to be different and take charge, and possessed the dedication and desire to work crazy hours to be the best.
In the introduction of his book, Gates notes: 'The logic, focus, and stamina needed to write long, complicated programs came naturally to me.' Gates also always loved to read. When he was around 9, he read through every volume of the World Book, A through Z. 'A summer reading program at our library was only me and girls.'
And he was among the best at math early on: 'It wasn't long before I realized I was finishing each problem faster than everyone else.' At Lakeside school he took a test for the math team. 'I did exceptionally well, scoring higher than nearly everyone on the math team, which put me, an eighth-grader, among the best high school math students in the region.'
As Gates argues: '[T]he logic and rational thinking demanded by math were skills that could be used to master any subject. There was a hierarchy of intelligence: however good you were at math, that's how good you could be at other subjects.'
His interest in business was present early. He drafted a school report on a fictitious company he called Gatesway 'that made a coronary care system which I invented. My report detailed factors of production, and how I hoped to raise capital from investors in order to build my products.'
He had the early ambition to be someone. With his friend Kent, he 'read through a stack of biographies of famous people, leaders like Franklin D. Roosevelt and Douglas MacArthur. We spent hours on the phone dissecting their lives. We analyzed the paths they followed to success with the same teenage intensity that other kids at that time spent deciphering 'Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds.''
He had intense interest in coding. When he and Paul Allen found out that the company that had given them some free computer time in exchange for them troubleshooting the system had brought in some top programmers—they found some 'source code' by looking through the dumpster to get a glimpse of what those programmers were working on. 'What we found was cryptic, just lines of code that we'd need to reverse engineer to figure out what they did. But that crumpled and coffee-stained paper was the most exciting thing we'd ever seen.'
After he and some of his older friends like Paul Allen had gotten a job to try to make a program to automate payroll services, at first the older guys thought they didn't need Bill. But then they realized they did. So Bill took charge. 'I would need to be in charge. And if I was in charge, I would decide who got what portion of the free computer time [their compensation]
Out on a long hike with his friends, he was cold and miserable, but 'I retreated into my own thoughts. I pictured computer code.' During all that time on his hike, he was able to pare down long messy code into something more succinct. 'On that long day I slimmed it down more, like whittling little pieces off a stick to sharpen the point.'
'Alone in my cave [his room] I'd read or just sit and think. I could lie on the bed endlessly working through some question.' Gates also wrote: 'I'd always possessed the ability to hyperfocus…If I truly concentrated on a subject, taking in the facts and theorems, dates and names and ideas and whatever else, my mind automatically sorted the information within a framework that was structured and logical.'
When starting up Microsoft, he explained: 'Like one of those watertight hatches on a submarine, I could shut out the rest of the world,' and this meant 'No girlfriend, no hobbies.' He reasoned: 'It was the one way I knew to stay ahead. And I expected similar dedication from the others. We had this huge opportunity in front of us. Why wouldn't you work eighty hours a week in pursuit of it?'
'My other notable early trait might be described as excess energy.' Later, when he was building Microsoft, a friend told him to meet Steve Ballmer. Gates reflected: 'By then I could instantly recognize other people…who emitted my kind of excess energy. Steve Ballmer had it beyond anyone I had ever known.'
At Harvard, Gates reflected on his less than perfect performance in Math 55 [the highly accelerated math class]: 'All of us had 800s on our math SAT,' and 'Up until then, I had experienced only a few situations in which I felt someone was hands-down better than I was in some intellectual endeavor that mattered to me, and in those cases I soaked up what they could teach me.' He noted a realization, 'This time was different, I was recognizing that while I had an excellent math brain, I didn't have the gift of insight that sets apart the best mathematicians. I had talent but not the ability to make fundamental discoveries.'
On the complementary work styles between himself and Paul Allen, Gates writes: 'My approach was rapid-fire, in your face. I prided myself on my processing speed—that I could come up with the right answer, the best answer, on the spot. Impatient real-time thinking. And I could work and work and work, for days on end, rarely stopping.'
On privilege: 'to be born in the rich United States is a big part of a winning birth lottery ticket, as is being born white and male in a society that advantages white men.'
On good timing and building on the work of others: 'I was a rebellious toddler at Acorn Academy when engineers figured out how to integrate tiny circuits on a piece of silicon,' and 'I was shelving books in Mrs. Caffiere's library when another engineer predicted those circuits would grow smaller and smaller at an exponential rate for years into the future. By the time I started programming at age thirteen, chips were storing data inside the large computers to which we had uncommon access, and by the time I got my driver's license, the main functions of an entire computer could be fit onto a single chip.'
On support from family: His grandmother Gami 'beyond her card-table acuity, was valedictorian of her high school class, a gifted basketball player, widely read…' His mother provided opportunities to socialize, connect with, and learn from a skilled community: 'When I look back on my childhood, it fit a pattern of pushing my sisters and me into situations that would force us to socialize, particularly with adults.'
When starting up the company that would become Microsoft: 'That summer would turn out to be the last time I lived in my parents' house. When I think about it now, I have much greater appreciation for the role my family played during that early period of Micro-Soft. As proudly independent as I imagined myself, in truth my family supported me in ways both practical and emotional. Throughout the year I regularly retreated to Gami's place on Hood Canal for much-needed periods of reflection.' And, 'My father was always at the ready to help me work out some legal issue.'
On the teachers who helped challenge him: 'One day Mrs. Carlson led me down to the hall to the library where she told the librarian that I needed a challenge.' The librarian, Mrs. Caffiere gave Gates a shelving task, and 'would draw me out with questions about what I was reading or found interesting. Here too she offered an affirmation, suggesting books that were a level of reading above what I knew, biographies of famous people and ideas that hadn't occurred to me.'
'My Lakeside teachers gave me the gifted of an altered perspective: To question what you know—what you think is true—is how the world advances.'
On his supportive friends: When his close friend Kent passed away, Gates noted: 'When we met, I was a thirteen-year-old kid with raw IQ and a competitive streak, but little aim other than to win whatever game I was playing. Kent helped give me direction, setting me on the course of defining who I wanted to become.'
On experienced mentors, like John Norton, who were willing to fix his code and challenge him to be better: 'Up to that point I had spent more time thinking about code and syntax than probably any other teenager alive. But Norton opened a completely new level to me. With his firm tutoring, I got a lesson not just in writing better code but about my self-perception. I remember thinking: Why am I so arrogant about this programming stuff? How do I even know that I'm that good? I started to consider what near-perfect computer code would look like.'
On having the great good fortune to get computer time when very few in the world could: After gaining access to computer time, instead of sleeping at night he would sneak out of his house and catch a bus over to the place where he could work on his programming. He talks about the 10,000 hour or roughly 10 year rule regarding the development of expertise—coined by Anders Ericsson—and how 'without that lucky break of free computer time—call it my first 500 hours—the next 9,500 hours might not have happened at all.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
OpenAI CEO joins chorus of industry experts warning about "AI bubble"
Tech giants have made clear that they'll spare no expense in their efforts to win out in the AI rat race. So much so, that tech giants like Meta () , Microsoft () , Amazon () , and Google () planned to spend up to $320 billion on AI tech in 2025. So when Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella, who augured the great LLM-ification of AI and became a major investor in ChatGPT creator OpenAI in 2019, warned about "overbuild" of data centers after being part of the cohort signaling their spending ambitions, some analysts and industry experts seemed to perk up. Even more so when Alibaba co-founder Joe Tsai echoed Nadella's concerns, calling the buildout in AI datacenters a "bubble." Microsoft, meanwhile, went on to deny additional capacity from hyperscaler CoreWeave () , which was in the process of IPOing (that capacity was bought by OpenAI instead.) Only, nobody really cared. On Wall Street, valuations in AI-fueled trades were taking off. The only real segway was April's tariff tiff. Then, it was back to all-time highs for U.S. equities. The attitude was: "don't fight the tape." In some techno-optimist circles, the advent of superintelligent AI was seen just around the corner. Their attitude: "Why sell now?" Investors might be more wary now, thanks to a recent MIT study warning that businesses are not seeing returns from AI investments. And making matters worse, more industry experts are warning that investors got ahead of themselves. MIT drops AI spending bombshell MIT researchers studied 300 businesses and how they were using AI and found that, despite claims that the businesses had invested $30 to $40 billion into generative AI, only 5% of companies had seen any return thus far. Where industry anecdotes fell on deaf ears, the MIT study cut through the noise. Immediately after the report dropped, so too did tech stocks. And dogpiling on, even more industry leaders are joining the chorus, explicitly calling out what they see as an AI bubble. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman warns of bubble Among them are OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, who said in plain terms that, "investors as a whole are overexcited about AI." While emphasizing its long-term important, Altman cautioned that investors could get "burnt" by the 'dot com-like' dynamic in the market. Unfortunately, it won't just be the people betting on high-flying names like Palantir () . Many Americans' 401(K)s, IRAs, and brokerage accounts are tied up in indexes which are heavily exposed to the AI trade. In fact, these tech giants represent over a third of the S&P 500's weight. Altman remains an optimist over the long run, casting issues with his firm's latest frontier AI model as a "misfire" and promising an even more fantastic sequel in GPT-6. But that's what many AI optimists were hoping for GPT-5. And waiting even longer for "the future" to arrive might mean expending their optimism. That's not to say that AI models (including at competitors) are not progressing, but what investors' willingness to allow firms to become capital intensive businesses might not last much longer if they don't see light at the end of the tunnel. While they've learned to love the stratospheric growth coming from AI chipmaker Nvidia () and the double-digit strides in cloud services from Microsoft, Amazon, and Google, wariness about payoff might prompt a pullback. Mark's spend-a-thon comes to a close There's some evidence that it's already come — or maybe, somehow, AI is already replacing jobs — at Meta. CEO Mark Zuckerberg spent big to acquire AI talent and build out data centers. He's now almost fresh out of cash and looking to private credit to shore up his ambitions. Still, if you're confident there's a payoff, why pullback? Per WSJ, Meta is in the process of reorganizing its AI segment into different businesses prioritizing business endpoints. With it, exec departures, layoffs, and a hiring freeze. Is this a sign that Zuckerberg and management have looked around and collectively discovered that they're buying the top? Is this an unfortunate repeat of the company's failed metaverse ambitions? Or is this a wake-up call from within after squandering billions on comp packages for researchers and data centers? Too early to say, but after blowing through $31.8 billion in the last six months, you'd have to wonder if maybe, the industry gurus called it how it was. Now that Wall Street finally seems to be paying attention, what does that bode for the market? This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Aug 21, 2025, where it first appeared in the Investing News, Analysis, and Tips section. Add TheStreet as a Preferred Source by clicking here.


CNBC
2 hours ago
- CNBC
Google scores six-year Meta cloud deal worth over $10 billion
Meta has agreed to spend more than $10 billion on Google cloud services, according to two people familiar with the matter. The agreement spans six years, said the people, who asked not to be named because the terms are confidential. The deal was reported earlier by The Information. Google is aiming to land big cloud contracts as it chases larger rivals Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure in cloud infrastructure. Earlier this year Google won cloud business from OpenAI, which had earlier been deeply dependent on Microsoft's Azure infrastructure. Alphabet said in July that the Google Cloud unit, which contains productivity software subscriptions in addition to infrastructure, produced $2.83 billion in operating income on $13.6 billion in revenue during the second quarter. Revenue growth of 32% outpaced expansion of 13.8% for the company as a whole. Meta's deal with Google is mainly around artificial intelligence infrastructure, said one of the people. Meta said in its earnings report last month that it expects total expenses for 2025 to come in the range of $114 billion and $118 billion. It's investing heavily in AI infrastructure and talent, building out its Llama family of models and adding AI across its portfolio of services. Meta and Google have long been rivals in online ads. But Meta needs all the cloud infrastructure it can access. The company operates data centers and has made commitments to use cloud services from Amazon and Microsoft.


Forbes
3 hours ago
- Forbes
AI Scams Are Coming For Your Parents—Here's How To Fight Back
The pop-up looked official enough to fool anyone—blue shield, Microsoft font, a blinking 'SECURITY ALERT' and a 1-800 number 'to prevent shutdown.' On the other end of the line, a calm voice turned menacing: 'If you don't cooperate, we will have to disable your computer permanently.' My client's 79-year-old mother—let's call her 'Mary'—felt her chest tighten. She wasn't reckless; she was kind, trusting, and alone with a machine that suddenly felt hostile. The scammer pressed for remote access and a wire 'to unlock' her accounts. That's when her son (our client) became the hero. He had already installed account alerts, restricted daily transfer limits, and set up multi-factor authentication. In minutes, he froze the right accounts, shut down remote access, and called the real bank on a published number. The thief never got a dime. Mary got her peace back. That scene is becoming more common, and more convincing, for one reason: automation plus psychology. Today's criminals use generative AI to write flawless emails, mimic support scripts, and even clone voices. The con feels human—because, in a way, it is. AI Scams Are Accelerating The emotional story is real, but so are the numbers. Internet crime losses reported to the FBI hit more than $16 billion in 2024, up 33% from 2023, on 859,532 complaints—both records. Seniors are being targeted with particular ferocity: in 2024, Americans age 60+ reported $4.9 billion in losses across 147,127 complaints—double-digit growth in both complaints and dollars. It isn't just the FBI's data. The FTC's 2024 Consumer Sentinel figures show consumers reported $12.5 billion in fraud losses—25% higher year-over-year. What's amplifying the trend? More organizations—and households—are adopting AI, which accelerates both productivity and abuse. In the World Economic Forum's 2025 outlook, two-thirds of security leaders expect AI to materially reshape cyber risk in the next 12 months, yet barely a third have mature guardrails in place. On the ground, incident volume is rising: Verizon's 2025 DBIR analyzed 22,052 incidents and 12,195 confirmed breaches—the most in the report's history. Translation: the con artists are faster, more believable, and more scalable than ever. Jocelyn King, 'The Queen of Online Safety,' is a Top 10 Woman in Cybersecurity and CEO/founder of Smarter Online Safety. She says the situation is daunting but not hopeless. 'Hacker's number one tool is not AI or software algorithms. Their number one tool is people's lack of knowledge and action. If you believe your bank or the IRS or DMV is really trying to reach you, leave the conversation and contact a known number and speak to an actual agent,' she advises. 5 Practical Moves To Protect Everyday People You don't need a six-figure tech stack to get safer. You just need guardrails. Create a house rule—especially for elders—that nothing involving money or access happens in real time. If someone calls, texts, or pops up on screen asking for action, hang up or close the window. No legitimate company demands install payment over email, text or the phone. Hang up and then call the real company using a known, published number from the back of the card or the company's actual website. Add a family 'safe word' for urgent requests that claim to be from relatives ('Grandma, it's me; I need bail'). No safe word, no action. Make it a word or phrase that is not something shared on social media. Before trouble strikes, set account alerts (every transaction), MFA (multi-factor authentication) on banking, brokerage, email and password manager, and daily transfer limits small enough to sting a fraudster. Jocelyn says, 'For seniors who are not tech savvy, are too trusting, or are losing some cognitive ability, put a trusted family member's phone number on the MFA account access number. It's far better to get interrupted in a busy meeting seeing that a retirement account is being accessed for an oversees wire transfer than to later fail at trying to recover a loved one's transferred lifesavings.' Consider credit freezes at all three bureaus for seniors who don't need new loans often; it's free and reversible. When available, passkeys (face/fingerprint + device) beat passwords because there's nothing useful for criminals to steal or phish. Legitimate tech support will never cold-call you, threaten to 'shut down' your PC, or demand payment to 'unlock' anything. Uninstall unattended remote-control apps your family doesn't use. If a pop-up includes a phone number, that is itself the red flag. Close the browser entirely or power the device off. If you think malware may have been installed, consult a trusted local tech or the device maker's official support—not the number in the pop-up. Set your lock screen. Turn on automatic updates for the operating system and browsers. Use a reputable DNS filter (often free from your router or ISP) to block known malicious sites. Give every user a standard (non-admin) account for daily use and reserve admin rights for installs. On phones, disable sideloading and review app permissions—especially anything with accessibility or screen-sharing rights. When adrenaline spikes, checklists win. Review this as a family or organization and keep it in a secure location away from any visitors or prying eyes. • Bank/Broker: call fraud department on the card back; freeze cards; reverse transfers. • Email & Cloud: change passwords from a clean device; revoke suspicious sessions; enable TFA/MFA everywhere possible. • Credit: freeze your credit with all three credit bureaus; place a fraud alert. • Block and Report: file with and help investigators see patterns and may speed restitution. Why This Works Criminals rely on four levers: urgency, authority, isolation, and confusion. Your job is to remove at least two of the four. The Pause Protocol kills urgency. Known-number callbacks puncture fake authority. Family safe words and checklists reduce isolation and confusion. Money guardrails like these mean that even if someone clicks once, the blast radius is small. 'If you want to be safe online, it's critical that you realize you're in an unfair battle for your privacy, safety and money against an AI cybercrime tsunami hitting our shores," says Jocelyn. "You can't afford to miss one key area, because as we say in cybersecurity: The bad guys only have to be right once.' Let's circle back to Mary. She felt embarrassed afterward, but she shouldn't. This con was designed to bypass human logic and hijack human emotion. What saved her were systems installed in advance by someone who loved her. In an era when AI makes scams look and sound legitimate, that's the blueprint: a warmer conversation around money and technology, plus a few well-placed speed bumps that buy time for common sense to catch up. If you remember one thing, make it this: Trust your pause, not the pop-up. The right small steps—today—can turn a would-be catastrophe into nothing more than a story your family tells over dinner about the day you outsmarted a machine.