South Korea's leader says trade deal with US remains unclear ahead of Trump's deadline
Speaking at his first news conference since taking office last month, Lee also reiterated his intentions to improve badly frayed ties with North Korea, though he acknowledged that mutual distrust between the Koreas is too deep to heal anytime soon.
Trump's tariff hikes and other 'America First' policies are major challenges for Lee's month-old government, as are North Korea's expanding nuclear program and domestic economic woes.
Lee, a liberal, came to power after winning a snap presidential election caused by the ouster of conservative President Yoon Suk Yeol over his ill-fated imposition of martial law in December.
Lee said the tariff negotiations with the US have been 'clearly not easy' and stressed that the countries must reach mutually beneficial outcomes.
'It's difficult to say with certainty whether we will be able to reach a conclusion by July 8. We are now doing our best,' Lee said.
'What we need is a truly reciprocal outcome that benefits both sides and works for everyone, but so far, both sides are still trying to define exactly what they want.'
Trump's 90-day pause in global reciprocal tariffs is set to expire on July 9, potentially exposing South Korean products to 25% tax rates.
Washington has separately been seeking higher duties on specific products such as automobiles and semiconductors, which are key exports for South Korea's trade-dependent economy.
There are growing concerns in Seoul that Trump may also demand a broader deal requiring South Korea to pay significantly more for the 28,000 US troops stationed on the peninsula to deter North Korean threats.
Lee has consistently urged patience on tariffs, arguing that rushing to secure an early deal would not serve the national interest. His trade minister, Yeo Han-koo, was reportedly arranging a visit to Washington for possible meetings with US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick.
On North Korea, Lee said he would seek to restore long-dormant talks with Pyongyang, whose expanding military cooperation with Russia pose major security concerns to their neighbors.
'I think we should improve relations with North Korea based on a reliable coordination and consultation between South Korea and the US,' Lee said. 'But I expect that won't be easy as mutual antagonism and distrust are too serious.'
Lee previously faced criticism that he was tilting toward North Korea and China and away from the US and Japan. But since the election, Lee has repeatedly vowed pragmatic diplomacy, saying he would bolster the alliance with the US while also seeking to repair ties with North Korea, China and Russia. Some critics say it's too difficult to satisfy all parties.
Lee's government has made proactive efforts to build trust with North Korea, halting frontline anti-Pyongyang propaganda broadcasts and taking steps to ban activists from flying balloons carrying propaganda leaflets across the border.
North Korea hasn't publicly responded to the conciliatory gestures by Trump and Lee, but officials said North Korean propaganda broadcasts have since been unheard in South Korean border towns.
Lee said he's been talking with his presidential security and intelligence officials about how to revive talks with North Korea but didn't elaborate.
Trump has also expressed intent to resume diplomacy with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. Lee has said he would support Trump's push.
North Korea has refused talks with the US and South Korea since earlier Trump-Kim nuclear talks collapsed in 2019. North Korea is now pursuing relations with Russia, supplying troops and weapons to support its war against Ukraine in return for economic and military assistance.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
31 minutes ago
- Mint
Vietnam trade deal takes aim at back door for Chinese goods
SINGAPORE—A tariff agreement with Vietnam emphasizes one of the White House's top priorities in this frantic round of dealmaking over global trade: Slamming shut any back door routes for Chinese goods to enter the U.S. A key provision of the Vietnam deal announced by President Trump Wednesday is that goods 'transshipped" to the U.S. through Vietnam would be subject to a punitive 40% tariff, twice the 20% rate Trump said he is applying to regular imports from Vietnam. The president didn't mention China explicitly and the exact details of how such rerouting will be defined and policed are unclear. Nevertheless, analysts say the measure appears squarely aimed at making it harder for firms to use the southeast Asian nation as a staging post to ship goods to the U.S. from China while sidestepping the steep levies that Chinese imports would typically face. These provisions of the Vietnam deal show that China remains the central focus of U.S. trade policy even after Washington and Beijing reached a shaky trade truce and discussions with other partners over trade drag on. The agreement implies that other countries will also be expected to limit China's presence in their economies if they want to keep selling to the U.S. The U.S. and U.K. agreed to provisions in their recent trade pact that require the U.K. to strengthen supply-chain security, which were similarly interpreted as targeting China. 'There does appear to be a more strategic intent here by the U.S. to essentially restrict Chinese exports entering the U.S. market via the backdoor," said Frederic Neumann, chief Asia economist at HSBC in Hong Kong. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning on Thursday reiterated Beijing's displeasure at the U.S. approach when asked about the pact, saying trade 'negotiations and agreements should not target or harm the interests of third parties." Vietnam was one of the main beneficiaries of the reordering of global supply chains in the wake of Trump's first term and the tumult of the Covid-19 pandemic. Factories mushroomed around Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City as Chinese and Western firms looked for ways to diversify their production base amid the strains of the pandemic and increasing geopolitical rivalry between Washington and Beijing. For U.S. consumers, Vietnam's entry into the top rank of exporting nations brought a bounty of affordable goods, as companies including Nike and Apple expanded production in the country. Shares of both companies rose Thursday after Trump said the trade pact was agreed. Michel Bertsch, who runs a factory in Vietnam that sells baby furniture such as cribs to the U.S. and other Western countries, said the 20% tariffs will inevitably translate into higher prices for American consumers. Still, he said he thought that Vietnam would remain a top destination for manufacturing. U.S. imports from China are subject to an average tariff of 40% to 50%, giving Vietnam an edge even with a 20% tariff, though whether it can keep that advantage depends on where tariff rates settle for alternative bases such as India or Indonesia. 'We need to wait and see what tariffs will be imposed on other countries but we don't think that we will lose competitiveness," Bertsch said. As recently as 2018, the U.S. deficit in goods trade with Vietnam was smaller than its deficit with Japan or Germany and a 10th the size of its deficit with China. By the end of last year, the U.S. deficit with Vietnam had ballooned to more than $120 billion, putting Vietnam behind only China and Mexico in its share of the U.S.'s $1.2 trillion goods trade deficit. Vietnam's rise up the rankings in U.S. trade has also drawn scrutiny from the U.S. as a hub for simply rerouting China-made goods bound for the U.S. for firms wanting to dodge tariffs. Chinese exports to the U.S. were about 10% lower in the first five months of the year than the same period a year earlier as tariffs bit into direct trade between the two economic superpowers, Chinese customs data show. Over the same period, however, Vietnamese imports from China were up 28% year over year, Vietnamese data show, while Vietnamese exports to the U.S. rose 26%. Deepali Bhargava, regional head of research for Asia-Pacific at investment bank ING, said in a report Thursday there are 'strong signs of transshipment" in sectors including machinery, electrical products and insulated wires and cables. Vietnam has taken steps to crack down on such trade rerouting through tougher policing of rules of origin certification, which give customs authorities detailed information about where a product and its components were made to levy the appropriate duties. Many different types of goods made in Vietnam, including clothing, furniture and electronics, use components made in China. Exactly how the U.S. plans to determine whether a product from Vietnam would qualify for a 20% tariff or a 40% tariff isn't clear. Still, 'these provisions send a clear message to global firms: the recent fall in tariffs between the U.S. and China doesn't weaken the argument for building supply chains outside China," Capital Economics economists Mark Williams and Gareth Leather said in a report Thursday. Write to Jason Douglas at and Jon Emont at
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Donald Trump's ‘Big, Beautiful Bill' heads for final vote — major relief for NRIs as India remittance tax cut to 1%
The US House of Representatives is expected to hold a final vote on President Donald Trump's flagship tax-and-spending legislation, known as the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill.' This comprehensive bill, central to Trump's second-term economic plans, has faced a challenging journey through Congress. Despite initial approval in May, the bill returns to the lower chamber after narrowly passing the Senate on Tuesday with a one-vote margin. Although introduced by the Republican president, the bill has attracted criticism from several lawmakers within his own party. Concerns raised include the projected $3 trillion increase in national debt and significant cuts to social welfare programs. Major relief for Indian remitters in final draft One of the most notable revisions in the final draft of the bill, released on June 27, involves a substantial reduction in the proposed tax on international remittances. Originally set at 5 percent, the tax was first reduced to 3.5 percent and now stands at just 1 percent. This change comes as a relief to many Indian professionals and non-resident Indians (NRIs) in the US who regularly send money back home. The provision will benefit nearly 4.5 million Indians living in the US, including 3.2 million persons of Indian origin. It applies to US residents who are not citizens—such as Green Card holders, temporary visa holders like H-1B and H-2A workers, and international students. According to the latest version of the bill, 'There is hereby imposed on any remittance transfer a tax equal to 1 per cent of the amount of such transfer… paid by the sender.' Specific transfers exempt from tax The bill also outlines specific exemptions. Transfers made from accounts held by financial institutions and those funded via US-issued debit or credit cards will not be taxed under this provision. Cash transfers, money orders, and cashier's checks will fall under the 1 percent tax rate. This final version of the bill reflects efforts to balance domestic economic concerns with the financial realities of millions of immigrants working in the United States, particularly those from India. As the House prepares for a conclusive vote, all eyes remain on how this high-stakes legislation will shape Trump's economic legacy.
Indian Express
43 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Why Trump's ‘big beautiful' tax bill is hanging by a thread as House Republicans rebel
The US House of Representatives worked into the early hours of Thursday morning as President Donald Trump pushed to secure final passage of a sweeping tax and spending bill—his defining legislative priority of his second term. Despite his party's control over both chambers of Congress, Trump has struggled to unify Republicans behind the bill, which promises to extend his 2017 tax cuts while slashing Medicaid and expanding military and border spending. The legislation narrowly cleared the Senate in an overnight vote on Tuesday. But in the House, Trump has faced a sharper challenge. After nearly seven hours of procedural wrangling late Wednesday night, the bill cleared a key hurdle that allowed it to be brought to the House floor for a final vote. That vote, expected before Trump's July 4 deadline, remains uncertain. 'The House is ready to vote tonight,' Trump posted on social media Wednesday, insisting that Republicans were 'united' to deliver 'massive growth.' However, at least half a dozen Republican representatives have expressed serious concerns. Their complaints have ranged from warnings about the bill's ballooning effect on the national deficit to fears that it cuts too deeply into federal healthcare and food subsidy programs. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the Senate's version of the bill would add $3.3 trillion to the national deficit over the next decade, compared to the $2.8 trillion projected under the earlier House version. That projection triggered outrage from fiscal conservatives in the powerful House Freedom Caucus, whose members have been among the bill's most vocal opponents. Texas Republican Chip Roy said the Senate version had pushed the odds of meeting Trump's deadline into doubt. Freedom Caucus chairman Andy Harris of Tennessee backed Elon Musk's criticism of the bill. 'He understands finances, he understands debts and deficits, and we have to make further progress,' Harris told Fox News. Other Republicans echoed the concern. Ohio's Warren Davidson posted on X: 'Promising someone else will cut spending in the future does not cut spending.' The spending in question centres in part on cuts to Medicaid, the government's health insurance program for low-income Americans. The House bill would result in 11 million people losing coverage. 'I've been clear from the start that I will not support a final reconciliation bill that makes harmful cuts to Medicaid, puts critical funding at risk, or threatens the stability of healthcare providers,' said California Republican David Valadao, who represents a swing district. That concern is also shared by representatives from poorer districts worried about blowback in the 2026 midterms. According to The Hill, six Republicans at one point planned to vote the bill down due to fears over key healthcare provisions. If the bill passes, it would extend the 2017 tax cuts, originally set to expire, while funding two major planks of Trump's platform: border security and defence spending. But those measures are offset through controversial cuts. In addition to healthcare, the Senate version also reduces food subsidies and modifies the so-called SALT deduction—the amount taxpayers can deduct for state and local taxes.
