The difference between immigrants, refugees. Info on legal pathways to enter the US
Refugee resettlement and immigration are hot topics in the United States right now.
As conversations about both pathways for entering the country continue, it's important to note the difference between the two. Policies, funding and executive orders impact those populations of people differently.
The United Nations High Commission of Refugees defines a refugee as a person 'forced to flee their own country and seek safety in another country.'
Depending on their motivation for migrating, a person fleeing persecution, violence, conflict or human rights violations is categorized as a refugee, an asylum seeker, an internally displaced person or someone in need of international protection.
An asylum seeker is a person seeking international protection from dangers in their home country, but whose claim for refugee status has not been determined legally in their destination country, according to International Rescue Committee.
Asylum seekers must arrive at or cross a border to apply for protection in their country of destination. From there, they must prove to authorities that they meet the criteria to be covered by refugee protections. Not every asylum seeker is recognized as a refugee.
Refugees resettled in the U.S. receive monetary support, resources and access to programs depending on what their specific situation is and if they meet certain requirements. Some classifications have shorter windows than others to capitalize on offered assistance.
A refugee of any distinction has crossed an international border and cannot return home unless it is safe to do so, according to UNHCR.
Afghan refugees become Blue Hens: 'The Taliban came, like, overnight': Afghan women flee Taliban to attend college at UD
Immigrants, like refugees, are starting new lives in a new country. They go through a vetting process and intend to settle permanently in a new location.
Unlike refugees, immigrants choose to leave home and begin elsewhere. They may decide to leave home to be closer to family, to pursue their education or for better economic opportunities, among other reasons.
This means that they were not forced to leave and can return home if they want to, without risking their life or freedom. Due to this distinction, the term 'migrant' can be used to describe an immigrant but should not be used when referencing a refugee, according to Amnesty International.
Education news: English-learning students discriminated against at this Delaware district, teacher reports
Immigration and refugee resettlement cover many types of legal entry into the U.S., but there are other pathways available for certain groups of people to enter the country, too.
One term you might hear is 'humanitarian parole.' This process allows an individual, who may be inadmissible or otherwise ineligible for U.S. entry, to be paroled into the country for a temporary period. A humanitarian parolee has not been formally admitted into the U.S. for purposes of immigration law, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
The Immigration and Nationality Act grants the secretary of homeland security the authority to temporarily parole any person applying for admission into the U.S., whether for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit. Parole is typically granted for no more than one year but can be longer depending on the reason for the parole. People granted parole are typically not automatically allowed to work in the U.S., but it may be granted due to a person's circumstances.
Examples of recent humanitarian parole programs, according to International Rescue Committee, are:
The Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela parole program, which offered crucial assistance to people from these countries and significantly reduced border arrivals. This program was terminated on Jan. 20.
Uniting for Ukraine, which provided a pathway to safety for Ukranians fleeing war in their country. Many Ukranians were granted parole status for up to two years before the program was suspended on Jan. 27.
Operation Allies Welcome, which assisted vulnerable Afghans, including those who supported U.S. operations in Afghanistan. Tens of thousands of people evacuated from Afghanistan after the withdrawal of American troops in 2021 were granted parole status.
Another type of U.S. entry is the Special Immigrant Visa program, which is available to people who helped the U.S. government abroad.
One SIV program is for those who worked with the U.S. Armed Forces or under Chief of Mission authority as a translator or interpreter in Iraq or Afghanistan. This program offers visas to up to 50 people a year, according to the U.S. Department of State.
This program is distinct from two other programs granting SIVs for certain Iraqi and Afghan nationals who worked for, or on behalf of, the U.S. government in either country. Certain requirements must be met for program consideration.
These pathways do not encompass every available process for U.S. entry, but they are some common examples showing the differences between programs and how they change based on global situations.
Got a tip or a story idea? Contact Krys'tal Griffin at kgriffin@delawareonline.com.
This article originally appeared on Delaware News Journal: Info on legal pathways for entering the US, what a refugee is
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Jailed Wisconsin Man Fooled ICE Barbie With Forged Death Threats Against Trump
A Milwaukee man awaiting trial on criminal robbery charges had an interesting defense strategy: framing one of his victims for threatening to murder President Trump. On Monday, Demetric D. Scott, 42, who was already in jail on charges of armed robbery and aggravated battery, was charged with witness intimidation, identity theft, and bail jumping after police discovered he'd forged several letters threatening the president's life under the name of Ramón Morales-Reyes. Scott admitted to police that he'd forged the letters not because he had any interest in harming the president, but because he'd hoped they would lead to the deportation of Morales-Reyes, who was set to testify at his upcoming robbery trial. Scott was arrested in 2023 after being captured on a Ring camera stabbing Morales-Reyes with a corkscrew while attempting to steal his bike, the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel reported. The phony letters already made national headlines when DHS Secretary Kristi Noem publicly celebrated the arrest of Morales-Reyes, despite police quickly expressing suspicion that the letters had been forged. According to Milwaukee police, on May 21, the offices of the Wisconsin Attorney General, Milwaukee Police Chief, and Milwaukee ICE headquarters each received handwritten letters signed in Morales-Reyes' name and with his home listed as the return address, containing threats against the president's life. The letters read in part, 'I will self deport myself back to Mexico, but not before I use my 30 yard 6 [rifle] to shoot your precious president in his head—I will see him at one of his big ralleys.' The following day, on May 22, police arrested Morales-Reyes, 54. He was quickly transferred into DHS custody due to his undocumented status. The arrest earned praise from Noem, who wrote, 'Thanks to our ICE officers, this illegal alien who threatened to assassinate President Trump is behind bars.' However, Milwaukee police weren't certain they had the right man. Not only did a handwriting test quickly reveal that Morales-Reyes' penmanship didn't match the letters, but they also discovered he is not fluent in English. When asked if someone may have a motive to frame him for the crime, Morales-Reyes mentioned his plans to testify against Scott. Upon further investigation, police discovered that Scott had made explicit plans to forge and mail the letters in recorded jail phone calls dating back nearly a month, NBC News reported. In one call, made five days before the letters were received, Scott said, 'This dude is a goddamn illegal immigrant and they just need to pick his ass up… if he gets picked up by ICE, there won't be a jury trial, so they will probably dismiss it that day. That's my plan.' Since his arrest, Scott has had a pattern of mischievous letter-writing. According to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, in an August 2024 letter to Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Kristy Yang, the judge presiding over his case, Scott had threatened to turn her courtroom 'into a circus,' adding, 'This case will never make it to jury trial.' After Morales-Reyes identified Scott as a suspect in the forgery, police searched his jail cell, finding a pen matching the ink used in the letters, an envelope, and a note Scott had written reminding himself to find out the address of the attorney general's office. Scott eventually confessed during police questioning on May 30. However, Morales-Reyes remains in ICE custody at Dodge County Jail in Juneau, Wisconsin, and is now facing removal proceedings. Responding to initial reports that the letters were forged, a senior official from the Department of Homeland Security told The Daily Beast last week that Morales-Reyes will remain in custody because he was 'determined to be in the country illegally and [has] a criminal record.' According to a DHS press release, Morales-Reyes has previously been arrested for felony hit and run, criminal damage to property, and disorderly conduct with a domestic abuse modifier. The press release also claimed Morales-Reyes entered the U.S. illegally nine times between 1998 and 2005. Morales-Reyes' attorney, Kime Abduli, told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that because he is still a witness in Scott's robbery trial, which is set for July 14, Morales-Reyes is in the process of applying for a U-visa, which allows undocumented immigrants to remain in the country if they are testifying in a criminal case.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Anti-ICE protesters express anger, heartbreak at Trump immigration crackdown
Hundreds of protesters waving American and Mexican flags and carrying signs that ranged from heartfelt to profane marched through downtown Milwaukee streets June 10 to protest federal immigration operations and decry the crackdown on demonstrations in Los Angeles by President Donald Trump's administration. The crowd made their way to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement offices. Those in the crowd said it was important to speak out and express their opposition to large-scale ICE arrests. Alan Chavoya, a protester with the Milwaukee Alliance Against Racist and Political Repression, said earlier in the day he fielded phone calls June 10 from several people hearing about ICE arrests in the area. "It's devastating," he said. "It's important to be out here and support, and it's also important to be bold about this." In the crowd were two 22-year-old women who met at the protest, Natalia Murillo, who draped a Mexican flag around her shoulders, and Alejandra Martinez. Murillo held a sign that read, "You can't love the culture and not support the people." "It's been stressful. You don't know when they're going to come into your cities and neighborhoods," Martinez said. Murillo said she was concerned about people being arrested by ICE who have legal status. "It's scary to see what's going on. We come here for a better life, and this is how we're getting treated?" she said. An arrest of an immigrant June 10 by federal agents on Milwaukee's south side added to a sense of anxiety in the city's Latino community over immigration enforcement operations. A spokesperson for ICE said the agency could not share information about whether agents were operating in Milwaukee. That arrest came as massive protests against recent ICE raids erupted in Los Angeles over the weekend and have since spread to other cities. Trump ordered National Guard troops to the Los Angeles area. The march in Milwaukee spanned roughly two city blocks and included dozens of young Latino adults as well as people from a range of ages and backgrounds. Some marchers held handmade signs that read, "We speak for those who can't" and, "Immigrants are welcome here." Other popular slogans urged authorities to keep families together, to keep ICE out of Milwaukee and to abolish the agency altogether. "No justice, no peace, we want ICE off our streets," marchers chanted. Signs and chants alike reflected the depth of anger at Trump's immigration crackdown and at ICE. Some posters referred to Trump as a parasite, or a pig. Others said "Dump Trump," and many chose similar phrases with expletives, in both English and Spanish. Rose Walters, a retiree from South Milwaukee, said she was "just livid" at several Trump policies. She was concerned about her Social Security benefits as well as immigration arrests that, in her view, lacked due process. She began attending protests for the first time in February. "I simply am fed up," she said. "It's ridiculous." Daniel Rivera, 27, of Michigan, was visiting Milwaukee and was walking past Cathedral Square Park when he noticed people were gathering for a protest about immigration. He jumped in because he he said feels strongly about the issue. "Immigrants are the backbones of this nation," he said, adding that more "dialogue across the aisle" was needed. There was a sense from several marchers that the Latino community's contributions and culture were being cast aside, and that politicians and pundits were conflating the entire community with the criminal actions of a few. A 40-year-old Milwaukee mother named Angelica, who asked for her last name not to be used, brought her two daughters and her niece to the protest. She wanted to stand up for Mexican Americans like her family, she said. And speaking about recent ICE efforts to expand arrests, she said, "It's heartbreaking. It causes me to question, what am I proud of as an American?" Nayleth Sedano, 30, of Milwaukee, arrived in the U.S. at age 4, and her family got legal status. She understands how "scary" moments like this can be for immigrant families. She has been especially concerned about the effect of that fear on children, who may be worried about ICE showing up at their graduation ceremonies. "If you have a heart, that's traumatizing for anybody," she said. The organizing groups included the Party for Socialism and Liberation's Milwaukee chapter; Comité Sin Fronteras, or "Committee Without Borders" — the young adult arm of local immigrant rights group Voces de la Frontera — Codepink Milwaukee, and 50501 Milwaukee, part of a national anti-Trump protest movement called 50501. The 50501 group, short for "50 protests, 50 states, 1 movement," is the organizer of the so-called "No Kings" rallies taking place across the country. One is scheduled for noon June 14 in Cathedral Square Park as part of a nationwide day of protest. Several additional "No Kings" protests are scheduled for the same day across southern Wisconsin, including in Brookfield, Cedarburg, Racine, Kenosha, Watertown and Madison, according to the organizer's website. They were planned to coincide with Trump's military parade in Washington, D.C., which is being held to honor the Army's 250th birthday and coincides with Trump's 79th birthday. Brian Dunleavy, a protester from Milwaukee, said he hopes both protests show that Milwaukeeans are standing in solidarity with others protesting around the country. 'I hope people see this and see (that) we've got your back," Dunleavy said. "We do not think what's going on in Washington and other parts of the country is OK, and we're going to be here for you." Sophie Carson is a general assignment reporter who reports on religion and faith, immigrants and refugees and more. Contact her at scarson@ or 920-323-5758. This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Anti-ICE protesters in Milwaukee decry Trump immigration crackdown
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
St. Paul school board OKs $1 billion budget for 2026
The St. Paul Public Schools board of education unanimously approved a $1 billion budget for the upcoming school year on Tuesday. An estimated $51.1 million budget shortfall is to be covered by $35.5 million in reserve funds and $15.6 million in budget cuts and new revenue under the budget. Of the overall budget reductions, 74%, or $11.5 million, come from cuts in central office departments – 8% of the district's total budget – including Schools and Learning, administration and operations and financial services, human resources and equity, strategy and innovation. Those departments will have cuts in staffing, contracts and vendor services, travel and supplies and service levels. Feedback this year from the community and board members encouraged district officials to look toward central office administration when making reductions, said Jackie Turner, executive chief of administration and operations. 'And we heard that as, stay away from the schools as much as you can,' Turner said. 'And I believe that the budget you see tonight does all of those things.' Drawing from the district's fund balance for the budget shortfall will maintain programs and services as much as possible, district officials said. They attribute the shortfall to state funding not keeping pace with inflation in the past 20 years and increased expenses. They also acknowledged that future adjustments may need to be made to the budget. During its May meeting, the board approved a resolution directing the district administration to prepare a November referendum recommendation for additional district revenue. Ballot language is expected to come before the board in July. The results of that referendum and as well as changes to enrollment may necessitate future budget adjustments, according to district officials. 'But I do hope that folks in our community who had concerns about the budget and the way that we're spending money, maybe there was something they cared about … that they will continue to speak to us if the concerns that they had bear out to be true,' board member Uriah Ward said. While the board passed an approximately $1 billion budget last year — this year's budget is around $8 million less — board members praised the increase in transparency this time around. Key components of the budget are construction and debt service, said district budget chief Tom Sager. The district's capital projects fund is $118.9 million. Additional revenue will not only include the proposed referendum, but also potential reductions in the district's facilities portfolio, said SPPS Superintendent Stacie Stanley. Some changes to the approved budget since the board's May meeting include $543,000 added from the general fund to reinstate some positions and programming in Early Childhood Family Education, or ECFE — a voluntary program for parents and their children below the age for kindergarten enrollment. Parents and community members in April had spoken against previously proposed cuts to the program. $60,000 was also added to the budget for student engagement support. St. Paul Central students design a mascot to represent everyone St. Paul's Maxfield Elementary breaks ground on 'community schoolyard' SPPS: New Superintendent Stacie Stanley begins first week with district St. Paul Public Schools narrows achievement gap in 2024 graduation rates St. Paul schools hit pre-COVID graduation levels, state reaches record high