WHO to document Karnataka's 'Asha Kirana' as global eye care model
doorstep eye care
, and plans to share its success story with other countries and regions.
The WHO has proposed a comprehensive assessment of the initiative to further strengthen the programme and generate valuable insights and best practices for other regions aiming to implement integrated, people-centred eye care.
In a letter to Harsh Gupta, Principal Secretary of Health and Family Welfare, WHO Representative to India, Dr Roderico H Ofrin, appreciated the state government for conceptualising and effectively implementing the 'Asha Kirana' initiative.
"This innovative model, launched under your leadership, marks significant progress towards eliminating avoidable blindness and ensuring equitable access to comprehensive eye care across the state. We are particularly encouraged by how 'Asha Kirana' aligns with the WHO's
Integrated People-Centred Eye Care
(IPEC) framework," Ofrin wrote in the letter dated June 30.
Recognising its impact and scalability, the WHO expressed keen interest in systematically documenting the state's model.
Such an evaluation, Ofrin noted, will help strengthen the programme while providing lessons and best practices for other regions and countries.
"We propose a comprehensive assessment using WHO's established tools, such as the Eye Care Situation Analysis Tool (ECSAT) and the Eye Care Indicator Menu (ECIM), to document processes, outcomes, and lessons from 'Asha Kirana'," he said.
"This documentation will be conducted independently by WHO at no cost to the state exchequer. It will contribute to global knowledge-sharing and support universal eye health," he added.
WHO has requested the nomination of a nodal officer to coordinate the process.
Taking to the social media platform 'X', Health Minister Dinesh Gundu Rao said Karnataka is setting new benchmarks in public health with the WHO recognising 'Asha Kirana'.
"This validation reinforces our commitment to equitable, accessible, and community-driven healthcare. WHO will now document this model using global tools like ECSAT and ECIM to share processes, outcomes, and lessons worldwide," he added. PTI
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
36 minutes ago
- Indian Express
WHO's ‘3 by 35' initiative targets tobacco, alcohol and sugary drinks
The World Health Organization (WHO) has launched a '3 by 35' initiative urging countries to raise real prices on tobacco, alcohol, and sugary drinks by at least 50 per cent by 2035 through health taxes in a move designed to curb chronic diseases and generate critical public revenue. Led by WHO, the initiative brings together a group of global partners to help countries put health taxes into action. These organizations offer a mix of technical know-how, policy advice, and real-world experience. By working together, they aim to raise awareness about the benefits of health taxes and support efforts at the national level. As per WHO officials, the consumption of tobacco, alcohol, and sugary drinks are fueling the epidemic of non-communicable diseases. NCDs, including heart disease, cancer, and diabetes, account for over 75 per cent of all deaths worldwide. A recent report shows that a one-time 50 per cent price increase on these products could prevent 50 million premature deaths over the next 50 years. 'Health taxes are one of the most efficient tools we have,' Dr Jeremy Farrar, Assistant Director-General, Health Promotion and Disease Prevention and Control, WHO, said in an official statement. The initiative has an ambitious goal of raising US $1 trillion over the next 10 years. Between 2012 and 2022, nearly 140 countries raised tobacco taxes, which resulted in an increase of real prices by over 50 per cent on average, showing that large-scale change is possible, according to the WHO report. Many countries have expressed interest in transitioning toward more self-reliant, domestically funded health systems and are turning to WHO for guidance. The '3 by 35' initiative introduces key action areas to help countries, pairing proven health policies with best practices on implementation. These include direct support for country-led reforms, mobilizing domestic public resources to fund essential health and development programmes, including universal health coverage. India has implemented tobacco taxation under the GST framework, with 28 per cent GST and an additional compensation cess on cigarettes and select products. However, bidis (smoked by low-income groups) and smokeless tobacco (SLT) (used by over two-thirds of tobacco users) remain under-taxed. Experts said that India's current approach to taxing tobacco, alcohol and sugar-sweetened beverages represents a fragmented, revenue-centric model that lacks a coherent public health framework. 'India's current taxation of tobacco, alcohol, and sugar-sweetened beverages represents substantial untapped potential for public health advancement. The absence of a coherent health tax framework limits their effectiveness in addressing India' s growing NCD burden. The WHO 3 by 35 Initiative provides both the rationale and the roadmap for transformation, offering a pathway to shift from revenue-driven to public health-oriented taxation that can achieve the dual objectives of sustainable health financing and disease prevention,' Dr Prashant Kumar Singh, senior scientist at Indian Council of Medical Research- National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research told The Indian Express. Anuradha Mascarenhas is a journalist with The Indian Express and is based in Pune. A senior editor, Anuradha writes on health, research developments in the field of science and environment and takes keen interest in covering women's issues. With a career spanning over 25 years, Anuradha has also led teams and often coordinated the edition. ... Read More
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Caution not anti-science, says CM as slugfest over vaccine heats up
A social media spat between chief minister Siddaramaiah and Biocon Executive chairperson Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw has brought renewed attention to the safety of COVID-19 vaccines and their possible long-term side effects. The exchange follows mounting concerns in Hassan district, where a spike in sudden heart-related deaths has raised public alarm. Caution not anti-science, says CM as slugfest over vaccine heats up The chief minister's initial remarks on July 1 questioned whether the deaths could be connected to the fast-tracked rollout of vaccines during the pandemic. While acknowledging that the vaccines were introduced under extraordinary global circumstances, Siddaramaiah suggested that the speed of approval may have overlooked long-term effects. 'It cannot be denied that the hasty approval and distribution of the COVID-19 vaccines to the public could also be a reason for these deaths,' he said in a post on the social media platform X, citing emerging global research linking vaccines to heart-related complications. To address public concerns, Siddaramaiah said his government had formed an expert committee led by Dr Ravindranath KS of Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research. The panel's mandate is to determine whether there is any scientific link between the vaccine rollout and the recent deaths in Hassan. In response, Shaw on Thursday challenged the chief minister's framing of the vaccine development process, calling it misleading and inaccurate. She said that India's vaccines were granted Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA) after meeting globally accepted safety and efficacy norms. 'To suggest that these vaccines were 'hastily' approved is factually incorrect and contributes to public misinformation,' she wrote, while also noting that side effects, though rare, did occur with any vaccine. In her follow-up post, Shaw said she agreed with the need for investigations into sudden deaths but reiterated that the regulatory process followed for vaccine approval met international standards. 'My response was that due process was followed as prescribed by WHO for safety and efficacy for Emergency Use Authorisation,' she wrote. 'Losing lives in a sudden manner is always tragic, and I am glad an investigation is being conducted in Hassan district.' By Friday, the discussion intensified as Siddaramaiah returned to the issue, stating that his role as chief minister obligated him to respond to the distress of families who had lost loved ones. 'When parents lose their young children or families lose breadwinners without warning, seeking clarity is not misinformation; it is an act of governance rooted in empathy,' he said. The chief minister further argued that questioning vaccine safety should not be equated with denialism or anti-science sentiment. He referred to studies published in journals such as Nature, Circulation, and the Journal of the American College of Cardiology, which have examined risks like myocarditis and cardiac arrest among younger populations post-vaccination. He also cited an admission by AstraZeneca about rare but serious side effects. 'Scientific caution is not anti-science,' Siddaramaiah said, adding that 'publicly funded stakeholders must acknowledge both the benefits and the potential risks without fear or favour.' He clarified that his use of the term 'hastily' was in reference to the emergency rollout timelines that global health agencies, including the WHO, had termed a 'calculated risk' during the height of the pandemic. 'Haste is not a sin when saving lives,' he said, 'but acknowledging potential unintended consequences is wisdom.' Meanwhile, the Union health ministry dismissed any connection between COVID-19 vaccines and the recent deaths. Referring to data from the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) and the National Centre for Disease Control (NCDC), the ministry asserted that the vaccines were both safe and effective, with serious adverse reactions being extremely rare.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
How many hours should you really be exercising each day? (Hint: It's less than you think)
We live in a world obsessed with productivity. And somewhere along the way, exercise got lumped into that hustle culture mindset. You've probably seen people bragging on Instagram about their two-hour gym grinds, their 5 a.m. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now marathons, or their sixth workout of the week. It's easy to feel like you're not doing enough if you're not drenched in sweat for hours every day. But let's pause. How much exercise do you actually need to stay healthy—and how much is just overkill? The short answer? Not nearly as much as you think. According to leading global health authorities like the World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, adults should aim for about 150 minutes of moderate physical activity each week. That works out to about 30 minutes a day, five days a week. If you prefer more intense workouts—running, high-intensity interval training, cycling—you can get away with half that time. Just 75 minutes a week of vigorous activity can still deliver major benefits to your heart, brain, metabolism, and overall mood. But here's the catch: consistency is what really matters. It's not about exhausting yourself on the treadmill once a week and then collapsing on the couch for the next six days. Your body thrives on regular movement. Daily effort—even in short bursts—is better than long, irregular slogs. What counts as exercise, anyway? A common myth is that unless you're lifting heavy weights or gasping through a gym class, it doesn't count. That's nonsense. Exercise isn't just what happens in a gym. A brisk walk to the grocery store, dancing in your living room, climbing stairs instead of taking the elevator—all of that is movement that your body appreciates. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Gardening, cleaning, playing tag with your kid, hauling groceries—these things may not come with a fitness tracker or a calorie count, but they absolutely count. Moderate activity is anything that gets your heart beating faster and makes you breathe a little harder. Vigorous activity is when you're breathing a lot harder and can't hold a conversation easily. Both types are good for you. And the beauty is, you can mix and match based on your energy level and schedule. Can you break it up? Absolutely! If the idea of carving out a dedicated 30-minute slot sounds impossible, here's some good news. You don't have to do it all at once. Multiple have confirmed that shorter bouts of movement scattered throughout the day are just as effective. Ten minutes in the morning, ten in the afternoon, ten after dinner—done. It all adds up. Your body doesn't care if you hit 30 minutes in one go or three. This is especially helpful for people with desk jobs or busy family lives. Movement doesn't need to be a production. It can be as simple as getting off the couch during ad breaks or doing a few squats while your coffee brews. But is 30 minutes enough for everyone? Here's where it gets a little more personal. Thirty minutes a day is enough to maintain general health, reduce the risk of chronic diseases, improve your mood, help you sleep better, and keep your muscles and bones in decent shape. But if your goals go beyond just being healthy—if you want to lose weight, gain muscle, or train for an event—you may need a little more. For weight loss, many experts recommend closer to 45–60 minutes of daily activity, depending on your diet and other habits. And if you're strength training, you might spend 45 minutes to an hour three or four times a week lifting weights or doing resistance exercises. Still, even then, more doesn't automatically mean better. Overtraining is a real issue. If you're working out hard every day without enough rest, your body will eventually push back. Think fatigue, insomnia, irritability, nagging injuries, and even a weakened immune system. It's not about punishment—it's about balance. The real problem: Sitting too much Even if you hit the gym for 30 minutes every morning, what you do with the rest of your day matters too. Sitting for eight to ten hours straight has been dubbed 'the new smoking' for good reason. Long periods of sitting can cancel out many of the benefits of exercise. Your metabolism slows down, your muscles get tight, and your risk for heart disease and diabetes shoots up. So if you're sedentary for most of your day, try to break it up with movement. Stand up and stretch every hour. Walk while you're on phone calls. Take stairs instead of elevators. Use your lunch break to move around instead of scrolling Instagram. These little changes make a big difference. What an ideal day could look like You don't need to go from zero to athlete overnight. A great day of movement could start with a 10-minute walk in the morning sunshine, followed by a few bodyweight squats or stretches after lunch. Maybe in the evening, you take your dog for a long walk or do 20 minutes of yoga before bed. That's it. You've already done more than most. And the best part? None of it has to feel like a workout. You're just adding more life to your day. We've been conditioned to believe that exercise has to be brutal, sweaty, and time-consuming to count. But the truth is far gentler—and more forgiving. Just 30 minutes of moderate activity a day can protect your heart, sharpen your mind, and improve your mood. You don't need to be extreme. You just need to be consistent. If you're just starting out, don't stress about the numbers. Start with five minutes, then build from there. The body responds to motion, no matter how small. And once you realize how good it feels to move every day—not just physically, but mentally—you'll actually want to keep going. So how many hours should you be working out each day? For most of us, just a half hour is enough. And in a world constantly asking us to do more, isn't it refreshing to hear that less can truly be more?
