
Labour councillor ‘horrified' by own cutting throats comment at rally, jury told
In the wake of rioting after the Southport murders last summer, Ricky Jones, 58, described far-right activists as 'disgusting Nazi fascists', his trial at Snaresbrook Crown Court heard.
He told jurors on Wednesday that his comment did not refer to far-right protesters involved in the riots at the time, but to those who had reportedly left National Front stickers on a train with razor blades hidden behind them.
A video showing Jones addressing the crowd in Walthamstow, east London, on August 7 last year, went viral on social media after the protest.
Wearing a black polo top and surrounded by cheering supporters, the councillor said: 'You've got women and children using these trains during the summer holidays.
'They don't give a shit about who they hurt.
'They are disgusting Nazi fascists. We need to cut all their throats and get rid of them all.'
He also drew his finger across his throat as he spoke to the crowd.
Jones, who at the time worked as an official for the Transport Salaried Staff's Association (TSSA) union, later sent an edited version of his speech video to union members, the court heard.
Asked by his defence barrister, Hossein Zahir KC, why he edited the video, Jones replied: 'When I had time to view the footage after the demonstration, I was shocked at what I had actually said.
'I was horrified.
'Under no circumstances did I want to portray that to anybody, so I edited that last bit out.'
The unedited video was eventually posted on social media platform X, formerly Twitter, where it attracted millions of views, the trial heard.
Jones told jurors he felt 'very emotional and very upset' after receiving pictures, the day before the rally, of National Front stickers that had been left on a train, which had razor blades hidden behind them – supposedly so that people who tried to remove the stickers would injure themselves.
He had also received reports from union members that more razor blades had been found stuck between seats, Jones added.
'I was very concerned about what had happened on the train.
'I was thinking, this (the speech) is a good opportunity to raise what happened.'
The father-of-four and grandfather described the mood in the crowd at the time as 'happy and joyful', adding: 'There clearly wasn't any upset or anger from any people in that scene, because they clearly knew it was about what happened on the train.'
Prosecutor Ben Holt, cross-examining, told the defendant: 'Your words about slitting people's throats were not cheerful or happy.'
Jones replied: 'I totally agree, I'm ashamed.'
The defendant however denied intending to encourage violence towards far-right protesters.
'What violence could have anyone caused to those people in the train?' Jones said.
'It was nonsensical – I didn't believe there was a risk.'
Jones, who has been a borough councillor in Dartford, Kent, since 2019, was suspended by the Labour Party the day after the alleged incident.
He was arrested on August 8 last year and interviewed at Brixton Police Station that night.
The demonstration had been organised in response to plans for a far-right march outside Waltham Forest Immigration Bureau.
It followed the disorder in parts of the UK last summer after the Southport murders.
Jones, of Dartford, denies one count of encouraging violent disorder.
The trial continues.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
22 minutes ago
- The Independent
Reeves says rulings on tax must wait for Budget amid inheritance tax speculation
Rachel Reeves has said that decisions around taxes will have to wait for the autumn Budget, amid reports that the Treasury is looking to raise more money from inheritance tax. The Chancellor told reporters that decisions will be made 'in the round' and her priority 'is to get our economy firing off all cylinders'. Earlier this week, the Guardian reported that officials are examining whether tightening rules around the gifting of assets and money could help address the UK's multi-billion-pound fiscal shortfall. Government U-turns over winter fuel payments and welfare reform have left Chancellor Rachel Reeves with a multibillion-pound spending gap to about the reports on Thursday, Ms Reeves said: 'Any decision around taxation is a … decision for the Budget, and I'll make those announcements. 'We haven't even set the date yet for the Budget, but the key focus of the Budget is going to be to build on numbers that we've seen today to boost productivity and growth and prosperity all across the country. 'That is my number one priority as Chancellor, to get our economy firing off all cylinders so that working people in all parts of the country will feel the benefits of that economic growth.' Pushed on whether taxes will have to increase in the autumn, Ms Reeves added: 'We'll wait for the official forecast from the Office of Budget Responsibility, and we'll make those decisions in the round.' Among the reported inheritance tax measures under consideration is a potential cap on lifetime gifts, part of a broader review into how assets can be transferred before death to minimise inheritance tax liabilities. Under current UK rules, gifts made more than seven years before a person's death are exempt from inheritance tax. Gifts made between three and seven years prior are taxed on a sliding scale, depending on their value and the total estate. The Chancellor was speaking as new official figures show that the UK economy slowed in the second quarter of this year amid pressure from tariff uncertainty and tax increases. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) said gross domestic product (GDP) grew by 0.3% for the quarter after 0.7% growth in the first three months of the year. However, the figure was stronger than the 0.1% level widely expected by economists after an uptick in activity in June and revised data for earlier in the quarter.


The Independent
22 minutes ago
- The Independent
UK ‘scales back' plans for 30,000-troop reassurance force in Ukraine
The UK has reportedly scaled back its plans to put troops in Ukraine, now offering a smaller 'reassurance force' to support peace efforts in the region. While a 30,000-strong group from countries that make up the coalition of the willing – a group of countries which have pledged support for Ukraine against Russia's aggression – had initially been floated, military chiefs are now said to have dropped the idea, instead favouring a smaller, 'more realistic' operation. It comes as Sir Keir Starmer prepares to welcome Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to No 10 on Thursday morning, as Europe rallies behind Ukraine. It comes amid fears the country could be shut out of any peace talks when Donald Trump and Russia's President Putin hold a historic summit on the future of the war in Alaska on Friday. The PM joined Donald Trump and European allies on a call to discuss the future of Ukraine on Wednesday, where he praised the US president's work to bring forward a 'viable' chance of an end to the devastating conflict. While Sir Keir had been in favour of a bigger coalition of the willing force, The Times reported that some European nations were concerned that such a large deployment to protect key Ukrainian sites was too risky. It is thought that the scaled-back force would not be sent to the frontline, instead providing logistical support, armament and training experts to support the regeneration of Ukraine's own forces. However, the role the US is expected to play is still unclear. Speaking after Wednesday's meeting, Sir Keir said: 'We're ready to support this, including from the plans we've already drawn up to deploy a reassurance force once hostilities have ceased. 'It is important to remind colleagues that we do stand ready also to increase pressure on Russia, particularly the economy, with sanctions and wider measures as may be necessary.' The PM said Friday's talks were 'hugely important', adding: 'As I've said personally to President Trump for the three-and-a-bit years this conflict has been going on, we haven't got anywhere near a prospect of actually a viable solution, a viable way of bringing it to a ceasefire. 'And now we do have that chance, because of the work that the president has put in.' But concerns have been raised over Mr Zelensky's exclusion from Friday's meeting between Mr Trump and Mr Putin. Sir Keir and European leaders have repeatedly stated that discussions about Ukraine should not take place without it, amid concerns that the country is being sidelined. Asked if he decided not to invite Mr Zelensky to the meeting, Mr Trump said 'no, just the opposite', before adding that a second meeting with the Ukrainian president could take place afterwards. Mr Trump has threatened Russia with "severe consequences" if a ceasefire is rejected by its leader. At the weekend, the US president suggested a truce could involve some "swapping" of land. Putin is expected to use the summit to demand that Ukraine cede parts of the Donbas region, which it still controls. On Saturday, Mr Zelensky rejected any proposal that would compromise Ukraine's territorial integrity, something that is forbidden by the country's constitution.


BreakingNews.ie
23 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Zelenskiy to meet Starmer in London ahead of Trump-Putin summit
Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy is due in London to meet British prime minister Keir Starmer on Thursday, to take stock ahead of US president Donald Trump's key talks with Russian president Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday. Zelenskiy, who was in Germany on Wednesday, has been working with European leaders to press Trump not to allow Putin to carve up Ukraine's territory at the Alaska summit. Advertisement He is due to meet Starmer at 9.30am at the British prime minister's official residence, 10 Downing Street. On Wednesday, Trump joined a Germany-hosted virtual meeting with European leaders, including Zelenskiy, who sought to set red lines ahead of the summit on ending the war in Ukraine. Zelenskiy said he warned Trump that the Russian leader was "bluffing" about his desire to end the war. Trump later threatened "severe consequences" if Putin does not agree to peace in Ukraine and while he did not specify what the consequences could be, he has warned of economic sanctions if his meeting on Friday proves fruitless. Advertisement The comments and the outcome of the virtual conference on Wednesday could provide encouragement for Kyiv ahead of the summit. Trump described the aim of his talks with Putin in Alaska as "setting the table" for a quick follow-up that would include Zelenskiy. "If the first one goes okay, we'll have a quick second one," Trump said. "I would like to do it almost immediately, and we'll have a quick second meeting between president Putin and president Zelenskiy and myself, if they'd like to have me there." Britain, France and Germany, the co-chairs of the so-called "Coalition of the Willing", set out their position on the pathway to a ceasefire in Ukraine in a statement released after Wednesday's virtual meeting.