Durham Council staff 'wanting to leave or retire' after Reform UK threats about jobs
Liberal Democrat Mark Wilkes suggested that comments made by the party nationally and locally have jeopardised officers' roles.
It comes after Nigel Farage previously said council staff working on diversity or climate change initiatives should be 'seeking alternative careers' after Reform UK took control of Durham council.
Cllr Wilkes also criticised the party's messaging around its recent decision to remove diversity training for all councillors after members refused participation.
He told a Durham County Council scrutiny committee: 'If you're a sane person, would you feel comfortable at all working for an organisation where the political leadership might appear to be anti-staff? Even if they're not, that might be what it appears to be.
'If you are somebody with a protected characteristic - perhaps a disability or from a minority background- would you want to come and work at Durham County Council right now when you see that kind of narrative in the press?
'I have heard of staff already wanting to leave or retire early.'
Reform said councillors were not legally required to take diversity, equality and inclusion training, and dismissed Cllr Wilkes' concerns as "utter nonsense".
Recommended reading:
Thousands of vulnerable residents face impact of proposed council tax changes
Bishop Auckland STACK venue to progress after funding lifeline
Speeding concerns on County Durham road are 'ignored' by council, MPs say
In May, Mr Farage warned council staff working on diversity or climate change initiatives to seek 'alternative careers' after the party took control of the local authority. The local authority is believed to have just 1.8 full-time-equivalent diversity roles, which are connected to duties required by law.
Durham County Council was urged to maintain its roll of 'quality' workers across several council departments to help deliver cost-effective services. Cllr Wilkes said: 'You can't have a well-functioning council, and you can't make savings, if you don't have quality staff.'
The opposition councillor's plea was supported by Reform's John Cook, chair of the corporate overview and scrutiny management board, who said: 'I agree. This should be a great place to work and our community should be a great place to live.'
Meanwhile, the party's deputy leader, Darren Grimes, added: 'He claims, without a shred of evidence, that staff are 'wanting to leave'. This is pure political scaremongering.
'Let me be clear: there is no statistically significant change. The mass exodus he imagines exists only in his alarmist fantasies.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Starmer pays tribute after death of ex-Labour general secretary Tom Sawyer
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has led tributes following the death of former Labour Party general secretary Lord Tom Sawyer. He said the former trade unionist's 'place in our party's history is assured' as one of the leading figures in the build-up to the 1997 general election success. Lord Sawyer had been one of the key figures in the New Labour era and was credited with helping to steer through the reforms to the party in the run-up to Tony Blair's landslide win. Sir Keir said: 'I am deeply sorry to hear of the death of Tom Sawyer. From the factory floor to the House of Lords, he was driven throughout his life by an unrelenting belief in the dignity of working people and opportunity for all. 'As a trade unionist, he drove that mission forward. As general secretary of the Labour Party, he was integral to delivering the victory in 1997 that transformed the nation. 'His place in our party's history is assured and his loss will be felt deeply by the many people who admired and loved him. 'My thoughts are with his family at this time.' Lord Sawyer served as Labour's general secretary from 1994 until 1998 when he stood down and was made a peer as Lord Sawyer of Darlington. Before becoming Labour's general secretary he served as deputy general secretary of the National Union of Public Employees and deputy general secretary of Unison. Labour's current general secretary Hollie Ridley said: 'Lord Tom Sawyer served the Labour Party and Labour movement with distinction. 'As general secretary, member of the National Executive Committee and as a trade unionist, he played a significant role in the transformation of our party from years in opposition before leading Labour through the 1997 landslide general election victory. 'Tom's legacy is the legacy of those great Labour governments that rebuilt Britain's public services, lifted millions out of poverty and delivered change to the lives of people throughout his beloved north east of England. 'On behalf of the whole Labour Party, I send my deepest condolences to his family, friends and all those who were close to him.'
CNN
18 minutes ago
- CNN
Analysis: Information is power, and Trump wants more control over it
Climate change reports, deleted. DEI initiatives, banned. Local TV and radio stations, defunded. Books, removed from military academies. Names of civil rights leaders, erased from ships. History lessons, purged from museums. The list goes on and on. President Trump and his government appointees keep asserting more control over ideas and information — which has the effect of taking power away from independent researchers, historians, and the real news outlets that he frequently calls 'fake.' Friday's abrupt firing of the labor statistics chief is one of the most dramatic examples yet. But this push for control has been evident all throughout his second term — and the individual headlines should be analyzed as part of a pattern, lest the memories start to fade. Remember the headlines about vaccine data being deleted from government websites last winter? Or the bogus math on DOGE's 'receipts' page? How about the 'Friday night purge' of impartial watchdogs investigating abuse within the government? 'Trump increasingly is playing the role of information gatekeeper,' Clay Calvert of the American Enterprise Institute wrote a prophetic blog post back in February. Calvert said Trump was 'dictating access on his terms' – promoting MAGA media outlets while punishing The Associated Press for not adopting Trump's 'Gulf of America' name. That AP dispute was about control over information. So, too, was the Trump White House's decision to purge a database of transcripts documenting his announcements and public appearances. The president has also objected to unflattering stories by lodging legal threats against news outlets. In one recent case, he followed through with a defamation lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal, which analysts said could have a chilling effect on reporting writ large. The White House has framed some of its most aggressive rewrites and removals as common-sense corrections. 'Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History' was the title of one such executive order in March. Another move to shut down a reliable source of information, the US-funded international broadcaster known as Voice of America, was framed by the administration as a way to curtail 'radical propaganda.' One of the alleged examples was a six-year-old news report 'about transgender migrants seeking asylum in the United States.' Every administration tries to shape reality to some degree. But 'Trump's statistical purges have been faster and more sweeping — picking off not just select factoids but entire troves of public information,' the Washington Post asserted in March. One glaring example involves the National Climate Assessment, a congressionally mandated report on climate change. The authors of the assessment were fired and previous versions 'have been hidden from view on government websites,' as CNN's Zachary B. Wolf wrote last week. Trump's dispute with the Bureau of Labor Statistics further raises the stakes — and the alarms about creeping authoritarianism. 'Suppressing statisticians is a time-honored tool for leaders trying to solidify their power and stifle dissent,' George Stephanopoulos said on ABC's 'This Week' on Sunday. 'It's happened throughout history, most recently in Venezuela and Turkey.' His guest, Lawrence Summers, the former treasury secretary, said that 'firing statisticians goes with threatening the heads of newspapers. It goes with launching assaults on universities. It goes with launching assaults on law firms.' 'This is really scary stuff,' Summers added. Yet some Trump aides and allies are publicly defending the firing. National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett said Monday morning on CNBC that the jobs data 'could be politically manipulated.' This battle for control isn't happening in a vacuum. There is evidence that media scrutiny and public pressure do make a difference. Back in March, the Associated Press revealed that an anti-DEI crusade at the Pentagon led to images of war heroes, women, minorities and even the famed Enola Gay warplane being flagged for removal. The embarrassing episode forced Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's aides into a defensive crouch. Similarly, just last week, the Washington Post reported on the Smithsonian removing Trump's name from an impeachment exhibit at the National Museum of American History. The whiff of scandal was so overwhelming that the museum issued a statement on Saturday denying any White House pressure and pledging to update the exhibit in the coming weeks.
CNN
20 minutes ago
- CNN
Analysis: Information is power, and Trump wants more control over it
Climate change reports, deleted. DEI initiatives, banned. Local TV and radio stations, defunded. Books, removed from military academies. Names of civil rights leaders, erased from ships. History lessons, purged from museums. The list goes on and on. President Trump and his government appointees keep asserting more control over ideas and information — which has the effect of taking power away from independent researchers, historians, and the real news outlets that he frequently calls 'fake.' Friday's abrupt firing of the labor statistics chief is one of the most dramatic examples yet. But this push for control has been evident all throughout his second term — and the individual headlines should be analyzed as part of a pattern, lest the memories start to fade. Remember the headlines about vaccine data being deleted from government websites last winter? Or the bogus math on DOGE's 'receipts' page? How about the 'Friday night purge' of impartial watchdogs investigating abuse within the government? 'Trump increasingly is playing the role of information gatekeeper,' Clay Calvert of the American Enterprise Institute wrote a prophetic blog post back in February. Calvert said Trump was 'dictating access on his terms' – promoting MAGA media outlets while punishing The Associated Press for not adopting Trump's 'Gulf of America' name. That AP dispute was about control over information. So, too, was the Trump White House's decision to purge a database of transcripts documenting his announcements and public appearances. The president has also objected to unflattering stories by lodging legal threats against news outlets. In one recent case, he followed through with a defamation lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal, which analysts said could have a chilling effect on reporting writ large. The White House has framed some of its most aggressive rewrites and removals as common-sense corrections. 'Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History' was the title of one such executive order in March. Another move to shut down a reliable source of information, the US-funded international broadcaster known as Voice of America, was framed by the administration as a way to curtail 'radical propaganda.' One of the alleged examples was a six-year-old news report 'about transgender migrants seeking asylum in the United States.' Every administration tries to shape reality to some degree. But 'Trump's statistical purges have been faster and more sweeping — picking off not just select factoids but entire troves of public information,' the Washington Post asserted in March. One glaring example involves the National Climate Assessment, a congressionally mandated report on climate change. The authors of the assessment were fired and previous versions 'have been hidden from view on government websites,' as CNN's Zachary B. Wolf wrote last week. Trump's dispute with the Bureau of Labor Statistics further raises the stakes — and the alarms about creeping authoritarianism. 'Suppressing statisticians is a time-honored tool for leaders trying to solidify their power and stifle dissent,' George Stephanopoulos said on ABC's 'This Week' on Sunday. 'It's happened throughout history, most recently in Venezuela and Turkey.' His guest, Lawrence Summers, the former treasury secretary, said that 'firing statisticians goes with threatening the heads of newspapers. It goes with launching assaults on universities. It goes with launching assaults on law firms.' 'This is really scary stuff,' Summers added. Yet some Trump aides and allies are publicly defending the firing. National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett said Monday morning on CNBC that the jobs data 'could be politically manipulated.' This battle for control isn't happening in a vacuum. There is evidence that media scrutiny and public pressure do make a difference. Back in March, the Associated Press revealed that an anti-DEI crusade at the Pentagon led to images of war heroes, women, minorities and even the famed Enola Gay warplane being flagged for removal. The embarrassing episode forced Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's aides into a defensive crouch. Similarly, just last week, the Washington Post reported on the Smithsonian removing Trump's name from an impeachment exhibit at the National Museum of American History. The whiff of scandal was so overwhelming that the museum issued a statement on Saturday denying any White House pressure and pledging to update the exhibit in the coming weeks.
