"If There Was A Deal...": Lingayat Leader's Tacit Support For DK Shivakumar
The Congress' Karnataka headache just won't go away.
DK Shivakumar 's bid to force it into replacing Siddaramaiah as Chief Minister has roiled the ruling party for weeks now, fuelled by claims and veiled warnings from MLAs loyal to DKS.
Those grumblings seemed to have been shut down, at least partially, after party troubleshooter Randeep Singh Surjewala's visit to Benglauru this month, during which he drew sulky ' don't want MLAs to bat for me ' and ' what option do I have ' statements from the Deputy Chief Minister.
But the Congress now faces renewed pressure - this time from religious leaders from the Lingayat community - to give sack Siddaramaiah and replace the party veteran with DKS.
Shaila Jagadguru, a Lingayat religious leader from Balehonnur in Chikkamagaluru district, referred to the 'deal' the Congress reportedly made with Siddaramaiah and DKS after the 2023 election - that each would rule for 2.5 years - and said the party should honour the agreement.
"We don't have information on what kind of agreement was made during the formation of the government. Without knowing the details, it is not appropriate to comment. But, if there was an agreement, the party's high command should honour it accordingly," he said in Bagalkote.
NDTV Explains | Siddaramaiah vs DKS Is Not New. What Happened In 2023?
Sheila Jagadguru isn't the only religious figure from the Lingayat community to back Shivakumar, a fact his camp has interpreted as widespread support for his bid.
Last week another prominent sect leader - Rajadeshikendra Shivacharya, who heads the Rambapuri math - openly endorsed Shivakumar in the chief ministerial squabble. "He should have got a higher position after the last election... may he get a higher position (soon)," he said.
DKS has also been backed by the Vokkaligas, but that is not surprising given he is a member of that community. Support from the Lingayats, however, could be critical in winning this battle.
The Vokkaliga and the Lingayats are the dominant communities in Karnataka.
Back in 2018 the Lingayats were happy to back Siddaramaiah after his administration recognised the community as a religious minority. The community hailed the two-time Chief Minister for swift action on their demand, and some even backed him (and the Congress) in that year's election.
NDTV Explains |
That swing in support has been critical for the Congress; the Lingayats constitue about 15 per cent of Karnataka's population and have long been since as a stronghold of the Bharatiya Janata Party.
It was also key for Siddaramaiah since it gave him a buffer to combat DKS's overtures.
But that support has drifted away over the years.
In December the Lingayat Panchamsali community protesting over reservation were lathi-charged by the police, who then arrested several leaders, including sect head Basavajaya Mrityunjay Swami.
Siddaramaiah was labelled an "anti-Lingayat" person by the community, which now seems to have shifted its support to his deputy. And how the Congress will read this key voter base's unhappiness - two years before the next election - could decide if DKS wins his dream job.
Meanwhile, the BJP is looking on hopefully. If it can win back the Lingayat vote the party stands a good chance of defeating the Congress in 2028, even if the Vokkaligas continue to back DKS.
The party's state unit chief BY Vijayendra, the son of former Chief Minister BS Yediyurappa, has played down the importance of Linagayat support for DKS, saying, "The people are not bothered if the Chief Minister is Siddaramaiah or DK Shivakumar. The issue is lack of development."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
28 minutes ago
- India Today
Aditya Srivastava only in Karnataka, not UP: Poll body rebuts Rahul Gandhi's claim
The Chief Electoral Officer of Uttar Pradesh on Thursday dismissed allegations made by Congress leader and Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi, who had claimed large-scale voter fraud involving individuals registered in multiple states, including Uttar UP election office clarified that the names mentioned by Rahul Gandhi - Aditya Srivastava and Vishal Singh - are not listed as voters in the state, contrary to the Congress leader's assertions during a press conference held earlier in the CEO UP (@ceoup) August 7, 2025advertisementIn an official statement, the Uttar Pradesh Election Commission said, "Rahul Gandhi, Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha, held a press conference today on 07 August, 2025 on the subject 'The foundation of the constitution is the vote, Vote has been destroyed'. In which, along with other topics, Uttar Pradesh state was also mentioned, in which he presented the fact that two voters named Aditya Srivastava son of SP Srivastava (EPIC No. FPP6437040) and Vishal Singh son of Mahipal Singh (EPIC No. INB2722288). Their names are also mentioned in the voter list of the Legislative Assemblies of UP as well as other states. These figures have been shown by Rahul Gandhi as taken from the website of the Election Commission of India on 16 March 2025." The poll panel added that on August 7, 2025, when the names and EPIC numbers of Aditya Srivastava and Vishal Singh were checked on the Election Commission's official portal, Aditya Srivastava was found registered only at booth number 458, C.S. 1265 in Mahadevpura Assembly constituency in Bengaluru Singh was also found registered only at booth number 513, C.S. 926 in the same Mahadevpura Assembly seat. Their names do not appear on the electoral rolls of Lucknow East (Legislative Assembly 173) or Varanasi Cantt (Legislative Assembly 390), the commission Rahul Gandhi's remarks, the UP CEO's office further said that, "an inspection of their respective EPIC numbers revealed that Srivastava is registered only at booth number 458 in Bengaluru's Mahadevapura Assembly constituency and Singh is registered only at booth number 513 in the same constituency".Earlier in the day, Rahul Gandhi held a press conference where he accused the Election Commission of overseeing what he called "poll theft" during the 2024 Lok Sabha alleged that there were 1,25,000 fake votes in the Bangalore Central seat and specifically named Aditya Srivastava and Vishal Singh as voters listed in multiple locations. He displayed Aditya Srivastava's photograph and EPIC number and claimed that the individual was a registered voter not just in Karnataka, but also in Maharashtra and Uttar verify this, India Today TV accessed the Election Commission's website and found that Aditya Srivastava's name appears in Karnataka's electoral roll, but not in those of Lucknow or Maharashtra. A search for his EPIC number returned "No result found" in both locations, contradicting Rahul Gandhi's Gandhi had claimed that Aditya Srivastava appeared on the voter list four times - twice in Karnataka, once in Maharashtra, and once in Lucknow - citing data from March 2024. However, the current status on the ECI portal indicates he is registered only in is worth noting that the central poll body had, earlier this year, issued a statement acknowledging the existence of duplicate entries across voter rolls and confirmed that it had taken corrective action. If Aditya Srivastava was previously registered in more than one location, his name may have been removed as part of that clean-up Rahul Gandhi's press conference, and the discrepancy between his claims and the current voter database, the UP Election Commission reiterated that the individual named Aditya Srivastava is not registered as a voter in Uttar Pradesh and remains on record only in Bengaluru Urban.- EndsTune InMust Watch
Mint
28 minutes ago
- Mint
INDIA Bloc gathers at Rahul Gandhi's residence to discuss Bihar SIR row, vote rigging allegations
Senior leaders from the opposition INDIA bloc convened at Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's residence in New Delhi on Thursday evening for a dinner meeting that took on a serious political tone. The gathering, attended by nearly 50 leaders from over 25 parties, focused on the contentious Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar and explosive allegations of large-scale electoral fraud made by Gandhi. The meeting, although informal in nature, served as a strategic forum for opposition leaders to coordinate responses and consolidate their stance on what many described as a threat to democratic integrity. Rahul Gandhi seen talking to Sonia Gandhi and Mehbooba Mufti Rahul Gandhi, Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, presented what he described as evidence of 'huge criminal fraud' in the 2024 general elections. In a PowerPoint presentation delivered to assembled leaders, Gandhi claimed that over 1 lakh votes were 'stolen' in one assembly segment in Karnataka alone, through what he termed five distinct methods of manipulation. He alleged that the Election Commission had 'colluded' with the ruling BJP to facilitate rigging and suppress genuine voter turnout — a charge that has ignited a fresh round of political confrontation. 'This is not just an irregularity; it's an atom bomb on our democracy,' Gandhi said earlier at a press conference, referencing the alleged vote theft. Kamal Haasan and Gaurav Gogoi at the dinner at Rahul Gandhi's house. The Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter lists currently underway in Bihar has become a flashpoint. Opposition leaders argue that the exercise could result in large-scale disenfranchisement, particularly of marginalised communities and minorities. CPI General Secretary D Raja said the meeting was 'very meaningful,' highlighting concerns over voter identity, roll manipulation, and lack of transparency by the Election Commission. 'What's happening in Bihar can happen anywhere in the country,' Raja cautioned, echoing Gandhi's fears that the issue has national implications. Sonia Gandhi, Derek O'Brien, Abhishek Banerjee, and Rahul Gandhi at the soiree. Although the meeting focused heavily on the EC and electoral fraud, other pressing concerns were also raised. Although the meeting focused heavily on the EC and electoral fraud, other pressing concerns were also raised. National Conference leader Farooq Abdullah reiterated demands for the restoration of statehood to Jammu and Kashmir, criticising the government for delaying the promised move. 'We also raised the issue of banned books in J&K. It's unconstitutional. This should not be happening,' Abdullah said. There was no formal agenda, but the overarching theme was clear: unity among opposition parties in the face of what they view as growing institutional compromise. Rahul Gandhi seen with Farooq Abdullah at his residence for the dinner The evening saw a high-profile turnout from across the political spectrum. Among those present were Congress leaders Mallikarjun Kharge, Sonia Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, Jairam Ramesh, and Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah. Key regional leaders included Sharad Pawar (NCP-SP), Uddhav Thackeray (Shiv Sena-UBT), Akhilesh Yadav and Dimple Yadav (SP), Tejashwi Yadav (RJD), Abhishek Banerjee (TMC), Mehbooba Mufti (PDP), Kamal Haasan (MNM), and CM Revanth Reddy (Telangana), CM Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu (Himachal Pradesh), and CPI(M)'s MA Baby, among others. Leaders from Forward Bloc, IUML, Kerala Congress factions, MDMK, RSP, VCK, PWK, RLP, and KMDK also participated. LoP in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi, and Congress Rajya Sabha MP Sonia Gandhi seen with Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav and Lok Sabha MP Dimple Yadav The INDIA bloc is expected to intensify its campaign against the Election Commission, with a protest march to the EC headquarters in Delhi reportedly in the works. The bloc has already displayed rare parliamentary unity in recent sessions, and Thursday's dinner further cemented that momentum. Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi described the meeting as 'positive,' noting that despite being informal, it was 'another sign of the opposition's resolve to fight for democratic accountability.' Whether these concerns will force the EC to respond publicly or prompt parliamentary inquiry remains to be seen — but the opposition appears poised to keep the issue alive.
NDTV
28 minutes ago
- NDTV
Bihar BJP Renews Attack On Prashant Kishor For 2020 Election Campaign Data 'Theft'
Patna: BJP's Bihar unit spokesperson Danish Eqbal on Thursday renewed the attack on Jan Suraaj founder Prashant Kishor for the 2020 election data "theft". The case pertains to the alleged theft and misuse of election campaign data and intellectual property from a Congress member. Eqbal, addressing the media and also releasing a video statement, said: "Prashant Kishor has been exposed. Those who preach morality are themselves involved in serious crimes under IPC Sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 406 and 120B. These are charges of forgery, fraud, and conspiracy. In Patliputra PS Case No. 94/2020, his role resembles that of a professional criminal." Eqbal further attacked Kishor, accusing him of misleading the public with his "Baat Bihar Ki" campaign, which he claimed was based on stolen content. "The people of Bihar now recognise these masked leaders. They are not leaders, but thieves," he said. Eqbal also shared the document related to the case. The case was filed by Congress worker Shashwat Gautam on February 25, 2020, alleging that he had been developing an election campaign titled 'Bihar Ki Baat' at his Patliputra Colony office. The campaign involved data collection, strategy planning, graphic design, and branding, all of which were reportedly stored on an office laptop. Gautam alleged that Osama Khurshid, a volunteer who had previously contested Patna University elections on a JD(U) ticket, came to the office and took the laptop containing the data. While the laptop was later returned, Gautam claimed the data was misused. According to the FIR, Prashant Kishor launched a similar campaign named 'Baat Bihar Ki' on February 18, 2020, allegedly using the stolen materials. The domain for Kishor's campaign was registered on February 16, just two days before its public announcement. The complainant accused Kishor and Khurshid of conspiring to misappropriate intellectual property. The anticipatory bail application for Prashant Kishor was filed during the COVID-19 pandemic under relaxed procedural rules. The case is pending before the Court of Sub Judge XII-cum-ACJM, Patna. Kishor's lawyer, Arun Kumar, argued that his client is innocent, has no criminal antecedents, and was falsely implicated for political reasons. Kishor's lawyer emphasised that the data allegedly stolen was publicly available and multiple similar domain names had been registered in recent months, weakening exclusivity claims. Kishor is a professional election strategist, and any resemblance in campaign themes is coincidental or a result of standard practices in the industry. It was also submitted that Osama Khurshid, not Kishor, was directly accused of taking the data. When approached for comment, a senior Jan Suraaj official and media coordinator declined to respond to the allegations. "Prashant Kishor will answer on this matter in the future," he said.
