logo
Much ado about nothing: the Baked Alaska summit

Much ado about nothing: the Baked Alaska summit

They came. They saw. They left. They achieved nothing. So much for the 'Baked Alaska' summit.
'Russian America' just ain't what it used to be. It's plain old America nowadays, although on a clear day, disconsolate Russian border guards can be spotted on Big Diomede Island. About 10 of them are there, against whom some 75 Alaskans stand firm on Little Diomede Island. This is probably a secure border, at least for the moment, as the closest Russian Orthodox community is in Nome, about 215 kilometres away. Anyway, these 'Arctic Ivans' won't try anything. Surviving island life in the Bering Strait is much easier than staying alive in sunny Crimea, to say nothing of on the battlefields around Pokrovsk.
The guy who wasn't there wasn't invited. You might think he would be offended. He isn't. He knows who's won. And that's not U.S. President Donald Trump, much less Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy had no role to play. He is neither a real estate developer nor a dictator. Instead, he is 'Ukraine's Moses,' determinedly leading his nation away from Moscow's pharaoh, continuing along a well-beaten and rather 'long and winding road' in the historical experience of Ukrainians. Once the crippling legacy of Russia's imposed settler colonial project has been fully shed, as it will be, Ukraine will resume its rightful place in Europe. Meanwhile, Muscovy will just further mire.
Zelenskyy has repeatedly confirmed that Ukrainians will never reward the aggressor. For the forgetful, he means Russia, which started the war against Ukraine in 2014 and escalated its brutality on Feb. 24, 2022. There will be no 'land for peace,' not after more than three and a half years of fighting. Why? Because any such settlement would not secure a just or lasting peace. It would merely provide a respite for the marauders, allowing Putin's now-increasingly enervated Russia a chance to recuperate before launching yet another attack.
At least, Putin has been candid. He has said he wants all of Ukraine. He doesn't believe Ukraine is a legitimate country or that a people known as Ukrainians exist. Erasing Ukraine and Ukrainians is his goal. That is known as genocide. Putin's legions even continued bombing Ukraine as the summit was being held. So there you have it: Ukraine seeks peace, but Russia intends to wage war, after war, after war until there is no more Ukraine. You can't fault Ukrainians for finding this an unpalatable prescription.
What is now evident, as never before, is that Ukrainians never were, are not now, and never will be Russians. Indeed, never before in history have Ukrainians been as well-known and admired as they are today. The valour of their soldiers, the stoicism of the Ukrainian people, and the principled and stalwart leadership of Zelenskyy have earned them widespread respect, a silver lining in the dark clouds of Putin's war against the West.
But the admiration of others is not enough. To achieve a real peace, Ukraine must defeat Russia. And it will, by continuing to target Russia's oil and natural gas-production facilities, railway and logistics networks, and by killing as many Russian soldiers as it can. It is doing a good job on all those fronts. If, sometimes, that means having to give up a farm field, or a destroyed hamlet, it will. Ukraine is a large country. Kyiv can trade space for time. Wherever they withdraw from today is land Ukrainians will reclaim tomorrow. Russia will pay reparations for what needs to be restored.
The West can help by providing more advanced weapons systems to Ukraine's defenders. All frozen Russian assets must be allocated to Kyiv, increasing the resources it needs to defend itself. And the West needs to tighten sanctions against all those who directly or indirectly contribute to the war-making capacity of the so-called Russian Federation.
Putin is little more than a dead man walking. His confederate, Trump, is a lame-duck president, desperately trying to make himself look better in history, contrasted with what his actual record warrants. Compared to these two men — a man wanted for war crimes, and a boor — Zelenskyy is a wartime leader who has earned the respect of the civilized world.
He is not perfect, by any means. Indeed, I remain skeptical about his chances of being re-elected once this war against Russian
revanchism has been won. But then Winston Churchill wasn't returned to the prime minister's office even though he steered Great Britain to its great victory over the Nazis. That shouldn't matter. Zelenskyy is, by far, the most deserving of candidates for a Nobel Peace Prize, a distinction that should be bestowed upon him as soon as Putin's imperial plan is undone and a just peace won.
Zelenskyy can then decide if he wants to invite Donald to his party.
Lubomyr Luciuk is a professor emeritus of the Royal Military College of Canada.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Adam Zivo: Zelenskyy meeting with Trump a resounding success
Adam Zivo: Zelenskyy meeting with Trump a resounding success

National Post

time31 minutes ago

  • National Post

Adam Zivo: Zelenskyy meeting with Trump a resounding success

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's visit to the White House on Monday was a resounding diplomatic success. With the support of Europe's most powerful leaders, Zelenskyy repaired his relationship with U.S. President Donald Trump and seemingly reoriented Washington's foreign policy in Ukraine's favour, bolstering hope that a just peace might yet be negotiated for the besieged country. Article content Article content The meeting came just three days after Trump, hoping to negotiate a ceasefire deal for Ukraine, hosted Russian President Vladimir Putin at a summit in Alaska. While Putin and Trump initially greeted each other at that summit warmly, their talks terminated prematurely, after just three hours, with both the American and Russian delegations leaving stonefaced. Article content Article content Following the Alaska summit, Trump told Zelenskyy and his European allies that Putin had demanded that Ukraine hand over its Donetsk province — which Russia only partially occupies — in exchange for freezing the frontlines elsewhere, and possibly conceded other territory Russia holds, and suggested that Washington would support such a deal. Article content As Donetsk contains Ukraine's most significant defensive fortifications, ceding this territory would leave the country vulnerable to further invasion. However, White House officials claimed on Sunday that Russia had, in a major compromise, agreed to allow Ukraine to receive NATO-style security guarantees, the details of which remain unspecified. Article content Article content But as Trump's public rhetoric grew more aggressive towards Ukraine throughout the weekend, some feared that Zelenskyy would be pressured into a bad peace deal — one where devastating land concessions would be inadequately compensated for with toothless promises. Article content This week's White House meeting could have provided the perfect opportunity for such a move. Zelenskyy's last visit in February had infamously devolved into a shouting match with Trump and U.S. President J.D. Vance, after a hostile journalist berated the Ukrainian President for not wearing a suit. The incident was widely interpreted as a MAGA ambush designed to humiliate Kyiv — so was this going to be another repeat with sinister policy implications? Article content In an apparent bid to protect Zelenskyy from bullying, the leaders of Britain, France, Germany, Italy and Finland, as well as the heads of the EU and NATO, abruptly announced that they would accompany the Ukrainian leader at the White House. In the leadup to the meeting, they firmly expressed their support for the Ukrainian president and reportedly provided private coaching on how to handle Trump. Article content Despite their best efforts, the beginning of the trip was not promising. While Trump had rolled out the red carpet for Putin days earlier and personally greeted him, Zelenskyy was given no such welcome. Article content Instead, the Ukrainian president first met with Trump's Special Envoy Keith Kellogg before convening with Kyiv's European partners. Zelenskyy then changed into an all-black suit — somber enough to acknowledge his country's wartime realities, but more formal than his usual attire — and joined Trump in front of the White House, where the two men seemed polite but uncomfortable with one another. Article content Inside their Oval Office public meeting, though, the mood quickly brightened. Article content Zelenskyy began by profusely thanking Trump for his support — an important move, as, during his last visit, both Vance and Trump had accused him of being ungrateful. He said that he appreciated that Trump's wife, Melania, had written a letter to Putin asking for an end to the war for the sake of Ukraine's children (the letter was given to Putin in Alaska). He then handed Trump a letter written to Melania from his own wife, Olena Zelenska, which seemed to set the American president at ease. Article content The relationship between the two men turned amicable. They even cracked small jokes with each other. 'You look fabulous in that suit!' said the aforementioned MAGA journalist who had criticized Zelenskyy's attire during his last visit. 'I said the same thing,' quipped Trump in reply. While some reporters asked leading questions that seemed intended to sow discord, none materialized. Article content Trump emphasized that, although the United States would stop donating military or financial aid, it would continue to sell weapons to Ukraine using NATO as an intermediary and would find other ways to assist. 'When it comes to security there's going to be a lot of help. It's going to be good,' he said. 'People are being killed, and we want to stop that. So I would not say it's the end of the road.' Article content In an unexpected twist, Trump did not rule out sending U.S. troops to Ukraine to assist in peacekeeping after a reporter asked him about the possibility. Article content However, contradicting months of his previous messaging, the American president stated that he did not believe that it is necessary to negotiate a ceasefire, and argued that Ukraine and Russia should seek a full peace deal instead. This approach is generally considered to be favourable to Russia, as Moscow has insisted for years that fighting should cease only at the end of the peace process, not the beginning, presumably so that Russian forces can press their advantages during negotiations. Article content After a closed-door session focusing on security guarantees, Zelenskyy told assembled reporters that he had a 'very good' meeting with Trump: 'It really was the best one. Sorry, or maybe the best one will be in the future.' Reciprocally, Trump said that he 'just had the honour of being with President Zelenskyy' and that they had 'had a very successful day thus far.' Such language would have been unthinkable earlier this year. Article content In the late afternoon, Trump and Zelenskyy met with the assembled European leaders for a group photo and joint discussion. The warm feelings evidently persisted. Article content Mark Rutte, NATO's general secretary, told Trump that Washington's willingness to 'participate in security guarantees is a big step, is really a breakthrough, and it makes all the difference.' However, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said he couldn't 'imagine that the next meeting would take place without a ceasefire,' and that Russia should be pressured to accept one. French President Emmanuel Macron proposed that the next meeting — presumably between Trump, Zelenskyy and Putin — should include a European representative, as security guarantees are relevant to the entire continent.

The Trump-Putin summit was a disaster. And things could still get worse
The Trump-Putin summit was a disaster. And things could still get worse

Toronto Star

time2 hours ago

  • Toronto Star

The Trump-Putin summit was a disaster. And things could still get worse

Watching the Alaskan summit last Friday, historians remember the 1938 Munich Agreement, or the Yalta Conference in 1945: both which serve as cautionary tales in appeasing dictators, selling out smaller states, and ignoring the principles of collective security. While the contexts and players are different, the melody is frighteningly familiar. The only positive result from the Trump-Putin meeting is that no deal was made, at least not publicly. What precisely the two discussed remains in question, but given the mercurial nature of Trump's foreign policy, Ukrainians worry that their interests were not well represented by American officials. Opinion articles are based on the author's interpretations and judgments of facts, data and events. More details

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store