Al Mahwit security event on Day of Wilayah, anniversary of Prophet's Migration
The Security Department of Al Mahwit Governorate held a speech event to mark the Day of the Guardianship of Imam Ali (peace be upon him) and the anniversary of the Prophet's migration, with the attendance of a number of security and local leaders.
The event addressed the religious and historical dimensions of these two occasions, emphasizing that the Day of Ghadir represents a pivotal moment in the Islamic message, as decreed by God for Imam Ali to assume leadership.
Its commemoration embodies the connection to the approach of the Ahl al-Bayt and strengthens the faith identity. It was also noted that the Prophet's migration represents a major transformation in the path of Islam.
The speeches included calls to adhere to divine leadership and follow the path of Imam Ali in sacrifice and steadfastness, considering this a safety valve for the nation in facing challenges. The event concluded with a poem that expressed the spirit of the occasion.
Whatsapp Telegram Email Print
more of (Local)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Saba Yemen
5 hours ago
- Saba Yemen
Two Sit-ins held at September 21 University condemning genocide & starvation in Gaza
Sana'a - Saba: The University of September 21 for Medical and Applied Sciences in Sana'a Governorate organized two sit-ins on Wednesday to denounce the ongoing acts of starvation and genocide committed by the Zionist entity against the people of Gaza, and to express support for the fourth phase of escalation. Participants in the sit-ins, held at the university's main campus in Haziz and its branch on 50th Street in New Sana'a District, included university leadership, faculty, and students. They chanted slogans and raised banners condemning the continued atrocities committed by the Zionist entity against the Palestinian people in Gaza, amid shameful international silence and Arab and Islamic inaction. A statement issued during the events called on Arab and Islamic nations to break their silence and urgently pressure their governments to demand an end to the massacres and violations carried out by the Israeli occupation against civilians in the Gaza Strip. The statement emphasized that the participation of the University of September 21's members is part of a weekly mobilization, driven by moral and religious responsibility in the face of the genocidal crimes and starvation affecting the Palestinian people. It also renewed calls for Arab and Islamic peoples—particularly scholars, academics, and university students—to fulfill their duty, abandon silence , complacency, stand in solidarity with their starving and thirsty brothers in Gaza, who are facing the worst forms of genocide. The statement further praised the steadfast position of the Yemeni people in support of their brothers in the land of Al-Isra and Al-Mi'raj. Whatsapp Telegram Email Print
Saba Yemen
5 hours ago
- Saba Yemen
Expanded scholars' meeting in Raymah calls for muslim unity, support for Gaza
Raymah – Saba: Religious scholars and preachers in Raymah governorate held a broad meeting today under the theme: 'The Religious and Human Duty of the Arab and Islamic Nation Toward the Genocide and Starvation in Gaza.' Participants emphasized the urgent need for Muslim unity and standing as one in defense of Gaza, condemning the crimes committed against civilians, particularly women and children, in full view of a complicit and silent world. Speakers highlighted the role of scholars in raising awareness, mobilizing support for the Palestinian people, and resisting efforts to divide or pacify the Islamic world. They stressed that victory and dignity lie in resistance and jihad against aggression by Israel and the U.S. Key outcomes of the meeting included: a call for unified action by Muslim scholars, preachers, and thought leaders to fulfill their duty in exposing the crimes of the Israeli occupation and supporting the oppressed in Gaza. Condemnation of normalization with the Zionist entity, stressing it is religiously prohibited and morally disgraceful. A demand for Arab and Muslim armies to fulfill their responsibility and intervene militarily to liberate Gaza and Palestine. An appeal to cut all political, economic, and security ties with Israel and expel its envoys. Support for economic boycott campaigns against U.S. and Israeli goods and media outlets. Endorsement of Yemen's military actions in support of Gaza and encouragement for continued mobilization through programs like 'Al-Aqsa Flood.' The statement warned against misleading fatwas and divisive rhetoric that serve Zionist interests and urged solidarity in this decisive battle, which it described as a confrontation between truth and falsehood, Islam and disbelief. In closing, the scholars praised the steadfastness of the Yemeni people and leadership, reaffirmed support for Gaza, and called on all citizens of Raymah to join mobilization efforts as a moral and religious obligation. Whatsapp Telegram Email Print
Saba Yemen
5 hours ago
- Saba Yemen
Manifestations of Arab Complicity in Aggression on Gaza in Light of Firm Yemeni Position
Sana'a - Saba: The Israeli enemy is waging a complex aggression against the Gaza Strip, going beyond bombing and starvation to unprecedented political complexity. Regional parties are participating in this indirect role, varying between directed silence, field facilitation, political cover, and economic engagement, this makes the situation go beyond the concept of absence to the level of complicity in the crime and its repercussions. The official Arab response to the massacres in Gaza has been characterized by a complete disconnect from the necessary humanitarian and political stance. Narrow strategic calculations have been present, while the imperatives of belonging and position have been absent. Palestine has transformed from a central issue into a negotiable matter, and the priorities of some capitals have shifted from supporting the victim to securing the interests of the aggressor partner. Arab support for the enemy emerged through multiple channels, most notably the supply of fuel to Israeli fighter jets, this provided them with additional capacity to continue their strikes on the Gaza Strip without relying entirely on Western supplies, thus enhancing the efficiency of the aggression and reducing its operational costs. On the financial side, some Arab countries maintained the pace of funding the US administration, knowing in advance that this money was included in the annual military aid allocations to the Israeli entity, this made this funding a direct factor in sustaining the aggression, perpetuating the perpetration of crimes, and starving Gaza and its people. The opening of Arab airspace to Israeli aircraft, whether for the transport of equipment or diplomatic travel, expanded the enemy's operational margin and granted it undeclared regional coverage, which contributed to reducing the logistical barriers that previously limited its freedom of movement. Trade relations between some regimes and the Israeli enemy continued during the aggression, with shipments of food, medicine, and essential goods continuing to arrive at the occupied ports, while the besieged Gaza Strip suffered from a shortage of vital supplies due to the joint blockade. On the political front, no serious Arab steps were taken to reduce representation, freeze relations, or review bilateral agreements. Rather, official meetings were held at various levels, and some capitals maintained direct communication channels with the occupation government. This coincided with continued Arab-Israeli security cooperation on sensitive issues, including data exchange, tracking of activists, and restrictions on resistance support activities, including preventing donations, closing accounts, and banning some Islamic entities active in this field. The Palestinian Authority has emerged as one of the fundamental weaknesses on the internal front, through its continued security coordination, pursuit of resistance cadres, and the extradition of some of them, this has weakened the environment for field action and dismantled the Popular Front in the West Bank. On the religious and media levels, major voices in the Arab world have failed to cover the massacres in the Gaza Strip, the official positions of religious institutions have declined, with some outlets issuing limited statements. Meanwhile, some platforms have maintained a discourse of criminalization of the resistance and warnings against escalation. In the popular sphere, the imposed security and legislative restrictions have limited the space for expression and demonstrations, and have prevented marches and solidarity protests, this has led to the complete disruption of popular pressure tools, despite the clarity of the bloody scene and the scale of the massacres. This was paralleled by the deliberate marginalization of educational and media platforms from their awareness-raising role. Resistance discourse was excluded from curricula, universities were emptied of their political content, and official and private media outlets were subject to controls that prevented the narrative of the Palestinian victim from being conveyed as it is. Some media platforms became tools of justification, focusing on rhetoric of "calm," "peace," and "restraint." This gave the enemy additional cover in its battle and contributed to reshaping public opinion toward accepting normalization as a rational option. The negative classification of the resistance increased, with major factions being placed on terrorist lists, their leaders demonized, and their supporters accused of threatening security and stability. Meanwhile, Zionist delegations remained welcomed in a number of Arab capitals. In this context, Sayyed Abdulmalik Badr al-Din al-Houthi affirms that granting the Israeli enemy Arab cover under any pretext does not express neutrality. Rather, it establishes a position on the front line of aggression and places the regimes involved in a political path that paves the way for comprehensive Zionist hegemony over Arab decision-making, beginning with Palestine and not stopping there. The Leader believes that classifying Gaza's defenders as terrorists and treating them as a threat represents a reversal of principles and exposes the profound imbalance in the political compass of some regimes, this paves the way for the liquidation of the cause and drags the nation toward an existential cost that goes beyond the current battle. In this climate, the Yemeni position has emerged as a firm and clear one, not subjecting its support for Palestine to any circumstantial considerations. Rather, it has maintained its principled compass and strengthened its media, political, and field presence through official positions, major demonstrations, popular mobilization, and armed forces operations deep within the enemy's territory. Sana'a has adopted an approach that links the Palestinian cause with religious identity, classifies the confrontation with the Israeli enemy as part of the nation's central battle, and views the continuation of the aggression as a primary cause of destabilizing Arab national security and a constant source of existential threat. The Yemeni position was not limited to condemnation, but rather constituted a strategic support element in the battle, in terms of strikes supporting Gaza and in terms of political clarity, public presence, and media and mobilization engagement, at a time when many countries were shrinking and retreating from their previous positions. This cohesion affirms that strengthening the position does not come from a balance of interests, but rather from clarity of principles. Supporting Palestine is not tied to momentary calculations, but rather is built on a comprehensive vision that considers the Israeli enemy a direct threat to all Arab and Islamic peoples. The developments in the aggression on Gaza reveal an unprecedented level of official Arab complicity, matched by continued Palestinian steadfastness and a steadfast Yemeni position, this position redefines the map of alignment in the region and forces peoples to reconsider who governs them, who stands with them, and who sells them out. Observers believe that Sana'a is advancing a position rooted in the values of faith and the responsibility of belonging, this position reflects the identity of the nation and the conscience of its peoples. It embodies a state of strategic vigilance based on insight, not self-interest, and on self-sacrifice, not bargaining, this makes its political and military presence more consistent with the requirements of the current stage. The facts of the Gaza massacre demonstrate that the moment no longer allows for ambiguity, the lines of alignment have crystallized with extreme clarity: one side is writing its positions in blood, waging its battle with dignity, and offering its martyrs with a cohesive ideological awareness, the other side is signing off on facilitating the situation, participating in supplying weapons, and securing the enemy's back with fuel, transit, and normalization. M.M
