
No point in MVA parties allying if we're to repeat state poll mess-up: Uddhav
Shiv Sena
(UBT) chief
Uddhav Thackeray
on Saturday said mistakes were made by the Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) while allocating seats for the assembly elections. He said that instead of calling this lack of coordination, they had to accept that the success achieved during Lok Sabha elections "went to the heads of some people.
" He appeared worried about MVA's future, saying if they want to repeat the same mistake, there was no point in coming together.
Congress politician Vijay Wadettiwar agreed with Uddhav and said arrogance and internal disarray within the opposition cost its dear.
Thackeray said that the struggle over seat-sharing had continued in the MVA ahead of the state polls until the last day, and its effect was that a bad message was sent to people.
You Can Also Check:
Mumbai AQI
|
Weather in Mumbai
|
Bank Holidays in Mumbai
|
Public Holidays in Mumbai
"We were united during the Lok Sabha elections, but in the assembly elections, our selfishness came to the fore and we were defeated," Thackeray said in an interview with Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut in the party mouthpiece Saamna. Thackeray also criticised the Election Commission (EC), calling it a "dhondya" stone that is revered by people.
Thackeray said he didn't blame anyone for the assembly election defeat. "Basically, Shiv Sena, Congress, and NCP were staunch opponents of each other until the MVA was formed.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
No annual fees for life
UnionBank Credit Card
Apply Now
Undo
The important thing is that during the election period, there was a fight over slogans. You give Rs 2,100, we give Rs 2,500, we give Rs 3,000. If you do this, we will do this. In that, we could not tell the people about the good works we did when we were in govt," Thackeray said.
Uddhav stated the Thackeray brand was about struggle for the people, starting from his grandfather Prabodhankar Thackeray, father Balasaheb Thackeray, himself, and son Aaditya Thackeray.
Now, Raj Thackeray has come together, he said, indicating the alliance with Raj was on the cards.
Uddhav said people had wondered ahead of the assembly polls that if there is so much struggle going on between them (MVA partners) now, what would happen later. He added that during the Lok Sabha polls, MVA allies left seats for each other with the common objective of winning elections, but this didn't happen in the assembly polls.
Thackeray demanded that polls be held on ballot paper. "Why were EVMs introduced? To save time for counting votes. If voting was held in Maharashtra on May 1 and in Bihar on May 30, then the time in between has passed, right? If it takes four days more for counting of votes, what will happen? In America and Europe, voting is done on ballot papers. Are those countries more backward than us? PM Modi himself has also spoken against EVMs.
BJP members should listen to it once," Thackeray said.
Thackeray also opposed the Maharashtra Special Public Security Act, saying there was no clarity in the bill. "Will this bill stop atrocities on women or stop the looting of people? It starts with what is the hardline left wing. What is leftist ideology? There is no problem in ending Naxalism and terrorism, but there is no clarity in this public security bill," he said.
"Remember one thing, no matter how much theft is done, the EC can give the Shiv Sena's election symbol to someone else or freeze it. EC does not have that right. Because the name Shiv Sena was given by my grandfather and my father. If tomorrow I change the name of the EC, do I have the right? But after changing my name, I will call him Dhondya. That Dhondya does not have the right to change the name of the party. If we have behaved in a democratic way, you can remove the symbol, but according to the Constitution, if we have not done anything wrong, they cannot remove our symbol.
But those who are throwing vermilion on that Dhondya are sitting in Delhi, it is working," Thackeray said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NDTV
24 minutes ago
- NDTV
Just 3 Days Of Parliament Disruptions Have Cost You Rs 23 Crore. Here's How
New Delhi: The Monsoon session of Parliament has, as expected, been a stormy one, but behind the headlines about repeated adjournments lies a real cost - Rs 2.5 lakh for every minute the Parliament is in session during active hours. The current session began on Monday and two key issues which have led to a logjam in both Houses - Lok Sabha more than the Rajya Sabha - have been the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar, which the opposition has dubbed an attempt to help the ruling coalition, and the opposition parties' demand for a discussion on Operation Sindoor, which was India's response to the terrorist attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam. Each house of Parliament is supposed to be productive for six hours a day - excluding one hour for lunch - and, according to former parliamentary affairs minister Pawan Bansal in 2012, running the Parliament for one minute while in session costs Rs 2.5 lakh - or Rs 1.25 lakh each for the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. These figures are now a conservative estimate, given that they are from over a decade ago, but, in the absence of updated ones, that is what we will use for the calculations to follow. There have been three days in the monsoon session, which means each House should have functioned for 18 hours. Given the adjournments, however, according to data from non-profit PRS legislative research, the Rajya Sabha has functioned for 4.4 hours and the Lok Sabha for a measly 0.9 hours, or 54 minutes. This means that the disruptions have cost the taxpayer Rs 10.2 crore for the Rajya Sabha (816 minutes lost multiplied by Rs 1.25 lakh) and Rs 12.83 crore for the Lok Sabha (1,026 minutes it did not function multiplied by Rs 1.25 lakh). So, just three days of disruption have cost tax-paying citizens Rs 23 crore. Point, Counter-Point On Tuesday, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju had slammed the opposition and accused it of wasting taxpayers' money. "The Opposition party leaders are all present here. In the Business Advisory meeting, it was decided that there would be a discussion on Operation Sindoor, and a fixed time was agreed upon. All issues cannot be taken up at once. Yet, instead of cooperating, they came with placards and disrupted the House," he said in the Lok Sabha "They're protesting with pillows, bringing placards -- despite agreeing not to. This is not acceptable. If they wanted a discussion and we were ready, then why disrupt the House?" he asked. Congress MP Randeep Surjewala accused the government of not letting the Parliament function and disallowing discussion. "Votes of 52 lakh people of Bihar are being cut... Isn't this a conspiracy to end democracy? It shows that this government wants to end democracy in this country. We only want to discuss this," he said on Wednesday


New Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Parliament likely to hold discussion on Pahalgam attack, Operation Sindoor next week
Amid opposition protests bringing the Parliament to a standstill for three consecutive days after the beginning of the Monsoon session on Monday, both the Houses are likely to hold a 16-hour debate each on the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor early next week, reported PTI. According to the report citing sources, Lok Sabha will begin the discussion on July 28 and the Rajya Sabha a day later if there are no disruptions. The decisions were taken at the Business Advisory Committee (BAC) meetings on July 21 and 23 as the opposition has been insisting that Prime Minister Narendra Modi should speak on Operation Sindoor and the alleged security lapses during the Pahalgam terror attack. The government however, the sources said, has made no commitment on the opposition's demand for the prime minister's response but has cited its proposal for a parliamentary discussion next week on the ground that Modi will be back by then from his four-day foreign visit, for which he left on Wednesday. The government has also given no assurance regarding any discussion on other issues raised by the opposition, including the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar.


Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Nuclear power generation stood at 56,681 million units in 2024-25; capacity projected to reach 22,380 MW by 2031-32
New Delhi: Nuclear power contributed about 3 per cent to the total electricity generated in India in 2024-25, with nuclear power plants producing 56,681 million units (MUs) of electricity during the period, the government informed the Lok Sabha on Wednesday. Presenting the data, Union Minister of State for Science and Technology and Earth Sciences, Dr. Jitendra Singh stated that the government has set a target of achieving 100 GW of nuclear power capacity by 2047 under its Nuclear Energy Mission. This would involve expanding both domestic and imported nuclear fuel sources and enabling participation from public and private sector entities in nuclear energy development . As of now, India's installed nuclear capacity stands at 8,780 MW spread across 24 reactors. This excludes the 100 MW Rajasthan Atomic Power Station (RAPS-1), which is under extended shutdown. An additional capacity of 13,600 MW—including the 500 MW Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR) being implemented by BHAVINI—is currently under various stages of implementation. On completion of the ongoing projects, the installed nuclear power capacity is expected to increase to 22,380 MW by 2031-32. The Minister also noted that the government is promoting research and development in Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) and advanced nuclear technologies to meet the 2047 target. The upcoming capacity addition will include both existing reactor designs and new technologies under development.