Lee's Summit School District seeks $225M bond for school upgrades, repairs
KANSAS CITY, Mo. — The Lee's Summit R-7 School District is asking voters to approve a $225 million bond, allowing it to update school buildings and address deferred maintenance.
The 2025 school and special elections ballot says the bond, if passed, will allow the district to acquire, construct, renovate, furnish and equip new and existing schools in the districts, as well as purchase land.
Your Local Election Headquarters: Candidates, races and results on FOX4
Specifically, :
Update schools to meet modern standards for accessibility, safety and future ready learning.
Prepare the district to address future growth and accommodate the needs of all students.
Protect taxpayer investments by prioritizing essential upgrades and deferred maintenance districtwide.
Some of the schools that would see improvements and changes would be Pleasant Lea Middle School, Hazel Grove Elementary, Greenwood Elementary, Lee's Summit North High School and Lee's Summit West High School.
Additionally, Tuesday's vote will determine the future of Lee's Summit Elementary (LSE) and Westview Elementary.
In November 2024, the school district about both schools through a proposed 'renovation' to Westview. The plan would consolidate the schools, moving LSE's students to an updated Westview school.
Since news of the consolidation efforts broke in November, the district has from some families who claim there is no legitimate benefit to the proposal and that there could be long-term impacts on students and families who may not live close to the school.
However, the district claims that the cause for the consolidation efforts stems from and threats to its Title One status, which provides low-income families with federal funds.
The district also said that despite the merge, no jobs would be affected by the change, and the land previously used for the school will be repurposed.
Download the FOX4 News app on iPhone and Android
If the bond passes, regardless of its $225 million total, there will be . It will stay at $0.87 per $100 of assessed real and personal property valuation if passed, according to the ballot.
For a 2025 special election sample ballot, .
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNET
22 minutes ago
- CNET
Score Phones Like the Samsung S25 From $30 Per Month Plus Two Years of Unlimited With Mint Mobile
Choosing between different smartphones and phone plans can be a headache. You're usually picking between expensive plans and more expensive plans to go along with them. This could easily run you thousands of dollars, especially if your looking for a top tier phone like the iPhone 16 or Samsung Galaxy S25 and perks like unlimited data. However, Mint Mobile just dropped some deals that can help you save hundreds of dollars. Right now, you can score two years of unlimited data and a new phone all for just $30 per month. Prices start at $30 per month but vary based on what phone you pick. There are tons of options from Google Pixels, Galaxy S25, iPhones and more. Keep in mind this offer is available for new customers only. The Samsung Galaxy S25 is now just $30 a month including unlimited data for two years. This is a pretty big savings of $440 on the phone and another $360 on the data plan. The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a great choice. In fact, we ranked it our favorite Android phone of 2025. We love the high quality camera, impressive battery life and the AI features. If you want the Galaxy S25 Plus, that will cost you $39 per month. Remember, you must keep this phone and plan for two years to keep the deal. There are lots of color options still availble but act fast as they can sell out at anytime. Not looking for a Galaxy? No problem there are lots of other options. The coveted iPhone 16 lineup is a part of this deal as well. You can score the iPhone 16e for just $40 per month. And if you want something more elaborate, the iPhone 16 Pro Max starts at just $65 per month. These phones come with the unlimited data as well. The Google Pixel 9 is available, too. You can score the Pixel 9 for just $30 a month. Be sure to check out the full sale to see which phone you want. Why this deal matters Many of these phones retail for hundreds if not thousands of dollars. By taking advantage of one of these deals you can score hundreds of dollars off the phone. The only catch is you need to sign up for Mint Mobile's service plan but that comes with offers too, such as two years of unlimited data included in your plan for $15 per month when you buy a new phone.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Is Apple or Disney Stock a Better Buy?
Apple and Disney are both huge players in the entertainment sector. The question is, when it comes to Apple vs. Disney stock, which is the smarter investment? This guide will walk you through the ins and outs of both and whether or not you should buy Apple or Disney. Find Out: Read Next: Apple has consistently outperformed Disney in terms of revenue and profit margins. As of recent earnings reports, Apple boasts higher revenue figures, driven primarily by even its relatively soft iPhone sales, the services segment and expanding product ecosystem. Here are some key considerations when it comes to investing in Apple stock: Stock price: $203.64 Market cap: $3.01 trillion 52-week high: $260.10 52-week low: $169.21 Dividend yield: 0.51% Discover More: Disney has faced some headwinds lately, particularly in its streaming division and theme park operations. While its streaming service, Disney+, has gained traction, the company's financials have struggled to maintain profitability in its direct-to-consumer segment. Here are things you should consider as an investor: Stock price: $113.91 Market cap: $203.06 billion 52-week high: $118.63 52-week low: $80.10 Dividend yield: 0.88% For investors and stockbrokers seeking stability, strong cash flow and a proven growth trajectory, Apple appears to be the better overall buy. Its financial strength, diverse revenue sources and ability to innovate make it a compelling choice. However, for those willing to take on more risk in hopes of a turnaround story, Disney could present a long-term value opportunity if its streaming and entertainment segments regain and keep momentum. When comparing Apple and Disney stock, there are a few main factors to consider. Apple's growth strategy revolves around innovation, subscription-based services, and emerging markets. With new product launches for everything from MacBook Air M4 and iPhone 16s and expansion into artificial intelligence, Apple is well-positioned to sustain its revenue growth and remain a strong buy because of how it has been performing. Furthermore, its substantial cash reserves allow for aggressive stock buybacks and dividend payouts, making it an attractive investment. Disney's long-term growth potential hinges on its content dominance and the recovery of its theme parks. While the company owns valuable intellectual property, including Marvel, Star Wars and Pixar, competition in the streaming industry remains fierce. Still, analysts project an average stock price target of about $130 in 2025. The success of Disney+ and other streaming ventures will play a crucial role in the company's future performance, but its stock still comes in with a buy recommendation. Neither of these stocks could be considered a bad buy, but factor in your risk tolerance before investing in one company's stock over the other. That said, if you can only invest in one of these companies, Apple is considered more reliable and currently a better value than Disney. Yes, in general, Apple stock (AAPL) is often considered a stronger investment compared to Disney stock (DIS), especially for those seeking stability and proven growth. In many analysts' opinions, Apple's strong financial performance, diverse revenue streams and consistent innovation have led to significant returns for investors, whereas Disney stock may be undervalued due to relying on the Walt Disney Company's theme park attendance and box office performance. Editor's note: Company stock information is accurate as of Jun 3, 2025, and is subject to change. More From GOBankingRates Here's the Minimum Salary Required To Be Considered Upper Class in 2025 This article originally appeared on Is Apple or Disney Stock a Better Buy?
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Senate GOP Sorts Out Which Poison Pills It Can Swallow To Pass House's ‘Big Beautiful' Bill
Senate Republicans began the work this week of deciphering what exactly House Republicans' have stuffed into President Trump's massive spending package — and what elements of it they can live with. One thing is clear: Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) and Republican leadership have their work cut out for them. And in a few key cases, senators might soon find themselves caught between what Trump demands of them, and what's good for their reelection prospects. Similar to the competing pain points that surfaced among members of the House Republican conference, several Senate Republicans have gone on the record to object in various ways to either the bill's extensive gutting of social safety net programs or — on the other end of the spectrum — the extent to which it will add to the deficit, a Republican sin many in the party have built their brands opposing. At this point, it looks almost inevitable that senators will make changes to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which House Republicans drafted after weeks of intraparty quarrels. That means the House will have to vote on the bill again. Any major shifts could backfire, breaking the delicate balance on which House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) built the bill. Thune can only lose three votes from his caucus and still pass the legislation. Here are four places in which Republicans are likely to have to cut a deal, potentially tweaking just how destructive the final bill is. Several Senate Republicans have been publicly declaring that they are opposed to the ways in which the bill currently cuts social safety net programs, while, in most cases, still suggesting there are some cuts they'd support. Several Republican senators, including Sens. Susan Collins (R-ME), Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) and Josh Hawley (R-MO), have already indicated they won't get behind certain kinds of cuts to Medicaid and other programs, which are widely utilized by their constituents. 'I am not going to vote for Medicaid benefit cuts,' Hawley told reporters in the Senate basement in March. 'Work requirements, I'm totally fine with. But 21% of Missourians either get Medicaid or CHIP so I am not going to vote for benefit cuts for people who I think are qualified.' Sen. Jim Justice (R-WV) has made similar statements, telling reporters on Wednesday that he is ok with freezing the provider taxes House Republicans took up in their bill but not cutting them back. Meanwhile Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL), who recently announced a gubernatorial bid in his state, has said he is opposed to the way in which the legislation cuts Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The House bill includes deep cuts to that program, including a cost-sharing plan that would require states to cover a portion of SNAP benefit costs; the benefits are currently completely covered by the federal government. 'Everybody that's going to be in state government is going to be concerned about it,' Tuberville said, according to Politico. 'I don't know whether we can afford it or not.' In recent days, some Senate Republicans have also indicated that they are exploring ideas to slash what they claim is 'waste, fraud and abuse' in Medicare —- despite President Donald Trump's previous vows to 'love and cherish' the program and promises not to touch it. Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) on Thursday said that Republicans are looking at changes to Medicare, telling The Hill there are 'a number' of reforms he'd like to see to programs maintained by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. 'I think anything that can be — that's waste, fraud and abuse are open to, obviously, discussions,' Thune also told reporters of Medicare. Meanwhile Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-ND) took a stronger stance, saying Republicans shouldn't be afraid of cutting waste from the program. 'Why don't we go after that? I think we should,' Cramer told NBC. 'Some people are afraid of the topics; I'm not,' he added, noting that they would focus on waste, fraud and abuse. That phrase — 'waste, fraud and abuse' — has, of course, become the go-to terminology for Republicans who want to justify their cuts to largely popular programs, despite the fact that rooting out supposed 'waste, fraud and abuse' roughly translates to hidden, hard-for-the-public-to-understand cuts. This new proposal, too, is already stirring some pushback. 'What a terrible idea. We should not be touching Medicare,' Hawley told NBC. Sens. John Curtis (R-UT), Jerry Moran (R-KS), Tillis and Murkowski have warned leadership about provisions of the bill that would gut Biden-era clean energy tax credits passed in the Inflation Reduction Act. The House bill's cuts were largely added to the House bill at the last minute in order to appease House Freedom Caucus members who were threatening to sink the bill on the House floor unless leadership made more cuts. They include plans to repeal residential energy-focused credits and several electric vehicle-related credits — both used by individual taxpayers — as well as almost immediately phasing out the clean electricity production and investment tax credit that aims to boost zero-emission electricity production from industry, utilities and manufacturing. 'I want to make sure that we are making good on the investments that we have made with those tax credits,' Murkowski told reporters in the Senate basement on Wednesday when asked about the tax credits. Meanwhile, Tillis — one of the most vulnerable Republicans in 2026 — on Wednesday indicated he wanted to see negotiations around the requirements and duration for the programs in question. He also specifically called out the foreign entity restrictions House Republicans put in the bill, which experts described to TPM as a 'bad faith' and 'unworkable' provision that Republicans say will prevent nations like China, Iran, North Korea and Russia from having access to the tax subsidies. Tillis described them as 'a big problem.' 'As I understand it, the level of granularity proposed by the House renders the programs inoperative,' Tillis told reporters on his way up to a floor vote. While several Senate Republicans are opposing cuts to programs that are crucial for their states, others, on the other end of the spectrum, are calling for more spending cuts than what are included in the House Republican package. (These Republicans have, lately, found a surprising ally in the president's erstwhile advisor, Elon Musk.) Sens. Rand Paul (R-KY) and Ron Johnson (R-WI) are loudly asking for deeper cuts, saying they are worried about the impact of the megabill on the deficit. 'I refuse to accept $2 trillion-plus deficits as far as the eye can see as the new normal. We have to address that problem, and unfortunately this bill doesn't do so,' Johnson, a member of the Senate Finance Committee, said Wednesday during an ABC News interview. Paul has made a career of libertarian budget hawkery, and is objecting, in particular, to a provision of the bill that raises the debt ceiling, something that must happen this summer in order for the U.S. to avoid default. He has previously indicated he does not believe 'expanding the debt ceiling more than we've ever done it before' is fiscally conservative. 'This will be the greatest increase in the debt ceiling ever, and the GOP owns this now,' Paul told reporters after the House passed their version of the bill.
