
Telecom sector seeks tax break
Listen to article
The Telecom Operators Association has called for addressing several issues including tax exemptions in the upcoming budget for fiscal year 2025-26 for smooth activities of telecom firms.
In a letter sent to the finance minister, the association said that the telecom industry plays a vital role in economic growth, contributing significantly to revenue generation, digital inclusion and employment.
However, several fiscal and policy challenges need to be addressed to ensure sustainable growth and advancement of the sector. In this regard, it has submitted key recommendations for the budget.
The industry has demanded exemption from withholding taxes. Cellular mobile operators (CMOs), as major utility providers, face complex and costly withholding tax compliance due to a large number of transactions subject to income tax deductions under the Income Tax Ordinance (ITO) 2001, including utility bills, sales to corporate customers and imports.
The current withholding tax framework creates significant administrative challenges and negatively impacts business environment in the telecom sector.
To enhance tax compliance efficiency and foster a more business-friendly environment, the telecom industry has proposed extension in exemption from all withholding tax provisions under the ITO 2001.
This will simplify the advance tax payment process, allowing CMOs to make payments of quarterly installments under Section 147 of the ITO. This measure will not result in any revenue loss to the FBR as telecom companies will continue to make quarterly advance tax payments.
Adjustment to withholding tax
The Finance Act 2015 introduced a significant change to Section 153(1)(b) of the ITO 2001, replacing adjustable withholding tax with a minimum tax on services provided by telecom companies and other service providers. This shift has effectively turned income tax from a direct tax into an indirect tax, as the tax payable is no longer tied to actual income but is instead a fixed charge applied uniformly, regardless of profitability.
The 4% minimum tax rate imposed on telecom services is disproportionately high and negatively impacts the profitability of telecom companies, which are already struggling due to discriminatory taxation and financial difficulties.
The administrative burden has also increased, as telecom companies now face the cumbersome task of collecting tax deduction certificates from thousands of corporate customers nationwide. To ease financial difficulties and reduce tax costs, it is recommended that the withholding tax be made adjustable once again.
The companies demanded that taxpayers who comply with their obligations should not be subjected to unfair practices or undue pressure. The telecom association said that actions such as freezing bank accounts or halting business operations by sealing premises should only be undertaken when absolutely necessary and justified. These measures can cause undue disruptions and have adverse effects on the economy. While enforcement powers are necessary to recover due taxes from defaulters, current provisions should address the genuine concerns of compliant taxpayers. It said that recovery powers should distinguish between habitual tax defaulters and genuine taxpayers.
Exaggerated tax demands and forced recoveries undermine the business environment, investor confidence, and foreign direct investment. Recovery proceedings should not be initiated until an appeal has been decided by at least one independent appellate forum, such as the Appellate Tribunal.
The association has urged tax relief for telecom sector employees saying the surge in income tax on employee salaries, coupled with hyperinflation, has made it increasingly difficult for the industry to attract and retain top talent. High income tax burdens, combined with rising inflation, significantly reduce disposable income, making the sector less appealing to skilled workers essential for digital infrastructure and economic growth.
To balance revenue collection with workforce retention, sector-specific tax reforms should be introduced, including inflation-indexed tax brackets, increased exemptions for essential expenses, lower withholding tax rates, and special tax incentives for telecom professionals.
They asked for reduction in income tax and FED rates. The applicable income tax under Section 236 of the ITO 2001 is currently 15%, up from 12.5% via the Finance (Supplementary) Act 2022. Previously, the tax rate was set to decrease to 8% from 2022 onwards.
Additionally, under the Federal Excise Duty (FED) Act 2005, the applicable rate has risen from 16% to 19.5%. Since telecom products are already priced inclusively of taxes, reducing these rates would encourage revenue growth rather than suppress it.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
WHT regime: Finance Bill will introduce major changes
ISLAMABAD: Finance Bill (2025-26) will introduce major changes in withholding tax regime in budget (2025-26) to generate additional revenue. According to sources, the difference of withholding taxes between filers and non-filers would be further widened from next fiscal year. The heavy reliance on withholding taxes would continue in the next fiscal year. The withholding taxes (collected in sales tax mode) constitute over 70 percent of the direct taxes collection. One of the proposals under consideration is to raise tax rate on interest income. Cash withdrawals from banks: FBR proposes raise in WHT for non-filers The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has proposed to raise withholding tax on cash withdrawal from the banks by non-filers from 0.6 percent to 1 to 1.2 percent. Another proposal is to impose 1.5 percent withholding tax on the value of imports. The rates of Withholding Tax on immovable properties are expected to be rationalized in the upcoming budget (2025-26) to facilitate buyers and sellers of real estate sector from July 1 2025. Other proposals under consideration included raise in withholding tax on supplies, services and contracts. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025


Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
Expiry of statutory time limits: ST Department criticised for passing orders
LAHORE: Tax experts have objected to the sales tax department for passing orders after expiry of statutory time limits while treating the tax cases. They are of the view that the departmental proceedings after the expiry become invalid because these time limits are mandatory. They asserted that the specific insertion of time periods through statutory amendments showed a clear legislative intent to make these timelines mandatory. The use of 'shall,' they argued, indicated a mandatory requirement, particularly since no such time limit existed prior to 2000, and its later inclusion was deliberate. The department, on the other hand, believes that the time limits are meant only to ensure speedy proceedings and should not invalidate lawful tax liabilities. Ironically, the department deals with all such time limits as directory, saying that in fiscal laws, especially, such time limits are aimed at efficient and timely tax collection. They contended that the time limits are intended to enforce administrative discipline, not to cancel tax liabilities entirely. According to the departmental sources, the absence of any explicit penalty for missing these deadlines supports their view that the time limits are not mandatory, rather than mandatory. According to the department, the time limits prescribed for passing orders under sections 11(5), 11G, and the former section 36 of the Sales Tax Act are mandatory or merely directory and the use of the term 'shall' in these provisions does not impose a strict legal obligation to adhere to the specified timelines. However, the tax circles are of the considered view that the language of sections 11(5), 11G(2), and section 74 suggests that both uses of 'shall' in the provisions are mandatory, especially when combined with the words 'in no case.' They said that reading the timelines as directory would render critical parts of the statute meaningless. Section 74 does not give FBR unlimited power to extend time. Any extension must be based on objective and reasonable grounds to strike a fair balance between administrative discretion and legal certainty, helping prevent delays, abuse of power, and uncertainty in tax matters. Furthermore, they added that the 2024 amendments retaining the same time structure strongly confirmed Super Asia's interpretation. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025


Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
ST returns filing: PCDMA concerned at FBR's new requirement
KARACHI: The Pakistan Chemical & Dyes Merchants Association (PCDMA) has raised serious concerns about difficulties faced by traders in filing their sales tax returns, following a new requirement introduced by the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR). Through SRO 55(I)/2025, the FBR has made it mandatory for all registered commercial importers, distributors, and wholesalers to declare their stock position in Annexure H1 with every monthly sales tax return. However, PCDMA Chairman Salim Valimuhammad said the lack of clear instructions from the FBR has created unnecessary confusion and hardship. He explained that many traders submitted their March 2025 returns without Annex H1 simply because they didn't understand the process. As a result, they're now unable to declare their opening stock for April, and the delay continues even in June. 'PCDMA has received many complaints from members who are still unable to file their April 2025 returns due to this confusion,' Valimuhammad stated. He added that many traders were forced to go back and forth with the FBR for clarification. Eventually, the FBR allowed revised returns without needing to change Annex A or C or seek commissioner approval—but by then, it was too late for many. To address the issue, PCDMA is urging the FBR to grant traders a 60- to 90-day grace period to submit Annexure H1 after filing their returns. This would be similar to the 120-day window already available to manufacturer-exporters. 'PCDMA believes that such decisions should be made after proper consultation with trade bodies,' Valimuhammad said. He emphasized that timely and clear communication is crucial to ensure compliance and avoid similar problems in the future. PCDMA continues to push for reforms that protect traders' interests and promote smoother tax procedures. The association urges urgent action before more disruptions affect business operations, confidence, and overall revenue collection in the coming months. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025