Air Force blames air traffic controllers for near miss involving B-52 bomber
In a statement released Monday evening, the Air Force said the B-52 crew told Minot International Airport's air traffic control that the bomber was nearing the area where a SkyWest Airlines pilot was approaching to land the evening of July 18.
'The tower did not advise of the inbound commercial aircraft,' the Air Force said.
The pilot of the passenger jet Flight 3788, which departed from Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, was forced to veer sharply to avoid the B-52, startling passengers, though both planes landed safely. A passenger aboard the commercial flight captured a video of the pilot's explanation over the intercom of what had occurred, during which he said he had to make an 'aggressive maneuver' to turn after spotting the bomber in his flight path.
'Sorry about the aggressive maneuver. It caught me by surprise,' the pilot said. 'This is not normal at all. I don't know why they didn't give us a heads up.'
SkyWest is owned by Delta Air Lines.
The Air Force explained that the bomber, from Minot Air Force Base, had been conducting a flyover at the North Dakota State Fair in Minot that was 'planned in advance' and 'approved by the Federal Aviation Administration' the Minot International Airport air traffic control and the military base's air traffic control team.
Ahead of the flyover, the B-52 crew contacted its base air traffic control team as well as that of the Minot International Airport's air traffic control tower. At 7:40 p.m. the bomber crew told the base they were departing their holding point for the fairgrounds. Three minutes later the base directed the crew to contact the airport's air traffic control.
'The B-52 crew contacted Minot International Airport tower and the tower provided instructions to continue 2 miles westbound after the flyover,' the Air Force said, noting that the tower did not advise them of the incoming commercial aircraft.
The flyover happened at 7:50 p.m., and the B-52 kept flying west as instructed to clear the airport's airspace before returning to base, according to the Air Force.
The FAA, Air Force and SkyWest are investigating the incident, the latest in a string of recent air safety scares.
On Jan. 29, an American Airlines passenger jet and an Army helicopter collided over Washington, D.C., killing all 67 people aboard the two aircraft. It was later found that the UH-60 Black Hawk helicopter, on a training exercise, had been flying in airspace well above where it should have been when it struck the regional jet out of Wichita, Kansas.
On Feb. 17, another flight out of Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport owned by Delta crashed upon landing at Toronto Pearson International Airport. All 76 passengers and four crew members survived but 21 were injured.
Then in late February, a Southwest Airlines flight set to land at Chicago's Midway Airport was forced to sharply rise back into the sky to avoid another aircraft crossing the runway.
The FAA said Monday that a private company provides services for the Minot air traffic control tower, and that those controllers are not FAA employees.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
2 days ago
- The Hill
2 flight attendants injured in Southwest Airlines flight
Two flight attendants were injured on a Southwest Airlines flight taking off in Burbank, Calif. after the plane made several sudden altitude changes to avoid colliding with another aircraft. CNN reported that the Las Vegas-bound flight made a sudden drop of 475 feet in order to avoid a privately owned Hawker Hunter fighter jet. The commercial jet then climbed about 600 feet in about a minute. The extent of the injuries were not disclosed. 'Southwest is engaged with the Federal Aviation Administration to further understand the circumstances,' the airline said in a statement to NewsNation. 'Nothing is more important to Southwest than the Safety of our Customers and Employees.' The Federal Aviation Administration said in a statement that it was investigating the incident and that it was in contact with the airline. Most commercial planes are equipped with an alert system to avoid collisions that can direct pilots to climb or descend rapidly. The avoided collision comes less than a week after a SkyWest Airlines plane made what the pilot called an 'aggressive maneuver' during landing in North Dakota to avoid a B-52 bomber. In January, an American Airlines flight collided with an Army helicopter during a training exercise above the Potomac River, killing 67 people. The FAA has since modified helicopter routes in and around Washington Reagan National Airport, some of the most complex and restricted airspace in the country.
Newsweek
3 days ago
- Newsweek
US-Allied Military Planes Involved in Airspace Scare
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. South Korea's military has launched an investigation after one of its transport planes entered Japan's air defense identification zone (ADIZ) without prior notice, leading Japan to scramble fighters to carry out an interception. Newsweek has reached out to South Korea's defense ministry by email with a request for comment. Why It Matters An ADIZ is a designated area of airspace where foreign aircraft are required to identify themselves. Failure to do so typically prompts the claimant nation to dispatch military aircraft. Japan and South Korea—both key U.S. security partners in the Asia-Pacific—have a history of uneasy relations, shaped by Japan's colonial rule over the Korean Peninsula and a territorial dispute over a group of islets. Still, recent years have seen increased security cooperation between the uneasy partners in response to perceived threats posed by North Korea and China. A Republic of Korea Air Force C-130 takes off at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Alaska on June 9, 2023. A Republic of Korea Air Force C-130 takes off at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Alaska on June 9, 2023. Airman 1st Class Julia Lebens/U.S. Air Force What To Know On July 13, a South Korean Lockheed C-130 Hercules, en route to a large-scale U.S.-led military exercise in Guam, was forced to reroute to Kadena Air Base in Japan's Okinawa Prefecture to refuel. While officials did not name the exercise, it was likely the ongoing Resolute Force Pacific, billed as the largest combat exercise ever held in the Pacific. The diversion occurred after the plane burned through more fuel than expected while navigating bad weather, a South Korean military spokesperson told the media Thursday. The plane entered Japan's ADIZ without first obtaining clearance, prompting Japan to dispatch fighter jets to intercept the aircraft, the country's Joint Staff told outlet Stars and Stripes. The C-130's pilot then explained the situation to U.S. and Japanese forces via radio before making an emergency landing, Seoul said. After refueling, the aircraft was cleared to continue on to Guam, a U.S. territory. "We conveyed to South Korea that this scramble was regrettable and requested measures to prevent further incidents," a Japanese official said. "But as they are our important partner, we will continue to work closely together to address the issue." The incident came just two days after a joint drill in South Korea involving U.S. and South Korean fighter jets and a U.S. B-52 Stratofortress. It marked the first deployment this year of the nuclear-capable bomber to the Korean Peninsula. What's Next It's unclear whether South Korea's military will take disciplinary measures against the C-130 pilot. Japan is expected to continue to respond to anomalous activity within its EEZ, particularly in light of repeated encroachments by Chinese drones.
Hamilton Spectator
4 days ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Close call between a B-52 bomber and a commercial jet over North Dakota puts focus on small airports
The evasive action an airline pilot took to avoid a B-52 bomber in the skies over North Dakota has focused attention on the way small airport towers are often run by private companies without their own radars. Neither one of the pilots of the bomber or of the Delta Air Lines jet seemed to know the other plane was there before the airline pilot saw the B-52 looming in its path. The incident last Friday is still under investigation. But the Air Force has said the controller at the Minot airport didn't let the bomber's crew know about the airliner, and the SkyWest pilot flying the Delta flight told passengers he was surprised. Passengers were alarmed by the sharp turn and dive the pilot of Delta Flight 3788 executed to avoid the bomber that had just completed a flyover at the State Fair in Minot, and a video shot aboard the plane captured the pilot's explanation afterward. 'Sorry about the aggressive maneuver. It caught me by surprise,' the pilot can be heard saying on the video posted on social media. 'This is not normal at all. I don't know why they didn't give us a heads-up.' This close call is just the latest incident to raise questions about aviation safety in the wake of January's midair collision over Washington, D.C., that killed 67 people. Here's more about the way small airports like Minot operate: Many small airports lack radar It is common for small airports across the country to operate without their own radar systems because it would be too costly to install them at every airport. But there generally aren't many problems with that. The controllers at small airports are able to guide planes in to land visually with binoculars and radios as long as the weather is clear. Aviation safety consultant Jeff Guzzetti, who used to investigate crashes for both the National Transportation Safety Board and Federal Aviation Administration, said if the weather is bad, a regional FAA radar facility may be able to help, but ultimately planes simply won't land if the weather is too bad. Sometimes small airport towers do have a video feed that gives controllers a view of a radar screen at an FAA facility miles away. Because the radar is so far away the display may not be as detailed about planes flying close to the ground, but the system does give controllers more information. It's not clear if the Minot tower has one of those systems because the company that runs it, Midwest Air Traffic Control Inc., hasn't responded to questions since the incident. The overlapping network of FAA radar facilities across the country also keeps track of planes flying between airports, and an approach control radar center in Minneapolis helps direct planes in and out of Minot before controllers at the airport take over once they see the planes. The Minot airport typically handles between 18 and 24 flights a day. That's how it works at many small airports. 'Most times it works just fine,' Guzzetti said. Some of these small airports could gain radar as part of a massive overhaul of the air traffic control system, but that will depend on how busy the airports are and how much funding Congress ultimately approves for the multibillion-dollar project. So far, $12.5 billion was included in President Trump's overall budget bill. Private companies operate the towers The FAA says that 265 airport towers nationwide are operated by companies as part of the contract system. The Transportation Department's Inspector General has said the contract towers that handle more than one quarter of the nation's flights are more cost effective than comparable FAA towers and have similar safety records. In some cases, local governments help pay the costs of contract towers. The program began in 1982 at five less busy towers that had closed because of the air traffic controller strike the previous year, and it has expanded significantly over the years because it has been so successful. Most of the airports with contract towers would have no controllers without the program. 'Common sense would tell you that having an extra set of eyes controlling the local traffic — especially in good weather — would be safer than having no controller and just having the pilots talking to each other,' Guzzetti said. That's exactly how it works at the vast majority of the 5,100 public airports nationwide that are smaller than Minot. Pilots at those uncontrolled airports use their radios to coordinate takeoffs and landings with other planes in the area. Only about 10% of all airports have towers. The FAA says it works closely with the companies that run contract towers to ensure their controllers are properly trained. It is easier to get certified at a contract tower because they handle fewer flights than FAA towers even though controllers are held to the same standard. More controllers are needed nationwide The ongoing shortage of air traffic controllers has persisted for years partly because it takes so long to train and certify new controllers. The FAA has said that it is roughly 3,000 short of the number of controllers it should have at its facilities. The staffing situation at private towers is similar because they hire from the same pool of candidates. All the roughly 1,400 controllers at these smaller airports have to meet the same qualification and training requirements. But contract towers also have the ability to hire controllers who retired from an FAA tower before the mandatory retirement age of 56. The contract towers don't have a retirement age. The FAA has been working for a long time to hire more air traffic controllers to replace retiring workers and handle growing air traffic. But it can be hard to find good candidates for the stressful positions who can complete the rigorous training. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy has announced several efforts to hire and retain more controllers. The FAA is trying to shorten the time it takes between when someone applies to the air traffic controller academy in Oklahoma City and when they start training, and the agency is also trying to improve the graduation rate there by offering more support to the students. The candidates with the highest scores on the entrance exam are also getting top priority. The FAA is also offering bonuses to experienced controllers if they opt not to retire early and continue working to help ease the shortage. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
