logo
Clydebank man possessing knife was wearing body armour

Clydebank man possessing knife was wearing body armour

Glasgow Times2 days ago
Thomas Gallagher was drinking in the company of a pregnant woman at a property in Second Avenue when he started calling her "the devil".
The 39-year-old was shouting and acting aggressively.
The woman was distressed and left while barefoot, Dumbarton Sheriff Court was told.
A witness saw her and could hear her crying. Another neighbour heard Gallagher threatening to "murder" her and "I hope you die".
Around 1.10am, police arrived.
The man answered the door, intoxicated, and started threatening officers.
He was repeatedly reminded they were there to check on the welfare of everyone there.
READ MORE: Drug dealer caught as phone lights up with WhatsApp texts during police search
Fiscal depute Euan Nicholson said the man continued to threaten to fight officers and "said he had body armour".
As additional police arrived, he then opened his tracksuit top and showed his armour and a knife in the front pouch.
Gallagher, listed in court papers as a prisoner at Low Moss, also had a knuckleduster in his right trouser pocket.
Police had to deploy PAVA spray to his face.
He pleaded guilty in June to shouting, swearing, uttering threats and making derogatory remarks towards his partner at a property on February 8 this year.
It was aggravated by being against a partner or ex.
He further shouted, swore and uttered threats of violence and made homophobic remarks to two police officers. This was aggravated by prejudice relating to sexual orientation.
And he admitted having a knife and having a knuckleduster.
READ MORE: Former cop caught driving while disqualified after crash
The Crown accepted last month that he did not shoot a crossbow at a veranda door at Orbiston Place on May 18 and 19, 2024.
At sentencing on July 8, his defence solicitor said it was an "extremely frightening incident".
"He is apologetic about his behaviour on the night in question," he said.
There was not just alcohol in his client's system, but a "cocktail" that "acted as a catalyst for his behaviour".
He accepted Gallagher had a lengthy record, including for past offences of violence. But he said the last one was 10 years ago.
Because he had been locked up for about five months, under automatic early release, that was a 10-month sentence, explained the solicitor.
Sheriff Robert Carr said: "This was an incident involving appalling behaviour on your partner.
"You have a bad record. There is no alternative to a custodial sentence."
He jailed Gallagher for 10 months, backdated to February 10.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

British tourists who died after 'jumping into hotel pool' named as pals pay tribute
British tourists who died after 'jumping into hotel pool' named as pals pay tribute

Daily Record

timean hour ago

  • Daily Record

British tourists who died after 'jumping into hotel pool' named as pals pay tribute

The pair had allegedly been drinking and could not swim when the tragedy in Portugal took place. The two British men who died after reportedly jumping into a swimming pool during a holiday to Portugal have been pictured for the first time. ‌ King Endonmi, 29, and his friend Mo, 27, were discovered at the bottom of a hotel pool in Albufeira, in the Algarve, on Tuesday, July 15. They had only arrived less than 24 hours earlier. ‌ Emergency services raced to the scene at around 4am and attempted to resuscitate them, but both were tragically pronounced dead at the scene. Police say there is no suspicion of foul play. ‌ Both had travelled to the popular holiday spot from the Ipswich area, the Mirror reports. A fundraising page has been set up in memory of them, who "brought light into every room they entered". A spokesperson for the Portuguese Criminal Investigation Police, the Policia Judiciaria, said the bodies were discovered at around 4.30am. They added: "We went to the swimming pool and found CSI work there. There is no criminal evidence involved in the deaths of the two British citizens. The cause of deaths will be determined by the national medical cabinet in Portugal." ‌ Portuguese newspaper Correio da Manhã reported that both men had allegedly been drinking and could not swim. Friends of the pair paid tribute to them, adding: "Their families are now facing every parent's worst nightmare." Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. The GoFundMe has raised over £14,000 so far, which is to go towards costs of repatriation. A message on the page read: "On what was meant to be a joyful holiday in Portugal, our two dear friends Mo and King tragically lost their lives, less than 24 hours after arriving. "What was supposed to be sunshine and laughter turned into heartbreak no one could have imagined. They were brothers to many. Gentle, kind-hearted souls who brought light into every room they entered. The kind of people who would drop everything to help you, no questions asked. "They were warm, loyal, funny and full of dreams. The sort of men you never hear a bad word about because there simply were none. They were deeply devoted to their families, their friends and their faith. And now, all of that has been taken so suddenly and so unfairly."

Premier League clubs with highest fan arrests in 2024-25 and most banning orders revealed
Premier League clubs with highest fan arrests in 2024-25 and most banning orders revealed

Daily Mirror

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Premier League clubs with highest fan arrests in 2024-25 and most banning orders revealed

There were 1932 football-related arrests across England and Wales during the 2024-25 season, an 11 per cent drop on the previous year - the first drop since fans returned to stadiums after the Covid-19 pandemic Manchester United had the highest number of supporters arrested of all clubs in England and Wales last season. There were 121 arrests of United supporters in the 2024-25 campaign, putting the Red Devils ahead of Manchester City (94) and West Ham (77), according to data from the Home Office. ‌ West Ham had the highest number of fans arrested in each of the previous three seasons, the Home Office said. Forty nine per cent of the arrests of United fans occurred at home games, with 34 of them for public or violent disorder. ‌ The number of football-related arrests overall dropped by 11 per cent to 1,932 compared to 2023-24, and marks the first drop since fans returned to stadiums after the Covid-19 pandemic. ‌ The most common arrest type was public disorder (32 per cent). The percentage of arrests for possession of Class A drugs was the highest since it became a Schedule 1 offence in November 2022, up to 19 per cent from an initial nine per cent in 2022-23. The number of matches with reported incidents increased however by 18 per cent, from 1,341 to 1,583. A total of 2,439 banning orders were in force as of June 1, 2025, an increase of 12 per cent compared with the end of the previous season, and the highest number in force since the end of the 2012-13 season. ‌ Banning orders prevent individuals from attending matches in the UK and individuals subject to orders can be ordered to hand over their passports to police before overseas matches and tournaments. West Ham had the most supporters with a banning order in force at the end of last season, up from 93 to 112. ‌ Manchester United were second with 108, up from 89. Chelsea's increase from 54 to 80 moved them up from eighth at the end of 2023-24 to third by June 2025. The most common reported incidents were related to hate crime – reported at 420 of the 1,583 matches where at least one incident was reported. Of those hate crime reports, 287 incidents related to race, 140 to sexual orientation, 20 to religion, 19 to disability and three to gender identity. The number of hate crime reports at matches was up from 341 in 2023-24, and was the highest on record within the Home Office data provided which goes back to the 2017-18 season. The number of online hate crimes recorded in connection to football decreased from 322 in 2023-24 to 212 last season. Join our new WhatsApp community and receive your daily dose of Mirror Football content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.

How fast above the speed limit can you drive before you risk a speeding fine
How fast above the speed limit can you drive before you risk a speeding fine

Daily Record

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Record

How fast above the speed limit can you drive before you risk a speeding fine

Drivers could be fined or even disqualified if they are caught speeding. Drivers are often curious about the speed limit thresholds, especially if they are worrying about being hit with a fine. If you don't know the ins and outs of the rules of the road, you could risk your safety and the safety of others – not to mention facing penalty points, a fine or even a ban. ‌ Just this week, Harry Potter star Emma Watson was banned from driving after being caught speeding at 38mph in a 30mph zone in Oxford last year, with that offence taking her to the 12-point threshold. ‌ And the experts at are now warning drivers not to rely on myths or guesswork when it comes to speed limits, with many people believing there to be a "buffer" over the limit. ‌ A spokesperson for the car valuation company said: "We regularly speak with drivers who think there's a guaranteed buffer – but the truth is, as soon as you exceed the speed limit, you're technically breaking the law." Speed cameras work using radar or road markings to monitor a vehicle's speed and capture evidence of any offence. While older cameras used film, most modern devices are fully digital and can even track your average speed over many miles. The expert explained: "Not all cameras flash anymore. Some operate silently, and some mobile units are manually operated – so relying on a flash as a warning is a risky game.' ‌ Digital systems record: Vehicle speed Time and location of the offence Vehicle registration Road speed limit In some cases, they even capture a clear image of the driver and passenger. ‌ What Speed Actually Triggers a Camera? According to the professionals, contrary to common belief, there's no universal '10 per cent + 2mph' rule baked into law. The spokesperson said: "The idea that you're safe doing 35mph in a 30 zone is one of the biggest myths we hear. Technically, you're liable for a fine the moment you go even 1mph over the limit.' While the National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) does recommend a '10 per cent plus 2' margin to allow for officer discretion, this is not a legal threshold and can vary depending on the enforcement area or the officer reviewing the case. ‌ Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Mobile Cameras vs Fixed Cameras Fixed cameras typically have a set trigger speed, though the exact threshold is rarely published. Mobile cameras, on the other hand, are operated manually – and decisions to issue fines can depend on how far over the limit you are and the circumstances. Mobile speed units are particularly unpredictable. They're often deployed in accident-prone zones, so officers tend to take a tougher stance. ‌ With speeding fines ranging from fixed penalties to points on your licence and even court appearances, the best strategy is simple. The team added: "Don't gamble with the grey area. If you're even slightly over the limit, you're putting your licence, insurance, and safety at risk. No journey is worth that.' According to the RAC, UK car speed limits are generally 30mph in urban areas, 60mph on main single-carriageway roads, and 70mph on dual carriageways and motorways.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store