Federal Reserve's Waller says central bank should cut rates at next meeting
Christopher Waller, a member of the Fed's governing board, said in a speech in New York City that the economy is showing signs of weakening, with consumer spending slowing and job gains cooling. The Fed should reduce borrowing costs to shore up spending and growth before the job market weakens further, Waller said.
'The economy is still growing, but its momentum has slowed significantly,' he said, adding that the slowdown threatens the Fed's goal of maximum employment.
At the same time, President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs are likely to only lift inflation temporarily and aren't a reason to postpone rate cuts, Waller said.
'Tariffs have boosted, and will continue to boost, inflation a bit above the (Fed's) 2% objective this year,' Waller said, but policymakers should 'look through tariff effects and focus on underlying inflation,' which he said is nearing the 2% goal.
Waller has been mentioned as a potential replacement for Powell when the current chair's term expires in May 2026, or perhaps earlier if Trump takes the unprecedented step of firing Powell. Trump has threatened to fire Powell this year but on Wednesday said it was 'highly unlikely' he would take such a step.
For his part, Powell has said the Fed wants to see the impact of the duties on prices and the economy before making any moves.
Waller, a Trump appointee, has previously said that he would support a rate cut in July. Michelle Bowman, also a Trump appointee, has also spoken in favor of a cut.
Minutes to the Fed's June 17-18 meeting said that only 'a couple' of the 19 members of the central bank's interest-rate setting committee supported a cut in July.
Other participants — the minutes didn't say how many — said that the Fed should keep rates unchanged this year, since inflation remains above 2%. Consumer prices rose 2.7% in June from a year ago, the fastest pace in four months.
Other potential replacements for Powell have also publicly expressed support for cutting rates soon, including Kevin Warsh, a former member of the Fed's board who stepped down in 2011. Warsh, currently a fellow at the Hoover Institution, said on Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures' earlier this week that he supported rate cuts.
'The president's right to be frustrated with Jay Powell and the Federal Reserve,' Warsh said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
20 minutes ago
- The Hill
What a GOP bill banning central digital currency means for consumer banking
A proposed GOP ban on a central bank digital currency (CBDC) could pump the brakes on grand visions to reshape electronic payment access around the Federal Reserve. Republican lawmakers pushed the ban through the House on Thursday over concerns the government could use a CBDC to surveil Americans' financial transactions. The banking industry has also lobbied against the currency, arguing the public already has sufficient access to easily usable and safe digital money. 'Nobody yet knows whether a CBDC is a good idea or not,' Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), who has pushed for the government to explore a CBDC, said following the House's vote. 'There is potential for abuse and corruption, but also for extraordinary modernization that could serve unbanked communities, support the primacy of the U.S. dollar, and much more,' he added. Fed floated idea in 2022 white paper In 2022, the Federal Reserve issued a study of CBDCs that outlined their risks and benefits. 'All options for private digital money, including stablecoins and other cryptocurrencies, require mechanisms to reduce liquidity risk and credit risk. But all these mechanisms are imperfect,' the report notes. A traditional bank account is backed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, which guarantees individual deposits up to $250,000 in the event a bank fails. But there are also riskier forms of digital financial services. In 2024, a financial technology company called Synapse collapsed and left customers unable to access some $265 million in deposits. A CBDC, backed with the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, would be the safest possible digital asset. The Fed paper said that a CBDC could make cross-border payments easier and potentially improve access to banking for low-income households. A 2022 study by Himes, the Connecticut Democrat, proposed that CBDCs could be used for depositing paychecks or even be integrated into federal programs like Social Security. A more ambitious version of a CBDC could allow Americans to hold digital dollars at a bank account with the Fed, enabling them to make digital payments without an account at a traditional bank. That could, as the Fed paper noted, 'fundamentally change the structure of the U.S. financial system, altering the roles and responsibilities of the private sector and the central bank.' A government-backed digital dollar — especially one that could bear interest — could also drive consumers away from traditional commercial bank accounts. A CBDC still would require significant study, from the impacts on the banking system to the technology that it would run on. A hypothetical CBDC could use existing technology, or it could be distributed on a blockchain, similar to how Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are issued. In 2022, former Federal Reserve Vice Chair Lael Brainard estimated that it would take ' a long time ' — at least five years, she said — to launch a digital currency if Congress decided to do so. Fed Chair Jerome Powell said in February that the bank would not develop a CBDC under his tenure. His term expires in May 2026. The bill, which now heads to the Senate, would bar the Fed from directly or indirectly issuing a CBDC or studying the issue. Other federal agencies are already barred from studying a CBDC due to a January executive order from President Trump. Republicans cite privacy concerns Privacy is the biggest concern about CBDCs aired by Republican lawmakers. House Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R-Minn.), who led the CBDC ban through the House, said on the floor that a digital dollar would be tantamount to government surveillance. 'It is government-controlled programmable money that, if designed without the privacy protections of cash, this could give the federal government the ability to surveil and restrict Americans' transactions and monitor every aspect of our daily lives,' he said. In contrast to cash, which is essentially untraceable, a CBDC would likely leave a digital record of some form. If the government pursued a CBDC, it would have to balance concerns about privacy with safeguards to curb its use in money laundering or other illegal activities. Many lawmakers have cited China's digital yuan as a worrying example. Tech and China experts, as reported by WIRED, have raised concerns that the Chinese government could use its digital currency to track individual transactions or otherwise scoop up tranches of consumer data. Other Republicans have issued starker warnings about CBDCs. 'CBDC is an existential threat to Western civilization,' Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio) wrote on the social platform X. Banking, crypto lobbies strongly oppose Banking and cryptocurrency lobbying groups are staunchly against a centrally issued digital currency. In a letter to Emmer in April, the American Banking Association argued that Americans already had sufficient access to digital payments. Alongside other digital transfer systems pioneered in the private sector, the Fed launched FedNow, an instant payment system that can operate 24/7, in 2023. Banks have to opt in to using the service, whose major clients include JPMorganChase and Wells Fargo. More broadly, the bank lobby argued that a CBDC would undercut the role banks play in the country's economic system. 'For example, a CBDC would be an advantaged competitor to retail bank deposits that would move money away from banks and into accounts at the Federal Reserve, severely limiting the ability of commercial banks to make loans that power economic growth in communities across the country,' the group wrote. A CBDC could also dampen hopes that cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or privately developed stablecoins — cryptocurrencies whose value is pegged to a reference asset like the U.S. dollar — could become the primary form of digital money. 'You wouldn't need stablecoins; you wouldn't need cryptocurrencies, if you had a digital U.S. currency,' Powell said at a congressional hearing in 2021. 'I think that's one of the stronger arguments in its favor.'
The Hill
20 minutes ago
- The Hill
Himes: White House warning of ‘massive market reaction' if Trump fires Powell
Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.) said Sunday that a White House insider is warning President Trump of a 'massive market reaction' if he fires Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. 'I mean, what happens if there's a tweet that says the Fed chair is gone?' CBS's Margaret Brennan asked Himes on 'Face the Nation.' 'Well, interestingly, inside the White House — and I don't know who it is — my guess is, it's maybe the Treasury secretary — is saying — and this is a very difficult thing to say to a person like Donald Trump — that, if you fire the Fed chair, either illegally, which they're happy to do, or because you trump up some baloney-like charge associated with a renovation of the headquarters, there is going to be a massive market reaction, because you cannot lie to the capital markets,' Himes responded. Trump has recently grasped on to the Federal Reserve's multibillion-dollar makeover as a possible way to finally oust Powell. The president has for months criticized Powell over the Fed's decision not to cut interest rates, a move partly based on uncertainty surrounding Trump's tariffs. Trump has stated his desire to remove Powell, whom he appointed during his last term in the White House. Senate Republicans have recently warned Trump that it would be a large mistake to go forward on his threat to fire Powell, saying it would probably send a 'shock wave' through the financial markets and rattle the larger economy. Republican senators, including those who are strong supporters of the president, have warned that any action to oust Powell would jeopardize the Fed's independence, which could erode investors' confidence in American monetary policy and creditworthiness. 'I do not believe a president, any president, has the authority to fire the Federal Reserve chair,' Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) said previously.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Howard Lutnick Claims Tariffs Will Spark Up to 1.5 GDP Growth
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. During an interview appearance on CBS News' Face the Nation on Sunday, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said President Donald Trump's sweeping new tariffs would drive as much as 1.5 percent gross domestic product (GDP) growth and open hundreds of billions in export opportunities. Lutnick also outlined the administration's timeline for renegotiating major trade deals, challenged European threats of retaliatory tariffs, and accused Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell of inflicting economic pain on Americans through high interest rates. Why It Matters The Trump administration's latest round of tariffs—including a general 10 percent levy on U.S. imports and even higher rates on key trading partners—marks an expansion of trade policy intended to address longstanding U.S. trade deficits. Business and policy analysts have expressed concern about the impact tariffs would have since they're expected to lead to higher prices on imported goods, which could spur inflation and potentially dampen consumer spending. What To Know Lutnick projected that the new tariffs and subsequent trade negotiations could deliver between $300 and $400 billion of opportunity. "That's up to 1.5 percent GDP growth because the president's going to open all these markets up," he told host Margaret Brennan. The commerce secretary added that Trump's tariffs would force countries across the globe to "open their markets" to the U.S., which would allow American businesses to expand and sell overseas. "You should assume that the small countries, the Latin American countries, the Caribbean countries, many countries in Africa, they will have a baseline tariff of 10 percent, and then the bigger economies will either open themselves up or they'll pay a fair tariff to America," Lutnick said. The commerce secretary confirmed that Trump administration's August 1 tariffs deadline remained firm, and most major U.S. trading partners can expect to see a significant rise in their tariff rate. However, Lutnick said the U.S. was still open to negotiations after the deadline passes. "President Trump is going to deliver for the American people. [The] next two weeks are going to be weeks for the record books," he added. Meanwhile, Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, told ABC News on Saturday that he believed tariff revenue could exceed $300 billion by the end of 2025, nearly 1 percent of U.S. GDP. However, he added that "it would not be prudent for lawmakers to count on this revenue in the future." "It is unclear whether the tariffs will remain in place given they may be found to be illegal or future presidents may decide to lower or eliminate them under executive order," Zandi said. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is seen in the East Room of the White House on July 18 in Washington, D.C. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is seen in the East Room of the White House on July 18 in Washington, D.C. Alex Brandon/AP Lutnick Reveals Timeline for Trump Renegotiating USMCA Deal Lutnick told Brennan that Trump intends to renegotiate the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) when the agreement comes up for review. The agreement was signed in 2020 to facilitate trade and stimulate economy and job growth in North America. He added that Trump will begin renegotiating one year from now, with the aim of securing greater market access for U.S. businesses and protecting American manufacturing jobs. "It makes perfect sense for the president to renegotiate it," he said. "He wants to protect American jobs. He doesn't want cars built in Canada or Mexico when they can be built in Michigan and Ohio," Lutnick said. Lutnick Suggests Europe Will Cave Over Tariff Threats to Boeing, Bourbon Lutnick addressed retaliatory threats from Europe targeting American goods during the interview. The European Union (EU) has finalized a list of U.S. goods worth $84 billion, including Boeing aircraft, American cars and bourbon, that they will hit with retaliatory tariffs if the trade war escalates. Lutnick said he was confident the EU would cave and open their market to the U.S. before it got to that point. "The president and the European Union, these are the two biggest trading partners in the world, talking to each other. We'll get a deal done. I am confident we'll get a deal done," he said. Jerome Powell 'Torturing' America, Says Lutnick Lutnick sharply criticized Powell for maintaining high interest rates, which he said costs "us, you and me and the American people, more than $500 billion." "I think he's costing us $700 billion a year by keeping rates too high. It's just wrong. I don't know why he's torturing America this way. Our rates should be lower." He predicted the Fed would be forced to lower rates, making mortgages "so much better off under Donald Trump." What People Are Saying Peter Schiff, chief economist and global strategist for Europac, wrote on X, formerly Twitter, on last month: "Tariffs are not working. The U.S. trade deficit in goods surged to $96.6 billion in May, up 11% from April and 6.5% above expectations. Most problematic was the 5.2% decline in exports. Trump's goal to reduce trade deficits while expanding markets for U.S. exports has backfired." Brad Setser, an economist at the New York City-based Council on Foreign Relations, recently wrote on X: "I am not yet seeing a significant tariff impact on trade in capital goods -- and I do think the ongoing rise in the US deficit here is a problem (capital goods are a sector where the US should be competitive)." Denmark's foreign minister, Lars Løkke Rasmussen, told reporters this week after Brussels suspended its retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods in hopes of reaching a trade deal: "We shouldn't impose countermeasures at this stage, but we should prepare to be ready to use all the tools in the toolbox. So we want a deal, but there's an old saying: 'If you want peace, you have to prepare for war.'" What Happens Next? The full economic and political consequences of the tariffs will likely unfold in the coming months, as the impact on trade balances, job growth, and consumer prices becomes clearer.
