Nigeria's Pipeline Crisis Will Worsen Under the President's Power Grab
When a state of emergency was declared in parts of Nigeria in 2013, Bola Tinubu, then a fiery opposition leader, was apoplectic. He condemned the declaration by former President Goodluck Jonathan as a 'ploy to subvert constitutional democracy' and warned it was 'a potentially destructive path to take.'
Now, as president, Tinubu's words have come back to bite him. Hours after the March 18 explosion on the Trans-Niger Pipeline — imperiling the 245,000 barrels of crude oil and condensates it transports daily — in Rivers State, Tinubu declared a state of emergency in the richly endowed ' oil capital ' of the country. He suspended the governor, his deputy and all lawmakers for six months and installed a retired vice admiral as caretaker of the region. Echoing Tinubu's words from 12 years ago, the Nigerian Bar Association condemned the declaration as ' an assault on democracy ' and said it violates Section 305 of the constitution, which outlines strict conditions for emergency rule. Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar said ' it reeks of political manipulation and outright bad faith.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
26 minutes ago
- The Hill
Congress should think again about foreign investor tax: UK ambassador to US
British Ambassador to the U.S. Peter Mandelson is appealing to Congress to think again about the proposed new retaliatory tax on certain foreign investment in the US. 'I think that there's something wrong in principle that you should punish a country's businesses and individuals in America because you don't like what their governments are doing at home,' Mandelson said of Section 899 of the House's 'big, beautiful bill' to implement Trump's agenda. Section 899 would create a retaliatory tax on nationals of countries that impose 'unfair foreign taxes' on American businesses. 'If you've got an argument with their governments, then take it out on the governments. Don't take it out on the businesses and the individuals,' he added. Mandelson also believes that this new foreign investor tax is 'counterproductive' for the United States. 'If you're creating such a risk or potential uncertainty tax on businesses here, then many will think twice about investing further in the United States. I would ask Congress to think again about 899,' he said. According to Mandelson, both Congress and the Trump administration should resolve these matters by negotiation, and 'not by means of a legislative bludgeon', where he says the 'innocent are being punished because it's felt that revenge is due against a country and it's taken out on businesses and individuals here in the US.' He added that Section 899 also sets a 'very difficult precedent,' and it's better resolved by 'government to government negotiation and by discretionary means, not statutory ones.' The provision has stoked concerns on Wall Street over whether foreign investors would pull out of U.S. investments over fears of retribution from Trump.
Axios
3 days ago
- Axios
Scoop: Treasury officials defend "revenge tax" from wary GOP senators
Top Treasury officials are privately explaining to GOP senators that Section 899 of the House-passed budget bill is already forcing foreign countries to the negotiating table, according to administration officials. Why it matters: Critics are calling the provision a "revenge tax." But the Trump administration sees Section 899 as an important tool — like tariffs — to help negotiate better deals for American multinational corporations. While Trump officials are signaling to senators a willingness to make changes to the provision, they are also making the case for why it should stay in Trump's "one, big beautiful bill," officials said. Some Republican senators, including Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), have expressed reservations about the provision. Zoom out: On his first day in office, Trump promised to undo the Biden administration's plan to impose a global minimum corporate tax. He signed an executive order that it "has no force or effect." Section 899 is an attempt to give the White House more power to negotiate with the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, a collection of 38 market-based economies, which has also been critical of Trump's trade policies. While the original outline of the global minimum tax rates was included in President Biden's Inflation Reduction Act, it ultimately required foreign countries to come to a common agreement on how to tax multinational corporations. Republicans howled at that process and argued that it usurped Congress' constitutional power to establish tax rates. They also had policy concerns with a global minimum tax. Zoom in: Section 899 of the House-passed budget bill is designed to penalize countries that impose taxes on U.S. companies, including a global minimum tax of 15% as well as a digital services tax. It allows the U.S. to increase tax rates for foreign direct investment on countries it claims has unfair tax policies. Wall Street is worried that a potential tax on foreign investment could harm U.S. assets and the broader economy. But there's some indication that European countries are open to modifying their policies in order to mollify the Trump administration, Bloomberg reported. The other side: A coalition of trade associations, led by the Global Business Alliance, wrote to Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) and Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) to call for the removal of the provision. "As the budget reconciliation process advances, we urge you to uphold the pro-growth principles embedded in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) and avoid tax increases that would undermine American jobs, innovation, and long-term economic growth," the coalition wrote. The bottom line: The Trump administration is essentially arguing to senators that Section 899 might never have to be used.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Posts falsely claim IMF ranked Nigeria as fourth fastest-growing economy in 2025
'BREAKING: Nigeria ranked as the 4th fastest growing economy in the world by IMF reports,' read a post shared on Instagram and liked more than 400 times. The post, dated April 30, 2025, includes a graphic charting the economic growth projections of various countries, including India, China, the United States and the United Kingdom. The data in the chart, titled 'Fastest Growing Economies in 2025' and featuring the logo for an entity called 'Trade Brains', is credited to the IMF. The chart shows the projected growth rate of the gross domestic product (GDP) – a key measure of economic performance – of 12 countries in descending order, with India the highest at 6.2 percent. Nigeria appears in fourth place with projected GDP growth of 3 percent. The same graphic has also appeared in dozens of other posts on Instagram and Facebook, including a verified account belonging to Nigeria's National Orientation Agency. However, the claim that the IMF has projected Nigeria's economy will be the fourth fastest-growing economy in the world is false. AFP Fact Check traced the chart's source to the Instagram page of Trade Brains, an Indian financial news blog. The Trade Brains post, published on April 27, 2025, poses the question: 'Can Indian GDP reach new heights?' It cites IMF projections, which are released in a biannual report called the World Economic Outlook. The latest version of the report, which covers 191 countries, was published in April 2025 (archived here). In the report, the IMF projects Nigeria's economy will grow by 3 percent in 2025. This is correctly depicted in the chart by Trade Brains, as are the figures listed for the other 11 countries. However, the Trade Brains graphic represents a tiny sample of the IMF's global GDP projections and gives the misleading impression that India tops the pile. In fact, it predicts that the economies of several dozen countries will grow faster than India and Nigeria (archived here). These include Libya (17.3 percent), with the biggest growth, followed by Guyana (10.3 percent), Senegal (8.4 percent), Guinea (7 percent) and Rwanda (7 percent). This growth is calculated in percentage of the country's GDP, not in overall monetary amounts. In 2023, Tinubu declared an end to the petrol subsidy on his first day in office and freed up the naira currency, changes that government officials and analysts say will revive the economy and attract investors. Meanwhile, the population is suffering the harsh effects of these policies, which have set inflation at a three-decade high while the cost of living has soared (archived here). AFP Fact Check previously debunked claims about Nigeria's relationship with the IMF here, including one that Nigeria is now debt-free.
