
Families criticise Starmer and say hostages ‘will rot in Hamas dungeons'
Lawyers representing the relatives of British people who were held by Hamas and those who had been murdered said the prime minister's peace plan would harm the remaining hostages in Gaza.
Adam Wagner KC and Adam Rose, acting for the seven British families of hostages in Gaza, said four of the families met with senior Foreign Office officials on Thursday evening.
In a statement, they said that British recognition of a Palestinian state if Israel and Hamas failed to reach a ceasefire by September would 'disincentivise Hamas from agreeing a deal'. They asked: 'Why would Hamas agree to a ceasefire if it knew that to do so would make British recognition of Palestine less likely?'.
They said the families had 'held out some hope that the policy could not be as they feared and that since the UK had chosen to impose conditions on recognition, those conditions would also be on Hamas, as otherwise they would essentially be rewarded for continuing to commit war crimes, including hostage taking and encouraged to continue that path'.
But that 'it was clear from the meeting last night that the British government's policy will not help the hostages, and could even hurt them'.
Wagner and Rose claimed the release or otherwise of hostages would 'play no part' in the decision ministers will make in September and added: 'In other words, the 'vision for peace', which the UK is pursuing and which the families heard much about last night, may well involve our clients' family members continuing to rot in Hamas dungeons, just as British and British-linked hostages Emily Damari and Eli Sharabi did before them.'
Starmer said the UK would only refrain from recognising Palestine if Israel allowed more aid into Gaza, stops annexing land in the West Bank, agrees to a ceasefire and signs up to a long-term peace process over the next two months.
While he also called for Hamas to immediately release all remaining Israeli hostages, sign up to a ceasefire, disarm and 'accept that they will play no part in the government of Gaza', he did not explicitly say these conditions would factor into a decision on whether recognition would go ahead.
The US accused Starmer, Mark Carney, the Canadian prime minister, and President Macron of France of being 'clumsy' by saying they would recognise a Palestinian state before all hostages were released.
Marco Rubio, the US secretary of state, said recognition of Palestine as a state was 'irrelevant' and told Fox News Radio: 'The UK is like, well, 'if Israel doesn't agree to a ceasefire by September, we're going to recognize a Palestinian state. So if I'm Hamas, I say, 'you know what, let's not allow there to be a ceasefire.' If Hamas refuses to agree to a ceasefire, it guarantees a Palestinian state will be recognized by all these countries in September.'
The British families want the government to 'confirm that without the hostages being released, there can be no peace, and that this will be an important part of its decision as to whether to proceed with recognition and its current plan'.
Starmer said this week that 'I've been absolutely clear and steadfast that we must have the remaining hostages released, that's been our position throughout'.
However, Damari, a British-Israeli woman who was held captive by Hamas, accused him of 'not standing on the right side of history' and said she was 'deeply saddened' by his decision.
The families of Damari and Sharabi were among those who met with the Foreign Office. Also present were relatives of Nadav Popplewell, who died while held captive, as well as those of Oded Lifshitz, who also died, and Yocheved Lifschitz, who was released.
The government said: 'We have announced our intention to recognise Palestine in September to protect the viability of the two-state solution. The first step in that process must be a ceasefire and there is no question about that.
'Our demands on Hamas have not changed. For there to be any chance of peace, the hostages must be released. Hamas must lay down its weapons and commit to having no future role in the governance of Gaza.
'We must also see significant progress on the ground including the supply of humanitarian support and for Israel to rule out annexations in the West Bank, and a commitment to a long-term sustainable peace. We will make an assessment ahead of UNGA (the United Nations general assembly) on how far both Israel and Hamas have met the steps we set out. No one side will have a veto on recognition through their actions or inactions.'
President Trump had also expressed his 'displeasure and disagreement' with Starmer over the promise to recognise a Palestinian state.
The US president, who had previously suggested he was relaxed about the prospect, even though he disagreed, hardened his stance after more countries said they would recognise Palestine.
Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, said Trump had expressed his 'displeasure and his disagreement with the leaders of France, the United Kingdom and Canada'.
She told reporters: 'He feels as though that's rewarding Hamas at a time where Hamas is the true impediment to a ceasefire and to the release of all of the hostages.'
Dame Diana Johnson, the crime and policing minister, said there would be an assessment in September on whether the British government will recognise a Palestinian state.
Asked if hostages being released would be a condition of that, she told Times Radio: 'Neither side has a veto on what the British government choose to do in September. And that will be an assessment that will be taking place in September.
'The prime minister has set out what he expects from Israel. Obviously, that's a democratically elected government, very different to Hamas, which is a terrorist organisation.'
She said: 'We need to actually have the ceasefire, and then move on to trying to re-establish that peace process and the establishment of what my party and I think generally is accepted, a two-state solution.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Metro
2 minutes ago
- Metro
Israel sets October 7 deadline for Gaza City evacuation ahead of full occupation
Israel will give Palestinians in Gaza until October 7 to evacuate before it launches a full military occupation. Set for the two-year anniversary of the Hamas massacre which triggered the latest war, the expansion has drawn fresh condemnation both at home and abroad. In Israel, families of hostages held by militants in Gaza and opposition leaders blasted Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for a decision that they said would put captives' lives at risk. The Hostage Relatives Forum, an organisation representing the majority of hostage families, called the expansion of the war in Gaza a 'death sentence' for those still held in the enclave. A spokesperson for UN chief Antonio Guterres says Israel's plan for Gaza City marks a 'dangerous escalation' in the enclave. 'Palestinians in Gaza continue to endure a humanitarian catastrophe of horrific proportions,' the statement reads. 'The Secretary-General warns that this further escalation will result in additional forced displacement, killings and massive destruction, compounding the unimaginable suffering of the Palestinian population in Gaza.' The Security Council will meet in a rare weekend session tomorrow to discuss the plan, three diplomatic sources have told the Agence France-Presse news agency. Far-right allies in Netanyahu's coalition have been pushing for a total takeover of Gaza as part of his vow to eradicate Hamas militants. However, Israel Defense Forces (IDF) Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir is reported to have expressed concern over the move, saying it could endanger the lives of remaining hostages. Yair Lapid, the Israeli opposition leader, criticised the Security Cabinet's backing of the takeover of Gaza City. He said the move was 'a disaster that will lead to many more disasters' and was made in 'complete contradiction to the opinion of the military and security ranks'. 'This is exactly what Hamas wanted: for Israel to be mired on the ground with no purpose, without defining the day after picture, in a pointless occupation that no one understands where it is leading,' he said on X. Israel's air and ground war has killed tens of thousands of people in Gaza, displaced most of the population, destroyed vast areas and pushed the territory toward famine. There are 50 hostages still held in Gaza, of whom Israeli officials believe 20 are alive. Most of those freed so far emerged as a result of diplomatic negotiations. Talks toward a ceasefire that could have seen more hostages released collapsed in July. Mediators from Egypt and Qatar are preparing a new framework that will include the release of all hostages — dead and alive — in one go, in return for an end of the war in Gaza and the withdrawal of Israeli forces from the strip, two Arab officials told The Associated Press. More Trending Before Israel's Security Cabinet approved the plan to take over Gaza City, Netanyahu told Fox News Channel's Bill Hemmer in an interview that aired on Thursday that the military intended to take control of all of Gaza. He said Israel did not want to keep the Gaza Strip, but to establish a 'security perimeter' and to hand over the territory to Arab forces. It's unclear how many people are still in Gaza City, the territory's largest before the war. Hundreds of thousands fled under evacuation orders in the opening weeks of the conflict, but many returned during a ceasefire at the start of this year. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Corbyn vs Starmer, modern manners, and a crumbling NHS MORE: What does recognising Palestine as a state really mean? MORE: 'More than 48 Palestinians killed' while waiting for flour delivery in Gaza Strip


The Independent
2 minutes ago
- The Independent
Nicola Sturgeon says police investigation into her ‘was like mental torture'
Nicola Sturgeon has opened up about her arrest, describing how the police investigation was like 'mental torture' and she thought about disappearing into the North Sea. In an excerpt of her new memoir, Frankly, published by The Times, the former first minister of Scotland spoke about some of the hardest moments of her life, as well as conflicted feelings over motherhood and sexuality. Being arrested and questioned by the police following the arrest of her ex-husband and the Scottish National Party (SNP) treasurer was the 'worst day of my life', she wrote. Peter Murrell, the former chief executive officer of the SNP, was arrested in 2023 and later charged with embezzlement, after his and Ms Sturgeon's home was searched by police looking into what happened to £660,000 of donations to the party. Police also investigated Colin Beattie and Ms Sturgeon but they were later exonerated. The arrests, Ms Sturgeon said, made her feel like she 'had fallen into the plot of a dystopian novel'. She said she barely slept during the period leading up to her arrest and would wake with her stomach in knots. She described June 11, the date she was arrested and questioned, as the 'worst day of my life' but added she was partly relieved that her wait was over. Following her questioning, she went to visit a friend in the north east of Scotland for a week to escape the media glare. She wrote: 'I spent hours, looking out across the North Sea. At first, I wanted to somehow disappear into its vastness. 'Slowly but surely, though, the sea calmed me.' But alongside her darker moments was one of her proudest achievements, she said – passing her driving test at the age of 53. Ms Sturgeon told how she carried a sense of 'dread and anxiety' for a year, during which nothing happened, until April 2024, when Mr Murrell was re-arrested and charged. But the probe into Ms Sturgeon continued and she admitted she was frightened about the investigation even though she knew she had 'done nothing wrong'. And she said: 'I retain both faith in and respect for our country's criminal justice system. However, none of that changes this fact: being the subject of a high-profile criminal investigation for almost two years, especially having committed no crime, was like a form of mental torture.' She wrote of an 'overwhelming' sense of relief and release upon being told she would face no further action on March 20, 2025. Ms Sturgeon also opens up about her miscarriage in 2010, saying she went to work in January while she was in 'constant agony', including a memorial event for the 40th anniversary of the Ibrox disaster. And she addressed rumours of her 'torrid lesbian affair' around 2020 with Catherine Colonna, who was French ambassador to the UK at the time, and false rumours perpetuated about her issuing a super-injunction to silence the press. She concludes: 'However, while the fact I was being lied about got under my skin, the nature of the insult itself was water off a duck's back. 'Long-term relationships with men have accounted for more than 30 years of my life, but I have never considered sexuality, my own included, to be binary. Moreover, sexual relationships should be private matters.' Frankly by Nicola Sturgeon will be published on Thursday.


The Independent
2 minutes ago
- The Independent
Two arrested during demonstrations outside Canary Wharf hotel
Two people have been arrested at a protest at the Britannia Hotel in Canary Wharf, the Metropolitan Police said. More than 100 people were protesting with Stand Up to Racism at the hotel in London against recent anti-migrant demonstrations. They gathered as part of the 'Defend Refugees, Stop the Far Right' demonstrations happening across the UK on Friday. Around 100 counter-protesters also gathered at the venue, shouting 'stop the boats' as a number of them waved the Union flag. It came as officers also imposed conditions on the group protesting against the use of the hotel to house asylum seekers. The force posted on X: 'Officers have made two arrests in Canary Wharf. 'One person protesting against the use of the hotel by asylum seekers has been arrested after a bottle was thrown at officers. 'A member of the counter-protest group has been arrested for failing to remove a face covering. 'We have imposed conditions using the Public Order Act to prevent serious disorder at the protests in Canary Wharf. 'The group protesting against the use of the hotel by asylum seekers have been instructed to remain in front of the blue hoarding on the pavement opposite the Britannia Hotel.' Dozens of protesters were escorted by a large number of police officers, and they were carrying banners that read: 'Never again: remember history, fight fascism' and 'Refugees welcome'. There was a continued heavy police presence at the scene. Other counter-protesters wore St George's Cross flags wrapped over their shoulders or neck, with a handful wearing full-face coverings. A counter-protester also unfurled an Israeli flag. Police chiefs have warned they are ready to 'mobilise significant and specialist resources' if unrest breaks out at a string of anti-migrant protests planned at hotels housing asylum seekers. The National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) is working with forces across the country and monitoring intelligence in preparation for a fresh wave of protests on Friday, with demonstrations planned at up to 14 hotels across the country.