
Ukrainians have lost faith in Zelensky
Putin chose war over peace this spring because his spies and generals told him that Ukraine is on the brink of collapse. Alarmingly, they may be right. Ukraine is running out of fighting men, its frontline soldiers are exhausted and US military support has narrowed to focus on air defence. The Kyiv government is racked by corruption scandals and purges, public faith in their future and in their leaders is tanking and pressure to make peace at almost any price is growing.
In many ways the most remarkable thing about the conflict is that Ukraine still fights on despite the merciless and titanic punishment that Russia has meted out on its soldiers, civilians and infrastructure.
'If the war continues soon there will be no Ukraine left to fight for,' one former senior official in Zelensky's administration tells me. They now believe their former boss is 'prolonging the war to hold on to power'. Even once-staunch pro-Zelensky cheerleaders such as Mariia Berlinska, head of the Aerial Reconnaissance Support Centre, a prominent Ukrainian volunteer movement, express despair. 'We are hanging over the abyss,' Berlinska said recently. 'Ukraine is an expendable pawn in an American game… Trump, Putin, Xi [will] spend us like small change if they need to.'
Ukrainian morale, admirably high for much of the war, is collapsing. Back in October 2022, even after six months of violence and bloodshed, 88 per cent of Ukrainians believed that they would be a 'flourishing country inside the EU' within a decade. Now 47 per cent think that 'Ukraine will be a depopulated country with a ruined economy'. A separate survey found that 70 per cent of Ukrainians also believe their leaders are using the war to enrich themselves.
Nothing is more corrosive to wartime morale than the idea that a nation's leaders are stealing as its people fight and die. 'Corruption kills and loses wars,' says Kyrylo Shevchenko, a former head of Ukraine's Central Bank, who is in exile in Austria after being charged with corruption in 2023. In recent weeks, Ukraine has been engulfed in corruption scandals. Two deputy prime ministers, minister for national unity Oleksiy Chernyshov and minister for reconstruction Oleksandr Kubrakov, have been investigated for embezzlement and treason. Zelensky has also repeatedly tried to sack Major General Kyrylo Budanov, the head of Ukraine's military intelligence, allegedly because of his growing popularity. Only pressure from the US embassy in Kyiv prevented the sacking of one of Ukraine's most popular generals, a serving senior European diplomat with knowledge of the case tells me.
The recent spate of arrests and searches against Zelensky loyalists suggest serious political infighting at the heart of the Kyiv government – and also a reckless readiness to take down prominent critics both inside and outside the state, regardless of how it looks to the outside world. Perhaps the most shocking of all the recent arrests is that of Vitaliy Shabunin, one of Ukraine's most prominent anti-corruption activists, who has been charged with evading military service and fraud. Shabunin, the chair of the Anti-Corruption Action Centre executive board and a leading watchdog of military corruption, attacked the government soon after this arrest.
'Taking advantage of the war, Volodymyr Zelensky is taking the first but confident steps towards corrupt authoritarianism,' Shabunin wrote on Telegram. He has been a critic of a proposed law on defence procurement that would allow the Defence Ministry to exempt chosen companies implementing government contracts from criminal liability.
At the same time, the administration has blocked the appointment of a new independent head of the Bureau of Economic Security, a powerful law enforcement agency with an uncomfortable track record of prosecuting Zelensky's political opponents.
'Ukraine has two enemies, two Vladimirs: Zelensky and Putin,' says a former Ukrainian cabinet minister, once a strong Zelensky supporter. 'Putin is destroying Ukraine from [the] outside, but Zelensky is destroying it from within by destroying its will to fight and its morale. Human rights are being trampled on, there is pressure against political opponents, rich and influential people who could support opposition are being expropriated and opposition media is silenced. And the irony is that this Putinification of Ukraine is being funded by the West.'
Under the terms of a wartime state of emergency, more than 5,000 Ukrainians have come under sanctions and had their property frozen. The measure, first invented to prevent Russia-connected politicians, media groups and oligarchs from influencing Ukrainian politics, is now widely used to silence opponents of the regime, say critics, as well as to police the media. 'Sanctions have led to the closure of three YouTube channels belonging to Zelensky's critics in the past month,' says Shevchenko. 'Censorship often shields authoritarian leaders, and unchecked power breeds dictatorship.'
Zelensky's term of office formally expired in May last year. While many argue it's unfeasible to hold elections in wartime, there is frustration that Zelensky has exiled key potential opponents and imprisoned and sanctioned others. 'In May 1940 Churchill invited the leader of the opposition Attlee to be his deputy and united all of parliament in one government,' notes opposition MP Oleksiy Goncharenko. 'Zelensky has done the opposite, he is holding on to power by all means possible.' Goncharenko sparked controversy by comparing Zelensky to Kim Jong-un and Ukraine to North Korea.
Meanwhile, resentment, resistance and anger are rising at aggressive measures taken by the authorities to press-gang military-age men into the army – a process known as 'busification'. Unlike the Russian army, which is made up of contract soldiers, Ukraine has instituted full mobilisation of men over 26 not engaged in vital civilian work.
Ukraine's social media is filled with daily videos of men being bundled into vans by recruitment officers, sometimes at gunpoint. Yet many of those forcibly recruited seem to have little desire to fight. In the first six months of this year, Ukraine's Prosecutor's Office reported that it had opened 107,672 new criminal cases for desertion. Since 2022 some 230,804 such criminal cases have been instigated, suggesting that more soldiers have deserted the Ukrainian army than there are fighting men in today's British, French and German armies combined.
Those who remain at the front are exhausted. Mobilised Ukrainian soldiers serve until the end of hostilities, meaning that some have been fighting continuously for three-and-a-half years. A draft law releasing military personnel from service after 36 months was squashed by the government last year for fear that the retiring personnel could not be replaced. No men aged 18 to 60 have been allowed to leave the country since February 2022 without special permission.
Since the Russian invasion, more than 6.8 million Ukrainians have fled the country, with a further eight million internally displaced. That's equivalent to 40 per cent of its working-age population. Runaway inflation is impoverishing ever-larger swathes of the country. Today 8.8 million people in Ukraine are living below the poverty line, up from six million before the war.
Last week governments and businesses gathered in Rome for the third annual Ukraine Recovery Conference. The centrepiece of the conference was meant to be the unveiling of a multibillion-dollar Ukraine recovery fund that US investment giant BlackRock has been working on since 2022. But earlier this year BlackRock announced that it was shuttering the fund 'due to a lack of interest'. Germany's Friedrich Merz, Italy's Giorgia Meloni and Poland's Donald Tusk were there to make the usual pledges of support. Yet in terms of concrete aid, the EU was able to rustle up just €2.3 billion – just a drop in the bucket compared with the World Bank's estimate of $524 billion to restore Ukraine's infrastructure.
'All of the political elite understands that Ukraine needs a new system of government to stabilise [the] situation,' says the former Zelensky cabinet minister. 'People want to stop living in fear. But instead of asking how to help a transition of power in Ukraine, the EU is closing its eyes.' Many of Zelensky allies, including some of the country's top ministers, fear that they could be prosecuted or exiled if they leave power. Zelensky's team have 'made many enemies' in Ukraine's political class, explains a senior European diplomat who attended the Rome conference. 'They fear that their future is exile, or jail' – which, in turn, only increases the 'temptation to line their pockets while they can'.
Trump's newly announced Patriot package is welcome news. So are Europe's continued promises of unwavering support. But none of Ukraine's allies can really help with the country's chronic manpower shortage or with the deepening crisis of legitimacy that Zelensky faces. Most worrying of all, no outsiders can reverse the spiral of arrests of former regime loyalists, crackdown on opposition members and shutdown of media outlets that are doing so much to erode Ukrainians' faith in the war effort and in Zelensky's leadership.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
21 minutes ago
- Reuters
US-Japan trade deal guarantees lowest tariff rates for chips, pharma, Japanese official says
TOKYO, July 29 (Reuters) - Japan's leading trade negotiator said on Tuesday that the trade deal Tokyo agreed with the United States last week guarantees Japan will always receive the lowest tariff rate on chips and pharmaceuticals of all the pacts negotiated by Washington. "If a third country agrees with the United States on lower rates on chips and pharmaceuticals, those lower rates would apply to Japan," Ryosei Akazawa told a news conference. The European Union secured a 15% baseline tariff as part of a framework trade deal with the U.S. this week, averting looming new tariffs on chips and pharmaceuticals. Japan last week struck a trade deal with the U.S. that lowers tariffs on cars and other goods to 15% in exchange for a U.S.-bound $550 billion Japanese investment package including equity, loans and guarantees. Asked why there has been no joint statement on the agreement, Akazawa said Japan is prioritising having President Donald Trump sign an executive order to bring the agreed 15% tariff rate into effect. "We want to concentrate our efforts on getting the tariffs lowered first, and then we can consider whether an official document on the agreement is necessary," he said.


Daily Mirror
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
7 explosive moments in Donald Trump's years-long feud with London Mayor Sadiq Khan
US President Donald Trump has a fraught history with London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan - The Mirror takes a look back at some of the standout moments from their long-running feud Donald Trump reignited his feud with Sir Sadiq Khan yesterday as he branded the London Mayor a "nasty person" in a televised sit-down. Mr Trump, who is on a golfing trip to Scotland, took a shot at Sir Sadiq when he was asked if he will visit London during his state visit in September. The Republican politician said he didn't know, before hurling abuse at the mayor: "I'm not a fan of your mayor. I think he's done a terrible job. He's a nasty person." It was an an uncomfortable moment for Keir Starmer, who was sitting next to the President and was forced to lean over and interject, saying: "He's a friend of mine." But it was not the start of tensions between Mr Trump and Sir Sadiq. The US President has a fraught history with the London Mayor dating back to his last presidency. The Mirror takes a look back at some of the standout moments from their long-running feud. IQ test jibe In 2016, Mr Trump challenged Sir Sadiq to an IQ test after he said the US President's views on Islam were ignorant. The then newly elected London Mayor branded Mr Trump's views on Muslims "ignorant" and said: "I'm clearly hoping Hillary Clinton wins." Sir Sadiq criticised Mr Trump after he vowed to ban Muslims from the US during the 2016 presidential campaign. He said: "Donald Trump's ignorant view of Islam could make both of our countries less safe. It risks alienating mainstream Muslims around the hands of extremists." In an interview with Piers Morgan, Mr Trump later said he was offended by Sir Sadiq's comments and even challenged him to an IQ test. "He doesn't know me, hasn't met me, doesn't know what I'm on about," he said. "I think they're very rude statements and frankly tell him I will remember those statements. They're very nasty statements." Trump's astonishing 'pathetic' comment In 2017, Donald Trump launched an astonishing Twitter attack on Sir Sadiq Khan following a terrorist attack in London, calling the London Mayor's response "pathetic". Eight people were killed and 48 injured when terrorists drove a van into pedestrians on London Bridge before launching a deadly knife attack. In the aftermath, Sir Sadiq sought to reassure Londoners, telling people there would be an increased police presence in the capital but that there was "no reason to be alarmed". The US president took issue with the comment, tweeting: "Pathetic excuse by London Mayor Sadiq Khan who had to think fast on his "no reason to be alarmed" statement. MSM [mainstream media] is working hard to sell it!" Sir Sadiq's office initially responded by saying the London mayor had 'more important things to do than respond to Donald Trump's ill-informed tweet that deliberately takes out of context his remarks'. Sir Sadiq allows giant 'Trump Baby' In 2018, Sir Sadiq granted permission for a giant blimp depicting Mr Trump as an angry, orange baby to fly over London during the US President's visit. The mayor said he supported the decision taken by the Greater London Authority, adding that it was not for him to be a "censor". In a frank exchange with Piers Morgan on Good Morning Britain at the time, Sir Sadiq said: "My views are irrelevant. The issue is 'Do they have freedom to protest, freedom to assemble and should they be allowed to do so?' If it's peaceful and it's safe they should, Piers." The 20ft (6m) high inflatable, dubbed "Trump Baby", was granted permission to rise above Parliament Square Gardens. 'Stone cold loser' In 2019, moments before he landed in the UK for a three-day state visit, Mr Trump launched a vicious attack on Sir Sadiq, branding the mayor a "stone cold loser who should focus on crime in London". Tweeting from the plane, the US President wrote: "Sadiq Khan, who by all accounts has done a terrible job as Mayor of London, has been foolishly 'nasty' to the visiting President of the United States, by far the most important ally of the United Kingdom. He is a stone cold loser who should focus on crime in London, not me." Misspelling Sir Sadiq's name, Mr Trump continued: "Kahn [sic] reminds me very much of our very dumb and incompetent Mayor of NYC, de Blasio, who has also done a terrible job - only half his height." A spokesman for the mayor at the time said the "childish insults should be beneath the president of the United States". '20th Century fascist' Mr Trump's "loser" comment came a day after Sir Sadiq had compared President Trump to a "20th Century fascist", saying he was guilty of "defending white supremacists, neo-Nazis and anti-Semites" in Charlottesville and "amplifying messages from racists in this country". He wrote in The Observer: "President Donald Trump is just one of the most egregious examples of a growing global threat. The far right is on the rise around the world, threatening our hard-won rights and freedoms and the values that have defined our liberal, democratic societies for more than 70 years. "Viktor Orbán in Hungary, Matteo Salvini in Italy, Marine Le Pen in France and Nigel Farage here in the UK are using the same divisive tropes of the fascists of the 20th century to garner support, but with new sinister methods to deliver their message. And they are gaining ground and winning power and influence in places that would have been unthinkable just a few years ago." Trump branded 'racist bigot' Also in 2019, Donald Trump launched an attack on Sir Sadiq over knife crime in London after three killings in the capital in less than 24 hours. The US President was branded a "racist bigot" after also amplifying a racist tweet The US President branded the British politician "a disaster" while re-tweeting far-right activist Katie Hopkins. He said: "LONDON needs a new mayor ASAP. Khan is a disaster - will only get worse! He is a national disgrace who is destroying the City of London!" It sparked a furious backlash from now-Energy Secretary Ed Miliband saying: "What is it about Sadiq Khan and what he stands for that leads the President to be tweeting rubbish about him? Oh yes, Trump's a racist bigot, who tried to ban Muslims from America and hates anyone who stands up to him." Critics - including Jeremy Corbyn - also slammed Mr Trump for re-tweeting a post by Hopkins in which she referred to London as 'stab-city' and 'Khan's Londonistan'.. 'Trump is racist' Last year, London Mayor Sadiq Khan labelled Donald Trump a "racist" and claimed that the then President-elect singled him out because of his skin colour. Mr Khan, who was repeatedly attacked by Trump during his first term in the White House, said his policies were "sexist, homophobic, Islamophobic, racist". He said: "He's coming for me for my ethnicity and my religion, so it's incredibly personal to me." Speaking to the High Performance podcast before November's Presidential Election, the London Mayor said: 'It's personal, let's be frank. If I wasn't this colour skin, if I wasn't a practising Muslim, he wouldn't have come for me.


Daily Mirror
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Rosie O'Donnell says 'cruel' Trump supporters forced her to flee America
Rosie O'Donnell has been involved in a long-standing feud with US President Donald Trump and she has now opened up about how his supporters forced her to leave America Comedian Rosie O'Donnell has opened up about the "cruel" backlash from Donald Trump supporters that drove her to leave the US in a bid for "self-preservation". The 63-year-old American talk show host has been embroiled in a bitter dispute with the President of the United States ever since she took a swipe at him almost twenty years ago. In a 2006 episode of The View, during the Hot Topics segment, Rosie didn't hold back in her criticism of Trump. Trump, who was not a politician at the time, hit back by branding Rosie "a woman out of control", and their animosity has persisted over the years. While chatting with Christine Lampard, who was filling in on Tuesday's Lorraine, Rosie disclosed that the ongoing conflict prompted her to up sticks and move to Ireland for the sake of her own well-being and that of her family. Discussing her relocation to Ireland earlier this year, she said: "I just think this is the best decision I could have made for myself and my child, I love it here, we've been welcomed by everyone," reports the Express. Following a DNA test that confirmed Rosie's Irish heritage as 100 per cent, she expressed that there was never any doubt about her destination if she ever felt compelled to leave America due to its political atmosphere. "There was never a question for me where I would go if I had to leave the country because of the political climate, and that's what I felt I had to do, and I'm so glad that this is where we came, and so thrilled at the warm welcome we've received," she elaborated. Rosie also touched upon her choice to relocate following the spat with Trump, seeking to distance herself from the "intensity" of the situation. She reminisced about poking fun at his hair back in 2006, doing "did what comedians have been doing for years" and then noted: "He went really crazy, he could not get himself to get over it for over 20 years. "He uses me as a punching line and disparages me and insults me and calls me names like it's a kid in school and I'm being teased. "But when I talked about him, he was not the President, he was a reality TV host, he was a bit of a joke in New York. "Nobody really took him seriously in 2006 at all, and then he becomes the President of the United States. "And does he stop? No. He puts the pedal to the medal and uses my name in the debate and it was difficult for my children." Rosie disclosed that Trump's remarks and political actions were the reasons behind her departure. "I knew I could not stay in my country and be a healthy parent that I need to be for this child, with all of this destruction going on in the country that he had planned and now has implemented. "So it really was self-preservation. I knew I had to take care of myself mentally and emotionally, and being here has given me that distance, and I don't live in fear of what someone is going to say to me in Walmart. "Even though most people are very kind, the MAGA people are emboldened by his cruelty to be just as cruel, even to my face. "I knew for my own safety and health that I had to leave, but he hasn't stopped; he just threatened to take away my citizenship a couple of weeks ago."