What is a Panican? Donald Trump's newest insult explained amid tariff backlash
Now, as president, he has conjured up a brand new expression for those voicing dissent against his sweeping levies targeting every country – bar Russia – which he imposed last week.
As trillions of dollars are wiped from Wall Street and markets around the globe reel from his tariff onslaught, the president took to Truth Social not to reassure anxious Americans, but to call those with woes a 'Panican.'
'Don't be Weak! Don't be Stupid! Don't be a PANICAN,' he wrote Monday.
Adding to his growing list of unique phrases and bizarre nicknames, what exactly is a Panican?
What is a 'Panican'?
Trump says a Panican is a 'new party' for the 'weak and stupid' - those who have lost life savings and sweating big tech companies that have seen millions wiped off their market value.
The 'panic' part is self-evident - anyone worried about the economic impact of his sweeping tariffs. The 'can' at the end could either refer to Americans generally or more pointedly, Republicans who dare to question Trump's wisdom.
His newly-minted phrase was unleashed on social media as he faces widespread backlash after imposing 10 percent universal tariffs with around 60 countries deemed the 'worst offenders' facing even higher levies.
Stock markets have continued to slide with Thursday – the day after Trump's announcement – marking Wall Street's single largest decline since the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020 with about $3.1 trillion wiped from the market.
The S&P 500, which has fallen about 10 percent since Trump's 'Liberation Day,' was down another 0.2 percent Monday, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell by 0.9 percent. The Nasdaq, however, rallied by 0.1 percent.
But instead of taking a softly-softly approach with Americans fearing for their finances, the president went on the offensive.
In a defiant post, Trump told the quivering Panicans they had no place in his Republican party if they couldn't accept his tariff gamble.
'The United States has a chance to do something that should have been done DECADES AGO,' he said after spending a weekend on the golf course as markets tanked.
'Don't be Weak! Don't be Stupid! Don't be a PANICAN (A new party based on Weak and Stupid people!). Be Strong, Courageous, and Patient, and GREATNESS will be the result!'
What is the Panican reaction?
Jon Stewart used this week's installment of The Daily Show to mock Donald Trump's new nickname for those concerned about his trade tariffs which are causing economic chaos around the world.
'The genius who gave us classics like Sleepy Joe and Crooked Hillary, just s*** out, 'You're a Panican'? How about Hysterocrats? Repussicans? How about Cryontologists? Did the overseas factory you had been sourcing your nicknames from get shut down during the tariff war?' quipped Stewart.
Just days before adding Panican to his parlance, Trump posted to Truth Social Friday 'ONLY THE WEAK WILL FAIL!' which Stewart said was the 'same tagline as season 3 of Squid Game.'
Social media users also poked fun at Trump's new phrase.
'He's panicking,' one X user tweeted alongside a screenshot of Trump's Panican post.
Jack Kimble, a fictitious 'Republican congressman' posted on X: 'Oh phew. When I heard Trump created a new word PANICAN, I thought that meant we were invading Panama and Canada today.'
'Panican (n) - cross between a penguin and a pangolin, capable of causing unspeakable havoc to [the] global market,' wrote political scientist Ian Bremmer.
Others called Trump himself 'Panican-in-chief' dredging up old tweets where he railed against stock market collapses under former President Joe Biden.
Should we be panicking?
The president's latest threats come as stock markets tumbled for the third consecutive trading day.
The massive sell-off had a brief respite around 10:30 a.m. ET on Monday after CNBC and social media influencers falsely reported that National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett said Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs for all countries other than China.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt immediately shot down the reports as 'fake news' and the markets continued to plummet following her denial of any consideration of a pause on the import taxes, which Trump frequently and falsely claims will be paid by foreign governments rather than by importers who pass them along to consumers in the form of higher prices.
Trump also confirmed to reporters he's 'not looking at' pausing the sweeping tariffs. So, should Americans be panicking?
The chief investment strategist at CFRA Research, Sam Stovall, told AARP that data shows in every market pullback since World War II, the market regained lost ground between a month and a half and four months during corrections.
The advice remains roughly the same for workers nearing retirement age. Experts suggest that people move to more conservative investments to shield their savings from market volatility and avoid any knee-jerk reactions.
Who might join the Panican party?
Republican Texas Representative Pete Sessions told the BBC that tariffs are not in the best interests of Americans or the free world to pay that extra money.
GOP Texas Senator Ted Cruz warned the tariffs could be a 'terrible outcome' for the party's political prospects if they remain.
Billionaire Bill Ackman, who backed Trump's 2024 presidential campaign, warned of an 'economic nuclear winter' as business investments 'grind to a halt.'
Ken Langone, the co-founder of Home Depot who donated to Trump's campaign in 2016, said that the 46 percent tariff placed on Vietnam was 'bulls***.'
Investor Stanley Druckenmiller, a mentor to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, wrote on X: 'I do not support tariffs exceeding 10%.'
Even Elon Musk, Trump's special adviser tasked with gutting the federal government through DOGE, said he hopes for a 'zero-tariff situation' between the U.S. and Europe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump plans to PAINT Southern border wall to make it hotter and harder to climb
The border wall separating the United States and Mexico will soon be painted black to make it too hot for migrants to climb. Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem revealed the project was a specific request from President Donald Trump. 'In the hot temperatures down here, when something is painted black it gets even warmer,' Noem said during a press conference in front of the wall on Tuesday. She noted the structure is already hard to climb and near impossible to dig under, but said Trump's latest measure will help to secure the American border even further. 'There will be more added to it as far as technology, cameras, sensors,' she added. The black paint, in addition to making the wall so hot to the touch that migrants will not be able to grip onto it, will have a dual purpose of protecting the steel from rust. Temperatures can reach as high as 120 degrees Fahrenheit during the summer months in Texas and Mexico, along the lines of the border wall. The paint job will restore the border wall to Trump's initial design from his first presidency The paint job will restore the border wall to Trump's initial design from his first presidency. During his first term, parts of the wall along Calexico were being painted black, but the project was abandoned to speed up construction of the wall itself. But now with more than three years left of his term, Trump has allocated an additional $46.5 billion to the completion of his border wall project. 'We had an incredible amount of resources allocated to us in the big beautiful bill, because that's going to allow us to continue construction,' Noem said. 'Construction right now is at the pace of a little bit less than a half a mile a day. And the border wall will look very different based on the topography and the geography of where it is built.' Noem also hailed the fact that the United States now has 'the most secure border that we've ever had in the history of this nation.' The Trump administration claims there were zero illegal border crossings recorded in May, June and July. Troop deployments at the border have tripled to 7,600 and include every branch of the military and Trump has authorized funding for an additional 3,000 Border Patrol agents, offering $10,000 signing and retention bonuses. Since April, large swaths of border have been designated militarized zones, empowering US troops to apprehend immigrants and others accused of trespassing on Army, Air Force or Navy bases, and authorizing additional criminal charges that can mean prison time.
The Guardian
16 minutes ago
- The Guardian
There is no ‘Trump Doctrine' in foreign policy. Just chaos
All the elaborate efforts of the European allies to prevent Donald Trump from prostrating himself before Vladimir Putin came to naught at their summit meeting in Alaska. Flattering, coddling and petting the big baby appeared to have been in vain. Before the 15 August summit, the Europeans persuaded Trump to impose new sanctions if Putin would not agree to a ceasefire, which would serve as a prerequisite for any negotiations. But Trump willfully tossed policy like a stuffed animal out of the window of 'the Beast,' the presidential car as he eagerly invited Putin to join him for a triumphant chariot ride. The Europeans scrambled once again, trying to get the addled Trump back on the page he was on before the summit. Ukraine's president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, sped to Washington to confer with Trump to try to pick up the pieces. At their last encounter, Trump jibed: 'You don't have any cards.' But Trump had just handed over his cards to Putin. Zelenskyy was not about to play the appeasement card. The European leaders gathered in an extraordinary posse to accompany Zelenskyy in an attempt to restore a unified western position. Unlike the last Zelenskyy meeting with Trump, he was not hectored. With the Ukrainian leader urrounded by a protective phalanx, Trump made agreeable sounding but vague gestures about a future summit with both Zelenskyy and Putin. Trump seemed favorable, if indefinite and imprecise, about western forces stationed in Ukraine to maintain its sovereignty. But the notion of a ceasefire, pressed again by the French president, Emmanuel Macron, and German chancellor, Friedrich Merz, had evaporated. While the European recovery effort took place at the White House, Russian bombs rained down. Trump dreams of receiving the Nobel peace prize. Before the summit, he called the Norwegian finance minister to lobby him. In Alaska, Trump melted again in the presence of Putin while the whole world was watching. The self-abasing embarrassment of his previous meeting in Helsinki in 2018 did not serve as a cautionary precedent. Now, he invited the sanctioned war criminal to US soil. He ordered uniformed US soldiers to roll out the red carpet, 'the beautiful red carpet' as the Russian foreign ministry called it. He applauded when Putin stood next to him. He patted Putin's hand when he clasped it with an affectionate gesture. Then the door of 'the Beast' opened for Putin. Trump's personal negotiator for the summit, Steve Witkoff, a New York real estate operator whose knowledge of Russian culture to prepare him for his delicate role may had been a bowl of borscht at the Russian Tea Room on 57th Street, was easy prey for Putin. Bild, the German newspaper, reported on 9 August that Witkoff had committed an 'explosive blunder'. According to Bild, Putin 'did not deviate from his maximum demand to completely control the five Ukrainian regions of Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, Kherson and Crimea before the weapons remain silent … And even worse: Trump's special envoy Witkoff is said to have completely misunderstood some of the Russians' positions and misinterpreted them as an accommodation by Putin. He had misunderstood a 'peaceful withdrawal' of the Ukrainians from Kherson and Zaporizhzhia demanded by Russia as an offer of 'peaceful withdrawal' of the Russians from these regions'. 'Witkoff doesn't know what he's talking about,' a Ukrainian government official told Bild. An assessment that, according to Bild information, is also shared by German government representatives. Bild further reported: 'There was a telephone conference on Thursday evening between representatives of the US government – including the special envoy Witkoff and Foreign Minister Marco Rubio and Vice President JD Vance – and the European partners. As BILD learned, the American side was perceived as chaotic and ununited. This was primarily due to Witkoff, whose remarks about his conversation with Putin on Wednesday in the Kremlin were perceived as confusing. He himself seemed overwhelmed and incompetent to the Europeans when he spoke about the territorial issues in Ukraine.' The German newspaper also reported friction between Rubio and Vance, with the vice-president seeking to shut the European allies out of the process and Witkoff taking his side against the secretary of state. 'Apparently, there was also disagreement about the further course of action between Witkoff and Rubio, as the foreign minister emphasized that the Europeans should be involved in the further process, while Vance and Witkoff only wanted to inform Europe of the results of the further Trump steps.' Bild's report on Putin's position turned out to be completely accurate and its description of the Trump administration's unsettled position prophetic of the fiasco that would unfold. Little noticed in the US media accounts, Trump had presented Putin with enormous economic advantages, according to the Telegraph. He offered access to valuable Alaskan natural resources, opportunities to tap into the US portion of the Bering Strait, which would boost Russia's interests in the Arctic region. Trump promised to lift sanctions on Russia's aircraft industry, which would permit Russian airlines (and by extension the Russian air force) to return to US suppliers for parts and maintenance. Trump would give Putin approval for access to rare earth minerals in Ukrainian territories currently under Russian occupation. In Trump's new world order, Putin would be his partner, especially on the frontier of the Arctic, while Trump waged a trade war imposing harsh tariffs on every other nation. Ukraine stood as an obstacle to the gold rush. According to the Telegraph, Witkoff suggested to the Russians: 'Israel's occupation of the West Bank could be used as a model for ending the war. Russia would have military and economic control of occupied [parts of] Ukraine under its own governing body, similar to Israel's de facto rule of Palestinian territory.' Then, after Trump laid on lavish treatment for the Russian dictator at the US military base, marking his indifference to international condemnation, came the joint appearance, which exceeded the Helsinki disaster. An elated Putin and dejected Trump appeared on stage together. The announced joint press conference was a theater of the absurd. Its brevity contributed to the farce. There was no agreement, no plan for an agreement, and no press conference. Trump deferred to Putin to speak first, to set the tone and terms after which he would come on as the second banana to slip on the peel. A clearly delighted Putin reiterated his belief that Ukraine was a security threat to Russia, and that 'we need to eliminate all the primary roots, the primary causes of that conflict,' which was his language for the elimination of an independent and democratic Ukraine. He blamed Biden for the war he had launched. He affirmed Trump's presumptuous boast that there would have been no war had he been president. 'Today, when President Trump is saying that if he was the president back then, there would be no war, and I'm quite sure that it would indeed be so. I can confirm that.' A clearly glum Trump stepped to his podium. 'So there's no deal until there's a deal,' he said. He had pledged during the 2024 campaign that he could and would end the war on 'day one'. It had taken him 210 days to reach the 'No Deal'. Trump wistfully talked about doing business with Russia, his will-o'-the-wisp ambition since he attempted for decades to build a Trump Tower in Moscow even through the 2016 election. He threw Putin a bouquet. 'I've always had a fantastic relationship with President Putin, with Vladimir.' He blamed their inability to monetize their relationship to the inquiries that extensively documented Putin's covert efforts in the 2016 election to help Trump. 'We were interfered with by the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax,' Trump complained. He would not let it go, drifting incoherently into his grievances. 'He knew it was a hoax, and I knew it was a hoax, but what was done was very criminal, but it made it harder for us to deal as a country, in terms of the business, and all of the things that would like to have dealt with, but we'll have a good chance when this is over.' Then, Trump praised the Russian officials accompanying Putin. Chief among them was the foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, who had arrived wearing a sweatshirt embossed with the Cyrillic letters 'CCCP', standing for the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, signaling Putin's ultimate objective to restore the empire of the Soviet Union. The message was more than nostalgia; it was a mission statement. And Trump called Putin 'the Boss', not a reference to Bruce Springsteen. 'Next time in Moscow,' said Putin. The press conference was over. There were no questions. There were no answers. Trump fled from the stage. Before the summit, Trump threatened new sanctions if Putin did not agree to a ceasefire, but now he forgot he had ever said that. He spoke loudly and carried a tiny stick. On Air Force One, on the return to Washington, he gave an exclusive interview to his lapdog, Sean Hannity of Fox News, along on the ride for this purpose. Trump reverted to his tacit support for Putin's position. He put the burden on Zelenskyy to accede to Putin's demands, which were unchanged. Then, Trump spiraled down a wormhole, obviously anxious about his growing unpopularity and the prospect of the Democrats winning the congressional midterm elections, which has prompted him to prod the Texas Republicans to gerrymander districts and California Democrats aroused to counter it in their state. 'Vladimir Putin, smart guy, said you can't have an honest election with mail-in voting,' said Trump. 'Look at California with that horrible governor they have. One of the worst governors in history. He is incompetent, he doesn't know what he is doing.' Is this a subject that Putin actually spoke about in their discussion? Has he had experience with mail-in voting or even know what it is? Was it brought up by Trump during their car ride? Or was Trump simply making it up for his gullible Fox News audience? Whatever the reality, Trump's fear about losing control of domestic politics was at the top of his mind as he flew away from his charade in Anchorage. The shambolic scene left in Alaska represented the wreckage of Trump's attempt at diplomacy. Setting the stage himself, Trump babbled, whined and weakly sided with Putin. Trump's foreign policy team was exposed as incompetent, confounded and feckless. This was no best and the brightest, no rise of the Vulcans, but the circus of the Koalemosians, after Koalemos, the Greek god of stupidity. Apologists for Trump, in advance of this exemplary event, had suggested that there was such a conceit as a Trump doctrine. A former Trump official from his first term, A Wess Mitchell, has called it 'The Return of Great Power Diplomacy' in the May/June issue of Foreign Affairs. He described 'a new kind of diplomacy' that is 'diplomacy in its classical form' and 'an instrument of strategy'. He cited an ancient Spartan king, Archidamus II, the Roman Emperor Domitian, Cardinal Richelieu, and in his mélange did not neglect to throw in Metternich and Bismarck. (Kissinger, in his grave, must be weeping over the parading of Metternich's mannequin as a forerunner of Trump. Mitchell, in any case, dismisses Kissinger as a fake realist and an 'idealist', which would have been a revelation to Kissinger.) Left out of Mitchell's pantheon of great diplomatic influences through the ages is the influencer Laura Loomer, the loony far-right troll who has an open door to Trump, feeding him lists of national security officials he must purge. In Putin's shadow, Trump was bared as having no larger or smaller concept or strategy of Great Power politics. It would be unfair to accuse Trump of having an idea beyond his self-aggrandizement. If anything, he aspires to be like Putin, whom he called a 'genius' after his invasion of Ukraine. Putin has created and controls a vast kleptocracy. In 2017, Bill Browder, an American businessperson who had invested in Russia and has been targeted for assassination by Putin for exposing his corruption, testified before the Senate judiciary committee that Putin was 'the biggest oligarch in Russia and the richest man in the world'. Nobody, however, knows Putin's true personal wealth. Trump, the Putin manqué, is trying to turn the United States into a kleptocratic system. According to the calculations of David D Kirkpatrick in the New Yorker, in just six months of his second term his alleged personal profiteering, 'would disappoint the haters who saw Trump as a Putin-level kleptocrat. Yet some three and a half billion dollars in Presidential profits – even though my accounting is necessarily approximate – is a dizzying sum.' Meanwhile, three days before the Trump-Putin summit, the Trump family crypto business, World Liberty Financial, raised $1.5bn to buy the Trump family token. The CEO of World Liberty Financial, Zach Witkoff, son of Steve Witkoff, along with Eric Trump of WLF, will join the board of the investing company. That is the Trump doctrine. Sidney Blumenthal, former senior adviser to President Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton, has published three books of a projected five-volume political life of Abraham Lincoln: A Self-Made Man, Wrestling With His Angel and All the Powers of Earth. He is a Guardian US columnist
Rhyl Journal
19 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Trump offers assurances that US troops will not be sent to help defend Ukraine
Mr Trump also said in a morning TV interview that Ukraine's hopes of joining Nato and regaining the Crimean Peninsula from Russia are 'impossible'. The Republican president, Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and other European leaders held hours of talks at the White House on Monday aimed at bringing an end to Russia's war against Ukraine. While answering questions from journalists, Mr Trump did not rule out sending US troops to participate in a European-led effort to defend Ukraine as part of security guarantees sought by Mr Zelensky. Mr Trump said after his meeting in Alaska last week with Vladimir Putin that the Russian leader was open to the idea of security guarantees for Ukraine. But asked on Fox News Channel's Fox & Friends what assurances he could provide going forward and beyond his term that American troops would not be part of defending Ukraine's border, Mr Trump said: 'Well, you have my assurance, and I'm president.' Mr Trump would have no control over the US military after his terms ends in January 2029. Speaking later, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said that 'US boots will not be on the ground' as part of any potential peacekeeping mission. The president also said in the interview that he is optimistic that a deal can be reached to end the Russian invasion, but he underscored that Ukraine will have to set aside its hope of getting back Crimea, which was seized by Russian forces in 2014, and its long-held aspirations of joining the Nato military alliance. 'Both of those things are impossible,' Mr Trump said. Mr Putin, as part of any potential deal to pull his forces out of Ukraine, is looking for the withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, as well as recognition of Crimea as Russian territory. Mr Trump said on Monday that he was arranging for direct talks between Mr Putin and Mr Zelensky. But the Kremlin has not yet said whether Mr Putin, who has resisted previous calls by Mr Trump and others for direct negotiations on ending the war, is committed to a face-to-face meeting with the Ukrainian leader. Asked whether Mr Putin had promised Trump that he would meet directly with the Ukrainian leader, Ms Leavitt responded affirmatively. 'He has,' she said of Mr Putin. Mr Trump, early on Monday during talks with Mr Zelensky and European leaders, said that he was pressing for three-way talks among Mr Zelensky, Mr Putin and himself. But after speaking to Mr Putin later in the day, Mr Trump said that he was arranging first for a face-to-face between Mr Zelensky and Mr Putin and that three-way talks would follow if necessary. 'It was an idea that evolved in the course of the president's conversations with both President Putin, President Zelensky and the European leaders yesterday,' Ms Leavitt said. But when discussing a phone call held after the meeting between Mr Trump and the Russian leader, Mr Putin's foreign affairs adviser Yuri Ushakov gave no indication that either a bilateral or a trilateral meeting with Ukraine had been agreed. Mr Trump said he believed Mr Putin's course of action would become clear in the coming weeks. 'I think Putin is tired of it,' Mr Trump said. 'I think they're all tired of it. But you never know. We're going to find out about President Putin in the next couple of weeks. That I can tell you.' Later on Tuesday, Senator Lindsey Graham told The Associated Press in a phone interview that if peace talks between Ukraine and Russia are not 'moving in the right direction' by the time Congress returns next month, then 'Plan B needs to kick in'. For months, the Republican senator has been pressing Mr Trump to support a bipartisan sanctions bill that would impose steep tariffs on countries helping fund Russia's war. On Tuesday morning, following a phone call with Mr Trump, Mr Graham signalled the president may now be willing to back the effort. 'Trump believes that if Putin doesn't do his part, that he's going to have to crush his economy. Because you got to mean what you say,' Mr Graham told reporters in South Carolina earlier on Tuesday.
