Bengaluru stampede: Event organiser moves HC against judicial commission report
In the aftermath of the stampede, the Karnataka government had constituted a judicial commission headed by retired high court judge Justice John Michael D'Cunha.
In his report submitted before the state government earlier this week, Justice D'Cunha's report has blamed the 'reckless' conduct of the organisers, including DNA, RCB, the Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA), and certain police officials for the huge crowd that gathered at the stadium gates and the subsequent stampede.
The commission report has recommended legal action against them for failing to regulate crowd movement and for inadequate planning. However, DNA has now challenged these findings before the high court, arguing that the tragedy was due to the failure of state authorities, particularly the police, in managing the crowd outside the stadium, which it has claimed was 'beyond the scope' of the company's responsibility.
DNA's counsels mentioned the petition on Friday before a bench of Justices Jayant Banerjee and SG Pandit, seeking an urgent hearing and the bench agreed to hear the matter on July 28.
Also Read:Bengaluru stampede: Karnataka HC directs release of RCB's marketing head Nikhil Sosale, others
In its petition, DNA has also alleged serious procedural lapses in the judicial commission's functioning. It has claimed that it was never provided a copy of the report before its contents were 'leaked to the press,' violating principles of natural justice.
'The fact that the impugned Report is leaked to the press but not given to the Petitioner till date makes it clear that the Respondents have acted in a pre-planned manner with a vendetta,' the plea reads.
Further, DNA has accused the Commission of failing to allow its directors to cross examine witnesses, a right guaranteed under the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952.
The company also said that its directors, Venkata Varadhana Thimmaiah and Sunil Mathew, who had appeared before the Commission, and had answered all its questions, realised their statements had been recorded 'inaccurately,' and that their requests to correct these were ignored.
The petition contends that the commission submitted its report in undue haste to deflect blame and pacify public anger. The inquiry, it has claimed, was a mere 'eyewash' intended to scapegoat the company.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
5 hours ago
- NDTV
Uploading Burnt Cash Video Doesnt Mean Process Is Vitiated: Top Court To Justice Verma
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday agreed with Justice Yashwant Varma's submission that the video of burnt wads of currency notes found at his residence should not have been uploaded on the apex court website. However, a bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and A G Masih said just because tapes have been published on the website, it does not mean the process is vitiated and Justice Varma can go "scot-free". The top court said the impeachment proceedings will be held independently in the Parliament, without reference to the in-house report. On the question of delay in approaching the top court, senior advocate Kapil Sibal, arguing for Justice Varma, said a tape was released on the SC website and the judge's reputation was already damaged. "Tape was released. It was already released, my reputation already damaged. What would I come to court for?" Sibal said. Justice Datta remarked, "We are with you on this for the time being. It should not have been done." However, Justice Datta said, "It does not mean that there has been some lapse in the procedure, which affects the powers of the Parliament to take action against you, because Parliament, I need not to say with any emphasis, it has its own powers. "Parliament is not supposed to be guided by what judiciary says or what CJI recommends. They are supposed to act independently and if, at all, Parliament admits the motion and if an inquiry committee is set up, you know who can be the members of the committee. "Do you think those members, people of high calibre, would be influenced by preliminary report where you will have whole opportunity to demolish what are the findings," he said. The top court was hearing Justice Varma's plea seeking invalidation of a report by an in-house inquiry panel which found him guilty of misconduct in the cash discovery matter. The in-house inquiry panel report indicted Justice Varma over the discovery of a huge cache of burnt cash from his official residence during his tenure as a Delhi High Court judge. In an unprecedented move, the top court on Mach 22 uploaded on its website an in-house inquiry report, including photos and videos, into the discovery of a huge stash of cash at the residence of Justice Varma who was then Delhi High Court judge. The report contains photos and videos of the cash discovered at a storeroom at Justice Varma's house during a firefighting operation on the night of Holi, March 14.
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
After HC directives, govt restrains cops from contacting parties, lawyers of pending cases directly
Prayagraj: After the directives and concerns issued by the Allahabad High Court, the Uttar Pradesh govt has issued circular restraining police personnel from directly contacting parties and lawyers in pending matters. The development came when 90-year-old petitioner – Gauri Shankar Saroj of Jaunpur-- alleged that local police personnel had threatened him to withdraw his petition against alleged encroachment of Gram Sabha land. It was further alleged that the police had also raided his house in retaliation. In the circular dated July 25, the state govt issued a comprehensive statewide guideline to prevent police interference in sub-judice (pending) matters. These guidelines strictly prohibit police personnel from contacting petitioners, or their advocates concerned with pending matters without lawful authority and prior sanction from a competent officer or court. Earlier, the high court had taken a serious note of the allegations made by the petitioner. Subsequently, on July 15, the state had sought 10-day time to formulate statewide directions on the issue. During the course of hearing on July 28, the state govt informed the court that it has issued a comprehensive circular in this regard on July 25. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Libas Purple Days Sale Libas Undo Taking the personal affidavit filed by principal secretary (home), UP on record, Justice JJ Munir termed the guidelines as 'commendable'. However, the court also voiced concerns about their implementation. "This court, not without reason, has apprehensions that the guidelines, like many others, would be forgotten in course of time. They would gather dust with the bureaus of district officials, where they are meant to be implemented," the court observed. In this backdrop, the court also directed the additional chief standing counsel to consult state officials and then make suggestions about how to implement these guidelines. The court in its order dated July 28 also took on record an affidavit by the superintendent of police, Jaunpur regarding disciplinary action against the officers allegedly involved in the intimidation of the petitioner and his lawyer. The court has directed to hear this matter on July 31.
Time of India
9 hours ago
- Time of India
Kerala HC junks plea to quash vigilance case related to Kudumbashree Mission fund misappropriation
Kochi: High court has dismissed the petition seeking to quash the vigilance case related to the alleged misappropriation of Rs 2.16 crore allocated by the State Kudumbashree Mission to the High Range Rural Development Society (HRDS), which had been appointed as the project implementing agency (PIA) for projects aimed at supporting underprivileged youth. Justice A Badharudeen dismissed the plea filed by G Sreeraj of Kottarakkara, who was serving as the state programme manager (finance) of Kudumbashree Mission and is the third accused in the case. The prosecution alleged that all three accused — HRDS secretary Aji Krishnan, HRDS employee Praise Pious and Sreeraj — entered into a criminal conspiracy and abused their official positions, thereby misappropriating Rs 2.16 crore out of the Rs 5.63 crore granted by the State Kudumbashree Mission to HRDS for implementing skill development courses and providing placement assistance to economically disadvantaged youth. As programme manager (finance), Sreeraj was responsible for scrutinising financial statements and audit reports submitted by the PIA in connection with the projects. However, he allegedly failed to report the diversion of funds, despite being aware of it, thereby facilitating the misappropriation. In his defence, Sreeraj argued that he was the last in the hierarchy involved in processing fund release requests and that such applications from the PIA were routed through five other senior officers, including director (finance) and chief operating officer, before reaching him. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Undo Rejecting this defence, HC observed that the FIR contains specific allegations against all three accused and held that an effective investigation is necessary. The court ruled that the petition to quash the FIR cannot be entertained at this stage and directed that the investigation proceed.
