Irish brands quiz: What is the Brennan's bread slogan? Who founded Tayto?
Names like Guinness and Jameson have become staples worldwide, and many Irish people living abroad yearn for their home country's tea, butter, and crisp brands.
Advertisement
From Tayto to Baileys, and Kerrygold to Brennan's bread, how much do you know about Irish brands? Take our quiz and find out!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
2 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Classic Hits radio fails to prevent rival from using brand name GHR
The High Court has refused an injunction preventing a rival broadcaster to the Classic Hits Radio station owners from using the brand name "GHR". Choice Broadcasting Ltd, which is part of a group behind Radio Nova and Sunshine 106.8, owns Classic Hits Radio. The overall parent is Bay Broadcasting Ltd and it has been broadcasting as "Ireland's Classic Hits Radio" for the last three years. Advertisement GHR is a brand name by Bauer Audio Ireland Ltd, part of the 150-year-old Germany-headquartered Bauer family company, which manages a portfolio of eight FM radio stations in Ireland including Today FM, Newstalk, 98FM, Spin 1038, Spin South West, Cork's Red FM, iRadio and Beat. Along with GHR, Bauer also owns the brands 'Greatest Hits Radio', both of which it launched in the United Kingdom in 2019. Bauer says these are part of its brands to its more contemporary 'Hits Radio Network' radio service. The GHR Network of stations in the UK have a combined weekly reach of 7.1 million listeners and includes over 50 local and regional radio stations. On June 20th, Choice obtained an interim injunction preventing Bauer using the name 'Greatest Hits Radio' on the Failte DAB+ multiplex and any other delivery platform that is available in the Republic of Ireland. Choice claimed Greatest Hits Radio would infringe the plaintiff's trademark, 'Classic Hits'. Advertisement When the case returned to court a few days later, Bauer said it would not seek to contest the injunction but would instead seek an early hearing of the entire matter. It also said, instead of Greatest Hits Radio, it intended to trade using the initials 'GHR', both in its announcements and jingles on the radio station, and in its logo and advertising until the trial of the action. Choice objected, and there followed a hearing of the issue of extending the injunction to cover the use of GHR, which was strongly contested by each side. On Wednesday, Mr Justice Brian Cregan ruled the terms of the injunction do not include the initials 'GHR'. Advertisement He found Choice had not made out a fair issue to be tried that the initials 'GHR' amounted to passing off its brand or that there was a fair issue to be tried in relation to alleged infringement of trademark. Entertainment Today FM announce Oasis ticket giveaway and launch... Read More Even if it had, the balance of justice would have been in favour of refusing the application to extend the injunction to 'GHR', he said. The judge also said that even if he had found in favour of Choice in relation to fair issue and balance of convenience, he would have considered its (Choice's) undertaking that it could pay damages if it lost the case not to be sufficient on its own. This was in circumstances where the evidence showed Choice is "balance sheet insolvent" and has created a charge over all of its assets, he said. He would therefore have concluded that a fortified undertaking as to damages from Choice's parent company was required. He said he would hear the parties later in relation to the fortified damages undertaking.
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
UK Government urged to reconsider decision to cut cash for peace fund
The UK Government has been urged to reconsider its decision to cut its backing for a significant Irish peace fund. The Government confirmed it had decided not to continue with the £1 million contribution to the International Fund for Ireland (IFI) in 2024-25, citing a 'very challenging fiscal position'. The IFI was originally set up by the UK and Irish governments as an independent international organisation in 1986. It delivers a range of peace and reconciliation initiatives across Northern Ireland and Irish border counties, including supporting communities to work towards removal of the remaining peace walls. Sinn Fein North Belfast MP John Finucane said he is concerned about the move, and said he will raise it directly with Secretary of State Hilary Benn. 'It is extremely concerning that the British Government is to cut funding for IFI,' he said. 'IFI was established to promote peace, reconciliation and a better future for all communities across Ireland. 'Peace is hard-won and hard-fought. It can never be taken for granted, and crucial funds like this must continue to be supported. 'The British Government should be increasing funding in light of the withdrawal of US support, not imposing further hardship. 'I will be writing to British Secretary of State Hilary Benn, calling for his Government to reverse this decision and ensure IFI can continue its vital grassroots-led programmes.' Responding, a UK Government spokesperson said: 'This Government inherited a very challenging fiscal position, and needed to take difficult but necessary decisions to place the public finances on a sustainable footing. 'As a result, the Government has decided not to continue with the £1 million contribution to the International Fund for Ireland in 2024-25. 'The Government remains supportive of the IFI's aims of promoting peace and reconciliation.'
BreakingNews.ie
4 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Maurice Regan sent text saying he hoped news article gave John Magnier a 'heart attack'
Construction magnate Maurice Regan, involved in the bitter dispute over the failed sale of Barne Estate in Co Tipperary, wrote in a text to a third party that he hoped a newspaper article would give rival bidder and billionaire John Magnier a "heart attack". US-based Mr Regan appeared in the Four Courts in Dublin on Wednesday morning before Mr Justice Max Barrett giving evidence of his involvement in bids for the estate when it was put to him by Paul Gallagher SC, for the Magnier side, that he sent the WhatsApp message. Mr Regan replied: "All is fair in love and war." Advertisement Mr Magnier wants the court to enforce a €15 million 'handshake deal' he claims he sealed at his home on August 22nd, 2023, with Richard Thomson-Moore, an heir to the 751-acre, 17th-century estate. The Magnier side has sued the Barne Estate, Mr Thomson-Moore and three companies of IQEQ (Jersey) Ltd group – the estate trustees – seeking to enforce the purported deal, which they say had been "unequivocally" agreed. The Barne defendants say there was never any such agreement, as they needed the consent of the trustees to finalise any deal. They subsequently preferred to sell the estate to Mr Regan for €22.25 million. Mr Thomson-Moore has told the court that while a "price" was agreed with Mr Magnier for Barne, a "deal" was not. Advertisement The trustees who hold the estate initially decided to remain loyal to the Magnier offer and felt Mr Regan's higher offer could be seen as "provocative". After the exclusivity period had ended, the trustees decided to go with Mr Regan's offer. On Wednesday at the High Court, Mr Regan, who is not a party to proceedings, was questioned about the message sent in October 2023 to another man with some knowledge of the deal's progression. Mr Gallagher said Mr Regan sent a link to the man of a newspaper article referencing Mr Magnier and Mr Regan and followed this up by saying "hopefully, it will give him a heart attack". Mr Gallagher said the message referred to Mr Magnier, to which Mr Regan said, "Yes, we were at war, according to him [Mr Magnier] and... all is fair in love and war". Advertisement The row between the two businessmen has been described as a "war" by witnesses in the case. Mr Regan told Martin Hayden SC, for Barne Estate and Mr Thomson-Moore, that he rejected being described as a "dark force" in the deal by Mr Gallagher at a previous hearing when claiming Mr Regan was funding the defendants in the litigation. After agreeing on €15 million, Barne and the Magniers entered into an exclusivity agreement stipulating that Barne would not permit itself or its representatives to solicit or encourage any expression of interest, inquiry or offer on the property from anyone other than Mr Magnier between August 31st to September 30th, 2023. Mr Regan said a description of him as a "dark force" trying to breach the exclusivity agreement was a "cheap shot" and that he had been a victim of "derogatory remarks" that were going to be in the press "forever". Advertisement Mr Regan described Mr Gallagher's remarks as "very hurtful" to him, that he did not know why they were made. He added he "just wanted to buy a farm... and here I am today". He said he never knew anything about the exclusivity agreement when bidding on the farm and that nobody told him it was in place. He denied funding the Thomson-Moores defence and said that he had, last April, given Barne Estate Ltd a commercial loan from one of his companies against the farm. Mr Regan said he was "blocked" out of bidding for the farm and that "multiple offers were ignored for a long time" making him think that "something is going on". Mr Regan told Mr Hayden he admired the Thomson-Moores as a nice family and would not have "misled" them in the selling process, as claimed by Mr Magnier in his evidence. Advertisement Mr Regan told Mr Gallagher that the signed exclusivity imposed obligations on the vendors of Barne but not on him and that he did not attempt to induce any breach of the agreement. At one stage during the evidence, Mr Regan had to clarify to Mr Gallagher that he was using "light humour" when he said that the silence from Barne on his offers made him wonder if Richard Thomson-Moore had actually been "kidnapped". Mr Regan said approaches to the joint estate agents handling the deal was an attempt to make himself "relevant" regarding the sale and to get "back in the game". Ireland Court hears of alleged 'secret' mobile phone to Jo... Read More Mr Gallagher put it to Mr Regan that his contact with certain individuals with knowledge of the deal was "highly improper". "Me being blocked out at a higher price than a lower price is improper," said Mr Regan. Mr Regan said legal letters sent to the joint estate agents handling the sale were not meant to "frighten" or "threaten" but his concern was that his bids were not getting to the trustees of the estate. Mr Hayden asked if any of the defendants or anyone from the Magnier side had at any point written to Mr Regan to say he should desist in his bidding and was told "no".
