Council of Europe censures EU state for treatment of Russian speakers
The European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) has reported an increase in hate speech targeting Russian speakers in Latvia in recent years, suggesting that the naturalization procedures in the EU state for non-citizens could "fuel negative sentiment."
After Latvia gained independence in 1991, a large proportion of residents originating from other parts of the Soviet Union (predominantly Russians), even those who were born in the Baltic state, were issued "non-citizen" passports, which barred them from voting or working in certain jobs.
The resulting ethnic division within the population was only made worse by the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in 2022, when Latvia and its Baltic neighbors stepped up their efforts to combat Moscow's perceived influence. Riga has implemented travel restrictions targeting Russian citizens and introduced a mandatory Latvian language test for long-term residents of foreign origin.
Thousands who have failed or refused to take the exam have been deported. The Kremlin has denounced the measures as "blatant discrimination."
In a report published on Thursday, the European Commission stated that since February 2022, there has been a notable spike in hate speech on Latvian internet sites directed at local Russian speakers. According to the document, local authorities may be fueling this animosity with their policies.
The EU watchdog singled out the country's rigorous naturalization procedures, particularly the Latvian language tests that resident non-citizens have to take if they wish to acquire citizenship in the Baltic EU member state if they were born before 1991.
The report urged Riga to take "due account of individual circumstances and [provide] support as appropriate," when conducting such tests.
The commission noted that as of June 2024, only 54% of applicants had passed language proficiency tests, raising concerns over the threat of forced deportation facing those who failed.
The ECRI also cited complaints it had received from the Russian-speaking community in Latvia regarding the local government's decision to phase out their native language from school curriculums by 2025.
The watchdog stressed that Russians, who comprise 24% of the general population in Latvia, constitute the largest ethnic minority in the country.
Earlier this month, a Latvian lawmaker who is an ethnic Russian was removed from a parliamentary session for uttering a few sentences in his mother tongue during proceedings.
Aleksey Roslikov of the For Stability! Party spoke out against what he described as the growing marginalization of Russian speakers in Latvia.
In latte May, Latvian Foreign Minister Baiba Braze called on EU member states to stop issuing Schengen tourist visas to Russian citizens, citing an alleged threat to the bloc's security.
Moscow has criticized Riga's measures targeting Russian speakers as "blatant discrimination," with Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova warning that Moscow could file a complaint against Latvia at the International Court of Justice.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
4 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Much ado about nothing: the Baked Alaska summit
They came. They saw. They left. They achieved nothing. So much for the 'Baked Alaska' summit. 'Russian America' just ain't what it used to be. It's plain old America nowadays, although on a clear day, disconsolate Russian border guards can be spotted on Big Diomede Island. About 10 of them are there, against whom some 75 Alaskans stand firm on Little Diomede Island. This is probably a secure border, at least for the moment, as the closest Russian Orthodox community is in Nome, about 215 kilometres away. Anyway, these 'Arctic Ivans' won't try anything. Surviving island life in the Bering Strait is much easier than staying alive in sunny Crimea, to say nothing of on the battlefields around Pokrovsk. The guy who wasn't there wasn't invited. You might think he would be offended. He isn't. He knows who's won. And that's not U.S. President Donald Trump, much less Russian President Vladimir Putin. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy had no role to play. He is neither a real estate developer nor a dictator. Instead, he is 'Ukraine's Moses,' determinedly leading his nation away from Moscow's pharaoh, continuing along a well-beaten and rather 'long and winding road' in the historical experience of Ukrainians. Once the crippling legacy of Russia's imposed settler colonial project has been fully shed, as it will be, Ukraine will resume its rightful place in Europe. Meanwhile, Muscovy will just further mire. Zelenskyy has repeatedly confirmed that Ukrainians will never reward the aggressor. For the forgetful, he means Russia, which started the war against Ukraine in 2014 and escalated its brutality on Feb. 24, 2022. There will be no 'land for peace,' not after more than three and a half years of fighting. Why? Because any such settlement would not secure a just or lasting peace. It would merely provide a respite for the marauders, allowing Putin's now-increasingly enervated Russia a chance to recuperate before launching yet another attack. At least, Putin has been candid. He has said he wants all of Ukraine. He doesn't believe Ukraine is a legitimate country or that a people known as Ukrainians exist. Erasing Ukraine and Ukrainians is his goal. That is known as genocide. Putin's legions even continued bombing Ukraine as the summit was being held. So there you have it: Ukraine seeks peace, but Russia intends to wage war, after war, after war until there is no more Ukraine. You can't fault Ukrainians for finding this an unpalatable prescription. What is now evident, as never before, is that Ukrainians never were, are not now, and never will be Russians. Indeed, never before in history have Ukrainians been as well-known and admired as they are today. The valour of their soldiers, the stoicism of the Ukrainian people, and the principled and stalwart leadership of Zelenskyy have earned them widespread respect, a silver lining in the dark clouds of Putin's war against the West. But the admiration of others is not enough. To achieve a real peace, Ukraine must defeat Russia. And it will, by continuing to target Russia's oil and natural gas-production facilities, railway and logistics networks, and by killing as many Russian soldiers as it can. It is doing a good job on all those fronts. If, sometimes, that means having to give up a farm field, or a destroyed hamlet, it will. Ukraine is a large country. Kyiv can trade space for time. Wherever they withdraw from today is land Ukrainians will reclaim tomorrow. Russia will pay reparations for what needs to be restored. The West can help by providing more advanced weapons systems to Ukraine's defenders. All frozen Russian assets must be allocated to Kyiv, increasing the resources it needs to defend itself. And the West needs to tighten sanctions against all those who directly or indirectly contribute to the war-making capacity of the so-called Russian Federation. Putin is little more than a dead man walking. His confederate, Trump, is a lame-duck president, desperately trying to make himself look better in history, contrasted with what his actual record warrants. Compared to these two men — a man wanted for war crimes, and a boor — Zelenskyy is a wartime leader who has earned the respect of the civilized world. He is not perfect, by any means. Indeed, I remain skeptical about his chances of being re-elected once this war against Russian revanchism has been won. But then Winston Churchill wasn't returned to the prime minister's office even though he steered Great Britain to its great victory over the Nazis. That shouldn't matter. Zelenskyy is, by far, the most deserving of candidates for a Nobel Peace Prize, a distinction that should be bestowed upon him as soon as Putin's imperial plan is undone and a just peace won. Zelenskyy can then decide if he wants to invite Donald to his party. Lubomyr Luciuk is a professor emeritus of the Royal Military College of Canada.
Winnipeg Free Press
4 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Letters, Aug. 19
Opinion What a waste Re: Trump-Putin takeaways: no agreement, no questions but lots of pomp (Aug. 15) You are so very accurate in your headline reporting on the Trump-Putin 'summit.' What a colossal waste of effort and global attention. Just another Trumpian waste of time that could been handled by an email. Slava Ukraine! Roland Stankevicius Winnipeg There are things one encounters that can never be unseen and remain in memory forever. The sight of U.S. President Donald Trump smiling and applauding as Russian President Vladimir Putin emerges from his plane in Alaska and walks toward Trump on the red carpet awaiting him, like a conquering hero, and then gleefully smiling and chatting jovially together like best buds reuniting, is one. The memory of emergency workers in Ukraine removing bodies and wounded women from a bombed maternity hospital is another. Others are sights of bombed apartment blocks in Ukraine, both the 'military targets' Russian Foreign Affairs Minister Sergey Lavrov claimed are the justified Russian targets of the Ukrainian offensive. That Trump says he 'gets along great' with a war criminal like Putin and 'understands him,' is beyond repulsive, as it goes far beyond appeasement. Len Lewkowich Winnipeg An embarrassing display Wow! Did you watch the TV coverage of this much anticipated summit. What an embarrassing event for the American people and the world. Russian President Vladimir Putin, an alleged war criminal, pariah, kidnapper, and murderer, being warmly welcomed by the president of the United States, Donald Trump, giving Putin the appearance of legitimacy? Then after a short two-hour meeting, both leaders attended a scheduled news conference, where Trump made the mistake of allowing Putin to speak first, setting the stage in his direction and leaving Trump with little to say. At no time were the words ceasefire or peace used. This was a complete letdown, a nothing conference, with Putin winning the day and Trump being played by a skilled dictator. Terry Meindl Winnipeg Hiding hog realities Re: Agricultural fair shuts down Humane Society's pig-crate display (Aug. 17) On Aug. 15 the Hanover Ag Society asked The Winnipeg Humane Society (WHS) to pack up their display of a life-sized sow model in a real gestation stall, along with another stall the same size which was open for humans to step in to help them understand the intense confinement experienced by female pigs. The WHS was asked to leave the ag fair in Grunthal even though they had received permission to set up a display. This move on the part of the Hanover Ag Society can only be interpreted as their desire to keep the public in the dark about the use of gestation stalls in the hog industry. Although the cessation of the use of these stalls by 2024 had been agreed to by the hog industry in Canada, there are still many thousands of sows confined in them in Manitoba. The sows are moved into the stalls around six months of age and remain in stalls that size for the remainder of their adult life, perhaps another 12 to 18 months. Imagine forcing any animal to live in such a tiny space that they can only take a step or two backwards or forwards and they must eat, sleep, relieve themselves and give birth in that confinement. The practice of using gestation stalls in the hog industry is considered to be one of, if not the most, egregious practice in industrial animal agriculture. The Hanover Ag Society's recent action towards the Winnipeg Humane Society says it all. They know how inhumane this is, and they want to hide the truth from the public. Vicki Burns Winnipeg Air Canada strike a test Air Canada's flight attendant strike isn't just about wages. It's about a broken industry standard called 'block pay,' where attendants are only paid once the plane pushes back from the gate. Boarding, deplaning, delays — the very moments when attendants do some of their hardest work — are unpaid. Forward-thinking executives like Ray Dalio often remind us that businesses thrive when they align with reality. The reality is this: attendants are working long hours they're not paid for. Correcting that is not only fair, it's good business. Customers increasingly choose brands that reflect their values — just as people pay more for fair-trade coffee, many would welcome the chance to fly with an airline that treats its employees with dignity. The truth is, full pay for ground duties would add only a few dollars to the cost of a ticket. For that, passengers would get better morale, better service, and the satisfaction of knowing the people responsible for their safety are compensated for every hour they work. Progressive executive leadership would seize this as an opportunity, not a burden. Imagine Air Canada announcing: 'We pay for all hours worked, because fairness isn't negotiable.' Like fair-trade coffee, many Canadians would gladly pay a little more for fair skies. This strike is a test. Air Canada can cling to outdated norms, or it can set a new standard in aviation. Leadership means choosing the latter. Robert Mitchell Winnipeg Don't give up on U.S. market Re: Confusion as exemption pause nears (Aug. 16) Some small business owners are pausing their offerings to American customers because of tariffs imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump. Why would you pause and take the U.S. market completely out of your books instead of adding the tariffs to your prices and telling American customers that the price increase is because of their president? If they choose to not buy then you're no worse off. Some may continue to buy at the increased price. And some will certainly complain to their representatives that these tariffs are ridiculous because Americans are the ones paying for the supposedly billions of dollars coming into the country. At the very least you can make these people realize how much tariffs hurt their economy. Small businesses have an opportunity to reach individual Americans and highlight the effects of tariffs. Don't throw in the towel yet. Chuck Halikas Winnipeg Cattle don't cut it Re: 'Benefits of grassland' (Letters, Aug. 15) The beef producer who wrote in last week raised a very important issue: Canada's Prairie grasslands are an indispensable ecosystem – teeming with biodiversity and serving a number of key roles including carbon sequestration – yet 75 per cent have been dispensed with over time. However, contrary to what many in the beef industry would have us believe, cattle grazing is not the be-all and end-all of grassland maintenance. While cattle are essentially the modern-day analogue of bison in this regard, the two ruminants differ considerably in how they move, stand, and graze. For example, unlike bison, which walk with a relatively light gait and move in smaller groups, cattle can actually damage the soil crust with their trampling, compacting the soil and hindering root growth. A study in 2022 that analyzed nearly three decades of data bears this out. The fact remains that industrial animal agriculture is inherently unsustainable on account of its contribution to greenhouse gas emissions and its inefficiency as a means of food production. True, not all land is suitable for crops – which is why innovations like vertical farming are gaining momentum. If we are to come out on the other side of the ecological crisis we are in, it will mean embracing alternative ways to feed ourselves – and yes, manage grasslands. Let's get on with it. Tracy Groenewegen Winnipeg
Winnipeg Free Press
4 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
A New Zealand soldier admits attempted espionage in the country's first spying conviction
WELLINGTON, New Zealand (AP) — A New Zealand soldier who tried to spy for a foreign power has admitted to attempted espionage in a military court. Monday's conviction was the first for spying in New Zealand's history. The soldier's name was suppressed, as was what country he sought to pass secrets to. Military court documents said the man believed he was engaged with a foreign agent in 2019 when he tried to communicate military information including base telephone directories and maps, assessments of security weaknesses, his own identity card and log-in details for a military network. The wording of the charge said his actions were 'likely to prejudice the security or defense of New Zealand.' He wasn't speaking to a foreign agent, but an undercover New Zealand police officer collecting intelligence on alleged right-wing extremist groups, documents supplied by the military court showed. The soldier came to law enforcement attention as part of an operation that was established after a March 2019 terrorist attack on two mosques in the city of Christchurch, when an Australian white supremacist opened fire on Muslim worshipers, killing 51. He was based at Linton Military Camp near the city of Palmerston North. Officers spoke to the man twice about his involvement in a group, court documents showed, and after the government became aware he had expressed a desire to defect he was contacted by the undercover officer. When the soldier's hard drive was searched, investigators found a copy of Christchurch gunman Brenton Tarrant's livestreamed video of his massacre and a manifesto document he published online before the killings. Possession of either without permission is a criminal offense in New Zealand and the soldier, who admitted that charge too, joins several others convicted in New Zealand of having or sharing the terrorist's banned material. In a statement read to the court by his lawyer, the man said the two nationalist groups with which the man was involved were 'no more than groups of friends with similar points of view to my own,' according to Radio New Zealand. The laywer, Steve Winter, added that his client denied supporting the Christchurch shooter's ideology, RNZ reported. The soldier also pleaded guilty to accessing a military computer system for dishonest purposes. The amended suite of three charges replaced 17 counts levelled against him earlier in the proceedings. Each of the three charges he admitted carries a maximum prison term of either seven or 10 years in New Zealand. His sentence was expected to be delivered by a military panel within days after Monday's conviction. The man was due to stand trial by court martial on the charges before he admitted the offenses. His was the first charge in a New Zealand military court for espionage or attempted spying. The last time such a case reached the civilian courts before was in 1975, when a public servant was acquitted on charges alleging he had passed information to Russian agents. A spokesperson for New Zealand's military said they would not comment until the proceedings against the soldier finished.
