logo
Former council leader returns to top job

Former council leader returns to top job

Yahooa day ago

A former leader of Walsall Council has returned to the position, a year after he resigned from the role.
Mike Bird stepped down from leading the Conservative-run council in June 2024 after being suspended from the party.
The new leader was confirmed on Tuesday after councillor Garry Perry, who succeeded Bird as leader, resigned himself from the role over what he described as "a campaign of political attrition, deliberate undermining and personal hostility".
Bird said the council had been through "turbulent times" in recent weeks and thanked Perry at the meeting.
Bird, who represents Pheasey Park Farm, has led Walsall Council six times.
"We must unite as a council no matter what political party you are," he told councillors.
"Tonight I feel like the osprey that has returned back to its nest and I am very grateful for that."
The Conservatives have a majority on Walsall Council with 37 elected councillors.
Perry resigned with immediate effect on 21 May, saying the borough deserved better "than the behaviour it is currently being subjected to behind closed doors."
In his statement, he added: "I have been subjected to a sustained campaign of political attrition, deliberate undermining and personal hostility — not because of failure or wrongdoing but because I refused to play the game of patronage and self-preservation."
Councillors welcomed Bird back to the chamber.
Councillor Aftab Nawaz, leader of the Walsall independent group, said: "The way you were removed from council was an affront to democracy in this chamber.
"We had people from outside deciding who would [run] this council and that is never good."
Councillor Matt Ward, leader of the Labour group, asked Bird if he would investigate the "serious allegations" around bullying made by Perry.
The new leader said: "I will speak to Garry, I have no knowledge of where his bullying came from, it certainly wasn't from me."
The Conservative Party has been approached for a response.
Follow BBC Black Country on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Council leader resigns over 'political attrition'
Council leader suspended by Tories after disciplinary
Conservative councillors must unite - new leader
Walsall Council

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

House Republicans spar with Democratic governors in tense immigration hearing
House Republicans spar with Democratic governors in tense immigration hearing

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

House Republicans spar with Democratic governors in tense immigration hearing

House Republicans clashed with three Democratic governors over immigration policies during a testy hearing Thursday that served as a broader forum for one of President Donald Trump's landmark issues amid the breakout of anti-deportation protests in California and around the country. Over the course of an hourslong hearing convened by the House Oversight Committee on so-called sanctuary state policies, Republican lawmakers repeatedly accused those three blue-state leaders — Govs. Kathy Hochul of New York, JB Pritzker of Illinois and Tim Walz of Minnesota — of bearing responsibility for the deaths and abuse of people who were killed or assaulted by immigrants who entered the U.S. illegally. The three governors defended themselves, frequently and forcefully pointing out that immigration enforcement is a federal responsibility — not a state one — and at times suggested that Republicans on the panel were creating a political spectacle to impress Trump. House Democrats led the criticism of Trump directly, with some calling him a 'gangster' or a 'dictator' and others lambasting his decision to deploy National Guard troops and U.S. Marines to Los Angeles to maintain control of protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids. Conservatives have said sanctuary laws refer to policies that prevent local authorities from being compelled to participate in federal immigration enforcement. Trump has in his second term signed multiple executive orders that target such cities and states, including one that withholds federal funds. The hearing got off to a hostile start, with Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., the panel's chair, kicking off his opening statement by declaring that the three governors — as well as other Democratic leaders — were running 'sanctuary cities and states' that were 'siding with illegal aliens.' Rep. Stephen Lynch, D-Mass., the ranking Democrat on the committee, hit back in his own opening statement by comparing several recent ICE actions to moves conducted by the 'Gestapo' — referring to the secret police in Nazi Germany. During a particularly tense exchange, Rep. Byron Donalds, R-Fla., asked Hochul, 'Do you go along with the strategy from the Biden administration, which massively expanded immigration protocols that overwhelmed your city and overwhelmed your state?' 'We call for secure borders,' Hochul interjected, prompting Donalds to retort, 'I never remember you calling for secure borders at all, governor.' 'You're putting a federal problem on our laps. And know what? It gets old after a while,' Hochul responded. 'I wish you would just do your job.' At one point, Walz attempted to take a more conciliatory tone, while also pointing out that immigration enforcement remains a federal duty. 'No one here wants to hear these horrific stories. But we have a job to do on limited resources,' Walz said. He added that it was a mistake for Republicans to say "that not doing ICE's job means we're not cooperating." 'Nothing we do precludes them from doing their job,' Walz said. 'We have the responsibility of the American public to work together, and I think threatening arrests on elected officials … doesn't help any of us.' (Trump has suggested he would support the arrest of California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat.) The hearing also featured numerous distinctly political moments. Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., who is considering a run for governor of New York, is not a member of the committee, but Comer allowed several lawmakers to join in on the questioning. Stefanik used the opportunity to attack Hochul, repeatedly bringing up instances of undocumented immigrants committing crimes in the state, saying that they were emblematic of 'Kathy Hochul's New York.' 'No amount of words is going to clean up your failed record, and these horrific crimes committed in the sanctuary state that you created,' Stefanik said. In what at times resembled potential campaign messaging, Stefanik said, 'We deserve a governor who stands up for law-abiding New Yorkers, who doesn't put illegals first, but actually puts New Yorkers first." Hochul hit back by saying that Stefanik was simply 'going after the viral moment.' It was just one of several examples where a questioner on Thursday's panel was running for higher office. Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, D-Ill., is running for U.S. Senate, for example, while Donalds, as well as Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., are both running for governor in their states next year. In addition, Walz and Pritzker are viewed as potential 2028 Democratic presidential candidates. Both in recent weeks have taken steps to limit government-funded health care coverage for undocumented immigrants, a potential move to the right on the broader issue of immigration. The latter half of the hearing featured numerous Democrats seeking to introduce reports for the record documenting the forcible removal of Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., from a news conference in Los Angeles after he tried to question Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. Rep. Maxwell Frost, D-Fla., repeatedly pressed Comer and other Republicans to commit to subpoenaing Noem. 'Just shut up,' Comer replied, after moments of back-and-forth yelling. Rep. Majorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., said "Democrats can't follow the rules, can't follow the law" as Frost continued to demand Comer's attention. The hearing took a brief recess after that. Later in the hearing, Democrats played the clip of the incident. 'I want to say to all of you, all of you on both sides, but particularly those on the Republican side, that I cannot believe the disrespect that was shown to a United States senator, who was thrown down, handcuffed and not allowed to ask a question of our secretary of homeland security," Pritzker said. Earlier, the hearing veered off track numerous times, with Republicans using the stage to pepper the governors with questions on topics that GOP lawmakers are currently investigating or that are popular with their conservative base. At one point, Comer asked Walz if he'd ever asked former Vice President Kamala Harris about former President Joe Biden's 'cognitive decline.' Walz, who ran on the Democratic Party's 2024 ticket with Harris, replied he had not, triggering Comer to press harder. At another point, Rep. Brandon Gill, R-Texas., asked Pritzker about whether he thought that 'biological men should be able to use women's restrooms.' Prtizker eventually replied, 'so you're admitting that this is just a political circus.' The three Democratic governors also slammed Trump for calling up the National Guard to respond to the protests in California, expressing concern that the move could be replicated in other states. Pritzker said that, "When the president of the United States is calling up your National Guard over the top of local law enforcement, saying that they don't need it, that they have things under control, it tends to have an inflaming effect on what's going on on the ground." Hochul, for her part, said Trump's actions 'absolutely undermine the sovereignty of individual states.' 'Undermining confidence in local law enforcement — you're basically saying that there's not a belief that the highly trained individuals of our municipal police departments ... can handle their jobs,' she said. 'This is an overreach of epic proportions." This article was originally published on

Kendall to add protections to welfare Bill amid backlash to cuts
Kendall to add protections to welfare Bill amid backlash to cuts

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Kendall to add protections to welfare Bill amid backlash to cuts

The Work and Pensions Secretary will add 'non-negotiable' protections to the Welfare Reform Bill, amid a backlash against planned cuts to benefits. The package of measures is aimed at reducing the number of working-age people on sickness benefits, and the Government hopes they can save £5 billion a year by the end of the decade. The proposals include tightening of the eligibility criteria for personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability benefit in England, and cutting the sickness-related element of universal credit (UC). Dozens of Labour MPs last month urged the Prime Minister to pause and reassess planned cuts, saying the proposals are 'impossible to support'. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall told the Guardian there will be extra protections added to the Bill when it is published next week. She said: 'When we set out our reforms we promised to protect those most in need, particularly those who can never work. 'I know from my 15 years as a constituency MP how important this is. It is something I take seriously and will never compromise on. 'That is why we are putting additional protections on the face of the Bill to support the most vulnerable and help people affected by the changes. 'These protections will be written into law, a clear sign they are non-negotiable.' A Government impact assessment published alongside the reforms warned some 250,000 people, including 50,000 children, across England, Scotland and Wales, could fall into relative poverty after housing costs as a result of the changes.

Rachel Reeves 'a gnat's whisker' from having to raise taxes, says IFS
Rachel Reeves 'a gnat's whisker' from having to raise taxes, says IFS

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Rachel Reeves 'a gnat's whisker' from having to raise taxes, says IFS

Rachel Reeves is a "gnat's whisker" away from having to raise taxes in the autumn budget, a leading economist has warned - despite the chancellor insisting her plans are "fully funded". Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), said "any move in the wrong direction" for the economy before the next fiscal event would "almost certainly spark more tax rises". 'Sting in the tail' in chancellor's plans - politics latest Speaking the morning after she delivered her spending review, which sets government budgets until 2029, Ms Reeves told Wilfred Frost hiking taxes wasn't inevitable. "Everything I set out yesterday was fully costed and fully funded," she told Sky News Breakfast. Her plans - which include £29bn for day-to-day NHS spending, £39bn for affordable and social housing, and boosts for defence and transport - are based on what she set out in October's budget. That budget, her first as chancellor, included controversial tax hikes on employers and increased borrowing to help public services. Chancellor won't rule out tax rises The Labour government has long vowed not to raise taxes on "working people" - specifically income tax, national insurance for employees, and VAT. Ms Reeves refused to completely rule out tax rises in her next budget, saying the world is "very uncertain". The Conservatives have claimed she will almost certainly have to put taxes up, with shadow chancellor Mel Stride accusing her of mismanaging the economy. Taxes on businesses had "destroyed growth" and increased spending had been "inflationary", he told Sky News. New official figures showed the economy contracted in April by 0.3% - more than expected. It coincided with Donald Trump imposing tariffs across the world. Ms Reeves admitted the figures were "disappointing" but pointed to more positive figures from previous months. Read more:Chancellor running out of levers to pullGrowth stats make for unpleasant readingYour spending review questions answered 'Sting in the tail' She is hoping Labour's plans will provide more jobs and boost growth, with major infrastructure projects "spread" across the country - from the Sizewell C nuclear plant in Suffolk, to a rail line connecting Liverpool and Manchester. But the IFS said further contractions in the economy, and poor forecasts from the Office for Budget Responsibility, would likely require the chancellor to increase the national tax take once again. It said her spending review already accounted for a 5% rise in council tax to help local authorities, labelling it a "sting in the tail" after she told Sky's Beth Rigby that it wouldn't have to go up.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store