logo
Wikipedia operator loses court challenge to UK Online Safety Act regulations

Wikipedia operator loses court challenge to UK Online Safety Act regulations

LONDON: The operator of Wikipedia on Monday lost a legal challenge to parts of Britain's Online Safety Act, which sets tough new requirements for online platforms and has been criticised for potentially curtailing free speech.
The Wikimedia Foundation took legal action at London's High Court over regulations made under the law, which it said could impose the most stringent category of duties on Wikipedia.
The foundation said if it were subject to so-called Category 1 duties – which would require Wikipedia's users' and contributors' identities to be verified – it would need to drastically reduce the number of British users who can access the site.
Judge Jeremy Johnson dismissed its case on Monday, but said the Wikimedia Foundation could bring a further challenge if regulator Ofcom "(impermissibly) concludes that Wikipedia is a Category 1 service."
He added that his decision "does not give Ofcom and the Secretary of State a green light to implement a regime that would significantly impede Wikipedia's operations."
The Wikimedia Foundation said the ruling "does not provide the immediate legal protections for Wikipedia that we hoped for", but welcomed the court's comments emphasising what it said was "the responsibility of Ofcom and the UK government to ensure Wikipedia is protected."
Britain's Department for Science, Innovation and Technology welcomed the judgment, which it said "will help us continue our work implementing the Online Safety Act to create a safer online world for everyone."
Ofcom said it would "continue to progress our work in relation to categorised services."
The Online Safety Act, which became law in 2023 and is being rolled out this year, was criticised earlier this month by social media site X, which said significant changes were needed to the law.
Free-speech campaigners and content creators have complained its rules have been implemented too broadly, resulting in the censorship of legal content.
The British government says the law is designed to protect children and remove illegal content. Technology Secretary Peter Kyle has said those who wanted to overturn it were "on the side of predators."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

On India's Independence Day, Modi vows to punish Pakistan for future attacks
On India's Independence Day, Modi vows to punish Pakistan for future attacks

The Star

time6 hours ago

  • The Star

On India's Independence Day, Modi vows to punish Pakistan for future attacks

NEW DELHI (AP): Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi warned Pakistan that India will punish its neighbor if there are future attacks on India as he marked 78 years of independence from British colonial rule. Modi's remarks on Friday come three months after nuclear-armed rivals India and Pakistan engaged in four days of intense fighting, their worst clash in decades. Modi addressed the country from New Delhi's 17th-century, Mughal-era Red Fort, saying India has established a "new normal' that does not differentiate between "terrorists' and those who support terrorism. He said he would not tolerate what he called Islamabad's "nuclear blackmail." "India has decided that it will not tolerate nuclear threats. For a long time, nuclear blackmail had been going on, but this blackmail will not be tolerated now,' Modi said. There was no immediate response from Pakistan to Modi's remarks. Pakistan has previously rejected India's statements about nuclear blackmail as provocative and inflammatory. However, Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Thursday announced the creation of a new "Army Rocket Force Command' to bolster the country's defense capabilities. Sharif made this announcement during a speech marking Independence Day celebrations, but gave no further details. India celebrates its Independence Day one day after Pakistan. The two states came into existence as a result of the bloody partition of British India in 1947. The process sparked some of the worst communal violence the world has seen and left hundreds of thousands dead. It triggered one of the largest human migrations in history and some 12 million people fled their homes. India and Pakistan exchanged tit-for-tat military strikes in May that brought them to the brink of war. The fighting between the two countries was sparked by an April massacre by gunmen in Indian-controlled Kashmir that killed 26 people, mostly Hindu tourists. India blamed the attack on Pakistan-backed militants. Islamabad denied responsibility while calling for a neutral investigation. Days after the massacre, India launched strikes on Pakistan and said it had hit nine "terrorist infrastructure' sites. "Terror infrastructure was turned to rubble,' Modi said in his speech Friday. Pakistan responded by sending waves of drones into India, as well as missile and artillery bombardments. Dozens of people were killed on both sides until a ceasefire was reached May 10 after U.S. mediation. Pakistan immediately claimed it shot down six Indian aircraft during the clashes, including a French-made Rafale fighter. India acknowledged some losses but did not provide details. Last week, India's air force chief said India shot down five Pakistani fighter jets and one other military aircraft during clashes in the first such public claim by India. Pakistan rejected it, saying both sides should open their aircraft inventories to independent verification. During his Friday speech, Modi also hinted India would continue its unilateral suspension of the Indus Water Treaty. The treaty, which India suspended after the April massacre, allows the sharing of the Indus River that runs about 2,897 kilometers (1,800 miles) through South Asia and is a lifeline for both countries. "Rivers from India were irrigating the lands of enemies while my country's farmers and land faced a deficiency of water," Modi said. "India has now decided that blood and water will not flow together." Pakistan has said any effort by India to stop or divert the water from flowing into Pakistan would be considered an "act of war.' Modi did not directly mention US President Donald Trump's tariffs on India in his Independence Day speech, but said he would not compromise on the agriculture sector, one of the main sticking points in trade negotiations with the US. Earlier this month, Trump imposed a 25% penalty on India in addition to 25% tariffs for buying oil and weapons from Russia. India has resisted US pressure to open its markets to some farm products as Modi's government is unwilling to risk angering farmers, who are a powerful voting bloc. "India will not compromise on the interests of farmers," he said. Modi claimed India's demography was being changed as part of a "conspiracy' through illegal migration and announced what he called a "high-powered demographic mission' to tackle the problem. He did not provide further details. "No nation in the world can hand over itself to infiltrators,' he said. Modi's ruling Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party has repeatedly described the influx of illegal immigrants from Bangladesh as a "national security crisis' and claimed that unchecked Muslim infiltration from the country is leading to a demographic shift in India. In recent months, Indian officials have conducted what they call a verification drive, which they say is intended to identify immigrants lacking legal status. Many people, most of them Muslim, have been detained or expelled to neighboring Bangladesh. - AP

UK councillor acquitted over 'cut all their throats' speech
UK councillor acquitted over 'cut all their throats' speech

The Star

time6 hours ago

  • The Star

UK councillor acquitted over 'cut all their throats' speech

FILE PHOTO: Ricky Jones attends an anti-racism protest in Walthamstow, London, Britain, August 7, 2024. REUTERS/Catarina Demony/File Photo LONDON (Reuters) -A British councillor was on Friday acquitted of encouraging violent disorder for saying far-right activists should have their throats cut amid riots last year, drawing claims from right-wing politicians of a hypocritical "two-tier" justice system. Ricky Jones made the comments at a counter-protest in London after three girls were murdered in the north English town of Southport and was suspended by the ruling Labour party. Misinformation on social media said the teenager who committed the murders at a Taylor Swift-themed dance event was an Islamist migrant, fuelling days of violent riots including attacks on mosques and hotels housing asylum seekers. Jones, 58, was cleared by a jury following a trial at Snaresbrook Crown Court. He had made the remarks to a crowd gathered near an immigration advice centre in London after reports that far-right supporters were planning a protest. "They are disgusting Nazi fascists ... We need to cut all their throats and get rid of them all," he said, running a finger across his throat. Jones gave evidence that he did not intend his words to be taken literally and said his comments referred to far-right stickers with hidden razor blades found on a train. Right-wing politicians and activists said his case was an example of how Britain had an unfair police and justice system, with those who voice concerns about immigration treated differently to those who support liberal or left-wing causes. They contrasted Jones' treatment with that of Lucy Connolly, the wife of a Conservative councillor who was jailed for 31 months for inciting racial hatred for a post urging mass deportation of migrants and the burning of their hotels. Unlike Jones, she had pleaded guilty to the offence. Chris Philp, the opposition Conservative Party's home affairs spokesperson, said on X: "The development of two-tier justice is becoming increasingly alarming." Zia Yusuf, from the populist right-wing Reform UK party which is leading in opinion polls, also compared Jones' acquittal to Connolly's sentence. Prime Minister Keir Starmer was labelled "two-tier Keir" by some opponents last summer after claims some ethnic groups were policed more leniently than others, a suggestion that has been rejected by senior ministers, police chiefs and prosecutors. (Reporting by Sam Tobin; Editing by Andrew Cawthorne)

Jimmy Lai's Hong Kong security trial delayed again over health issues
Jimmy Lai's Hong Kong security trial delayed again over health issues

The Sun

time13 hours ago

  • The Sun

Jimmy Lai's Hong Kong security trial delayed again over health issues

HONG KONG: The high-profile national security trial of media mogul Jimmy Lai faced another delay on Friday due to the 77-year-old's health concerns. Lai, founder of the now-defunct Apple Daily, requires a heart monitoring device before proceedings can resume. This marks the second postponement this week after bad weather earlier suspended court sessions. Defence lawyer Robert Pang revealed Lai experienced palpitations and a sensation of collapsing but stressed his client wished to avoid focusing on his condition. Lai has been detained since December 2020, with reports indicating solitary confinement and ongoing welfare concerns. Pang told AFP the defence requested Lai's exemption from attending closing arguments as he isn't required to speak. '(Lai) believes the episodes will occur when he is fatigued, and coming to court fatigues him,' Pang explained in court. Judge Esther Toh assured Lai could voice discomfort without disrupting proceedings. Medical staff found no heart abnormalities but arranged a wearable monitor and medication as a precaution. Judge Alex Li deemed it prudent to adjourn until Monday pending medical arrangements. The trial, ongoing since December 2023, has drawn international condemnation as Lai faces life imprisonment for foreign collusion charges. He additionally faces sedition charges over 161 opinion pieces published under his name. The Committee to Protect Journalists stated 'the world is watching how Hong Kong treats its journalists'. Former US President Donald Trump claimed on Fox News he previously discussed Lai's case with China's Xi Jinping. Hong Kong authorities rejected what they called external interference in the judicial process. Lai's British citizenship has prompted his son Sebastien to urge UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer to intervene. During testimony spanning 50 days, Lai repeatedly declared himself a 'political prisoner', drawing judicial reprimands. Prosecutors presented evidence alleging Lai's influence networks in the US, UK and Taiwan. Lai denied advocating sanctions or separatism against China and Hong Kong. Apple Daily shuttered in 2021 following police raids and staff arrests. A former employee outside court described Lai as a caring boss with deteriorating health but resilient spirit. 'His health worsened after he was taken into custody, but I think his spirit is strong, and I hope he can persist,' the employee told AFP. - AFP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store