South Africa to invest over R1 trillion in infrastructure over three years
Of the R1.03 trillion to be allocated to public infrastructure, Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana said a total of R402 billion goes towards major allocations to roads, R219.2 billion to energy, as well as R33.7 billion to water and sanitation.
Image: Armand Hough / Independent Newspapers
INVESTING R1 trillion on roads, rail, energy, and water over the next three years demonstrates the government's resolve to change the composition of spending from consumption to investment, says Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana.
The budget document said of the R1.03 trillion to be allocated to public infrastructure, a total of R402 billion goes towards major allocations to roads, R219.2 billion to energy, as well as R33.7 billion on water and sanitation.
Of the R402 billion for transport and logistics, R93.1 billion is for the South African National Roads Agency to keep the 24,000 kilometre national roadwork in active maintenance and rehabilitation.
A total of R53.1 billion was for the maintenance and refurbishment of provincial roads.
'These investments will maintain our extensive road network in good condition allowing easy access and movement of freight and people within the country and beyond,' he said.
He said allocations towards capital payments remained the fastest-growing area of spending by economic classification.
'Public infrastructure spending over three years will exceed the R1 trillion mark. This spending will focus on maintaining and repairing existing infrastructure, building new infrastructure and acquiring equipment and machinery,' he said.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
The infrastructure spend will focus on transport and logistics, energy and water and sanitation.
Godongwana also said R66.3 billion is allocated to the Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (Prasa), with R18.2 billion meant for the rolling stock fleet renewal programme and R12.3 billion is provisionally allocated for the renewal of the signaling system.
'The spending will sustain progress in rebuilding the infrastructure to provide affordable commuter rail services. This will enable Prasa to increase passenger trips from 60 million in 2024/25 to 186m by the end of the Medium Term Expenditure Framework.'
The Minister said the energy sector will invest R219.2 billion on strengthening the electricity supply network, from generation to transmission and distribution.
The water and sanitation sector will spend R156.3 billion on expanding water resource and service infrastructure including dams, bulk infrastructure to service mines and factories.
Godongwana told MPs that the National Treasury continued to implement reforms that will facilitate greater private sector participation in public infrastructure.
The new regulations for public-private partnerships (PPPs) were gazetted earlier this year and will take effect in June.
'The National Treasury has developed enabling guidelines and frameworks to support the new regulations,' said Godongwana, adding that the guidelines and framework will be published in the coming weeks.
The budget documents said a single structure overseen by the National Treasury will be established during 2025/26 to coordinate state participation in project preparation and planning, public-private partnerships (PPPs), funding and credit guarantees.
'It will consolidate two units currently in the Government Technical Advisory Centre that coordinate PPPs and capital appraisals with the Infrastructure Fund in the Development Bank of Southern Africa.'
It also said PPP regulations have been streamlined, reducing approval requirements for projects below R2 billion from June 2025.
'A clear framework is being established to receive and process unsolicited PPP proposals or bids from the private sector. Revised manuals and guidelines on PPPs are being produced and will be made available to the public.'
Cape Times
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
14 minutes ago
- The Citizen
Limpopo DA lays charges over GNT pension crisis
LIMPOPO – On Monday, May 26, the Democratic Alliance (DA) in Limpopo laid criminal charges against the CEO of Great North Transport (GNT) and the Limpopo Economic Development Agency (LEDA), the sole shareholder of GNT. The charges, filed at the Polokwane Police Station, relate to the non-payment of employee pension fund and medical aid contributions. Jacques Smalle, DA Limpopo provincial spokesperson for economic development, environment, and tourism, said LEDA, as the sole shareholder, holds both statutory and fiduciary responsibilities for GNT's financial management. 'The scale of the crisis became clear during an urgent sitting of the Limpopo Portfolio Committee on Economic Development, Environment and Tourism on Friday, May 23,' Smalle explained. 'This meeting, which followed the DA's repeated calls for GNT and LEDA to account, revealed unpaid contributions to three pension schemes totalling R6.78 million and affecting 945 employees. In some cases, employee memberships have already been suspended. If at least R1 million is not paid by the end of May, all memberships could be suspended, potentially resulting in permanent loss of pension benefits.' Smalle attributed the crisis to 'years of corruption, mismanagement, and lack of accountability' at GNT. He added that the company's failure to implement a viable turnaround strategy further deepened its financial troubles. 'The situation at GNT is dire; it has become an unsustainable entity,' Smalle said. 'The charges laid include theft, fraud, and violations of both the Pension Funds Act and the Medical Schemes Act, all of which are criminal offences.' In response to the allegations, Mthunzi Dlamini from LEDA acknowledged the outstanding contributions and said efforts were underway to settle the payments within the week. 'GNT has faced ongoing financial constraints in meeting its obligations,' Dlamini said. 'However, strategic steps have recently been taken, including the procurement of new buses to replace the ageing fleet and the launch of a bus lease programme aimed at increasing operational capacity.' LEDA CEO Thakhani Makhuvha said the LEDA is committed to resolving the issue. 'As the shareholder, LEDA has decided to step in and ensure that all outstanding pension and medical contributions are brought up to date,' Makhuvha said. 'We recognise the severity of the situation and apologise to affected employees. This is deeply regrettable.' At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
TimesLIVE
3 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
GNU ministers spent R200m of taxpayers' money on travelling since taking office
Ministers in the government of national unity (GNU) have spent more than R200m on travel expenses since July last year. This was revealed by ActionSA through its GNU performance tracker after receiving replies to parliamentary questions sent to ministers. This week, the party said Deputy President Paul Mashatile and his staff splurged more than R2m on travel expenses for transport and accommodation since last year. In a written reply, Mashatile said he has been on four international trips - to Ireland, Botswana, Zimbabwe and, recently, Japan. A total of R613,214 was spent on flights, R1,235,569 on accommodation and R410,926 for ground transport for all trips. Other costs included laundry services at R8,033 and R51,393 for restaurant services. ActionSA MP Alan Beesley criticised the spending, calling it 'executive indulgence' and 'wasteful expenditure'. 'This sort of wasteful expenditure, an extension of ANC excess now rebranded under the GNU, has become business as usual for the world's most bloated executive,' Beesley said. 'South Africans deserve leadership that puts people before perks and not a R200m travel spree by the world's largest cabinet.' The sport, arts and culture department's travel expenses have also raised concern. Minister Gayton McKenzie said he and his staff undertook 11 international trips costing more than R2m. R164,556 was paid for a trip to Burkina Faso that never took place. 'Not only is this spending exorbitant, but it is riddled with red flags, gaps and inconsistencies. The public paid for flights and accommodation for an event that was abandoned, a textbook case of wasteful expenditure, as defined by the Public Finance Management Act. 'Unless the minister can demonstrate that this loss was unavoidable and efforts were made to recover the funds, this reflects a serious failure of financial oversight and internal control.' ActionSA has introduced the Enhanced Cut Cabinet Perks Bill to address unchecked government spending. 'This bill seeks to slash ministerial perks and restore much-needed fiscal discipline.'
IOL News
4 hours ago
- IOL News
Why a medical report isn't enough for disability insurance claims
Discover the critical differences between employer medical boarding processes and disability insurance criteria as highlighted by the National Financial Ombud Scheme of South Africa. Learn how these distinctions can impact your disability claims. Image: Motshwari Mofokeng/Independent Newspapers A medical report does not automatically qualify an employee for disability insurance, according to the National Financial Ombud Scheme of South Africa (NFO). It said, while medical reports serve as key evidence, the employer's medical boarding policy may differ significantly from the criteria used by insurers to determine eligibility for disability benefits. The (NFO) describes itself as a single, one-stop, dispute resolution service made up of four former longstanding industry ombud schemes: the Ombudsman for Short-Term Insurance, the Ombudsman for Long-term Insurance; the Credit Ombud and Ombudsman for Banking Services. Services are provided free of charge. According to the NFO, medical evidence forms part of a broader application process that assesses the nature and extent of the disability, as well as the individual's ability to perform their duties, whether in their current occupation or an alternative role. The NFO says it regularly receives complaints from employees who have been dismissed due to incapacity or medically boarded by their employer, but later find their disability claims denied. 'The employee and the employer operate under the assumption that if the employer's doctor has declared the employee disabled for work, the insurer would pay his disability benefit. This is not correct. 'The employer's boarding or incapacity process and an application for disability benefits from an insurer in terms of the policy contract are two distinct processes,' says Denise Gabriels, lead ombud of the Life Insurance Division at the NFO. Gabriels highlighted two cases where employees were medically boarded but had their disability claims declined. In one instance, a Code 14 truck driver suffered vision loss in his right eye, undergoing multiple medical procedures. When he applied for income disability benefits through the group scheme's insurer, his claim was declined as it did not meet the policy's medical criteria. One year later, while still receiving specialist treatment, his employment was terminated due to ill health. His employer did not assist him with the claim process, instead advising him to appeal the insurer's decision. Under the policy terms, the driver needed to be classified as disabled under the Own Occupation clause, which meant he had to be unable to perform duties specific to his job. However, given his profession, the policy automatically referenced Any Occupation, meaning he had to prove that he was unable to perform any other role in the open labour market. Although the insurer acknowledged his inability to drive a heavy-duty truck, they deemed him capable of performing other tasks, including driving a light motor vehicle. His appeal was denied because he could still undertake alternative employment. Meanwhile, his employer terminated his services before the claim was finalised, without considering redeployment to a different role. The NFO stepped in, questioning whether it was reasonable to expect a 57-year-old truck driver with impaired vision to re-enter the labour market. Following further discussions, the insurer reconsidered and approved his claim. 'The NFO asked the insurer to reconsider its decision based on fairness and equity. Following further consideration, the insurer agreed to pay the claim. 'In deciding on disability claims, insurers have a responsibility to be fair and unbiased. The insurer should consider the individual's specific circumstances and attributes when assessing the risk,' Gabriels says. In another case, an underground load driver was medically declared unfit for his job due to a respiratory condition by an Occupational Medical Practitioner (OMP). When his claim for disability benefits was denied, he lodged a complaint with the NFO. His employer had found him unfit for underground work, could not offer an alternative position, and terminated his employment. However, the insurer noted that his respiratory pathology was mild, and while he was deemed unfit for underground tasks, no medical restrictions prevented him from operating the load driver vehicle. Following treatment, his condition improved, and he was no longer on chronic medication. His claim was declined as he did not meet the policy's strict criteria requiring a continuous, permanent, and total inability to work in his own occupation or a suitable alternative. The insurer considered a follow-up assessment that showed his medical condition was stable, his respiratory examination was normal, and his daily function was unaffected. Despite this, the OMP still declared him permanently incapacitated from underground work. His employer, unable to offer surface work, terminated his employment. The NFO ultimately ruled in favour of the insurer, concluding that while he was medically boarded, his medical evidence did not support total disability in terms of the policy. 'The availability of work within the mine and or in the open labour market is not a relevant factor in determining whether a person is disabled in terms of the policy. In this instance, the medical evidence did not support that the complainant was permanently unfit to work as a Load Driver or take up a suitable alternative occupation. 'The NFO could not assist this complainant, and the complaint was therefore dismissed,' Gabriels explained. These cases underscore the critical distinction between employer medical boarding processes and insurance policy criteria. Employees must understand that being medically boarded does not guarantee disability benefits under an insurance policy, she says. Gabriels says insurers assess claims based on contract definitions, which may differ from medical assessments. Alternative employment opportunities may influence claim decisions, even if the individual is unable to perform their current job. Employees should carefully review their policy terms and seek guidance if their claim is denied. With growing concerns over disability claims, the role of ombud schemes like the NFO remains vital in ensuring fairness and accountability in the insurance sector, she says. PERSONAL FINANCE
