NASA's Parker Probe Captures Closest-Ever Image Of The Sun
NASA's Parker Probe captured the first-ever images from inside a solar eruption, offering vital clues about space weather and its effects on Earth
The Sun, Earth's most powerful energy source, has long been a subject of awe and concern due to its sheer scale and volatile nature. Now, NASA's Parker Solar Probe has delivered astonishing new images that provide a close-up look inside the Sun's atmosphere; images as mesmerising as they are menacing.
Closest Flyby Reveals Intense Solar Activity
On December 24, 2024, the Parker Solar Probe made its closest-ever approach to the Sun, reaching just 3.8 million miles from its surface. During this moment, the onboard WISPR camera (Wide-field Imager for Parker Solar Probe) captured a live eruption of a Coronal Mass Ejection (CME).
This marks the first time scientists have directly recorded such a violent solar event from within, rather than simulating it through models.
Deadly Solar Waves Observed First-Hand
Within the CME, scientists observed Kelvin-Helmholtz Instabilities—swirling, wave-like patterns formed by the collision of solar flows. Once considered purely theoretical or seen only in simulations, these dangerous waveforms have now been witnessed in real solar conditions.
Unprecedented Footage From Inside the Corona
NASA released a video showing the Sun's corona from the probe's perspective.
According to Angelos Vourlidas from Johns Hopkins University, USA, the footage shows CMEs colliding and merging, giving researchers insight into how space weather forms and evolves.
NASA's Dr Nicky Fox added, 'We are finally seeing where Earth's space weather begins".
Against All Odds: The Probe Survives Extreme Heat
Despite temperatures above 1,300°C and intense radiation, the Parker Probe emerged undamaged. NASA engineers regard this survival as a historic feat in space engineering.
What's Next For Parker?
The probe's next flyby is set for September 15, 2025, where it will venture even closer to the Sun. Scientists are optimistic that this mission will help decode the origin of solar winds, which are critical in understanding and forecasting space weather.
Why This Matters For Earth
Space weather caused by CMEs can disrupt satellites, GPS systems, radio signals, and even power grids on Earth. These new findings will help scientists build better early-warning systems, protecting both astronauts and everyday technologies on Earth.
view comments
First Published:
July 12, 2025, 14:06 IST
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
3 hours ago
- Economic Times
Trump orders NASA to kill 2 satellites that can function for many more years - the reason will shock all
Trump NASA satellite shutdown: The White House has directed NASA to shut down two carbon-tracking satellites. These satellites monitor carbon dioxide levels. The satellites provide crucial data for understanding climate change. Scientists, farmers, and energy companies use this data. One satellite is on the International Space Station. The other will burn up in the atmosphere if shut down. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Satellites Tracking Carbon Emissions To Face Early Shutdown What Are the Orbiting Carbon Observatories? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Former NASA Scientist Raises Concerns What Are the Orbiting Carbon Observatories? Lawmakers Push Back, Call Cuts 'Catastrophic' Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs A decision that has left many scientists and space lovers scratching their heads is that the White House has ordered NASA to shut down two important satellites that are still working perfectly and could keep doing so for years, as per a report. These satellites track carbon dioxide levels in Earth's atmosphere, which helps to understand climate change and how it affects everything from farming to energy industries, as per a Futurism Trump administration's officials have reached out to NASA to draw up plans for terminating the two missions, called the Orbiting Carbon Observatories , as reported by Futurism. Both of them have been used to collect widely used data, which provide information to oil and gas companies and farmers about the distribution of carbon dioxide and how it can affect crop health, according to the READ: When is Labor Day 2025 in US and what should you know before celebrating? One of the satellites is attached to the International Space Station, and the other is collecting data as a stand-alone satellite, as reported by Futurism. The latter would see its permanent demise after burning up in the atmosphere if the mission gets terminated, according to the Trump administration's move to end the missions comes at a time when the two observatories had been expected to function for many more years, and a 2023 review by NASA found that the data they'd been providing had been "of exceptionally high quality," as reported by review also found that the observatories give detailed carbon dioxide measurements across various locations, which let scientists get a detailed glimpse of how human activity is affecting greenhouse gas emissions, according to the READ: Another Indian-American shakes up Silicon Valley - Meet Shyam Sankar, Palantir's CTO powering company's meteoric rise An ex-NASA employee, David Crisp, who worked on the Orbiting Carbon Observatories' instruments, revealed that current staffers reached out to him, saying, "They were asking me very sharp questions," adding, "The only thing that would have motivated those questions was [that] somebody told them to come up with a termination plan," as quoted by explained that it "makes no economic sense to terminate NASA missions that are returning incredibly valuable data," pointing out that it costs just $15 million per year to maintain both observatories, which is a small fraction of the agency's $25.4 billion budget, as reported by other scientists who have used data from the missions have also been asked questions about terminating the missions, as per the the two observatories are just two of dozens of space missions that are currently facing existential threats due to the Trump administration's proposed 2026 fiscal year budget, according to the reasons for terminating these missions are not known yet, but there is only speculation given US president Donald Trump's staunch climate change denial and his administration's efforts to deal the agency's science directorate a potentially existential blow, as per the has led many scientists to argue that the move could precipitate an end to the United States' leadership in space, according to the Futurism report. Many lawmakers have also drawn up a counteroffer that would keep NASA's budget almost in line with this year's budget, as per the and top appropriator Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) had siad in a July, "We rejected cuts that would have devastated NASA science by 47 percent and would have terminated 55 operating and planned missions," as quoted in the representative and Committee on Science, Space and Technology ranking member Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) said thar, "Eliminating funds or scaling down the operations of Earth-observing satellites would be catastrophic and would severely impair our ability to forecast, manage, and respond to severe weather and climate disasters," adding, "The Trump administration is forcing the proposed cuts in its FY26 budget request on already appropriated FY25 funds. This is illegal," as quoted in the Futurism farmers, environmentalists, energy companies, anyone needing detailed carbon emission will burn up in the atmosphere, and the other will stop collecting data, ending their missions prematurely.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Trump orders NASA to kill 2 satellites that can function for many more years - the reason will shock all
Trump NASA satellite shutdown: The White House has directed NASA to shut down two carbon-tracking satellites. These satellites monitor carbon dioxide levels. The satellites provide crucial data for understanding climate change. Scientists, farmers, and energy companies use this data. One satellite is on the International Space Station. The other will burn up in the atmosphere if shut down. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Satellites Tracking Carbon Emissions To Face Early Shutdown What Are the Orbiting Carbon Observatories? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Former NASA Scientist Raises Concerns What Are the Orbiting Carbon Observatories? Lawmakers Push Back, Call Cuts 'Catastrophic' Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs A decision that has left many scientists and space lovers scratching their heads is that the White House has ordered NASA to shut down two important satellites that are still working perfectly and could keep doing so for years, as per a report. These satellites track carbon dioxide levels in Earth's atmosphere, which helps to understand climate change and how it affects everything from farming to energy industries, as per a Futurism Trump administration's officials have reached out to NASA to draw up plans for terminating the two missions, called the Orbiting Carbon Observatories , as reported by Futurism. Both of them have been used to collect widely used data, which provide information to oil and gas companies and farmers about the distribution of carbon dioxide and how it can affect crop health, according to the READ: When is Labor Day 2025 in US and what should you know before celebrating? One of the satellites is attached to the International Space Station, and the other is collecting data as a stand-alone satellite, as reported by Futurism. The latter would see its permanent demise after burning up in the atmosphere if the mission gets terminated, according to the Trump administration's move to end the missions comes at a time when the two observatories had been expected to function for many more years, and a 2023 review by NASA found that the data they'd been providing had been "of exceptionally high quality," as reported by review also found that the observatories give detailed carbon dioxide measurements across various locations, which let scientists get a detailed glimpse of how human activity is affecting greenhouse gas emissions, according to the READ: Another Indian-American shakes up Silicon Valley - Meet Shyam Sankar, Palantir's CTO powering company's meteoric rise An ex-NASA employee, David Crisp, who worked on the Orbiting Carbon Observatories' instruments, revealed that current staffers reached out to him, saying, "They were asking me very sharp questions," adding, "The only thing that would have motivated those questions was [that] somebody told them to come up with a termination plan," as quoted by explained that it "makes no economic sense to terminate NASA missions that are returning incredibly valuable data," pointing out that it costs just $15 million per year to maintain both observatories, which is a small fraction of the agency's $25.4 billion budget, as reported by other scientists who have used data from the missions have also been asked questions about terminating the missions, as per the the two observatories are just two of dozens of space missions that are currently facing existential threats due to the Trump administration's proposed 2026 fiscal year budget, according to the reasons for terminating these missions are not known yet, but there is only speculation given US president Donald Trump's staunch climate change denial and his administration's efforts to deal the agency's science directorate a potentially existential blow, as per the has led many scientists to argue that the move could precipitate an end to the United States' leadership in space, according to the Futurism report. Many lawmakers have also drawn up a counteroffer that would keep NASA's budget almost in line with this year's budget, as per the and top appropriator Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) had siad in a July, "We rejected cuts that would have devastated NASA science by 47 percent and would have terminated 55 operating and planned missions," as quoted in the representative and Committee on Science, Space and Technology ranking member Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) said thar, "Eliminating funds or scaling down the operations of Earth-observing satellites would be catastrophic and would severely impair our ability to forecast, manage, and respond to severe weather and climate disasters," adding, "The Trump administration is forcing the proposed cuts in its FY26 budget request on already appropriated FY25 funds. This is illegal," as quoted in the Futurism farmers, environmentalists, energy companies, anyone needing detailed carbon emission will burn up in the atmosphere, and the other will stop collecting data, ending their missions prematurely.
Time of India
8 hours ago
- Time of India
NASA to build Moon reactor by 2030, outpacing China-Russia lunar ambitions with a 100-kilowatt power system
Source: New York Times / BBC The United States is accelerating its space ambitions with a bold plan to construct a nuclear reactor on the Moon by 2030, according to the reports. This move, championed by Transportation Secretary and interim NASA chief Sean Duffy, signals a significant shift toward energy independence and strategic dominance in lunar exploration. The directive aims to outpace China and Russia's joint lunar base efforts while ensuring sustainable power for future Moon habitats and research facilities. With a 100-kilowatt power system in focus and contracts for ISS replacement on the horizon, this strategy could reshape the future of space exploration and energy innovation. Why the Moon needs a nuclear reactor Solar power, though efficient in low-Earth orbit, is unreliable on the Moon due to two-week-long lunar nights. A nuclear reactor ensures continuous, high-output power for critical systems like habitats, life support, and mining equipment. NASA's earlier 40-kilowatt system design now expands to a 100-kilowatt model, enabling long-term settlements and deep-space missions. Experts note that nuclear power could support resource extraction, like oxygen and water from lunar regolith, which is crucial for producing rocket fuel and sustaining human life far from Earth. This capability would reduce dependency on Earth-based resupply missions, making lunar bases more economically and operationally viable. Space race 2.0: US reacts to China-Russia lunar base plans with a 100-kilowatt power strategy China and Russia's International Lunar Research Station (ILRS) poses a direct challenge to US leadership in space. Their collaboration aims to establish a permanently crewed lunar facility, backed by advanced robotics and resource utilization programs. Duffy's directive reflects a 'space race 2.0' mindset, emphasizing energy independence and infrastructure as strategic levers. Analysts say the nuclear reactor isn't just about science; it's a symbol of geopolitical power projection. By achieving reliable energy on the Moon, the US can support military, scientific, and commercial activities, ensuring it remains ahead in a future where lunar resources could influence global energy and technology markets. The directive significantly upsizes previous NASA designs, calling for a 100-kilowatt fission surface power system capable of running multiple habitats and industrial-scale facilities. The plan involves a 60-day window to gather input from private space and energy companies and appointing a NASA official to spearhead the project. This power scale is intended not only for lunar missions but also to serve as a blueprint for Mars and deep-space exploration. Unlike solar arrays, nuclear reactors can withstand lunar dust, extreme temperatures, and long nights, making them a game-changer for permanent extraterrestrial settlements and advanced resource processing facilities on the Moon. NASA's new vision under Duffy: Hard-power technologies and commercial space growth Sean Duffy's appointment as interim NASA chief, while also serving as Transportation Secretary, sparked debate in Congress. Critics question his ability to manage two high-profile federal roles simultaneously. However, this lunar reactor initiative shows Duffy's intent to leave a strong mark on US space policy, focusing on hard-power technologies rather than purely scientific exploration. His directive aligns with the White House's push for increased crewed spaceflight funding, even while cutting some research programs. The move highlights a shift in NASA priorities, emphasising infrastructure and power generation as key pillars for maintaining US dominance in an increasingly contested space environment. Alongside the Moon reactor plan, NASA aims to accelerate the replacement of the ageing International Space Station (ISS). The agency will award contracts to at least two private companies within six months, with a goal of deploying a commercially operated station by 2030. Leading contenders include Axiom Space, Vast, and Blue Origin. This transition reflects NASA's procurement shift toward private-sector partnerships, ensuring a continued human presence in low-Earth orbit while freeing up resources for deep-space missions. Critics have raised concerns about funding delays, but Duffy's directive is expected to fast-track development and synchronize with national space security strategies. Why the Moon nuclear reactor is important for Mars and asteroid missions The Moon nuclear reactor initiative signals more than just energy innovation; it represents a paradigm shift in space exploration. By coupling lunar nuclear energy infrastructure with a commercial space station ecosystem, the US positions itself to dominate both cislunar space and planetary exploration. Experts believe this could lead to permanent Moon settlements, asteroid mining, and Mars missions becoming practical within the next decade. Furthermore, the initiative reinforces US competitiveness in a world where space resources and technologies may define future economic and military power. The outcome of these programs could reshape the global balance of power beyond Earth. Also Read | NASA astronaut recalls awe-inspiring view of Mumbai and Delhi's night lights from space: 'India looks magical'
