Got read the Chief Justice's speech or not? — Hafiz Hassan
APRIL 24 — I read Philip TN Koh's 'The (mis)reading of the Right Honourable Chief Justice of Malaysia's speech at the 24th Commonwealth Conference'.
Then I read Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat's speech entitled 'Judicial Independence and Parliamentary Sovereignty — a Colossi of Roads?' — again.
I must agree with senior lawyer Philip TN Koh, who is also Adjunct Professor, Universiti Malaya, that the Chief Justice did not advocate 'a form of juristocracy, i.e. the judiciary being an unelected body embarking on a road to establishing judicial supremacy over elected officers that represents the sovereign will of the people.'
Neither did the Chief Justice make 'such an assertion nor was there discernible any desire to promote her own virtues or character.'
The speech has been available on the Malaysian Bar website since April 9. Kudos to the Bar for publishing the speech. Read it here.
Chief Justice of Malaysia Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat attends the Opening of the Legal Year 2024 at Putrajaya International Convention Centre January 15, 2024. — Picture by Shafwan Zaidon
Concluding her speech, the Chief Justice said as follows:
'In closing, it is essential to reaffirm that the Malaysian system is founded not on parliamentary sovereignty, but on constitutional supremacy. At all times, the Federal Constitution stands as the highest authority, establishing the framework within which all branches of government — the Legislature, the Executive and the Judiciary — must operate. No single branch is supreme in its own right; rather, each derives its legitimacy and powers from the Federal Constitution itself.
'Within this framework, the unequivocal role of the Judiciary is to uphold the supremacy of the Federal Constitution by ensuring that parliamentary and executive power remain within their constitutional limits. This duty demands that judges adjudicate cases with absolute independence, impartiality and integrity, without yielding to fear or favour. They must stand resolute in the face of adversity, undeterred by criticism or external pressures. Judicial independence is not an end in itself but a paramount means to ensure that the Rule of Law prevails within the constitutional framework.
'At the same time, a constructive and balanced relationship between the Judiciary and the other branches of government is essential to preserving judicial independence while respecting the democratic mandate of Parliament. This relationship is not a contest for supremacy but a partnership in governance — one founded not just on mutual respect but on a clear understanding of our respective constitutional roles. While our functions remain distinct, both institutions ultimately serve the same fundamental purpose of safeguarding constitutional democracy and protecting the fundamental rights of citizens.'
Clearly, the Chief Justice has called for 'a constructive and balanced relationship' between the Judiciary and the other branches of government, and not just the executive.
She acknowledges that the relationship is 'not a contest for supremacy but a partnership in governance — one founded not just on mutual respect but on a clear understanding of [their] respective constitutional roles.'
Did the critics misread, or did they not read, the speech?
To put it in Manglish, got read or not?
* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Malaysiakini
9 hours ago
- Malaysiakini
Zafrul to visit Washington on June 18 for tariff talks
Investment, Trade, and Industry Minister Tengku Zafrul Abdul Aziz will travel to Washington, United States, on June 18 to resume negotiations over tariffs imposed on Malaysian goods. Zafrul said he briefed the cabinet earlier today on the upcoming visit. 'I will be going to the United States next week, and we will...


Sinar Daily
9 hours ago
- Sinar Daily
Court of Appeal sets Aug 19 for decision in activist's appeal over challenge to online speech law
A three-man bench consisting of Federal Court judge Datuk Lee Swee Seng and Court of Appeal judges Datuk Hashim Hamzah and Datuk Azman Abdullah set the decision date after parties completed their submissions earlier today. 11 Jun 2025 05:44pm The Court of Appeal has fixed August 19 to deliver its decision in an appeal brought by an activist over the dismissal of her lawsuit that had challenged the validity of parts of a provision in the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 that criminalises offensive online comments. PUTRAJAYA - The Court of Appeal has fixed August 19 to deliver its decision in an appeal brought by an activist over the dismissal of her lawsuit that had challenged the validity of parts of a provision in the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 that criminalises offensive online comments. A three-man bench consisting of Federal Court judge Datuk Lee Swee Seng and Court of Appeal judges Datuk Hashim Hamzah and Datuk Azman Abdullah set the decision date after parties completed their submissions earlier today. Heidy Quah Gaik Li, the founder of Refuge for Refugees is claiming the use of the words "offensive' and annoy' in Section 233 of the Act are invalid as it goes against two fundamental human rights protected by the Federal Constitution. Section 233(1)(a) states that it is an offence for a person to make, create or solicit, and initiate the transmission of any online comment which is "obscene, indecent, false, menacing or offensive' with "intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass another person. In Sept 2023, the Shah Alam High Court dismissed Quah's lawsuit, leading her to file an appeal in the Court of Appeal. The hearing today was a continuation of proceedings that had begun earlier. Justice Lee was serving as a Court of Appeal judge before being elevated to the Federal Court in May this year. During today's hearing, senior federal counsel Liew Horng Bin representing the Malaysian government submitted that speech involving expletives, profanity, crude references, hate speech or incitement to violence are not expressions protected under Article 10 (1) (a) of the Federal Constitution. He argued that the right to free speech should be used to disseminate truth, respect for human dignity and perform essential informing function. On the other hand, lawyer Datuk Malik Imtiaz Sarwar, representing Quah argued the words "offensive' or annoy contained in Section 233 is inconsistent with Article 10 and Article 8 of the Federal Constitution, namely the right to equality and freedom of speech. He argued that the two words in Section 233 are not a "permissible restriction' under public order as prescribed in the Federal Constitution. In July 2021, Quah, 31, was charged in the Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court for allegedly making "offensive' online comments in a Facebook post. In April the following year, the Sessions Court granted her a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) due to the charge under section 233(1)(a) being defective. - BERNAMA More Like This


The Sun
10 hours ago
- The Sun
Tengku Zafrul to visit Washington June 18 for tariff talks
KUALA LUMPUR: Investment, Trade and Industry Minister Tengku Datuk Seri Zafrul Abdul Aziz will travel to Washington, United States (US), on June 18 to resume negotiations over tariffs imposed on Malaysian goods. Tengku Zafrul said he had briefed the cabinet earlier today on the upcoming visit. 'I will be going to the United States next week, and we will continue in-person negotiations. Previously, discussions were held online. I will meet with the US Trade Representative in Washington next week,' he told reporters after witnessing the signing ceremony of the DayOne Syndicated Financing and Corporate Renewable Energy Supply Scheme. He added that he is scheduled to meet US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, as well as other officials from the US administration and investors. Tengku Zafrul will also take the opportunity to engage with several business chambers, companies, and interest groups, including the American Malaysian Chamber of Commerce (AMCHAM) and the US-ASEAN Business Council. Earlier, on April 24, Tengku Zafrul led a high-level delegation to Washington, where he held talks with US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Greer. During that meeting, Tengku Zafrul stressed the importance of sustained engagement and reiterated Malaysia's commitment to finding constructive solutions to the concerns raised by the US. Malaysia has expressed its readiness to negotiate in four key areas: narrowing the trade deficit, addressing non-tariff barriers, strengthening technology protection and security, and exploring the potential for a bilateral trade agreement. On April 2, US President Donald Trump announced tariff measures affecting around 60 countries, including a 24 per cent levy on most Malaysian goods. However, the tariffs have been temporarily suspended for 90 days for most countries to allow room for trade negotiations.