logo
Zelensky rejects land surrender as US-Russia summit set for Alaska

Zelensky rejects land surrender as US-Russia summit set for Alaska

The Sun2 days ago
KYIV: President Volodymyr Zelensky has firmly stated Ukraine will not surrender territory to Russia in exchange for peace.
The declaration comes after the US and Russia confirmed a summit between Presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in Alaska next week.
Zelensky warned that any peace deal excluding Ukraine would be meaningless and counterproductive.
He stressed that only Ukraine's direct involvement in negotiations could lead to a genuine resolution.
The Ukrainian leader reiterated his stance during a call with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, urging stronger international support.
National security advisors from Western nations met in the UK to coordinate their positions ahead of the Alaska summit.
French President Emmanuel Macron echoed Zelensky's concerns, insisting Ukraine must be central to any peace talks.
US Vice President JD Vance and Ukrainian officials held discussions with UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy on Saturday.
Lammy reaffirmed Britain's unwavering support for Ukraine in achieving a just and lasting peace.
Zelensky emphasised in his nightly address that Russia alone bears responsibility for ending the war.
Previous negotiations between Kyiv and Moscow have failed to yield progress, with both sides far apart on key issues.
The conflict has claimed tens of thousands of lives and displaced millions since Russia's full-scale invasion in 2022.
Putin has repeatedly dismissed ceasefire appeals from Ukraine and its Western allies.
The Russian leader has also ruled out direct talks with Zelensky at this stage.
Ukraine insists a three-way summit including the US is essential for meaningful peace efforts.
The Alaska meeting marks the first face-to-face talks between sitting US and Russian presidents since 2021.
Zelensky noted the summit's remote location, far from the war's devastation in Ukraine.
The Kremlin defended the choice, citing Alaska's geographical and economic significance for both nations.
Russia has invited Trump for a reciprocal visit following the Alaska talks.
Trump and Putin last met in 2019 but have spoken several times since January without securing a breakthrough.
Putin held pre-summit calls with leaders of Brazil, China, and India to consolidate diplomatic support.
Brazilian President Lula reiterated his backing for peaceful dialogue during a 40-minute conversation with Putin.
Trump has imposed tariffs on India over Russian oil purchases to pressure Moscow into negotiations.
Similar threats against China remain unenforced so far.
Meanwhile, fighting continues with both sides exchanging drone strikes overnight.
A civilian bus attack in Kherson killed two and injured 16 on Saturday.
Russian forces claimed control of Yablonovka village in the contested Donetsk region.
Ukrainian officials reported four deaths from Russian shelling in Donetsk by Saturday morning.
Russia's 2022 annexation of four Ukrainian regions remains unrecognised by Kyiv and the West.
Moscow demands Ukrainian withdrawal from these areas and neutrality as peace conditions.
Ukraine refuses to concede sovereignty but acknowledges diplomatic solutions are needed to reclaim lost territory.
The war's toll underscores the urgency of a resolution, yet a viable path remains elusive. - AFP
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wikipedia operator loses court challenge to UK Online Safety Act regulations
Wikipedia operator loses court challenge to UK Online Safety Act regulations

New Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • New Straits Times

Wikipedia operator loses court challenge to UK Online Safety Act regulations

LONDON: The operator of Wikipedia on Monday lost a legal challenge to parts of Britain's Online Safety Act, which sets tough new requirements for online platforms and has been criticised for potentially curtailing free speech. The Wikimedia Foundation took legal action at London's High Court over regulations made under the law, which it said could impose the most stringent category of duties on Wikipedia. The foundation said if it were subject to so-called Category 1 duties – which would require Wikipedia's users' and contributors' identities to be verified – it would need to drastically reduce the number of British users who can access the site. Judge Jeremy Johnson dismissed its case on Monday, but said the Wikimedia Foundation could bring a further challenge if regulator Ofcom "(impermissibly) concludes that Wikipedia is a Category 1 service." He added that his decision "does not give Ofcom and the Secretary of State a green light to implement a regime that would significantly impede Wikipedia's operations." The Wikimedia Foundation said the ruling "does not provide the immediate legal protections for Wikipedia that we hoped for", but welcomed the court's comments emphasising what it said was "the responsibility of Ofcom and the UK government to ensure Wikipedia is protected." Britain's Department for Science, Innovation and Technology welcomed the judgment, which it said "will help us continue our work implementing the Online Safety Act to create a safer online world for everyone." Ofcom said it would "continue to progress our work in relation to categorised services." The Online Safety Act, which became law in 2023 and is being rolled out this year, was criticised earlier this month by social media site X, which said significant changes were needed to the law. Free-speech campaigners and content creators have complained its rules have been implemented too broadly, resulting in the censorship of legal content. The British government says the law is designed to protect children and remove illegal content. Technology Secretary Peter Kyle has said those who wanted to overturn it were "on the side of predators."

Could Trump tariffs become BRICS building blocks?
Could Trump tariffs become BRICS building blocks?

New Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • New Straits Times

Could Trump tariffs become BRICS building blocks?

United States President Donald Trump has the BRICS group of nations directly in his trade war crosshairs, slapping super-high tariffs on imports from Brazil and India, and accusing them of pursuing "anti-American" policies. Washington's relations with Brasilia and New Delhi have sunk to new lows. But this belligerence could backfire. The White House said last Wednesday it would impose an additional 25 per cent tariff on goods from India, citing New Delhi's continued imports of Russian oil. That brings the levy on most goods to 50 per cent, among the highest rate faced by any US trading partner. Brazil also faces 50 per cent tariffs on many of its US-bound exports, not because of trade imbalances, but because of Trump's anger at what he calls a "witch hunt" against his ally, Brazil's former president Jair Bolsonaro, who has been charged with plotting a coup following his election loss in 2022. This breakdown in relations could be Trump's intention: push these countries to the brink so that they'll agree to trade deals that are heavily lopsided in Washington's favour. That strategy seemed to work with Japan and the European Union. But hitting these BRICS economies with eye-watering tariffs could push them closer together, strengthening the resolve of a group that appeared to be losing whatever momentum, purpose and unity it had. The original BRIC nations — Brazil, Russia, India and China — held their first summit in 2009, eight years after former Goldman Sachs economist Jim O'Neill coined the acronym for this group of emerging economies he said would challenge the G7 group of rich countries in the future. South Africa became the "S" in BRICS two years later, and the club now comprises 11 countries including Indonesia, Iran and Saudi Arabia, as well as a further nine "partner" countries, including Malaysia, Nigeria and Thailand. It was always a disparate group — geographically, economically, culturally and politically — meaning its cohesiveness has always been questionable. Its relations have sometimes been rocky, particularly among its largest members. That's why it was so notable when Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi last Wednesday announced that he would visit China for the first time in over seven years. This could be a sign that rising tensions with Washington are helping to thaw frosty ties between New Delhi and Beijing. Also on Wednesday, Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva said he planned to call the leaders of India and China to discuss a joint BRICS response to Trump's tariffs. "I'm going to try to discuss with them about how each one is doing in this situation ... so we can make a decision," said Lula. "It's important to remember that the BRICS have 10 countries at the G20," he added, referring to the group that gathers 20 of the world's biggest economies. While nothing unites like a common enemy, the differences between the BRICS countries could limit how solid that front can actually be. Only 14 per cent of their trade is with each other. Russia and Brazil may have higher levels of intra-BRICS trade, but only nine per cent of China's exports are BRICS-bound, significantly less than the 19 per cent that goes to emerging Asia and 15 per cent destined for the US. And in economic, political and military terms, China matters far more than the others on the global stage. But there are signs that intra-BRICS trade is strengthening. China-Russia trade was a record US$244.8 billion last year, and China and India are the top two buyers of Russian oil. China is Brazil's largest trading partner, accounting for 28 per cent of Brazil's exports and 24 per cent of its imports. Roughly 70 per cent of China's soyabean imports are from Brazil. Trump's tariffs could push BRICS countries closer together in the near term, in areas such as trade, investment and currency usage. They may feel it's in their economic interests and, for some, in their political interests, to present a united front. How long that front can hold is anyone's guess. In the meantime, however, Trump's tariff salvos are BRICS-bound. How these emerging economies respond could be an indication of whether we may truly be seeing a reshuffling of global alliances. The writer is from Reuters

European leaders to meet virtually on Ukraine before call with Trump
European leaders to meet virtually on Ukraine before call with Trump

The Star

time2 hours ago

  • The Star

European leaders to meet virtually on Ukraine before call with Trump

FILE PHOTO: Ukrainian and European flags fly, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in central Kyiv, Ukraine August 11, 2025. REUTERS/Gleb Garanich/File Photo BERLIN (Reuters) -Germany is convening a virtual meeting of European leaders on Wednesday to discuss how to pressure Russia to end the war in Ukraine ahead of a European call with U.S. President Donald Trump, a government spokesperson said on Monday. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and EU and NATO officials are set to join the meeting at 1400 CET (1200 GMT) with the leaders of Germany, Finland, France, Britain, Italy and Poland, the spokesperson said. The calls come ahead of a scheduled meeting between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin on ending the war in Ukraine in Alaska on Friday. Trump has said the parties to the war were close to a deal that could resolve the three-and-a-half-year-old conflict. (Reporting by Sarah Marsh; editing by Matthias Williams)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store