.jpg%3Ftrim%3D0%2C50%2C0%2C50%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)
Morning Joe ridicules GOP for justifying Trump's firing of Labor Stats chief: ‘Put on their Baghdad Bob hat'
According to anchor Joe Scarborough, it appeared that the president's aides and top loyalists knew the assignment and 'put on their Baghdad Bob hat' in an effort to defend the impetuous move, knowing they didn't have a choice because 'there was no justification for' the termination.
On the same day that Trump resumed his global tariffs, which could potentially spark inflation and lead to reduced economic growth, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that the U.S. economy added only 73,000 jobs in July. Furthermore, there was a massive downward revision in the previous two months, showing that only 33,000 jobs were added rather than the previously reported 291,000.
With the president routinely declaring that the U.S. is the 'HOTTEST' country in the world and the economy is booming, the disappointing jobs report prompted Trump to lash out at BLS commissioner Erika McEntarfer. Trump accused her of manipulating and rigging the statistics to make him look bad, because former President Joe Biden nominated her. The president then fired McEntarfer Friday evening.
While some GOP lawmakers expressed concern that Trump appeared to terminate McEntarfer just because he didn't like the numbers, noting that she was overwhelmingly confirmed by the Senate last year, Cabinet members and top White House advisers spent the Sunday shows desperately scrambling to spin their boss' move.
'The president wants his own people there so that when we see the numbers, they're more transparent and more reliable,' National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett said on NBC's Meet the Press.
'You want to be able to have somewhat reliable numbers,' White House trade representative Jamieson Greer declared on CBS News' Face the Nation. 'There are always revisions, but sometimes you see these revisions go in really extreme ways. And it's, you know, the president is the president. He can choose who works in the executive branch.'
During Monday's broadcast of Morning Joe, Scarborough brought up the latest op-ed from the Wall Street Journal editorial board, which took aim at the president's economic advisers for being the 'bureau of labor denial' following McEntarfer's firing.
'The reality of slowing job growth is clear to anyone paying attention, no matter the official statistics,' the board wrote. 'Mr. Trump's data denial is one more reason fewer Americans will trust the government.'
Scarborough claimed that while Beltway insiders like himself are generally able to get White House officials to give them 'straight answers' during off-the-record chats on Trump's decision-making, he considered this an 'exception to that rule' before outright mocking their weekend performance.
'Everybody put on their Baghdad Bob hat this weekend because there was no justification for it,' Scarborough said. 'I was surprised that I didn't even get the sort of quiet eye rolling from inside the White House. I guess they understood they were going to follow the Baghdad Bob line, and they all did it this weekend.'
The Morning Joe star was referring to Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf, Saddam Hussein's former Minister of Information at the outset of the Iraq War, who was given the 'Baghdad Bob' nickname due to the comically false statements her would make in press conferences.
Al-Sahhaf once claimed American soldiers were dying by suicide 'by the hundreds', and denied that American tanks were in Baghdad – despite the fact that the tanks could be heard in the distance and were only a few hundred meters from where he was speaking.
'Those in the White House, those close to the president, were in lockstep – asserting, without evidence, that there was bias in these job numbers and that President Trump was simply justified in doing what he did,' Morning Joe co-host Jonathan Lemire said Monday. 'None of that is true. This is a bad one. Historically, this is a bad one.'
He added: 'Governments, economies, and businesses can only make decisions based on hard data, on statistics. This calls into question so much of what Washington produces.'
Elsewhere on the program, Scarborough said that a 'lot of people are certainly deeply concerned' that this latest move from Trump shows that he's 'playing with the facts' and that it could result in the 'rise of authoritarianism.' Regular contributor Katty Kay, meanwhile, observed that the U.S. could be 'going more in the direction of Latin America' and devolve into a 'feudal oligarchical system.'
Over on the other cable news outlets, CNN senior reporter Matt Egan suggested that Trump's firing of McEntarfer would be similar to 'an NFL owner who responds to his team losing big by immediately firing the scoreboard operator.'
Moments later, CNN global economic analyst and Financial Times editor Rana Foroohar sounded the alarm over what this termination could mean for the country down the road.
'I mean, you know, this is the same bureau and the same commissioner that he was lauding when good numbers came out. And now the bad numbers are coming out. He's firing them,' she said.
'And I think one thing that really worries me is that this is what you see in autocracies,' Foroohar continued. 'This is what you see in emerging markets that don't have the rule of law, that don't have democratic governments. You see the firing of officials that people don't like. You see leaders closing themselves off to the truth.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
10 minutes ago
- The Independent
MTG cashed in on ICE contractor's big win but Trump goes after ‘disgusting degenerate' Nancy Pelosi over stocks
Donald Trump's decision to wade into the debate over a congressional stock-trading ban could end up making things awkward for some of his closest allies in the House and Senate. While stock trades by members of Congress and their families have long been controversial, the sustained push for new restrictions on lawmakers is new. Supported by members of both parties, the effort to push back against an image of corruption and decadence in the chamber is growing in popularity particularly among younger members. But the prospect of making it to the president's desk with legislation that would ban congressional stock trading has now caused Trump to weigh in. The issue was glaring as he went on a late-night rant on Truth Social Saturday night against Democratic former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi — after reports about one of his own MAGA faithful, Marjorie Taylor Greene cashing in on a stock deal tied to an ICE contractor. 'Crooked Nancy Pelosi, and her very 'interesting' husband, beat every Hedge Fund in 2024. In other words, these two very average 'minds' beat ALL of the Super Geniuses on Wall Street, thousands of them. It's all INSIDE iNFORMATION! Is anybody looking into this??? She is a disgusting degenerate, who Impeached me twice, on NO GROUNDS, and LOST! How are you feeling now, Nancy???' he raged in his posting. Pelosi's office hadn't responded publicly as of Sunday morning. Taylor Greene has drawn criticism after she purchased stock in Peter Thiel-owned Palantir in April, three days before the company won an ICE contract. The company's stock has since surged. That's not even the first time this year Greene, who maintains that all of her trades are managed without her input by a financial adviser, has been called out by stock-trading watchdogs for highly-lucrative trading activity. 'After many successful years of running my own business, I ran for Congress to bring that mindset to Washington. Now that I'm proudly serving the people of Northwest Georgia, I have signed a fiduciary agreement to allow my financial advisor to control my investments,' Greene told the fact-checker site Snopes in May. 'All of my investments are reported with full transparency. I refuse to hide my stock trades in a blind trust like many others do,' she added. 'I learned about my Palantir trades when I saw it in the media.' The California Democrat Pelosi, once her party's leader in the House of Representatives, is one of a few senior members of the chamber who has come out publicly against restrictions on congressional stock trading. 'We're a free market economy,' Pelosi said in 2021. 'They should be able to participate in that.' But her stance shifted over time and earlier in 2025 she came out in favor of legislation that would restrict such activity. The HONEST Act, a bill sponsored by Republican Sen. Josh Hawley, advanced through a Senate committee in late July. 'While I appreciate the creativity of my Republican colleagues in drafting legislative acronyms, I welcome any serious effort to raise ethical standards in public service. The HONEST Act, as amended, rightly applies its stock trading ban not only to Members of Congress, but now to the President and Vice President as well. I strongly support this legislation and look forward to voting for it on the Floor of the House.' Pelosi supports the bill, despite it previously bearing her name: Hawley originally dubbed it the the 'PELOSI Act', a reference to the trading activity primarily conducted by Pelosi's husband Paul. She is one of the wealthier members of Congress; her family controls more than $127m in publicly-traded assets watched by stock-trading analysts. Its advancement drew opposition from Trump, which Hawley characterized in a rare public shot at his own colleagues as the result of Republican senators supposedly having called up the president and lied to him about what was in the bill. 'I wonder why Hawley would pass a Bill that Nancy Pelosi is in absolute love with — He is playing right into the dirty hands of the Democrats,' Trump wrote on Truth Social in late July. Hawley responded, telling reporters: 'He said, senators, I don't know who, had called and told him yesterday afternoon that the bill had been changed at the last minute and would force him to sell all of his assets, sell Mar-a-Lago, sell his properties. So, I said, 'Well, that's just false. I mean, it explicitly exempts you and all your assets.'' The senator's response referred to a provision stuck in aimed explicitly at winning Trump over. The ban affects future presidents and vice presidents, but not Trump or his no. 2, JD Vance. It's unclear whether Hawley will succeed in winning over the president, but the ban at least has the potential to make it through both chambers of Congress with bipartisan support. Members of Congress on key committees are often scrutinized for their trading activity as in some cases lawmakers are privy to information that is not yet public or widely known, but could still affect markets. Some members of Congress were caught up in a scandal over such activity in 2020, at the onset of the Covid pandemic, when they triggered selloffs of their own stock shares ahead of a market collapse. One former North Carolina senator, a Republican, sold more than $1 million in stock one week before the market crashed.


Telegraph
11 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump is deluded if he thinks his meeting with Putin is cause for celebration
Friday's Alaska summit between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin is not shaping up well for Ukraine. Every indication is that Trump believes he and his (once again) good friend Putin will conjure some land swaps and bring peace. Of course, the land in question will be bits and pieces of Ukraine's territory, not Russia's, with Moscow probably ending this war controlling 20 per cent of Ukraine. If anyone needed proof that Trump acts in international affairs not like a strategist but like a free electron, this past week settles the matter. Before the Alaska summit even begins, Putin has scored a major propaganda victory. An international pariah, leading a rogue state guilty of unprovoked aggression against its neighbour, is landing on American soil for pictures standing next to the president of the United States. Trump has tariffed the entire world for the privilege of doing business in America, but asked and received exactly nothing from Putin. Inviting him to Alaska is not quite as offensive as inviting the Taliban to Camp David in 2019 to discuss the Afghanistan war, but it comes close. Most ironically, Alaska is former Russian America, purchased (thank God) by Washington in 1867, which some Russian ideologues wish to reclaim. Putin almost certainly concluded from Trump's recent pro-Ukrainian behaviour, such as allowing Patriot air-defence systems to be transferred indirectly to Kyiv, that he had pushed his 'friendship' with Trump too far. With the August 8 deadline to have a Ukraine-Russia ceasefire looming, Putin was doubtless considering how to repair the damage and reel Trump back into line when Trump's envoy-for-everything Steve Witkoff sought a Moscow meeting. We don't know when Putin decided to propose a US-Russia summit, but that idea was certainly conveyed to Witkoff to bring back to Trump. As before, Putin clearly hopes to work his KGB training on Trump, making the president his unwitting tool. Perhaps, Putin reasoned, he might even avoid pain for missing the August 8 deadline. He knew the lure of being the centre of massive press attention is a fatal attraction for Trump, who was almost instantaneously ready for a summit. Indeed, just before announcing that August 15 was the time and Alaska the place, Trump said he wished the summit could have been earlier. Putin not only got his meeting, but TACO ('Trump always chickens out') worked again; August 8 came and went with no new tariffs or sanctions imposed on Moscow, or China, the largest purchaser of Russian oil and gas. Only India was left in the lurch, facing a doubling of its Trump tariff rate to 50 per cent for purchasing Russian hydrocarbons. The Alaska summit recalls Helsinki in 2018, when Trump sided with Putin's denial of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential campaign, contrary to what America's intelligence community concluded. Putin is doubtless looking for something analogous. Moscow has already achieved another success by ensuring that no pesky Europeans, especially Ukrainians, would be invited to Alaska, reminiscent of the Trump-Zelensky meeting at Pope Benedict's funeral, where Trump all but pushed French President Macron out of the picture. While Trump simply enjoys getting more attention, the one-on-one format provides exactly the kind of playing field Putin needs. Moreover, the Alaska meeting afforded Russia a first-mover advantage, which it seized immediately. Within 48 hours of Witkoff's Moscow trip, the two sides built on earlier outlines of what Russia would deem an acceptable solution. Press reports indicated that Russia's terms, which seemed acceptable to Trump, resembled vice presidential candidate J D Vance's proposal in September, 2024: Russia would essentially keep Ukrainian lands it had conquered; an undefined peacekeeping force would police the current front lines; and Ukraine would be barred from joining Nato. As observers noted, Vance's plan looked like Russia's. Seemingly, therefore, Trump and Putin are preparing to present Zelensky with a fait accompli after meeting in Alaska. Trump said on Friday that Zelensky would have to remove Ukraine's constitutional prohibitions against ceding territory to another country, which is exactly what Trump is expecting to come. Thus, even before the summit, Putin exploited his first-mover advantage by bringing Trump back to his side. With this disturbing prospect now explicit, Zelensky, in his first public response to news of the Alaska summit, rejected any surrender of Ukrainian lands. Zelensky's response is fully justified and hardly surprising, but it plays into Putin's hands: Russia, he will say, took the lead in seeking peace, and Ukraine is the obstructionist. While we are not yet back to the disastrous February 28 Oval Office encounter between Zelensky and Trump, Putin would obviously like to reprise Trump telling Zelensky 'you don't have the cards right now'. As of today, Putin again has diplomatic momentum, and Zelensky is on the defensive. Time for the UK and Europe's other Ukraine supporters to step in before it's too late.


Daily Mail
11 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
The most suspect stock trades by politicians revealed including the Republican who can't STOP flipping shares
Members of Congress aren't technically allowed to use insider knowledge to trade stocks while in office, but a couple of well-timed trades have raised eyebrows among eagle-eyed critics. Momentum to ban members of Congress from trading stocks is swelling even as lawmakers make major profits from the turbulent stock market. Right now, existing law allows legislators sitting on military committees buy defense stocks while financial regulators can snap up crypto and bank shares. Though trading on inside information is forbidden, there's little enforcement - and the practice appears rampant on Capitol Hill. Senate proposals would bar even the president and vice president from trading, but wealthy lawmakers claim restrictions would strip incentives and force unfair divestment of their holdings. Others complain they can't survive on their $174,000 salaries alone, fueling a trading bonanza that's generating handsome profits just as ban proposals gain steam. Here the Daily Mail highlights the top most suspect stock trades of the year: Rep. Rob Bresnahan, R-Pa., a 34-year-old freshman legislator has been one of the most scrutinized traders. He was the former CEO of Kuharchik Construction, Bresnahan's family company, where he is credited with expanding the family business. The Pennsylvania Republican campaigned on banning members from trading, but he has reported more transactions than practically every other lawmaker. 'Bresnahan has filed more stock trades than almost any other member of Congress since entering office this year,' Quiver Quantitative's co-founder Christopher Kardatzke told the Daily Mail. Since being sworn in this January and August 8, the Republican has made at least 617 trades, according to federal disclosures data compiled by Quiver Quantitative. The Republican has repeatedly claimed his financial advisors manager his trades, but when pressed recently by a local radio station on why he doesn't instruct them to halt the transactions he deflected. 'And then do what with it?' the lawmaker told WVIA. 'Just leave it all in the accounts and just leave it there and lose money and go broke?' Bresnahan introduced a bill earlier this year to ban members and their spouses from stock trading, even as he's continued to make transactions. According to federal data retrieved by Quiver Quantitative, Bresnahan has traded a total volume of over $7 million since January. He has sold $4 million in stock and purchased $3 million in the past eight months Right before Trump's signature domestic agenda the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' passed Congress, Bresnahan reported sale in Centene, a healthcare company that later lost over half of its share price because of Medicaid cuts contained within the legislation. Democratic attack ads have shredded him for voting for the cuts. 'Honestly I found out about it in real time but the key takeaway is I follow the STOCK Act and I follow the rules,' Bresnahan said when pressed on the stock sale by WNEP. Bresnahan has been widely criticized for being hypocritical about his stock trading. He's claimed his advisors are forbidden from trading in companies held by foreign adversaries, however his disclosures show that he has bought and sold shares in Alibaba, a Chinese e-commerce company. Bresnahan has also indicated he will put his money in a blind trust, where it is managed by someone else and he has no clue about the individual transactions. But setting up such an account takes time, he has claimed. 'The whole process has been excruciating,' he told the Washington Examiner recently. Nearly 170 of the Pennsylvanian's trades occurred just after Trump's early April tariff announcement, dubbed 'Liberation Day' by the White House. In one instance in February, the lawmaker even disclosed a day trade, showing the purchase and sale of Palantir stock on the same day. 'Even if the portfolio is managed by a financial advisor, as Bresnahan has claimed, we're left to wonder why an advisor is day-trading Palantir stock in a U.S. Congressman's account,' Kardatzke said. Firebrand Marjorie Taylor Greene has also gained attention for trading the same stock around the same time - a transaction that has netted her thousands. The Georgia Republican made a flurry of stock purchases around the exact time that Trump instructed the nation that it was 'a great time to get rich, richer than ever before,' on Truth Social. After the market dipped around Liberation Day, Green heeded the president's warning and loaded up on discounted stocks. She purchased tech stock Impinj on April 4, which has since rocketed up over 100 percent in the last few months. And after buying Palantir on April 8, the Georgia Republican has doubled her investment, locking in a return over 115 percent. The tech company provides AI solutions and software to the federal government, including the Pentagon and more recently the Department of Homeland Security. Greene currently sits on the House Homeland Security Committee, the congressional panel that approves funding for DHS and ICE. She also claims her portfolio is managed by a financial advisor. 'Prior to this year, we had only seen one member of Congress ever buy Palantir stock. In the first two months of 2025, we saw six different members buy in,' Kardatzke noted. 'Maybe they all share the same financial advisor. The stock is up 148 percent so far this year.' Legislation to ban trading among members has even received backing from former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., who has become notorious for scoring winning trades during her decades in Congress. When she led Congress in 2021 she famously brushed off questions about implementing a stock trading ban for members, citing 'a free market economy.' Though her disclosures show that these trades are done by her husband, Paul Pelosi, it does raise questions as to how he can so frequently beat the market, and by such massive margins. 'Speaker Pelosi does not own any stocks and has no knowledge or subsequent involvement in any transactions,' her spokesperson told the Daily Mail. Between 2023 and early July 2025, over 70 percent of Pelosi's trades were profitable, according to Capitol Trades. The Bay Area couple has also reported call options on AI-focused companies like Nvidia, Alphabet and others. 'I think it's a little bit sketchy just because of how high-risk high-reward option contracts are,' Christopher Josephs, co-founder of Autopilot, a congressional investing app, told the Daily Mail. 'No average everyday person trading does that.' The 85-year-old Democrat got defensive recently when asked by CNN's Jake Tapper to respond to Trump's attacks on her trading practices. 'Why do you have to read that?' Pelosi interrupted when Tapper began asking about members' trading.