'We were invisible': Pride parade attendees celebrate dispute security concerns
Downtown was filled with color as the joy radiating from Indianapolis Pride Parade attendees overshadowed security concerns and political frustrations. Indy Pride estimated 30,000 people attended the parade, according to Indianapolis Fire Marshal, Deputy Chief Michael Beard.
June is Pride Month. Here's how Indy's LGBTQ+ community is celebrating 🌈
Attendees emphasized the importance of empowering everyone to live authentically. "There wasn't any support when we were younger," said Divi Courtney, 42, from southeast Indianapolis. "We were invisible."
Mike Javorsky, 43, wore a corgi named Maple in a backpack as he spoke about the importance of celebrating. He said his role was to be supportive of those who felt less comfortable attending the parade.
Multiple guests said they were hesitant about attending this year's celebration. Celina Watkins, 45, said she was concerned for the group of three teenagers she drove the roughly 50 miles from Greensburg southeast of Indianapolis. If anything happened, she told them, they would leave immediately.
Ten minutes into the parade, she photographed three white men dressed in black shirts and military fatigues who handed out pro-Aryan race pamphlets. They were quiet, she said, and glared at guests watching the parade.
Evan Hart, 21, who woke up at 3 a.m. to carpool from Tell City, said he saw the men carrying a large skull flag. He was concerned for his safety attending this year, but felt law enforcement was on top of everything, including monitoring the three men.
Indianapolis Mayor Joe Hogsett, who has reduced public appearances following backlash over a scandal involving his knowledge of allegations about sexual misconduct, walked the parade route. On June 10, a spokesperson for the city said Hogsett would not be attending a previously scheduled press conference on homelessness, instead replacing it with a virtual briefing by others familiar with his efforts.
The parade began hours before Indianapolis' No Kings Day protest, a national day of protest pushing back on President Donald Trump's actions since taking office. Some guests said the events being on the same day changed how the parade protest felt and they carried anti-Trump items. "No Kings Only Queens," read one sign.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
4 hours ago
- Fox News
DHS pulls funding from groups with ‘alleged terrorist ties' after watchdog report
Print Close By Morgan Phillips Published August 20, 2025 FIRST ON FOX: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is reviewing federal security grants for Muslim groups with "alleged terrorist ties" after a new report linked past funding to "extremist" organizations. According to a DHS document obtained by Fox News Digital, 49 projects "with alleged affiliations to terrorist activities" have already been canceled, a move the department estimates will save $8 million. The review primarily targets funding distributed through FEMA's Nonprofit Security Grant Program (NSGP), which provides aid to churches, mosques, synagogues, and other faith-based institutions facing threats of hate-driven violence. The probe follows a report by the Middle East Forum, a pro-Israel conservative think tank, which claimed that more than $25 million in DHS and FEMA grants went to "terror-linked groups" between 2013 and 2023. COTTON CALLS ON IRS TO PULL MUSLIM ADVOCACY GROUP'S NONPROFIT STATUS A DHS official said the department is conducting its own independent review of funding but added, "We take the results of the MEF report very seriously and are thankful for the work of conservative watchdog groups." The report flagged a $100,000 grant in 2019 to the Dar al-Hijrah mosque in Virginia, which Customs and Border Protection once described as a "mosque operating as a front for Hamas operatives in the U.S.," according to records obtained by the Investigative Project through the Freedom of Information Act. In response to the MEF's findings, DHS is reviewing all current and future contracts to ensure funds are not awarded to such organizations. Officials said the department is also examining ways to recover unspent funds. Funding for fiscal year 2024 has already been allocated. That includes $94 million for 500 Jewish organizations and another $110 million shared among 600 Christian, Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, Sikh and Jewish institutions. For fiscal year 2025, DHS said applicants will face tougher requirements to ensure a "robust" vetting process. "We don't want to be empowering groups that could be causing a threat to our community here in the United States," a DHS official said. The Middle East Forum's report also highlighted specific cases of funding that it claims went to groups with extremist ties. It said $10.3 million had gone to the Islamic Circle of North America, which the forum alleges is tied to the South Asian Islamist movement Jamaat-e-Islami. The report further cited $250,000 awarded to the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), which DHS has accused of having "Hamas ties." Another $750,000, according to the report, went to mosques in Michigan and Texas that DHS described as "outposts for Iran's revolutionary brand of Shi'a Islamism," including the Islamic Center of America and the Islamic House of Wisdom near Detroit, as well as the Islamic Ahlul Bayt Association in Austin. HOUSE COMMITTEE ALLEGES BIDEN ADMIN USED FUNDS TO BACK ANTI-GOVERNMENT PROTESTS IN ISRAEL CAIR told Fox News Digital it has no active federal contracts with DHS. "While our civil rights organization has no active federal grants that the Department could eliminate or cut, and while the government cannot ban American organizations from receiving federal grants based on their religious affiliation or their criticism of Israel's genocide in Gaza," a CAIR spokesperson said, "it's important to note that Kristi Noem's Department of Homeland Security is embarrassing President Trump by making decisions based on the ravings of the Middle East Forum, an Israel First hate website." FEMA has previously worked with CAIR, holding seminars to encourage participation in the NSGP program. CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP But last week, CAIR urged organizations to withdraw from applying for DHS and FEMA grants — including the NSGP — unless DHS drops two new vetting rules. Those provisions require recipients to cooperate with immigration officials and prohibit them from running programs tied to diversity, equity, inclusion, or aid to undocumented immigrants, as well as from engaging in certain "discriminatory prohibited boycotts." Print Close URL
New York Times
13 hours ago
- New York Times
Hong Kong Officials Harden Their Stance on ‘Soft Resistance'
The Hong Kong authorities have a new favorite buzzword: 'soft resistance.' The phrase, which is used to describe anything seen as covertly subversive or insidiously defiant against the government, is showing up in news reports, speeches by top officials, and warnings from government departments. Officials and propaganda organs have warned of the threat of possible 'soft resistance' in a book fair, music lyrics, a U.S. holiday celebration and environmental groups. The term and its widespread official use reflect the political climate of a city that has been transformed since Beijing imposed a national security law in 2020, after quashing mass pro-democracy demonstrations in 2019. Protests disappeared, and the political opposition was largely dismantled by the yearslong crackdown that followed. Now, with such 'hard resistance' held at bay, the authorities appear to be targeting what they see as the next threat: subtler, inconspicuous expressions of discontent. Officials have warned that Hong Kong continues to be threatened by foreign forces, led by the United States, that seek to destabilize Hong Kong in order to block China's rise. To the authorities, 'soft resistance' is nothing short of a national security threat, and at least a dozen senior officials have used the term in recent weeks. Warning signs include messaging that is deemed to be critical of the government or sympathetic to the opposition or to protesters, whom the authorities have described as rioters or terrorists. 'Soft resistance is real and lurks in various places,' John Lee, the city's leader, warned in June. He cited the threat of unspecified forces that 'don't want our country to prosper and become stronger,' saying that such actors had planted agents in Hong Kong to undermine stability. Mr. Lee pointed to what he described as an attempt to turn public opinion in the city against organ donations, after Hong Kong and mainland China started exploring establishing a system for doing so across their border. In 2024, after thousands of people appeared to withdraw from the organ donation system, two people in Hong Kong were sentenced to prison, accused of using fake registrations and cancellations to create the illusion that there was widespread opposition to the system. The term 'soft resistance' is being used so widely that Hong Kong's justice secretary, Paul Lam, felt the need to explain it officially for the first time, in late June. He told local media that it referred to using false or misleading information to incite the public, or to cause people to have a 'wrong understanding' of the government. But he also said that the term was hard to define, and that 'soft resistance' was not necessarily illegal. The phrase was first coined by Beijing's representative to Hong Kong in 2021. It was revived by another high-ranking Beijing official in June, at a celebration of the fifth anniversary of the imposition of the national security law. As part of the term's current resurgence, a major Hong Kong broadcaster aired a series of episodes that repeatedly warned against 'soft resistance,' pointing to perceived threats like a children's book that portrayed the police as wolves. The education secretary said that public schools had been warned against letting teachers and students participate in a U.S. Consulate Independence Day event, over concerns about 'soft resistance.' But even some within the pro-Beijing establishment are expressing concern that the government's campaign risks stifling expression and hurting the economy. Ronny Tong, a prominent legal figure and member of the Executive Council, a top advisory cabinet, said in an interview that the government's response to the U.S. Consulate event appeared to be 'overdoing it a little bit.' He said that even the word 'resistance' was excessive when applied to a minority of people who were unhappy with the government, whom he said should be dealt with using 'soft measures, not strong words.' Prominent business figures with ties to the government say that the repeated emphasis on perceived security threats is undercutting more urgent efforts to attract foreign investment and preserve the city's image as a global hub. 'We, Hong Kong's pro-establishment, must clearly understand what the top priority is — national security or the economy, that's in itself contradictory,' David Tai Chong Lie-A-Cheong, a Hong Kong businessman and a member of an advisory body to Beijing, said in an interview. 'When officials are constantly saying that Hong Kong is not safe, would you invest here?' asked Mr. Lie-A-Cheong, a former chairman of the Hong Kong France Business Partnership, a semiofficial group that promoted trade with France. He said that foreign business groups were having a hard time understanding the direction of Hong Kong's policies. Mr. Lie-A-Cheong described the situation in Hong Kong as 'heart-wrenching' and said: 'As a pro-establishment member for decades, I feel we have failed our jobs.' To businessmen like Lew Mon-hung, who was also in the same advisory body to Beijing, the government should prioritize economic development and improving people's livelihoods. He said that people had complained to him about financial difficulties, as the city's property, retail and service sectors have suffered in recent years. Instead, 'they are focusing on opposing so-called 'soft resistance',' Mr. Lew said. The approach was fueling concerns among Hong Kongers about the future of 'One Country, Two Systems,' he said, citing a policy meant to protect the city's autonomy under Chinese rule, including the freedoms of speech, press and publication. 'Everyone is asking whether they're trying to bring a Cultural Revolution approach to Hong Kong,' he added, referring to a movement in the 1960s and '70s to purge elements deemed disloyal to Communist Party orthodoxy. (Mr. Lew said he himself had fled China during that period by swimming across to Hong Kong, which was then a British colony.) That sense of ideological zeal appeared to be mirrored in Beijing-controlled media in Hong Kong, which have lauded crackdowns on what they portrayed as hidden threats. In July, the Wen Wei Po newspaper published a front-page article that said an independent book fair was 'full of 'soft-resistance' intentions,' pointing to 'anti-China and destabilizing Hong Kong' books at the event. Some even see environmental activism as a potential hotbed of political opposition. The city's development secretary, speaking to the Wen Wei Po in June, said that some criticism of government's moves to dismantle environmental protections, in an effort to reclaim land around the city's iconic Victoria Harbour, could be regarded as 'soft resistance.' She accused one organization, which she did not name, of 'deliberate provocations.' Not long after, a 30-year-old group dedicated to protecting the harbor disbanded.
Time Magazine
a day ago
- Time Magazine
More Than 6,000 Student Visas Revoked By State Department
More than 6,000 student visas have been revoked by the State Department since January as the Trump Administration cracks down on international students and other immigrants to the U.S, the agency says. Around two-thirds of the student visas have been cancelled due to overstays and other alleged law violations, including assault, DUI, and burglary, according to a State Department spokesperson. Roughly 200-300, they said, were revoked for 'support for terrorism' under the Immigration and Nationality Act, which bars foreign-born people from admission to the country for engaging in—or being deemed likely to engage in—'terrorist activities.' The revocations were first reported by Fox News. The Trump Administration has targeted international students and student visa programs as part of its broader efforts to reshape both U.S. higher education and immigration. Students with legal status but without citizenship who participated in pro-Palestinian protests, including those involved in setting up encampments on college campuses, or otherwise showed support for Palestine, have been a particular focus of the Administration. Several, including former Columbia University graduate student Mahmoud Khalil and Tufts University PhD student Rümeysa Öztürk, were arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), with an official pointing to the President's Executive Orders on antisemitism following Khalil's arrest. Others have also been investigated. Foreign-born students have also been the subject of attacks from the federal government's battle with Harvard University, which has refused to cede to Administration demands including altering its diversity, equity, and inclusion practices and changing its hiring practices to include more conservative voices. Amid an escalating pressure campaign, the Administration has sought to revoke the university's ability to enroll international students, halt its federal research grants and funding, and more. A deal between university officials and the Administration is now reportedly being negotiated. Other Administration measures have targeted foreign-born students more broadly. In April, the immigration records of thousands of international students were erased from an information system due in many cases to minor or dismissed legal infractions—temporarily leaving them without legal status in the country—before the government reversed the action later in the month following mass public pressure from students and the court system. Weeks later, the State Department announced in June that new student visa applicants had to make their social media accounts 'public' to open them to review for potential 'hostile attitudes towards our citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles.' 'A U.S. visa is a privilege, not a right,' the June announcement said. 'Every visa adjudication is a national security decision. The United States must be vigilant during the visa issuance process to ensure that those applying for admission into the United States do not intend to harm Americans and our national interests.'
