Indian authorities in Kashmir ban books by eminent writers and scholars
The ban threatens people with prison time for selling or owning works by authors such as Booker Prize-winning novelist and activist Arundhati Roy, constitutional expert A.G. Noorani, and noted academicians and historians like Sumantra Bose, Christopher Snedden and Victoria Schofield.
The order was issued on Tuesday by the region's Home Department, which is under the direct control of Lt Gov Manoj Sinha, New Delhi's top administrator in Kashmir.
Sinha wields substantial power in the region as the national government's representative, while elected officials run a largely powerless government that came to power last year after the first local election since India stripped the disputed region of its special status in 2019.
The order declared the 25 books "forfeit' under India's new criminal code of 2023, effectively banning the works from circulation, possession and access within the Himalayan region. Various elements of the code threaten prison terms of three years, seven years or even life for offenses related to forfeit media, although no one has yet been jailed under them.
"The identified 25 books have been found to excite secessionism and endangering sovereignty and integrity of India,' the Home Department said in its notice. It said such books played "a critical role in misguiding the youth, glorifying terrorism and inciting violence against Indian State.'
The action was taken following "investigations and credible intelligence' about "systemic dissemination of false narratives and secessionist literature' that was "often disguised as historical or political commentary,' it said.
Nuclear-armed rivals India and Pakistan each administer part of Kashmir, but both claim the territory in its entirety.
A pedestrian walks past a book cart along a roadside in Srinagar on Aug 7. Photo: AFP
Militants in the Indian-controlled portion of Kashmir have been fighting New Delhi's rule since 1989. Many Muslim Kashmiris support the rebels' goal of uniting the territory, either under Pakistani rule or as an independent country.
India insists the Kashmir militancy is Pakistan-sponsored terrorism. Pakistan denies the charge, and many Kashmiris consider it a legitimate freedom struggle. Tens of thousands of civilians, rebels and government forces have been killed in the conflict.
Since 2019, authorities have increasingly criminalized dissent and shown no tolerance for any narrative that questions India's sovereignty over Kashmir.
In February, police raided bookstores and seized hundreds of books linked to a major Islamic organization in the region.
In 2011, police filed charges against Kashmir education officials over a textbook for first graders that illustrated the word "tyrant' with a sketch resembling a police official. A year earlier to that, police arrested a college lecturer on charges he gave his students an English exam filled with questions attacking a crackdown on demonstrations challenging Indian rule in the region.
In some cases, the accused were freed after police questioning but most of these cases have lingered on in India's notoriously slow judicial system.
The order declared the 25 books 'forfeit' under India's new criminal code of 2023, effectively banning the works from circulation, possession and access within the Himalayan region. Photo: AP
Mirwaiz Umar Farooq, a key resistance leader in Kashmir, condemned the book ban.
"Banning books by scholars and reputed historians will not erase historical facts and the repertoire of lived memories of people of Kashmir,' Mirwaiz said in a statement. He questioned authorities for organizing an ongoing book festival to showcase its literary commitment but on ground banning some books.
"It only exposes the insecurities and limited understanding of those behind such authoritarian actions, and the contradiction in proudly hosting the ongoing Book Festival.'
Banning books is not common in India, but authorities under Prime Minister Narendra Modi have increasingly raided independent media houses, jailed journalists and sought to re-write history in school and university textbooks to promote the Hindu nationalist vision of his ruling Bharatiya Janata Party.
Meanwhile, curriculums related to Muslim Mughal rulers who ruled much of India between sixteenth and nineteenth centuries have been altered or removed.
Last year, An Indian court ended decades-old ban on Salman Rushdie's The Satanic Verses owing to absence of any official order that had banned the book in 1988. - AP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Trump's sweeping tariffs on dozens of countries take effect; Myanmar and Laos among the worst hit at 40%
People walk past fresh produce at a street market in Yangon on August 4, 2025. Myanmar was hit with a 40% tariff on imports by the United States. - Photo: Sai Aung MAIN / AFP WASHINGTON (dpa): US President Donald Trump's tariffs on imports from around 70 countries and the European Union went into force on Thursday, including a whopping 50% on Brazilian imports, 39% on Switzerland and 35% on Canada. In a Truth Social post shortly before they went into effect, Trump wrote: "BILLIONS OF DOLLARS, LARGELY FROM COUNTRIES THAT HAVE TAKEN ADVANTAGE OF THE UNITED STATES FOR MANY YEARS, LAUGHING ALL THE WAY, WILL START FLOWING INTO THE USA." Trump has defended his aggressive trade stance by citing persistent deficits, which he claims pose a national security threat. Framing the issue as an emergency, he argues the tariffs will shield US businesses and revive domestic manufacturing. The measures are now being challenged in US courts. Since the start of his second term, Trump has targeted virtually every country with the threat of higher duties, including close allies. The tariffs have often been revised, delayed or scrapped altogether, and used as leverage to push countries into striking bilateral deals with Washington. Also among the slew of countries worst hit are South Africa (30%), Laos and Myanmar (40%), and war-ravaged Syria (41%). The European Union's 27 member states must now pay a 15% levy, down from the 30% Trump initially threatened following a last-minute deal with the European Commission. Critics of the deal said the commission had settled for a compromise that, while less severe than initially threatened, still clearly favours the US. In addition to the 15%, the EU promised Trump that it would buy US energy worth $750 billion by the end of his term. According to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, US liquefied natural gas, oil, and nuclear fuels will fill the gaps left by the complete phase-out of Russian gas and oil. The commission also announced that $600 billion in European investment is expected to flow into the US, citing private-sector interest. But officials clarified these are not government commitments, and no company names or figures were disclosed. Other countries, including Britain and Japan, recently reached separate trade agreements with the US to avoid steeper penalties. Attention now turns to Washington and Beijing, as the world's two largest economies near the expiration of their 90-day tariff truce next Tuesday. Both sides have threatened to slap import duties of over 100% on each other if talks collapse. India, already hit with a 25% levy on Thursday, is bracing for that rate to double by month's end.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
India presses for global ‘code of conduct' on pilot poaching
NEW DELHI: India wants countries to agree a new code of conduct on hiring each other's airline staff after raising concerns that its fast-growing aviation system is being stifled by the poaching of Indian pilots and cabin crew without adequate notice. India, one of the world's fastest-growing aviation markets, is wrestling with a shortage of experienced pilots, denting Prime Minister Narendra Modi's aspiration of developing a job-creating global aviation hub. The recent fatal crash of an Air India jetliner has sparked tighter scrutiny of the sector. But foreign airlines are repeatedly hiring skilled staff from Indian airlines, 'adversely impacting India's ability to develop its civil aviation sector in an orderly manner,' India said in an Aug 1 working paper submitted to the UN's aviation agency, the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO). 'Airlines from other (countries) tend to recruit experienced pilots, engineers, technicians, and cabin crew from Indian carriers, preventing India's civil aviation sector from achieving planned and orderly growth,' India wrote in the paper, without identifying any foreign airline by name. 'This practice creates a vicious cycle where Indian carriers are forced to continuously recruit and train replacement personnel by diverting resources from expansion activities and operational improvements.' The paper was released on the ICAO website ahead of its triennial assembly. It has not previously been reported. India's Civil Aviation Ministry was not immediately available for comment. India's government said in April the country would need 30,000 pilots over the next 15–20 years, up from the current 6,000–7,000, as airlines collectively had more than 1,700 aircraft on order. India's domestic aviation sector is led by IndiGo and Air India, while all major international airlines from Emirates to British Airways to Lufthansa operate regular flights. In 2023, Air India exchanged barbs with Akasa Air over the poaching of pilots domestically. The working paper asks for the creation of a code of conduct on the movement of skilled aviation workers among ICAO's member countries. It doesn't specify how the code of conduct would work. – Reuters
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Trump tariffs on buyers of Russian oil raise global risks
WASHINGTON: From punishing Brazil to trying to curb imports of fentanyl, US President Donald Trump has wielded the threat of tariffs as an all-purpose foreign policy weapon. With a Friday deadline for Russia to agree to peace in Ukraine or have its oil customers face secondary tariffs, Trump has found a novel, but risky, use for his favourite trade tool. The administration took a step towards punishing Moscow's customers on Wed-nesday, imposing an additional 25% tariff on goods from India over its imports of Russian oil, marking the first financial penalty aimed at Russia in Trump's second term. No order has been signed for China, the top Russian oil importer, but a White House official said on Wednesday, secondary measures that Trump has threatened against countries buying the petroleum were expected on Friday. These are the latest in a string of Trump's tariff threats on non-trade issues such as pressing Denmark to give the US control of Greenland, attempting to stop fentanyl deliveries from Mexico and Canada, and penalising Brazil over what he described as a 'witch hunt' against former President Jair Bolsonaro. While secondary tariffs could inflict pain on the Russian economy – severing a top source of funding for Russian President Vladimir Putin's war effort – they also carry costs for Trump. Oil prices will likely rise, creating political problems for him before next year's US midterm congressional elections. The tariffs would also complicate the administration's efforts to secure trade deals with China and India. For his part, Putin has signalled that Russia is prepared to weather any new economic hardship imposed by the US and its allies. There is 'close to zero chance' Putin will agree to a ceasefire due to Trump's threats of tariffs and sanctions on Russia, said Eugene Rumer, a former US intelligence analyst for Russia who directs the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace's Russia and Eurasia Programme. 'Theoretically if you cut off Indian and Chinese purchases of oil that would be a very heavy blow to the Russian economy and to the war effort. But that isn't going to happen,' he said, adding that the Chinese have signaled they will keep buying Russia's oil. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The Russian embassy in Washington did not immediately respond. Secondary tariffs would hurt Russia, the world's second leading oil exporter. The West has pressured Russia since late 2022 with a price cap on its oil exports, intended to erode Russia's ability to fund the war. That cap has piled costs on Russia as it forced it to reroute oil exports from Europe to India and China, which have been able to import huge amounts of it at discounted prices. But the cap also kept oil flowing to global markets. In an early sign that Putin hopes to avoid the tariffs, the White House said that Putin and Trump could meet as soon as next week, following a meeting between US envoy Steve Witkoff and the Russian leader on Wednesday. But some analysts are skeptical that Moscow is ready to stop the war. Brett Bruen, former foreign policy adviser for former president Barack Obama now head of the Global Situation Room consultancy, cautioned that Putin has found ways to evade sanctions and other economic penalties. And even if tariffs and sanctions cut into Russia's revenues, Putin is not under much domestic pressure. Secondary tariffs, Bruen said, could start to cause some economic pain. 'But the question is whether that really changes Putin's behaviour.' The tariffs could also create new problems for the Trump administration as it pursues sweeping trade deals, especially with India and China. Kimberly Donovan, a former US Treasury official, said the tariffs could hamper the US bilateral and trade relationships with India and China. 'You've got two major oil importers that can kind of dig in their heels and push back, knowing what the US needs out of them,' said Donovan, now director of the Economic Statecraft Initiative in the Atlantic Council's GeoEconomics Centre. China has demonstrated leverage over the US by cutting off mineral exports and new tariffs would upset a delicate balance negotiated since May to restart those flows critical to a host of US industries. India has leverage over generic pharmaceutical exports and precursor chemicals to the US. Both countries say that oil purchases are a sovereign matter and contend that they are playing by the previous rules, namely the price cap on Russian crude. Secondary tariffs would raise the cost of imports into the US of products from Russia's customers, giving them an incentive to buy their oil elsewhere. Squeezing the shipments risks spiking fuel prices and inflation around the world that could pose political difficulties for Trump. The month after Moscow's February 2022 invasion, fears of disruptions from Russia pushed international crude prices close to US$130 per barrel, not far from their all-time high of US$147. If India were to stop buying 1.7 million barrels per day of Russian crude, about 2% of global supply, world prices would jump from the current US$66, analysts said. JP Morgan analysts said this month it was 'impossible' to sanction Russian oil without triggering a price jump. Any perceived disruptions to Russian shipments could propel Brent oil prices into the US$80s or higher. Despite Trump's statements that US producers would step in, it would be unable to quickly ramp up, they said. Russia could retaliate, including closing the CPC Pipeline from Kazakhstan, which could create a global supply crisis. Western oil firms Exxon, Chevron, Shell , ENI and TotalEnergies ship up to 1 million barrels per day via CPC, which has total capacity of 1.7 million bpd. Cullen Hendrix, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, said energy shocks are never welcome, especially not amidst a softening housing market and weak job growth. A key question is whether Trump can frame any economic pain as necessary to force Russia to negotiate. – Reuters
