Gananoque pushes back on strong mayor powers
In a town where each council voice still matters, Gananoque has sent a clear message to Queen's Park: keep your Strong Mayor Powers.
At its April 15 meeting, Gananoque council passed a motion asking the provincial government to exempt the town from the expansion of legislation that grants additional authority to mayors – powers that could allow them to veto council decisions, craft budgets independently, and fast-track provincial priorities.
The motion passed 5-1, with one councillor, Patrick Kirkby, abstaining. Only Mayor John Beddows stood in opposition.
These strong mayor powers, introduced under the Ontario Municipal Act and expanded by Premier Doug Ford's government, are part of a broader effort to streamline decision-making and accelerate housing development in Ontario's growing communities. But in Gananoque – a town of just over 5,000 – councillors say the move chips away at the essence of small-town governance: collaboration, conversation, and consensus.
'Knowing you run, you represent the public, we have conversations, make points, then the mayor turns around and vetoes it,' said Coun. Anne-Marie Koiner. 'I fear for the staff, with the anxiety that will be brought on by this.'
Deputy Mayor Vicki Leakey, who seconded the motion, was blunt: 'It's a mark against democracy when the province starts messing with the power of elected councils. I don't understand how this is going to help us.'
The motion, introduced by Coun. David Osmond, reflects a rising discomfort among smaller municipalities that fear being swept up in one-size-fits-all provincial policy. In Gananoque, where community decisions are made around a modest table in Town Hall, councillors are wary of a future where a single elected official could wield outsized authority.
But not everyone on council sees it that way.
'We all knew this was coming,' said Mayor John Beddows, the lone dissenting vote. 'The intent of the Conservative Party to extend strong mayor powers was clear and available to anyone.'
Beddows supports the powers, noting they reinforce the mayor's role under the Act as the CEO of the municipality and head of council.
'This is not something I oppose,' he said. 'But it's not something that should be taken lightly.'
Keith Dempsey is a Local Journalism Initiative reporter who works out of the Brockville Recorder and Times. The Local Journalism Initiative is funded by the Government of Canada.(Catch up on what is happening throughout Eastern Ontario with our Midday Roundup.
Click here to sign up for the free newsletter
, which will be delivered to your inbox every weekday.)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
DOJ: Trump can abolish protected monuments set aside by past presidents
President Trump can abolish national monuments that were protected from energy development and other activities by past presidents, the Justice Department (DOJ) has determined. The department issued a legal opinion this week that Trump can shrink or eliminate national monuments, overturning a 1938 opinion saying presidents did not have the power to abolish them. 'The Antiquities Act of 1906 permits a President to alter a prior declaration of a national monument, including by finding that the 'landmarks,' 'structures,' or 'objects' identified in the prior declaration either never were or no longer are deserving of the Act's Protections,' the new DOJ opinion states. While this opinion does not in itself overturn any national monument boundaries, it sets the stage for doing so in the future. The document specifically names two national monuments set aside by the Biden administration, the Chuckwalla National Monument and the Sáttítla Highlands National Monument. These monuments, located in California, encompass a combined 848,000 acres of particular significance to Native American tribes in the region. The White House told The Washington Post that it planned to eliminate them after saying in a later-scrubbed fact sheet that it was 'terminating proclamations declaring nearly a million acres constitute new national monuments that lock up vast amounts of land.' President Trump has, in the past, sought to shrink monuments designated by past presidents, including Utah's Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante monuments. The legal opinion issued Tuesday said the prior 1938 opinion, named for monument Castle Pinckney, made reducing the size of those monuments more complicated. 'The ongoing existence of Castle Pinckney has needlessly complicated litigation challenging the President's authority to alter the declarations of his predecessors,' it stated. 'Following President Trump's 2017 decision to substantially reduce but not eliminate the Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monuments, the parties spent considerable resources litigating whether those actions should be considered revocations … in no small part because Castle Pinckney opined that reduction but not elimination of a parcel was permissible.' Environmental advocates criticized the new opinion. 'The Trump administration can come to whatever conclusion it likes, but the courts have upheld monuments established under the Antiquities Act for over a century. This opinion is just that, an opinion. It does not mean presidents can legally shrink or eliminate monuments at will,' Jennifer Rokala, executive director of The Center for Western Priorities, said in a written statement. 'Once again the Trump administration finds itself on the wrong side of history and at odds with Western voters,' she added. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
The Hill
7 hours ago
- The Hill
DOJ: Trump can abolish protected monuments set aside by past presidents
President Trump can abolish national monuments that were protected from energy development and other activities by past presidents, the Justice Department has determined. The department issued a legal opinion this week that Trump can shrink or eliminate national monuments, overturning 1938 opinion saying that presidents did not have this power. 'The Antiquities Act of 1906 permits a President to alter a prior declaration of a national monument, including by finding that the 'landmarks,' 'structures,' or 'objects' identified in the prior declaration either never were or no longer are deserving of the Act's Protections,' the new DOJ opinion states. While this opinion does not in itself overturn any national monument boundaries, it sets the stage for doing so in the future. The document specifically names two national monuments set aside by the Biden administration, the Chuckwalla and the Sáttítla Highlands National Monuments. These monuments, located in California, encompass a combined 848,000 acres of particular significance to Native American tribes in the region. The White House told The Washington Post that it planned to eliminate them after saying in a later-scrubbed fact sheet that it was 'terminating proclamations declaring nearly a million acres constitute new national monuments that lock up vast amounts of land.' President Trump has, in the past, sought to shrink monuments designated by past presidents, including Utah's Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante monuments. The legal opinion issued Tuesday said that the prior 1938 opinion, named for monument Castle Pinckney, made reducing the size of those monuments more complicated. 'The ongoing existence of Castle Pinckney has needlessly complicated litigation challenging the President's authority to alter the declarations of his predecessors,' it stated. 'Following President Trump's 2017 decision to substantially reduce but not eliminate the Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monuments, the parties spent considerable resources litigating whether those actions should be considered revocations…in no small part because Castle Pinckney opined that reduction but not elimination of a parcel was permissible.' Environmental advocates criticized the new opinion. 'The Trump administration can come to whatever conclusion it likes, but the courts have upheld monuments established under the Antiquities Act for over a century. This opinion is just that, an opinion. It does not mean presidents can legally shrink or eliminate monuments at will,' said Jennifer Rokala, executive director of The Center for Western Priorities, in a written statement. 'Once again the Trump administration finds itself on the wrong side of history and at odds with Western voters,' she added.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Former council leader returns to top job
A former leader of Walsall Council has returned to the position, a year after he resigned from the role. Mike Bird stepped down from leading the Conservative-run council in June 2024 after being suspended from the party. The new leader was confirmed on Tuesday after councillor Garry Perry, who succeeded Bird as leader, resigned himself from the role over what he described as "a campaign of political attrition, deliberate undermining and personal hostility". Bird said the council had been through "turbulent times" in recent weeks and thanked Perry at the meeting. Bird, who represents Pheasey Park Farm, has led Walsall Council six times. "We must unite as a council no matter what political party you are," he told councillors. "Tonight I feel like the osprey that has returned back to its nest and I am very grateful for that." The Conservatives have a majority on Walsall Council with 37 elected councillors. Perry resigned with immediate effect on 21 May, saying the borough deserved better "than the behaviour it is currently being subjected to behind closed doors." In his statement, he added: "I have been subjected to a sustained campaign of political attrition, deliberate undermining and personal hostility — not because of failure or wrongdoing but because I refused to play the game of patronage and self-preservation." Councillors welcomed Bird back to the chamber. Councillor Aftab Nawaz, leader of the Walsall independent group, said: "The way you were removed from council was an affront to democracy in this chamber. "We had people from outside deciding who would [run] this council and that is never good." Councillor Matt Ward, leader of the Labour group, asked Bird if he would investigate the "serious allegations" around bullying made by Perry. The new leader said: "I will speak to Garry, I have no knowledge of where his bullying came from, it certainly wasn't from me." The Conservative Party has been approached for a response. Follow BBC Black Country on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram. Council leader resigns over 'political attrition' Council leader suspended by Tories after disciplinary Conservative councillors must unite - new leader Walsall Council
