logo
Trump thinks owning a piece of Intel would be a good deal for the US. Here's what to know

Trump thinks owning a piece of Intel would be a good deal for the US. Here's what to know

Yahooa day ago
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — President Donald Trump wants the U.S. government to own a piece of Intel, less than two weeks after demanding the Silicon Valley pioneer dump the CEO that was hired to turn around the slumping chipmaker. If the goal is realized, the investment would deepen the Trump administration's involvement in the computer industry as the president ramps up the pressure for more U.S. companies to manufacture products domestically instead of relying on overseas suppliers.
What's happening?
The Trump administration is in talks to secure a 10% stake in Intel in exchange for converting government grants that were pledged to Intel under President Joe Biden. If the deal is completed, the U.S. government would become one of Intel's largest shareholders and blur the traditional lines separating the public sector and private sector in a country that remains the world's largest economy.
Why would Trump do this?
In his second term, Trump has been leveraging his power to reprogram the operations of major computer chip companies. The administration is requiring Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices, two companies whose chips are helping to power the craze around artificial intelligence, to pay a 15% commission on their sales of chips in China in exchange for export licenses.
Trump's interest in Intel is also being driven by his desire to boost chip production in the U.S., which has been a focal point of the trade war that he has been waging throughout the world. By lessening the country's dependence on chips manufactured overseas, the president believes the U.S. will be better positioned to maintain its technological lead on China in the race to create artificial intelligence.
Didn't Trump want Intel's CEO to quit?
That's what the president said August 7 in an unequivocal post calling for Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to resign less than five months after the Santa Clara, California, company hired him. The demand was triggered by reports raising national security concerns about Tan's past investments in Chinese tech companies while he was a venture capitalist. But Trump backed off after Tan professed his allegiance to the U.S. in a public letter to Intel employees and went to the White House to meet with the president, who applauded the Intel CEO for having an 'amazing story.'
Why would Intel do a deal?
The company isn't commenting about the possibility of the U.S. government becoming a major shareholder, but Intel may have little choice because it is currently dealing from a position of weakness. After enjoying decades of growth while its processors powered the personal computer boom, the company fell into a slump after missing the shift to the mobile computing era unleashed by the iPhone's 2007 debut.
Intel has fallen even farther behind in recent years during an artificial intelligence craze that has been a boon for Nvidia and AMD. The company lost nearly $19 billion last year and another $3.7 billion in the first six months of this year, prompting Tan to undertake a cost-cutting spree. By the end of this year, Tan expects Intel to have about 75,000 workers, a 25% reduction from the end of last year.
Would this deal be unusual?
Although rare, it's not unprecedented for the U.S. government to become a significant shareholder in a prominent company. One of the most notable instances occurred during the Great Recession in 2008 when the government injected nearly $50 billion into General Motors in return for a roughly 60% stake in the automaker at a time it was on the verge of bankruptcy. The government ended up with a roughly $10 billion loss after it sold its stock in GM.
Would the government run Intel?
U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told CNBC during a Tuesday interview that the government has no intention of meddling in Intel's business, and will have its hands tied by holding non-voting shares in the company. But some analysts wonder if the Trump administration's financial ties to Intel might prod more companies looking to curry favor with the president to increase their orders for the company's chips.
What government grants does Intel receive?
Intel was among the biggest beneficiaries of the Biden administration's CHIPS and Science Act, but it hasn't been able to revive its fortunes while falling behind on construction projects spawned by the program.
The company has received about $2.2 billion of the $7.8 billion pledged under the incentives program — money that Lutnick derided as a 'giveaway' that would better serve U.S. taxpayers if it's turned into Intel stock. 'We think America should get the benefit of the bargain,' Lutnick told CNBC. 'It's obvious that it's the right move to make.'
Michael Liedtke, The Associated Press
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

"This Reads Like A Satirical Cartoon": People Are Mocking This Trump Voter Who Claims To "Understand" Tariffs But Doesn't Get Why Prices Are Rising
"This Reads Like A Satirical Cartoon": People Are Mocking This Trump Voter Who Claims To "Understand" Tariffs But Doesn't Get Why Prices Are Rising

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

"This Reads Like A Satirical Cartoon": People Are Mocking This Trump Voter Who Claims To "Understand" Tariffs But Doesn't Get Why Prices Are Rising

Another day, another confused Trump voter! On today's edition, we've got a MAGA supporter who supposedly understands tariffs but can't imagine why costs are rising. In a social media screenshot posted to r/LeopardsAteMyFace, this person wrote, "Trump i voted for him,now that being said I understand the tarrifs,but what good are they doing to help us? Everything is going up i thought one reason to elect him as president was for things to be cheaper I haven't seen it,Everything is going up i know the government is making more money but its us I'm worried PLEASE!" The Trump voter seemingly edited the post with an update, writing, "OK I understand now just last time he was in office it seemed like right a way fuel was cheaper. Thanks all of you!" Related: Economists widely agree that Donald Trump's tariffs will likely result in rising costs, with many companies such as Walmart and Procter & Gamble already confirming the reasons behind their recent price hikes. Sooo I'm not sure if this Trump supporter really does understand now! Naturally, people had a lot to say in the comments: "Here let me explain using cookies: You voted for a fascist because you thought he would give other people's cookies to you, but now he's taking your cookies and telling you to go fuck yourself. Hope this helps." —u/Apple-Dust Related: "These fools will never get that tariffs are just a type of tax." —u/Gadshill "It's a sales tax with extra steps." —u/GoodDog_GoodBook123 "Why is water wet? Trump said water was dry, but every time I take a shower, I get wet? Is this something the transgender Democrats are doing? Can we arrest them? Is this from the Deep State?" —u/rwblue4u "Any Trumper who tells you they 'get' or 'understand' tariffs is lying." —u/Glenn-Sturgis Related: "This reads like a satirical cartoon. 'I understand exactly how an extra tax works, but why am I suddenly paying more?? And I could've sworn prices were cheaper last time he was in power and was working with Obama's economy… explain please??'" —u/Revolutionary-Ad5695 "The bizarre disconnect we're all going to continue to see from Trump voters on the tariffs issue is so frustrating. These bozos believed that foreign governments pay our tariffs because Trump told them this. They argued with Kamala Harris supporters at the time, despite the fact that this is Econ 101. They never believe they have ANY responsibility at all. They don't believe they're expected to research the issues, learn anything new, or verify any of the information they're being given, before they adopt it as their new mantra." "The biggest frustration is the fact that they're being continually misled and never, ever learn from it. There'll be a new lie tomorrow to cover up yesterday's lie, and they'll regurgitate it perfectly, without ever feeling any embarrassment or personal responsibility." —u/Longstroke_Machine "'Last time he was in office seemed like right away fuel was cheaper.' There was a pandemic, everything was closed, and demand for fuel cratered. I'm not sure why they all have amnesia about that part while remembering the cheap gas. They sure made enough noise about it at the time." —u/WintersChild79 Related: "'I understand now.' Lord knows what Rumpelstiltskin gold was spun on that thread with those geniuses." —u/ThatsRobToYou And finally, "Yeah. We tried to explain this beforehand, but he didn't understand since he only speaks Republican." —u/Jocelyn-1973 What do you think about all this? LMK in the comments below! Note: Some responses have been edited for length and/or clarity. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:

Intel: BofA breaks down pros and cons of a potential U.S. government stake
Intel: BofA breaks down pros and cons of a potential U.S. government stake

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Intel: BofA breaks down pros and cons of a potential U.S. government stake

-- Bank of America analysts said Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) stock is likely to remain 'range-bound until there is clarity around the company's manufacturing progress, especially 18A process yields and external customer engagement/validation.' The firm reiterated its Neutral rating and $25 price target on the stock. In a note Thursday, the bank highlighted the recent media reports that suggest the U.S. government may convert its prior funding into a 10% non-voting equity stake in Intel. BofA estimated the stake would be worth $11 billion, in line with the $10.9 billion in earlier support. Analysts wrote that the 'positive of such a move could be to promote INTC's U.S.-based manufacturing as a way for new and existing fabless customers to expand their made-in-the-U.S. presence.' Still, BofA warned of several drawbacks. A government stake could mean '10% dilution of existing common shareholders without any additional near-term benefits,' renewed pressure to restart construction projects like its Ohio fabs, and 'likely higher scrutiny of/pushback from customers in China that accounted for ~29% of INTC total sales in FY24.' The analysts were also cautious on other new investors. While Softbank's $2 billion strategic investment signals interest through its Stargate initiative, BofA said it is 'not a game-changer,' noting that Softbank (OTC:SFTBY) and its affiliates already engage with Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA), AMD (NASDAQ:AMD), and Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO). Ultimately, BofA said Intel's outlook 'invariably comes down to its manufacturing competitiveness.' The key questions remain whether Intel's 18A process can deliver competitive yields, attract external customers, and provide a bridge to its next-generation 14A node. Related articles Intel: BofA breaks down pros and cons of a potential U.S. government stake UBS sees buy opportunity in Microsoft as pricing changes boost cloud revenues Who benefits the most from rate cuts?

Google says a typical AI text prompt only uses 5 drops of water — experts say that's misleading
Google says a typical AI text prompt only uses 5 drops of water — experts say that's misleading

The Verge

time10 minutes ago

  • The Verge

Google says a typical AI text prompt only uses 5 drops of water — experts say that's misleading

Amid a fierce debate about the environmental toll of artificial intelligence, Google released a new study that says its Gemini AI assistant only uses a minimal amount of water and energy for each text prompt. But experts say that the tech giant's claims are misleading. Google estimates that a median Gemini text prompt uses up about five drops of water, or 0.26 milliliters, and about as much electricity as watching TV for less than nine seconds, roughly 0.24 watt-hours (Wh), which produces around 0.03 grams of carbon dioxide emissions. Google's estimates are lower than previous research on water- and energy-intensive data centers that undergird generative AI models. That's due in part to improvements in efficiency that the company has made over the past year. But Google also left out key data points in its study, leading to an incomplete understanding of Gemini's environmental impact, experts tell The Verge. 'They're just hiding the critical information.' 'They're just hiding the critical information,' says Shaolei Ren, an associate professor of electrical and computer engineering at the University of California, Riverside. 'This really spreads the wrong message to the world.' Ren has studied the water consumption and air pollution associated with AI, and is one of the authors of a paper Google mentions in its Gemini study. A big issue experts flagged is that Google omits indirect water use in its estimates. Its study included water that data centers use in cooling systems to keep servers from overheating. Those cooling systems have sparked concerns for years about how data centers might exacerbate water shortages in drought-prone regions. Now, attention is shifting to how much more electricity data centers might need to accommodate new AI models. Growing electricity demand has triggered a spate of new plans to build gas and nuclear power plants, which also consume water in their own cooling systems and to turn turbines using steam. In fact, a majority of the water a data center consumes stems from its electricity use — which Google overlooks in this study. As a result, with Google's water estimate, 'You only see the tip of the iceberg, basically,' says Alex de Vries-Gao, founder of the website Digiconomist and a PhD candidate at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Institute for Environmental Studies who has studied the energy demand of data centers used for cryptomining and AI. Google left out another important metric when it comes to power consumption and pollution. The paper shares only a 'market-based' measure of carbon emissions, which takes into account commitments a company makes to support renewable energy growth on power grids. A more holistic approach would be to also include a 'location-based' measure of carbon emissions, which considers the impact that a data center has wherever it operates by taking into account the current mix of clean and dirty energy of the local power grid. Location-based emissions are typically higher than market-based emissions, and offer more insight into a company's local environmental impact. 'This is the groundtruth,' Ren says. Both Ren and de Vries-Gao say that Google should have included the location-based metric, following internationally recognized standards set by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. Google's paper cites previous research conducted by Ren and de Vries-Gao and argues that it can provide a more accurate representation of environmental impact than other studies based on modeling that lack first-party data. But Ren and de Vries-Gao say that Google is making an apples-to-oranges comparison. Previous work was based on averages rather than the median that Google uses, and Ren faults Google for not sharing numbers (word count or tokens for text prompts) for how it arrived at the median. The company writes that it bases its estimates on a median prompt to prevent outliers that use inordinately more energy from skewing outcomes. 'You only see the tip of the iceberg, basically.' When it comes to calculating water consumption, Google says its finding of .26ml of water per text prompt is 'orders of magnitude less than previous estimates' that reached as high as 50ml in Ren's research. That's a misleading comparison, Ren contends, again because the paper Ren co-authored takes into account a data center's total direct and indirect water consumption. Google has yet to submit its new paper for peer review, although spokesperson Mara Harris said in an email that it's open to doing so in the future. The company declined to respond on the record to a list of other questions from The Verge. But the study and accompanying blogs say that Google wants to be more transparent about the water consumption, energy use, and carbon emissions of its AI chatbot and offer more standardized parameters for how to measure environmental impact. The company claims that it goes further than previous studies by factoring in the energy used by idling machines and supporting infrastructure at a data center, like cooling systems. 'While we're proud of the innovation behind our efficiency gains so far, we're committed to continuing substantial improvements in the years ahead,' Amin Vahdat, VP/GM of AI & Infrastructure for Google Cloud, and Jeff Dean, chief scientist of Google DeepMind and Google Research, say in a blog. Google claims to have significantly improved the energy efficiency of a Gemini text prompt between May 2024 and May 2025, achieving a 33x reduction in electricity consumption per prompt. The company says that the carbon footprint of a median prompt fell by 44x over the same time period. Those gains also explain why Google's estimates are far lower now than studies from previous years. Zoom out, however, and the real picture is more grim. Efficiency gains can still lead to more pollution and more resources being used overall — an unfortunate phenomenon known as Jevons paradox. Google's so-called 'ambitions-based carbon emissions' grew 11 percent last year and 51 percent since 2019 as the company continues to aggressively pursue AI, according to its latest sustainability report. (The report also notes that Google started excluding certain categories of greenhouse gas emissions from its climate goals this year, which it says are 'peripheral' or out of the company's direct control.) 'If you look at the total numbers that Google is posting, it's actually really bad,' de Vries-Gao says. When it comes to the estimates it released today on Gemini, 'this is not telling the complete story.' Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Justine Calma Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All AI Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Analysis Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Energy Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Environment Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Google Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Report Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Science Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Tech

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store