logo
Embrace Of Technology Across All Business Is Key To Growth

Embrace Of Technology Across All Business Is Key To Growth

Forbes12 hours ago

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves during a visit to ... More Horiba Mira in Nuneaton, to mark the launch of the Government's Industrial Strategy earlier this week. (Photo by Jacob King - WPA Pool / Getty Images)
As is almost inevitably the case with government announcements, it was not easy to assess how much of Sir Keir Starmer's long-awaited industrial strategy was new when it was unveiled earlier this week. In particular, and unsurprisingly, there were questions about both the amount of the money pledged and whether it also was new — or merely recycled from elsewhere.
Nevertheless, its existence is at least an acknowledgement that it is not enough for Sir Keir and his Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, to keep talking about growth and that they need to show some action and provide some incentives. This seems to have found favor with at least some in business who were involved in the development of the policy. For example, both Sarah Walker, chief executive for the U.K. and Ireland at technology giant Cisco, and Daniel Pell, her counterpart at the people and financial management software company Workday, welcomed the initiative, at least partly on the grounds that it had been — in Pell's words — 'built through consultation with business.'
Essentially, the strategy sets out to boost eight key sectors — the IS-8 — that the U.K. Government expects to deliver faster than average growth and higher pay for workers. These sectors are advanced manufacturing, creative industries, clean energy, digital technologies, professional and business services, life sciences, financial services and defence.
The focus on areas that are already deemed successful is bound to upset those in other industries that have missed out on special treatment. Reports point to how the retail and hospitality sectors have been hit hard by recent changes to employers' taxes and argue that they also suffer from the high energy prices that are being targeted for the chosen sectors. And then there are the supporters of the beleaguered agricultural sector. But for recognising that there are certain parts of the economy that merit support because they are successful rather than because they are struggling, ministers deserve some credit. In the past, too many governments of different political persuasions have wasted public money on industries and individual companies that were never going to compete internationally.
That said, there are a lot of details that will have to be got right if this strategy is to fare any better than its predecessors. A key element is the much talked-about issue of the British worker. Policy makers fret about lack of productivity while employers complain of skills shortages. Meanwhile, many would-be employees are disincentivised by the poor levels of pay. Not only have spikes in inflation meant that in real terms pay for many has dropped in recent years, but the benefits available to many can make people feel it is not worthwhile to go to work. This is a key reason why the current U.K. Government's attempts to reform the welfare state, which are putting it at odds with some of its own MPs and supporters, are so crucial.
Another over-riding concern is technology. Ministers can still seem to regard it as something somewhat fanciful that involves only a few businesses. But, as Cisco's Walker pointed out in a statement reacting to the announcement of the industrial strategy, 'As well as being one of the eight growth driving sectors, the role of technology will be key across the board.'
The strategy talks about spending more than £1 billion ($1.37 billion) a year on skills by 2028-29, including reforming apprenticeships so that, for instance, short, targeted courses within sectors qualify. This is something that has long been lobbied for by those involved in digital training and should be welcomed.
But the bigger issue, of course, is AI. Like technology in general, this will pervade all sectors before long. As Pell pointed out in his statement, the Government does have an AI Opportunities Action Plan. But, such is the pace of change, that plan is going to have to be implemented in short order if the country is not to be left behind.
According to Cisco research, only a tenth of U.K. organizations are fully prepared to harness AI's potential. However, a study recently published by the enterprise software company Salesforce suggests that U.K. companies are leading the way on agentic AI adoption. Nearly four out of five leaders reported that their companies were already using AI agents.
While the company is calling for a national digital skills platform to help resell and train the workforce in what is required to succeed in the AI world, it is hard to escape the conclusion that the process needs to start much earlier in individuals' lives.
Already, schools and colleges in the U.K. — like their counterparts around the world — are grappling with students using AI in fair and sometimes not so fair ways. But, rather than pushing against the tide, educators could be harnessing AI to enhance the learning experience — and improve results.
A glimpse of what might be possible was offered earlier this month by Efekta Education Group, a technology-led spin-off from Education First, which claims to be the world's largest private education company. With a track record in teaching children and employees of some of the world's largest companies English as a foreign language, it is offering two AI products — one to help teachers deal with the administrative work that takes up so much of their day and the other to provide students with an AI tutor to help make students more engaged and to provide the personalized learning that research has shown improves results. For the moment, the company is sticking to the language training that it has grown up on, but it has plans to move into sciences and mathematics. Imagine if something like this were adopted in the national curriculum. Then the U.K. really might be on a path to being a digital powerhouse.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Starmer Acknowledges Asking ‘a Lot' of UK Firms With Tax Hikes
Starmer Acknowledges Asking ‘a Lot' of UK Firms With Tax Hikes

Bloomberg

time36 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Starmer Acknowledges Asking ‘a Lot' of UK Firms With Tax Hikes

Prime Minister Keir Starmer acknowledged the impact his government's tax increases have had on UK firms as he faces strong calls from business to resist further hikes in the autumn budget. 'We've asked a lot of you,' Starmer said to an audience of hundreds of business leaders at the British Chamber of Commerce's annual conference in London on Thursday. 'I understand that and want to acknowledge that. It's made a huge difference. The money has gone into the NHS and waiting lists are coming down. None of that would have been possible without your contribution.'

The White House makes its closing argument for Trump's 'big, beautiful bill': ‘Very big' economic benefits
The White House makes its closing argument for Trump's 'big, beautiful bill': ‘Very big' economic benefits

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

The White House makes its closing argument for Trump's 'big, beautiful bill': ‘Very big' economic benefits

The White House is making its closing argument for President Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' and it involves some eye-popping projections for the US economy that don't line up with predictions of independent economists. How eye-popping? Try economic growth of 4.9% in the short term and up to $11.1 trillion in deficit reduction over the next decade if the Senate bill is passed and Trump's agenda is enacted. "Those are very big numbers," acknowledged Council of Economic Advisers chair Stephen Miran on a call with reporters as he laid out a 27-page report. The findings were immediately met with skepticism by economists who have come to very different conclusions. The report nevertheless concludes that Trump's entire 'suite' of policies — from the bill itself to unilateral deregulation efforts to tariffs — could lead, in Miran's words, to 'very material increases in GDP growth, very material increases in investment activity, and very material increases in real wages and take-home pay.' The case is essentially that certain provisions in the bill — especially deductions for businesses around things like research and development — will lead to a spike in corporate investment that will then fuel 4.6% to 4.9% in additional GDP growth over the next four years. It's an aggressive projection, to say the least. For context, a recent Tax Foundation estimate pegged that figure at 1.1%. But that outsized 4%+ growth will then fuel, the White House says, a reduction in federal deficits by roughly $8.5 trillion-$11.1 trillion over the standard 10-year budget window. That would lead to thousands of dollars in additional income for a typical family and stabilize America's debt-to-GDP ratio, according to the report. The rosy predictions from the White House were immediately slammed by a range of economists. 'Well I guess if you are going to make stuff up, go big or go home,' offered former Democratic Congresswoman Carolyn Bourdeaux. 'No credible economist believes this bill is going to reduce the deficit,' she added, noting that 'it adds $3+ trillion.' Bourdeaux currently runs the Concord Coalition, a group focused on the national debt. A range of independent projections — from the Congressional Budget Office to the Tax Foundation to the Penn-Wharton Budget Model — have looked at different versions of the bill and reached a similar conclusion of much lower economic growth and a price tag in the neighborhood of $3 trillion over the next decade. The back and forth comes after the House passed a first version of the bill last month that was then followed by amendments in the Senate. Majority Leader John Thune hopes to finalize those amendments and put the entire package up for a series of votes starting Friday. The deliberations are also being closely watched by Wall Street, with the mega-bill also responsible for raising a debt ceiling that is ticking towards a government default as early as Aug. 15, the Bipartisan Policy Center projected in a new report also released Wednesday. The problem for Thune and other Republicans is that a series of fights over different pieces of the bill remain unresolved, with GOP leaders facing a daunting to-do list in the days ahead before another round of voting can begin. In addition to lawmaker objections over issues like state and local tax (SALT) deductions and Medicaid cuts, recent Senate changes already appear likely to increase the price tag further and have further inflamed the concerns of fiscal hawks. A look at the tax provisions of the bill in recent days from the Joint Committee on Taxation offered a new price tag that tops $4 trillion. Wednesday's White House report offered a breakdown of how officials say the top figure of $11.1 trillion is achievable, suggesting that roughly $2.1 trillion-2.2 trillion in deficit declines come from the bill itself. Other cost savings will come from additional reductions in discretionary spending (about $1.8 trillion) and more tariff revenue (another $3.2 trillion). The tariff revenue figure is an increase from a recent Congressional Budget Office calculation of $2.8 trillion in revenues, but only if tariffs stay at current levels for the next decade. The final piece of the report focused on deregulatory and energy policies. The White House concluded those steps could reduce the deficit by an additional $1.3 trillion to $3.7 trillion over the coming decade. The new numbers further reinforced a divide between economists and the White House. After the House bill was released, there was an $11 trillion chasm between what economists said the bill's effects would be and what the White House said Trump's agenda would bring. The divide is now even wider, with $15 trillion separating projections released in recent days from each side. The bill is "far from deficit neutral," added Heather Boushey, a former member of Joe Biden's Council of Economic Advisors, on Wednesday afternoon. "There are a lot of shenanigans in how they are calculating their numbers." Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices Sign in to access your portfolio

Crown court backlog of cases passes 75,000 for first time
Crown court backlog of cases passes 75,000 for first time

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Crown court backlog of cases passes 75,000 for first time

The crown court backlog in England and Wales has risen to a new record high, passing 75,000 cases for the first time. Data published on Thursday shows the open caseload stood at 76,957 at the end of March this year, up from 74,592 at the end of December 2024. This is also up 11% from 69,021 a year earlier, according to Ministry of Justice figures. Some 18,093 cases had been open for at least a year at the end of March, up from 16,184 a year earlier and the highest since current data began. Responding to the figures, courts and legal services minister Sarah Sackman KC said the current rate of increase could see the backlog hit 100,000 before 2028. This is earlier than the minister's previous warning that it could hit the milestone by the end of 2029. Ms Sackman said: 'Despite the hard work of people across the criminal justice system the situation in our crown court is reaching breaking point. 'We inherited a courts crisis with an ever-growing backlog which, at its current rate of increase, will hit 100,000 before 2028. 'It is simply unacceptable that any victim has to wait years to see justice done and it is clear the status quo is not working. 'Only radical reform can deliver swifter justice for victims and that is why we asked Sir Brian Leveson to make recommendations for once-in-a-generation change, to be published in the coming weeks.' The Leveson review is expected to give recommendations on how to overhaul the court system. The Government has already agreed to implement a raft of reforms following an independent sentencing review by former justice secretary David Gauke to tackle jail overcrowding. But Mary Prior KC, chairwoman of the Criminal Bar Association, said ministers must open up closed crown court rooms to allow delayed cases to be heard, adding: 'Whatever the radical reforms suggested in ongoing reviews, implementation will take at least another year.' She said: 'The traumatised people in the long queue for justice may well have walked away by then, unheard and unseen. 'Victims of serious crimes want their cases dealt with in months, not years. 'People falsely accused of crimes want the same. Both want the nightmare to end.' In March, Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood announced a record level of sitting days for crown court judges to tackle delays but admitted the 'sad reality' is the backlog of cases will 'still go up'. The Lord Chancellor said judges will sit collectively for 110,000 days in the next financial year – 4,000 more than allocated for the previous period.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store