
Bangladesh pushes solar to tackle energy woes
Dhaka: Bangladesh's caretaker leader has ordered all government institutions including ministry buildings and schools to install solar panels to ease chronic power problems in a country regularly hit by deadly heatwaves.
The South Asian nation of 170 million people has set itself a target of generating 20 percent of its power from renewable energy by 2030 -- a four-fold increase -- and rising to 30 percent by 2040, the government said in a statement.
"Bangladesh is lagging far behind its neighbouring countries", the statement issued by the office of interim leader Muhammad Yunus read.
"Only 5.6 percent of our total requirement is currently met from renewable sources," it added, noting that in neighbouring India, it is 24 percent and in Sri Lanka, nearly 40 percent.
The government's rooftop solar programme will see all government offices, schools, colleges and hospitals installed with panels immediately, the statement issued late Thursday said.
The micro-finance pioneer said the panels would be installed and operated by private sector companies, unlike the largely failed push by since-ousted former prime minister Sheikh Hasina to install panels by using government power agencies.
"The private sector will handle overall maintenance and keep the systems operational for their own business interests", the statement said.
"The government will only provide them with rooftop access".
The government has also initiated tender processes for 55 solar power plants with a total 5,238 megawatts capacity.
Bangladesh relies heavily on importing cross-border power from neighbouring India, as well from Nepal, especially when demand soars during the blistering heat when consumers rely on energy-hungry air conditioners to keep cool.
Dhaka also began construction of the Russia-backed nuclear plant at Rooppur in 2017.
The much-delayed 2,400-megawatt project will be Bangladesh's largest power station by generating capacity once fully operational.
sa/pjm/stu

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NDTV
18 minutes ago
- NDTV
"Don't Mess With The Zohran": Indian-Origin's Primary Win Sparks Meme Fest
Zohran Mamdani's victory in the Democratic primary for New York City mayor has set off a wave of memes across social media. The 33-year-old made history by becoming the first Muslim nominee of a major party in the city's mayoral race, defeating former Governor Andrew Cuomo. Soon after his victory, Mamdani proposed several policies, such as freezing rent hikes on rent-stabilised apartments, free public buses, building two lakh new affordable homes in New York City, and increase taxes on wealthy individuals. Following that, social media turned into a laughter fest. An X user wrote, "Zohran Mamdani is going to use billionaire taxes to build the shawarmachine." zohran mamdani is going to use billionaire taxes to build the shawarmachine — Chuppa (@ChuppaVGC) June 25, 2025 Mr Mamdani's rise has also drawn a wave of pop culture references, most notably You Don't Mess with the Zohan, the 2008 Adam Sandler comedy. Another user wrote, "If Zohran doesn't have campaign posters that say 'You don't mess with the Zohran,' then he needs a new PR team." Contribution to the Mamdani Meme Industrial Complex 🫡 — /leftypol/ - (@leftypol_org) June 16, 2025 If Zohran doesn't have campaign posters that say "You don't mess with the Zohran" then he needs a new PR team — 6Thumbs (@6thumbs) June 25, 2025 A meme read, "Conservatives are actually doing this meme over Zohran Mamdani's citizenship lmao." Conservatives are actually doing this meme over Zohran Mamdani's citizenship lmao — 679 Enthusiast (@marionumber4) June 26, 2025 Other memes: NYC has fallen ???????????? #ZohranMamdani — The ???????????????? Next Door (@VotHardVotHard) June 25, 2025 how it feels knowing i might actually get to live in mamdani's new york — trish (@ultragloss) June 25, 2025 me in miami watching the zohran mamdani votes trickle in — Daniel is running for NCC Co-Chair (@SalupCid) June 25, 2025 If Mamdani wins the November election, he will become the first person of South Asian descent to become a mayor in the US. Mamdani even called himself US President Donald Trump's worst nightmare, adding that he is a progressive Muslim immigrant who actually fights for the things that he believes in. Zohran Mamdani was born to Ugandan Marxist professor Mahmood Mamdani, who was born in India, and renowned Indian American director Mira Nair. He was born in Uganda and raised in New York City.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
'One country didn't want terror reference': Jaishankar on SCO communique
Union External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on Friday said that India chose not to sign the outcome document of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) defence ministers' meeting because one country objected to including a reference to terrorism. During a press conference, Jaishankar said that the main purpose of the SCO is to fight against terrorism, and Defence Minister Rajnath Singh was right to accept or not accept it without reference to it. "The SCO was formed with the objective of fighting terrorism. When Rajnath Singh went to the meeting and there was a discussion on the outcome document, one country said they do not want a reference to that. Rajnath Singh's view rightly was, without that reference, that the main purpose of the organisation is to fight terrorism, and you are not allowing a reference to that. He expressed his unwillingness to accept... So Rajnath ji clearly said that if there is no mention of terrorism in the statement, we will not sign it," Jaishankar said. SCO is a 10-member organisation which works on unanimity. The organisation includes Kazakhstan, China, Kyrgyzstan, Pakistan, Russia, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Iran, and Belarus. Rajnath Singh refuses to sign SCO joint communique This comes a day after Rajanth Singh refused to sign a joint communique at the SCO meeting in Qingdao, China, because of its omission of the Pahalgam terror attack and the failure to directly address India's concerns about Pakistan-backed cross-border terrorism. At the SCO defence ministers' meeting, Rajnath Singh strongly criticised nations using cross-border terrorism as state policy — without naming Pakistan. He called on SCO members to reject double standards and stand united against terrorism and WMDs in the hands of non-state actors. 'Some countries use cross-border terrorism as an instrument of policy and provide shelter to terrorists. There should be no place for such double standards,' he said, referencing the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack in which 26 civilians were killed.


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
No end to wars: Trump, Pakistan and the art of self-congratulation
Amar Patnaik , Kartikey Singh Pakistan's cynical nomination of the US president for a Nobel Peace Prize tells us something grim about today's world. Yet, as we just saw, performative diplomacy can quickly collapse. Both Pakistan and the US need to ponder the principles that underpin that prize The episode underscores how performative diplomacy, rooted in a 'transactional calculus' rather than strategic coherence, can quickly collapse under the weight of real-world events. Gift this article Two days after US President Donald Trump was 'officially recommended" for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize by Pakistan, the United States joined Israel in launching airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear sites. Now, six months into Trump's second presidency, the world is not witnessing the peace he promised but an intensification of the very wars he vowed to end 'in 24 hours". Two days after US President Donald Trump was 'officially recommended" for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize by Pakistan, the United States joined Israel in launching airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear sites. Now, six months into Trump's second presidency, the world is not witnessing the peace he promised but an intensification of the very wars he vowed to end 'in 24 hours". Against this backdrop, Pakistan's nomination seems to be motivated by strategic sycophancy, aimed at currying favour with Washington in exchange for 'diplomatic goodwill.' Also Read: There we go again: Will America ever rid itself of its Pakistan delusions? In West Asia, Trump has openly favoured Israel across multiple wars. His stance on the Gaza conflict, a war triggered by Hamas's October 2023 incursion into Israeli territory, gruesomely killing 1,195 people and taking 251 hostages, is marked by inconsistency and opportunism. While he helped broker a three-phase ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas in January 2025, it collapsed within weeks as both sides traded accusations of violations. Nevertheless, Trump made no substantial effort to salvage the agreement. Instead, he oscillated between contradictory plans, endorsing Israel's military operations, proposing the US occupation of Gaza and suggesting peace negotiations with Hamas. Further, Trump's diplomacy has followed a similarly incoherent arc in the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war. Rather than finding a genuine long-term solution, he has repeatedly pressured Kyiv, even tying US military aid to concessions on 'rare earths.' Simultaneously, his approach to Iran has been equally erratic. After having withdrawn from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)—the Obama sponsored nuclear deal with Tehran—in 2018, Trump initiated talks earlier this year, only to undercut them by carrying out three airstrikes in Iran. On India, Trump's claims of a ceasefire between India and Pakistan, through late-night calls, 'trade-for-peace" overtures and personal negotiations with Prime Minister Narendra Modi, have been categorically denied by New Delhi. Recently, the PM himself made it clear to Trump that India has never accepted mediation—and will never do so. This clear stance is not reactionary, but reflects India's long-standing 'strategic autonomy.' India maintains robust diplomatic ties, among others, with Iran, deepening security partnerships with Israel and growing defence interoperability with the US, without allowing any single axis to influence its regional posture. Islamabad also hopes to secure US backing on Kashmir and deepen economic and tech ties. In a broader perspective, the US president must learn from past episodes. In 2001, the US invaded Afghanistan, promising to eliminate Al Qaeda, defeat the Taliban and establish democracy in the country. Yet, two decades later, power was returned to the Taliban. In 2003, the US invaded Iraq, claiming that Baghdad harboured weapons of 'mass destruction.' Additionally, in 2011, it intervened in Libya, citing the need to protect civilians from their government. Importantly, the Nobel Peace Prize, awarded 'for the greatest benefit to humankind," has been awarded to US presidents since Theodore Roosevelt (1906). Awards given to Woodrow Wilson (1920) for the League of Nations, Jimmy Carter (2002) for human rights and Al Gore (2007) for climate action were consistent in recognizing a commitment to institutional architectures, multilateral cooperation and universal values. Even Barack Obama's 2009 award, widely seen as aspirational, was granted less than a year into his presidency amid ongoing conflicts. He himself humbly acknowledged that he might not have deserved it. Yet, this award has long reflected a clearly stated vision and commitment to international diplomacy and 'global collaboration.' In essence, it recognized efforts to build bridges. In contrast, Trump's pursuits starkly deviate from that end. President Trump's departure from multilateralism is not incidental. It signifies a deliberate shift away from both global and domestic institutionalism. His administration's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, the WHO and the UN Human Rights Council; exit from arms control treaties like the INF and Open Skies Agreements; defunding of UNRWA; and departure from Unesco all demonstrate a clear disregard for an 'international consensus.' The Trump administration's actions have frequently been unilateral and without credible alternatives. Domestically, policies such as protectionist tariffs, aimed at shielding US industries, may ultimately raise consumer costs, strain American businesses and disrupt global trade flows. The episode underscores how performative diplomacy, rooted in a 'transactional calculus' rather than strategic coherence, can quickly collapse under the weight of real-world events. It is a sharp example of how easily performance is mistaken for policy. As the world's most powerful nation's leader, Trump is uniquely positioned to shape the architecture of peace, not perform it. If he truly alters the global trajectory, the recognition he seeks will follow, as it always has—for substance, not show. The authors are, respectively, a lawyer, former Member of Parliament and civil servant (@Amar4Odisha), and a lawyer based in New Delhi. Topics You May Be Interested In