Reform did ‘zero' checks on suspended MP, admits Farage
The MP for South Basildon and East Thurrock left the party on Saturday amid allegations surrounding his 'business propriety' during the pandemic.
The Reform party leader said that there had been no due diligence conducted prior to Mr McMurdock's selection, but that the party had since 'professionalised' its vetting process.
He told LBC: 'There was no due diligence on him at all. Zero. I mean, I inherited this.
'I said after the general election last year that I'd put proper professional vetting in place. I've done that.
'We fielded more candidates than anybody on May 1. There was hardly any arguments at all.'
He added: 'I can't verify the future of everybody going ahead, but have we now professionalised the party to stop this sort of thing ever happening again? Yes.'
Mr Farage also refused to rule out Mr McMurdock's return to the party pending the outcome of any party investigations into the claims.
The Sunday Times alleged that Mr McMudock borrowed £70,000 for two businesses under the Government's Bounce Back loan scheme during the Covid-19 pandemic.
It reported that Jam Financial Limited, one of Mr McMurdock's firms, allegedly received £50,000 in 2020, the largest loan available for medium-sized businesses with an annual turnover of more than £200,000.
Gym Live Health and Fitness Limited, another of Mr McMurdock's businesses, allegedly took out a £20,000 loan in 2020, which would have required an annual turnover of more than £100,000.
Jam Financial Limited allegedly had no employees and negligible assets until the pandemic, and Gym Live Health and Fitness Limited was also dormant until Jan 31 2020.
Mr McMurdock said in a statement on X that 'all my business dealings had always been conducted fully within the law and in compliance with all regulations'.
He added that he asked for the whip to be suspended as a 'precautionary measure' and 'for the protection of Reform UK'.
Statement from James McMurdock.
Thursday evening I received a phone call from a journalist who followed an extremely aggressive and clumsy line of questioning where he confused assets, profit, and turnover. He confirmed that the phone call was off the record and I advised him…
— James McMurdock MP (@JamesReform) July 5, 2025
Mr McMurdock unexpectedly won his Essex seat at last year's election, securing a majority of just 98 over Labour.
Shortly after his win, reports emerged about a historic conviction for assaulting a former girlfriend.
Earlier on Monday, Mr Farage warned Reform councillors that they must behave with 'integrity'.
He told Kent county council members that 'behaving with integrity is a responsibility upon all of you' but said that this did not mean they should be 'stuffed shirts'.
The local authority is the largest that Mr Farage's party controls, after Reform made sweeping gains at the local elections in May.
Zia Yusuf was brought into Reform last summer as the party chairman, who would be responsible for the professionalisation of the party.
Last month, Mr Yusuf dramatically resigned from the party, announcing on X: 'I no longer believe working to get a Reform government elected is a good use of my time, and hereby resign the office.'
He returned to the party just two days later, saying that his decision to quit had been 'born of exhaustion'.
Mr McMurdock is the second MP to have left the party since last year's election.
The party expelled Rupert Lowe in March over allegations of workplace bullying and threats against its chairman, which he has strongly denied.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Grandmother who went to see her new granddaughter in maternity ward was run over and killed by nurse as she left, inquest hears
A grandmother who was visiting her newborn granddaughter at the maternity ward of a hospital was run over and killed by a nurse, an inquest heard. Mary Owen-Jones, 51, was hit by nurse Chloe Thelwell's car on New Year's Day in 2023. The nurse cut a corner in her grey Audi as she left the hospital car park and witnesses said her car windscreen was too misted over to spot the grandmother. The hearing heard the Crown Prosecution Service ruled out charging staff nurse Thelwell with causing death by dangerous driving. Thelwell was driving at 10-15mph with the advisory limit in the hospital grounds being 10mph as she left Glan Clwyd Hospital in Bodelwyddan, North Wales. Witnesses said the nurse told them: 'I just didn't see her.' Fellow driver Dewi Wyn Williams said the windscreen on Thelwell's Audi was completely misted up. He told the hearing that he thought to himself: 'No wonder you didn't see her, you can't see anything.' The family said: 'She had a passion for life and her family and was particularly looking forward to being a grandma to her newly born granddaughter, April Rose' Thelwell told police she did not think her windscreen was misted up as she would not have been able to get out of the car park's awkward exit if it was. Forensic crash investigator Ian Thompson said Mrs Owen-Jones who was wearing dark clothes, crossed a few metres from an illuminated pedestrian crossing. He said she should have seen the car with its headlights and indicator on. He said those factors, combined with the fact Ms Thelwell had cut the corner, all played a part in the crash. An inquest heard she was taken to the hospital's A&E department with a broken leg before being airlifted to Stoke before dying from a bleed on the brain 36 hours later. Ms Owen-Jones's bleed on the brain was exacerbated by blood thinners which she had been prescribed after a heart operation. John Gittins, senior coroner for north Wales east and central, said the Crown Prosecution Service considered bringing a charge of causing death by dangerous driving. But the CPS decided there was no realistic prospect of a jury finding Ms Thelwell guilty. The coroner recorded a conclusion of death in a road traffic collision and pointed to a combination of factors as the cause. Mrs Owen-Jones, who also worked as a classroom assistant, leaves her husband Arwel, son Andrew and daughter Jasmine. In a moving tribute, her devastated family said after her death: 'Mary is survived by her son and daughter, Andrew and Jasmine, her granddaughter, April Rose and her husband, Arwel. 'She had a passion for life and her family and was particularly looking forward to being a grandma to her newly born granddaughter, April Rose.'
BBC News
24 minutes ago
- BBC News
Man dies after five-car crash on M1 junction in Nottinghamshire
A man has died following a crash involving five cars off the M1 in were called to the Nuthall Interchange, off the northbound junction 26 slip road, at 18:41 BST on Friday.A man in his 50s died at the scene of the crash and other people involved in the crash were taken to hospital suffering a "range" of serious injuries, according to Nottinghamshire northbound and southbound junctions were closed after the crash but reopened at 05:15 on Saturday. Specialist officers are currently supporting the man's family, the force who saw the incident or has information that can help with the investigation is asked to contact Nottinghamshire Police.
Daily Mail
24 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Reeves 'set to raise taxes' to fund Starmer benefits surrender: PM says he is 'pleased' after Labour revolt forces guarantee that NO-ONE will be stripped of handouts
Keir Starmer insisted he was 'pleased' today after caving into a massive Labour revolt on welfare. The PM claimed he had 'listened' in making major concessions to rebels threatening to kill flagship legislation on health and disability benefits. More than 120 MPs had publicly promised to oppose the plans in a crunch vote on Tuesday. But after frantic negotiations - with Sir Keir personally lobbying backbenchers - a deal was announced after midnight, including guarantees that existing claimants will not lose money. The move looks like it could be enough to prevent a disastrous defeat for the government at second reading, although some critics are still vowing to oppose the measures. However, the change on Personal Independence Payment (Pip) is estimated to wipe up to £2billion off the £5billion savings by the end of the Parliament, and Universal Credit tweaks another £1billion. Rachel Reeves was already struggling to balance the books with the economy stalling and the previous £1.25billion U-turn on winter fuel allowance. Speaking on a visit to Wales this afternoon, Sir Keir said: 'We need to get it right. That's why we've been talking to colleagues and having a constructive discussion. We've now arrived at a package that delivers on the principles with some adjustments, and that's the right reform, and I'm really pleased now that we're able to take this forward.' Challenged to explain how the funding would be found, the premier said: 'Well, the changes still mean we can deliver the reforms that we need, and that's very important, because the system needs to be a system that is fit for the future, and this is fit for the future. 'All colleagues are signed up to that, but having listened, we've made the adjustments. The funding will be set out in the budget in the usual way, as you'd expect later in the year.' Ruth Curtice of the Resolution Foundation think-tank suggested the warned she will not be able to find the money in existing budgets. 'That leaves only extra borrowing - which the Chancellor doesn't have much space for unless she were to change her own fiscal rules - or tax rises,' she told BBC Radio 4's Today programme. Asked if that effectively meant there would be tax rises, Ms Curtice said: 'Yeah. Unless the government were to get better news on the economy the next time the OBR does a forecast... but when we look at everything that's happened in the world since they last did that in March our estimate is that they will actually get bad news from the OBR as well.' Sir Keir and Ms Reeves have both insisted that Labour will stick to the manifesto pledge not to increase income tax, VAT or workers' national insurance. The Chancellor has also been adamant that she will not ease her fiscal rules, after borrowing more at the last Budget to splurge on the NHS, public sector pay and infrastructure. But Downing Street did appear to hint at the possibility of a temporary loosening today. Grilled on how the step would be funded, a spokesman said: 'There'll be no permanent increase in borrowing, as is standard. 'We'll set out how this will be funded at the budget, alongside a full economic and fiscal forecast in the autumn, in the usual way.' Asked whether the Government could say there would be no tax rises to pay for the changes, the spokesman said: 'As ever, as is a long-standing principle, tax decisions are set out at fiscal events.' Challenged how the costs would be covered, health minister Stephen Kinnock told Times Radio: 'The full details around what we are laying out, what I've summarised really today, is going to be laid out in Parliament, and then the Chancellor will set out the budget in the autumn the whole of the fiscal position and this will be an important part of that. 'But forgive me, I'm not in a position to set those figures out now. 'I think that is very much the Chancellor's job as we move into the budget in the autumn.' Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said she believed Labour was in 'a good place now' on the welfare Bill. She told broadcasters: 'We have listened to people, we have engaged with them. 'I think we're in a good place now, alongside the huge investments we are putting in to create the jobs that people need in every part of the country, to get waiting lists down in the NHS, to ensure stronger rights at work, but also to make sure there's employment support for those who can work and protections for those who can't.' Asked whether the Government had created a disparity between existing and new claimants, she insisted it was 'very common in the welfare system that there are protections for existing claimants'. 'That's happened before,' she said. Unveiling the concessions overnight, a No10 spokeswoman said: 'We have listened to MPs who support the principle of reform but are worried about the pace of change for those already supported by the system. 'This package will preserve the social security system for those who need it by putting it on a sustainable footing, provide dignity for those unable to work, supports those who can and reduce anxiety for those currently in the system. 'Our reforms are underpinned by Labour values and our determination to deliver the change the country voted for last year.' The Government's original package restricted eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limited the sickness-related element of universal credit. Existing claimants were to be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support in an earlier move that was seen as a bid to head off opposition by aiming to soften the impact of the changes. In her letter, the Work and Pensions Secretary said: 'We recognise the proposed changes have been a source of uncertainty and anxiety. 'We will ensure that all of those currently receiving PIP will stay within the current system. The new eligibility requirements will be implemented from November 2026 for new claims only. 'Secondly, we will adjust the pathway of Universal Credit payment rates to make sure all existing recipients of the UC health element – and any new claimant meeting the severe conditions criteria – have their incomes fully protected in real terms.' She said a ministerial review would ensure the benefit is 'fair and fit for the future' and will be a 'coproduction' with disabled people, organisations which represent them and MPs. 'These important reforms are rooted in Labour values, and we want to get them right,' she said. The change in Pip payments would protect some 370,000 existing claimants who were expected to lose out following reassessment. Tom Waters, an Associate Director at IFS, said: 'These changes more than halve the saving of the package of reforms as a whole, making the Chancellor's already difficult Budget balancing act that much harder. 'The decision is to protect existing health-related benefit claimants from the reforms, thereby making the savings entirely from new claimants to these benefits. 'This will create big differences – thousands of pounds a year, for many years in some cases – between similar people with similar health conditions who happen to have applied at a slightly different time.' If the legislation clears its first hurdle on Tuesday, it will then face a few hours' examination by all MPs the following week – rather than days or weeks in front of a committee tasked with looking at the Bill. The so-called 'reasoned amendment' tabled by Treasury select committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier had argued that disabled people have not been properly consulted and further scrutiny of the changes is needed. She said: 'This is a good deal. It is massive changes to ensure the most vulnerable people are protected… and, crucially, involving disabled people themselves in the design of future benefit changes.' While the concessions look set to reassure some of those who had been leading the rebellion, other MPs remained opposed before the announcement.
