US stocks edge toward records with inflation data in focus
New York
The US stock rebound has driven key indexes to the cusp of record levels, with fresh economic data and trade and fiscal policy developments set to test whether equities will get an extra push higher in thenear term.
A monthly US inflation report headlines the events for markets in the coming week.
Equities have bounced back from a steep fall in April, sparked by concerns about the economic fallout from President Donald Trump's tariff plans. Stocks ended the week on a high note, with the S&P 500 closing on Friday above 6,000 for the first time since late February, buoyed by a monthly US jobs report that calmed worries about theeconomy.
The benchmark S&P 500 ended on Friday 2.3 percent off its record closing high from February. 'I'd still say it's a cautious tone' in the market, said Jim Baird, chief investment officer with Plante Moran Financial Advisors. Despite a 'recovery off the lows, I still think it's a market that is looking for greater clarity.'
Some uncertainty stems from how the US economy is weathering the shifting trade backdrop. Trump has eased back on some of the harshest tariffs since his April 2 'Liberation Day' announcement sent stocks tumbling, but investors are waiting to see how other levies may be rippling through the economy.
The consumer price index report for May, due on Wednesday, could give insight into the tariff impact at a time investors are wary of any flare-ups in inflation.
'Consumers are feeling the impact of higher prices and if there are indications that near-term inflation could re-accelerate, that is going to put further pressure on discretionary spending and ultimately could lead to a more pronounced slowdown in growth,'Baird said.
The CPI report will be one of the last key pieces of data before the Federal Reserve's June 17-18 meeting. The US central bank is widely expected to hold interest rates steady at that meeting, but traders are pricing in nearly two 25-basis point cuts by the end of the year.
'If we see inflationary data that defies what people are concerned about based on this tariff talk and it comes in cooler, then that could also be a catalyst to at least test those old highs,' said Jay Woods, chief global strategist at Freedom Capital Markets.
US stocks closed higher on Friday, with the Dow and S&P 500 gaining 1 percent and the Nasdaq climbing 1.2 percent.
For the year, the S&P 500 is up 2 percent. But the index has stormed back over 20 percent since April 8, at the depth of the stock market's plunge on concerns over the tariff fallout.
Investors also are grappling with uncertainty over a sweeping tax-cut and spending bill under review in the US Senate. Wall Street is monitoring how much the legislation could stimulate economic growth, but also inflate the country's debt burden as widening fiscal deficits have become a central concern for markets in recent weeks.
'As debt increases, it has a greater negative impact on growth,' said Kristina Hooper, chief market strategist at Man Group. The legislation also appeared to be the source of a severe rift between Trump and Tesla chief Elon Musk, which weighed on stock indexes. Former Trump ally Musk called the bill at the heart of Trump's agenda a 'disgusting abomination,' while Trump said he was 'disappointed' by the billionaire's public opposition.
Trade talks also remain at the forefront of markets, with a 90-day pause on a wide array of Trump's tariffs set to end on July 8. Trump said on Friday three of his cabinet officials will meet with representatives of China in London on Monday to discuss a trade deal.
'When it comes to policy from Washington, there are still big question marks,' said Bob Doll, chief investment office at Crossmark Global Investments.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
15 minutes ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump threatens ‘major lawsuit' against Federal Reserve Chief Jerome Powell
United States President Donald Trump has suggested that Federal Reserve Chief Jerome Powell could face a lawsuit over renovation costs for the central bank's nearly century-old headquarters. The threat, issued on Tuesday in a post on Truth Social, is the latest salvo in Trump's ongoing pressure campaign against the central bank leader. The two have clashed over interest rates: Trump has pushed for aggressive cuts, while Powell has maintained the bank will make a decision based on financial indicators, not political pressure. 'Jerome 'Too Late' Powell must NOW lower the rate,' Trump wrote in Tuesday's message. 'I am, though, considering allowing a major lawsuit against Powell to proceed because of the horrible, and grossly incompetent, job he has done in managing the construction of the Fed Buildings.' The president's attacks on Powell have become a source of concern for economic observers, who worry that Trump is attempting to undermine the independence of the central bank and bring it into closer alignment with his political priorities. Trump has latched onto cost overruns stemming from construction work at the bank's headquarters in Washington, DC, which he said points to Powell's 'incompetence'. The Federal Reserve is currently undergoing renovations on two of its historic buildings, both built in the 1930s, including asbestos removal, major structural work to meet modern safety standards, and the replacement of antiquated systems for ventilation, plumbing, electricity and fire detection. 'While periodic work has been done to keep these buildings occupiable, neither building has seen a comprehensive renovation since they were first constructed,' Powell wrote in a letter to the Trump administration on July 17. 'Both buildings were in need of significant structural repairs and other updates to make the buildings safe, healthy, and effective places to work.' But while the renovation project was initially estimated to cost $1.9bn, that number has increased to around $2.5bn as construction proceeds. Some Republican lawmakers have said they may open an investigation into the increased projected cost, and Trump has used the renovation to push for Powell to step down. Trump has also pushed strongly for a decrease in rates, dubbing Powell by the nickname 'Too Late' for his supposed delays in cutting rates. Powell's term as Federal Reserve chair ends in May 2026. Trump, who nominated Powell to the role during his first term, has already suggested he is considering replacing the outgoing chair with a more compliant figure. 'The damage he has done by always being Too Late is incalculable,' Trump said on Tuesday. 'Fortunately, the economy is sooo good that we've blown through Powell and the complacent Board.' Powell and economic policymakers at the Federal Reserve, meanwhile, have expressed concern over Trump's aggressive tariff policy, which they maintain could increase inflation in the coming months. Data released by the US Labor Department on Tuesday said that consumer inflation had risen 2.7 percent for the 12-month period ending in July. That number was an increase of 0.2 percent over June. The Federal Reserve aims to keep inflation below 2 percent and does not typically lower interest rates when inflation is above that figure.
Al Jazeera
3 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump extends China tariff deadline for the second time. What does it mean?
The United States and China have extended their tariff deadline for another 90 days, preventing an escalation of the trade war between the world's two largest economies, with markets rallying after President Donald Trump announced the pause. With the extension, the imposition of higher tariffs on China will be suspended until November 10, with all other elements of an existing truce – which was set to expire on Tuesday – to remain in place. 'The United States continues to have discussions with the PRC to address the lack of trade reciprocity in our economic relationship and our resulting national and economic security concerns,' Trump's executive order stated, using the acronym for the People's Republic of China. China's Ministry of Commerce issued a parallel pause on extra tariffs early on Tuesday, with the state media reporting that 'a measure to further implement the important consensus reached by the two heads of state' would provide stability for the global economy. So, how significant is the second extension of the tariff truce, and will the two countries sign a trade agreement to prevent a trade war? What are the terms of the pause? Beyond the date extension, a fact sheet posted by the White House on Monday didn't detail any modifications to the trade truce agreed in May. China, in a similar statement, said it would also extend its tariff suspension for 90 days. On May 11, the two sides agreed to a 90-day tariff pause. From early April until then, US import levies on Chinese goods stood at 145 percent, while Chinese tariffs on US exports were 125 percent – rates that resulted in a virtual trade embargo between the two countries. But the tariff truce agreed to in Geneva, Switzerland, lowered the temperature by temporarily slashing US tariffs on Chinese imports to 30 percent, while Chinese levies on US exports fell to 10 percent. Beijing also agreed to resume some rare earth exports critical for the US manufacturing sector, including electronics, aerospace and cars. Following talks in Geneva, US and Chinese representatives met in London in June and then again in Stockholm, Sweden, last month. After the Stockholm meetings, US negotiators returned to Washington with a proposal that Trump extend the Geneva deadline past August 12. In the run-up to this latest pause, it's understood that Trump pushed for additional concessions on Sunday, urging China to quadruple its US soya bean purchases. But analysts questioned the feasibility of his deal, and Trump did not repeat his demand on Monday. How have stock markets responded? Financial markets rallied on Tuesday, with Japanese and Australian equities hitting record highs following the trade truce announcement. Japan's Topix benchmark rose 1.6 percent, as Australia's S&P/ASX 200 climbed 0.2 percent. In the US, futures tracking the S&P 500 and Nasdaq indexes edged up 0.1 percent. Meanwhile, oil prices increased. Brent crude futures jumped 0.4 percent to $66.9 a barrel, while US West Texas Intermediate crude futures were up 0.4 percent to $64.2. Why has Trump been flexible with China on trade? In recent weeks, US-China negotiations have been on a parallel track to other talks Washington has held with trade partners, as it moved to implement sweeping 'reciprocal' tariffs – as well as industry-specific levies – on August 7. Trump struck agreements to lower tariffs with some trading partners, including the EU and Japan, but hit others like Brazil and Switzerland with swingeing levies. In the case of India, Trump doubled tariffs to 50 percent after New Delhi refused to curb purchases of Russian oil and lower tariffs on US goods. For Thomas Sampson, a professor of economics at the London School of Economics, trade negotiations between the US and China have 'been running on their own track … because the US sees China as a long-term economic rival.' Sampson told Al Jazeera that 'I don't think it [Washington] sees the EU or other countries in the same way.' He also noted that the 'incipient military rivalry between the US and China' means that bilateral negotiations are sensitive. What makes the trade relationship special? Trump has consistently criticised Beijing for what he deems to be unfair trade practices – namely import quotas, tax breaks and subsidies. He has even argued that the US's trade deficit with China, which reached $295.4bn last year, amounts to a national emergency. China is the US's third-largest trade partner, after Mexico and Canada. It is heavily reliant on China for manufactured goods – from washing machines and TV sets to clothing. The US Department of Commerce calculated that mechanical appliances (mainly low to mid-range technology products) made up 46.4 percent of all US imports from China in 2022. And while US imports from China surged to beat Trump's tariff bite following his 'liberation day' announcement in April, they then dropped in June. Indeed, the US trade deficit with China fell by roughly a third to $9.5 billion in June – its narrowest level since 2004, according to US Census Bureau data. The US trade gap with China fell by $22.2bn from March to August. That amounts to a 70 percent drop from one year earlier. More generally, US Treasury Department data shows that the US generated $124bn from January to July this year from tariffs. This is 131 percent more than the same time last year. At the same time, the two countries trade goods of vital strategic interest whose importance trumps crude deficit figures. And both sides have been taking steps to reduce flashpoints recently. For its part, the US has eased some export restrictions on advanced semiconductors – a key demand from China. On Monday, the Financial Times newspaper revealed that Trump had permitted Nvidia and AMD to export advanced US chips to China. But the tech giants would pay 15 percent of their China sales to the federal government. Trump had previously barred those deals. Trump's predecessor, Joe Biden, had also imposed restrictions on US chip exports, as well as banned a range of US high-tech investments in China. On the flipside, Chinese exports of rare earth magnets have started to recover in recent weeks after it blocked sales to the US in April. Flows of rare earth magnets – used in everything from clean energy technology to military hardware – from China to the US rose to 353 tonnes in June, up from just 46 tonnes in May. Still, total shipments were still substantially lower than before Beijing launched its export controls in early April. Washington has also been pressing Beijing to stop buying Russian oil to pressure Moscow over its war in Ukraine, with Trump even threatening to impose secondary tariffs on China. US Vice President JD Vance said on Sunday that President Trump has been thinking of imposing tariffs on Beijing. 'Obviously, the China issue is a little bit more complicated because our relationship with China, it affects a lot of other things that have nothing to do with the Russian situation,' Vance told Fox News in an interview. What will happen next? This week's tariff pause may clear the path for Trump to meet President Xi Jinping in late October, when the president is expected to travel to South Korea for the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation summit. Until then, the partial tariff moratorium will give both sides time to work through longstanding trade concerns in advance of the potential meeting. In the US, economists widely agree that the impact of tariffs on Chinese goods has not been fully felt, as many firms have built up their stockpiles of inventories to mitigate the higher duties. Looking ahead, however, BBVA Research published an analysis last month estimating that US tariffs on China would raise US inflation and slow economic growth later this year. For Thomas Sampson, 'the tariff pause allows them [the US and China] to maintain the status quo, and it wouldn't be surprising if, after 90 days, they extend it further.' More broadly, however, he believes that 'there is a bipartisan consensus in Washington to push for a de-linking with trade from China.' 'Big picture,' he said, 'even under a different president, I think you'd still see tensions in the US-China relationship.'
Al Jazeera
14 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump names conservative economist to lead labour statistics agency
United States President Donald Trump has tapped an economist from a conservative thinktank to lead a key statistics agency after firing its previous head over her role in the release of weak employment figures. Trump said on Monday that he had nominated E.J. Antoni, the chief economist at the Heritage Foundation, to lead the Bureau of Labor Statistics. 'Our Economy is booming, and E.J. will ensure that the Numbers released are HONEST and ACCURATE. I know E.J. Antoni will do an incredible job in this new role. Congratulations E.J.!' Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. Trump's nomination of Antoni, who requires confirmation by the US Senate, comes after his firing of Erika McEntarfer earlier this month raised concerns about US government statistics remaining credible and free of political influence. Trump justified McEntarfer's dismissal by claiming, without evidence, that the latest jobs report, which showed sharply slower growth job for May and June than previous estimated, had been 'rigged' to make him look bad. At the Heritage Foundation, Antoni, who had called for McEntarfer's removal shortly before she was fired, has consistently showered Trump with praise. Following Trump's announcement of a trade deal with Japan last month, Antoni described the agreement as 'darn close' to perfect and described the US president and his Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent, as 'artistic masters.' Last week, Antoni said in a social media post that there were 'better ways to collect, process, and disseminate' economic data, and that the next head of the BLS would need to deliver 'accurate data in a timely manner' to rebuild trust in the agency. Antoni and the Heritage Foundation did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Antoni's nomination swiftly drew criticism from economists, who raised concerns about his qualifications and partisan leanings. Jason Furman, an economist at Harvard Kennedy School who served as an adviser to former US President Barack Obama, called Antoni 'completely unqualified.' 'He is an extreme partisan and does not have any relevant expertise. He would be a break from decades of nonpartisan technocrats,' Furman said in a post on X. Erica Groshen, who led the Bureau of Labor Statistics under Obama, voiced similar concerns. 'So far, what worries me is that the nominee and his work are not well known in the business, academic or public service communities,' Groshen told Al Jazeera.
