Lab Notes: The telescope redefining the Universe
News Grab: The $13 billion infrared unit is expected to revolutionise astronomy.
Belinda Smith: Faint, distant galaxies snapped into sharp focus in the first photo. The telescope also revealed the steamy atmosphere shrouding a hot gas giant planet. And gave us a rare glimpse into a star nursery inside our own galaxy, the Milky Way.
News Grab: NASA says humans have never before gained such important information about the universe.
Belinda Smith: In the years since, the James Webb Space Telescope has pulled back the veil on a whole bunch of mind-blowing cosmic phenomena. So how has this telescope changed our understanding of the universe? And what is still to come? Hi, I'm Belinda Smith and you're listening to Lab Notes, the show that dissects the science behind new discoveries and current events. To give us a rundown of some of the James Webb Space Telescope's greatest hits, so far, is Laura Driessen, a radio astronomer at the University of Sydney.
Laura Driessen: I think there was a collective gasp around the world when those first images were released because they were just so gorgeous. I can't tell you exactly where I was or anything like that, but I definitely remember seeing those first just beautiful images.
Belinda Smith: What's so special about the James Webb Space Telescope?
Laura Driessen: From an engineering perspective, it's just an amazing feat that they put a whole telescope and it was sort of folded up like origami. They sent it really, really far away to a spot that we call L2 and then unfolded it and it actually worked. That's amazing. I'm sure that everyone at NASA was doing the collective holding their breath thing because that would have been pretty stressful. The thing about JWST compared to Hubble, we can't go and fix it. If it breaks, that's it.
Belinda Smith: It's broken. Wow. One and done situation.
Laura Driessen: So it was a huge risk when they sent it up, but everything had worked perfectly on the launch. So, you know, maybe they were feeling a little bit more comfortable, but I think it's just stressful when you do anything like that.
Belinda Smith: I've seen the JWST described as doing infrared astronomy. What does that mean?
Laura Driessen: So there's all different kinds of light. The type of light that we can see with our eyes is called optical or visible light. And it's really just a teeny tiny little slice of all the different kinds of light that exist. It's in the nanometers part of the spectrum. So each little wave is nanometers, which is you divide a meter into a thousand, that's a millimeter. Another thousand is a micrometer and another thousand is a nanometer. Oh wow. So really tiny wheels. A thousandth of a thousandth of
Belinda Smith: a thousandth of a meter. Yes,
Laura Driessen: exactly. And the longest wavelength we can see is red. And if you keep going longer, then we get to infrared. We usually think about infrared as sort of heat. That's how we experience infrared light. For example, a fire would be quite bright in infrared and that's what we feel as heat. So it's a different kind of light that's invisible to us.
Belinda Smith: That's infrared light is what the JWST sees. But...
Laura Driessen: That also means the colours you see in the JWST images aren't real. That's us adding the colours because it's light we can't see. We don't have a colour for sort of invisible light. That wouldn't help if we just showed invisible light and you couldn't see anything. So we add the colours later.
Belinda Smith: Sure, those pretty pictures wouldn't be so beautiful. So in the three years since the James Webb Space Telescope sent back its first batch of images, we get treated to new cosmic insights on the reg, really. So how has it changed our understanding of the universe?
Laura Driessen: Ooh, I think one of my favourite things is from a cosmological perspective. So that's a subset of astronomy, but it's thinking about the universe as a whole. And because JWST can see things that are more distant, it's discovering things like black holes and galaxies further back in time than we thought that they existed.
Belinda Smith: Yeah, it can see back in time, so to speak, because the telescope picks up light that may have travelled for billions of years. So it's really seeing, say, a galaxy as it was all that time ago, maybe even from the baby universe.
Laura Driessen: So one of the main things is the universe started and expanded and there's a time period at the very start that we can't see anything because it's kind of foggy. There's just a whole bunch of electrons, very foggy. Then there was a flash in the universe that we could see when things cooled down enough that the fog kind of demystified. And then there was a period called the Dark Ages, which sounds very fancy and dramatic. And it's also a time period when the light couldn't escape. So at the start we had a fog of electrons, then we had a fog of hydrogen, so we couldn't see. After that time period, the first stars started forming. And that's called the cosmic dawn. We're very dramatic as it turns out. And that's when we start seeing light.
Belinda Smith: The JWST is helping push back when this cosmic dawn, well, dawned.
Laura Driessen: This is really interesting from the perspective of how our universe changed over time and how we started with kind of just a mess and ended up with the beautiful things that we can see in space today, planets, stars, galaxies, all that good stuff didn't just happen. And we're trying to work that out. So telescopes like JWST, as they push back in time, seeing black holes earlier than we thought we saw black holes, galaxies earlier than we thought that galaxies could exist, changes how we think about how the universe evolved.
Belinda Smith: So the universe's early years are taking on a slightly different form.
Laura Driessen: Yes. And I think this also, I think about like our parents when they were kids, they didn't have many photos. So when we look back, we're trying to work out what happened when our parents were kids and what sort of mischief they got up to and how they turned into the people they are today. We just don't have that much information. So JWST is like adding photos. You found a lost album. And now you can find out what your parents got up to.
Belinda Smith: The universe is about 13 billion years old. What time scales are we talking here for the universe's dark ages? Between that electron fog and the cosmic dawn.
Laura Driessen: Their estimates are a bit iffy, but I think JWST saw a galaxy 400 million years after the Big Bang. So that does sort of put a limit on the dark ages from 400,000 years to 400 million.
Belinda Smith: OK, so what else has the James Webb Space Telescope told us about the universe?
Laura Driessen: So one of my favourite ones, which is not as big in scale, much smaller in fact, is something called a jumbo, which is a Jupiter mass binary object. And these are planets, two planets in a binary, wizarding around each other with no star. So they're just planets existing. So
Belinda Smith: planets, generally we know of planets orbiting some kind of star, like our solar system. But these ones don't. So did they ever have a star? Have they run away from the star? What's happened? Well,
Laura Driessen: we don't know about these ones. So the fun thing is rogue planets are a thing we've already known about. So these are individual planets that through gravity, either a star, you know, say another star coming too near the solar system might kick out some planets through gravity, or planets in amongst themselves sort of having gravity interactions and one end up popping out. So we know about individual rogue planets. But having two planets that are kicked out but somehow stay together? Tricky. And planets don't really form on their own. So maybe these things were flung out, but somehow stayed together with a friend because they found about 40 of them in the Orion Nebula. To call them planets is maybe pushing it. That's why we call them objects. That's sort of an astronomy term for thing in space we don't have a better name for yet. But they look like planets and they're just whizzing around each other on their own. So a little bit of a challenge to planet formation, solar system formation and star formation that they were even seen. This is one of the things we never thought we'd see when we turned on the JWST.
Belinda Smith: Something else the James Webb Space Telescope has shed light on are exoplanets, planets around stars outside our solar system.
Laura Driessen: We just don't get pretty pictures of those. This is where that spectra comes in. And that's one of my other big favourite things of JWST is something called transmission spectroscopy of exoplanets.
Belinda Smith: What is that and why is it important?
Laura Driessen: So spectroscopy is where we can identify chemicals in space. So some of you might remember when you were in high school doing things with Bunsen burners where you sprayed different chemicals on the Bunsen burners so they light up different colours. Basically every element in the periodic table and all the molecules as well, so like carbon dioxide, water, where it's atoms all smooshed together, has their own signature, a little set of colours that every time you see it, they have that set of colours. And we can use that to look into space. We only have light so this is what we've got to work with to identify chemicals in space. And JWST has the instrument on there that can do this. So in the infrared still, identifying these lines, different wavelengths or colours that identify different chemicals and molecules in space. But what we're doing here is we're trying to detect the atmospheres of exoplanets. And that maybe doesn't sound that dramatic but you have to remember it wasn't too long ago that we'd barely detected any exoplanets at all, let alone trying to see their atmospheres. And atmospheres around planets are teeny tiny.
Belinda Smith: Yeah, it's like a thin shell of gas. Or some liquid maybe but it's not much.
Laura Driessen: It's not much at all and this is why we call it transmission spectroscopy. So as the planet passes in front of the star, we see a little dip in the light of the star and that tells us the planet's there. But as the planet passes in, you're also getting light from the star going through its atmosphere. So it's transmitting through the planet's atmosphere. So we're sort of using the star's light as it goes through the planet's teeny tiny atmosphere to see what molecules and things are going on in those atmospheres.
Belinda Smith: So it's kind of like a stained glass window. Yeah,
Laura Driessen: so you're shining a torch through the stained glass window basically to see what colours are going on in there and that's what we're doing. And it had sort of been done at a very basic level before JWST but now it's just sort of happening all the time. The one thing we want to do which hasn't yet been done by JWST, not for lack of trying, is to try and detect an atmosphere around a rocky planet. So we're pretty good at it for things that we call hot Jupiters. So Jupiter's a big gas giant. Neptune's which are also kind of gassy. But for it we want to do like the Earth. We want to see a planet that's kind of like the Earth, a big rock, and we want to be able to detect the atmosphere.
Belinda Smith: Why do we want to look at rocky planets?
Laura Driessen: So when we search for life, we're talking a little bit about aliens here, when we search for life the only model that we have is us. So we sort of think that if we're looking for what we call a habitable planet where there might be life, we're looking for planets that are like ours. Rocky, we sort of think that's what we need. I don't think we'd survive very well on Jupiter. Rocky, not too hot, not too cold, water is wet. Those are sort of the basic things. But we also know that we need an atmosphere. We love our atmosphere. It protects us from a lot of things and also breathing is great.
Belinda Smith: The thing is, for a planet to hang onto its atmosphere, it really needs a magnetic field. This protects that atmosphere from being swept away by stuff spat out by its star. Take Mars, for example. It once had a magnetic field, but that's no longer.
Laura Driessen: So over time, basically the sun has just kind of bombarded it and it had a really nice atmosphere and it's slowly just blown away by the sun. So that's what we want to see. If ours is sort of special for any reason, it can't be that special, the universe is infinite. But how common is it for these sorts of planets that are nice for us to live on? How often do they happen? That's one of the questions. Exoplanets is a great field, looking for life. It's fun. We really are in this era where we're seeing things we've never seen before.
Belinda Smith: That was Laura Driessen, a radio astronomer at the University of Sydney. Thanks for listening to Lab Notes on ABC Radio National, where every week we dissect the science behind new discoveries and current events. I'm Belinda Smith. This episode was produced on the lands of the Wurundjeri and Menang Noongar people. Fiona Pepper's the producer and it was mixed by Tim Symonds. We'd love to hear from you. Send us an email labnotes at abc.net.au. Catch you next week.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
4 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘First contact': Fears as alien object speeds toward earth
A mystery object tearing towards Earth at break-neck speed has raised fears that aliens are on their way here. Scientists warn that the odd entity, which astronomers are calling 31/Atlas, could be an ET craft set to launch probes on our planet. Estimated at more than 12 miles (19 kilometres) wide, it is whizzing through our solar system on a trajectory that will bring it within about 170 million miles (274 million kilometres) of us on December 19. A trio of scientists from Harvard University, led by astrophysicist Avi Loeb, have published a paper speculating whether it could be 'hostile' extraterrestrial technology. Nick Pope, who used to investigate UFOs for the UK's Ministry of Defence, said: 'It is not beyond the realms of science fiction that 31/Atlas could be an alien spaceship of some kind. 'It's an unusual size, unusual acceleration, unusual course and unusual behaviour — those things combined very closely match a sort of mapping or survey mission. 'Of course, this could turn out to be just a comet or an asteroid — albeit an interstellar one, so interesting and incredibly rare. 'The good thing is this is a testable hypothesis. 'The clock is ticking down. We will know soon enough whether we're dealing with first contact … or just a big rock.' Here, Nick sets out the six key theories proposed by Harvard experts. 1. It's too large to be an asteroid. We do know asteroids in our solar system range in size but this is much bigger than average 2. Its rate of acceleration seems unusual for a natural object. The European Space Agency and Hubble space telescope calculate it is travelling at about 130,000mph (209,215km/h) NASA says at that speed, it is the fastest solar system visitor. 3. We spotted it very late. This was because it was coming in from the centre of the galaxy, where there are a lot of obstacles, light and stars. If you wanted to covertly send a probe into our solar system, this is exactly the course you would choose. 4. Its course makes it very hard to intercept. At critical points where it might do something technological, such as perform a non-natural manoeuvre, it is blocked by the sun. 5. Passing close to Venus, Mars and Jupiter. This is like a mapping or survey mission. There is a very low probability of that happening naturally — the report suggests close to 0.005 per cent. That is statistically minute. 6. We won't see it. At its closest approach, the sun will be between the Earth and Atlas so we won't be able to see it. Again, this is exactly the course you would choose, as it can do all its sneaky braking manoeuvres and changes of course without us seeing it. It might do one of two things if this is technological. It could change course and come to Earth itself. Or it could, if it's a mothership, deploy some probes that would come to Earth.

News.com.au
15 hours ago
- News.com.au
Sounds serious: NYC noise pollution takes a toll
Tim Mulligan moved to central Manhattan so he could be closer to work and avoid a daily ordeal on the rattling, screeching subway, just one part of the urban noisescape that tests New Yorkers every day. "Even with your earbuds in, turned all the way up, you can't hear anything for the whole commute, and you're ruining your ears at that level," said Mulligan, a US Marines veteran who lives with PTSD. At his home close to New York's tourist hub Times Square, Mulligan has sealed his windows with high-density soundproof foam, draped them with double thick curtains and invested in earplugs to sleep. On the street he has resorted to noise-cancelling headphones, and he prefers bikes to the subway for getting around. New Yorkers and visitors to the megacity of 8.5 million people are bombarded with blaring sirens, loud locals, raucous bars and car horns almost constantly. A city-wide hotline received 750,000 noise complaints in 2024, the most commonly complained about quality of life issue. The city that never sleeps, perhaps because it can't, is one of the few built up US areas with a noise code regulating sound from vehicles, construction, businesses, and recreation. It has even installed cameras with sensors to detect and penalize violators. Nine-in-ten New Yorkers are at risk of hearing loss from daily exposure to noise levels exceeding 70 decibels, the healthy average, a Columbia University study conducted between 2010 and 2012 found. The report's author, professor Richard Neitzel, is now leading the first national study on noise in which 200,000 volunteers wear smart watches to track sound levels. "It looks like somewhere around one-in-four Americans are exposed to noise levels that could hurt their hearing over the long term," said Neitzel, a professor at the University of Michigan. - 'You can't undo it' - Among young people aged 18 to 25, the primary source of excess noise exposure comes from headphones. Overall, more people are exposed to high levels of environmental noise than to noise from their headphones, Neitzel added. Although the percentage of the population exposed to noise is similar to those exposed to air pollution, acoustic issues are not prioritized by residents and officials like air quality is, Neitzel said. There is clear evidence that excess noise is linked to poor sleep, cardiovascular issues, depression, cognitive decline, premature births and poor academic performance. Tinnitus, a permanent ringing in the ear affecting three out of 20 study participants, is increasingly prevalent. Loud music is even used to promote increased consumption, said Shane Newman, who manages a popular Mexican restaurant in Manhattan's trendy Hudson Yards development. "You have a drink in the music, it feels like a nice vibe and... they end up staying longer," he told AFP. Audiologist Michele DiStefano said the effects of noise on well-being have "not really been studied well enough." "The longer you have the exposure, and the higher the level, the (greater) degree of hearing loss you'll have" -- particularly for young people, she warned. "Once it does affect your hearing, you can't undo it, but you can actually prevent it," she said. "There's really a push to educate the younger generations on how you don't have to just have really loud noise at a concert -- it can be cumulative."


West Australian
21 hours ago
- West Australian
NASA's Webb telescope discovers tiny moon around Uranus
The Webb Space Telescope has spotted a tiny new moon orbiting Uranus. The new member of the lunar gang, announced on Tuesday by NASA, appears to be just 10km wide. It was spotted by the telescope's near-infrared camera during observations in February. Scientists think it hid for so long - even eluding the Voyager 2 spacecraft during its flyby about 40 years ago - because of its faintness and small size. Uranus has 28 known moons that are named after characters from Shakespeare and Alexander Pope. About half are smaller and orbit the planet at closer range. This newest addition, still nameless, ups the planet's total moon count to 29.