
Arab leaders ‘agree to build 200,000 homes' in alternative to Trump's Gaza riviera plan
Arab leaders have reportedly agreed to build around 200,000 new homes in Gaza as part of an alternative to Donald Trump's 'Middle East Riviera' plan.
Leaked documents from a summit in Cairo envisage a reconstructed and affluent-looking enclave, not entirely dissimilar to the US president's vision, but without first displacing the civilian population.
The plans, which are set to be published and formally agreed within days, would involve a temporary committee of technocrats to run Gaza, with no formal role for Hamas.
This would be 'under the umbrella' of the Palestinian Authority, the administration which currently runs the West Bank from Ramallah.
Despite being an alternative to Mr Trump's proposal, some language from leaders in Cairo on Tuesday suggested it was pitched with the US president in mind.
Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, Egypt's president, said he was certain Mr Trump would be able to achieve peace on the question of Gaza.
Elements of Mr Trump's entourage have suggested over the last month that his incendiary proposal to 'clear out' the Palestinians and build a Las Vegas-style international hub was intended to provoke fresh thinking from the Middle East.
Meanwhile, Arab diplomatic sources have briefed in recent weeks that they believe the White House could accept an alternative vision, so long as it was workable and had widespread support in the region.
Such a scenario would be potentially nightmarish for Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu 's government, which has repeatedly ruled out what appear to be important facets of the current Arab plan.
One is the involvement of the Palestinian Authority, which has been described by senior ministers as 'just as bad' as Hamas.
Late on Tuesday, the Israeli government appeared to reject the Arab plan.
Oren Marmorstein, a spokesman for the ministry of foreign affairs, said the statement issued at the summit 'fails to address the realities of the situation following October 7 2023, remaining rooted in outdated perspectives'.
He criticised it for failing to condemn Hamas, as well as for continuing to rely on the Palestinian Authority and UNRWA, the UN body that works in Gaza and the West Bank.
'Both have repeatedly demonstrated corruption, support for terrorism and failure in resolving the issue.'
He added: 'Now, with President Trump's idea, there is an opportunity for the Gazans to have free choice based on their free will. This should be encouraged.'
The Arab plan reportedly involves the holding of elections in the Palestinian Territories, where they have not taken place for 20 years.
The other sticking point could be the status of the terror group itself.
Israel has said that it is not sufficient for Hamas to be absent from a future government, but that it will not tolerate the presence of the armed group in Gaza in any form.
Hazem Qassem, a Hamas spokesman, suggested on Tuesday that the group could be content to cede power in Gaza for a plan that had the backing of the civilian population.
However, Israel has warned that it will not accept a 'Lebanon-style' situation, where a terror group may not formally hold power but in reality dominates by virtue of its armed strength.
Hamas has previously suggested that disarming would be a red line for the organisation.
The UN estimates that approximately 90 per cent of homes in Gaza are destroyed or damaged, with most of the infrastructure also destroyed.
According to leaked documents, the new plan is based on studies conducted by the World Bank and the United Nations Development Programme.
The UN has said that reconstruction would cost around $50 billion (£39 billion) and wealthy Arab states would be expected to foot some of this bill.
The plan's initial stage calls for around 200,000 homes to be built in Gaza over the next two years, at an estimated cost of $20 billion.
However, it is unlikely that any significant financial package will be forthcoming unless the backers are confident that the enclave will not return to war.
A 91-page glossy brochure, reportedly inspired by Emirati designs, has been circulating in Cairo as part of a push to gain acceptance for the plan.
However, while not addressing the Trump proposal explicitly, language within the draft document sets a clear alternate position on the issue of the Palestinian population.
'Any malicious attempts to displace Palestinians or annex any part of occupied Palestinian territories would lead to new phases of conflict, undermine stability opportunities, expand conflict into other countries in the region, and pose a clear threat to peace foundations in the Middle East,' it warns.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
27 minutes ago
- BBC News
World Business Report US-China trade tensions may benefit South East Asia
The countdown continues to trade deals with Washington. Ahead of President Trump's threatened tariff hikes next month, we're hearing from South East Asia, and looking at complaints that Chinese firms may be dumping goods, undermining regional economies. Also in the show, the disruption to aviation from the Iran-Israel conflict. And why Chinese officials are being ordered to drink less? You can contact us on WhatsApp or send us a voicenote: +44 330 678 3033.


NBC News
28 minutes ago
- NBC News
Companies ask Supreme Court to quickly hear Trump tariffs challenge
WASHINGTON — Two educational toy companies on Tuesday asked the Supreme Court to quickly take up their challenge to tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump. The companies, Learning Resources and hand2mind, filed a joint appeal arguing that Trump had no power to impose the tariffs on goods from China under a law called the International Economic Powers Act. They asked the court to leapfrog over a federal appeals court, which has yet to rule on the case, and agree to take the dispute up this month so it can schedule oral arguments this fall, possibly as early as September. A federal judge in Washington had ruled the tariffs were unlawful, but that ruling is on hold. In a separate case, the Court of International Trade ruled against the administration over the president's tariffs authority. That decision is also blocked for now, meaning all the tariffs remain in effect while litigation continues. "Even as these punishing tariffs cause American businesses and consumers to bleed billions of dollars each month, there will be no relief any time soon," the toy companies' lawyers said in court papers. The issue is one of national consequence that the Supreme Court has to decide, they added, noting that it concerns whether the president can "unilaterally reshape the national economy and global trade policy."


The Independent
39 minutes ago
- The Independent
Tehran has ‘no desire' for nuclear bomb, ambassador insists
Iran's ambassador to the UK insisted his country had no intention of building a nuclear weapon as he clashed with MPs on Tuesday. Seyed Ali Mousavi told the Commons Foreign Affairs Committee that Iran's nuclear programme was 'only peaceful', insisting: 'There is no desire, not any intention, to produce a nuclear bomb.' His comments come less than a week after the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) censured Iran for failing to comply with nonproliferation obligations intended to stop it developing a nuclear weapon. Tehran is reported to have enriched uranium up to 60%, requiring only a short technical step to reach the weapons-grade level of 90%. Earlier, Donald Trump had declared on his Truth Social platform that Iran 'can not have a nuclear weapon' and urged people to 'immediately evacuate Tehran'. But Sir Keir Starmer has played down the possibility of a US strike on Iran, saying a statement by leaders of the G7, including Mr Trump, was 'about de-escalation'. During Tuesday's hearing, Mr Mousavi condemned Israeli air strikes on Iran, accusing Tel Aviv of 'terrorist and criminal aggression' and deliberately targeting civilians. But he also clashed with MPs on the committee over Iran's support for Russia's war in Ukraine and plots to assassinate people in the UK. In a heated exchange with Labour MP Blair McDougall, Mr Mousavi complained about the use of the word 'regime' to describe the government in Tehran, insisting it was 'a very lawful and legally responsible state'. Referring to Russia's use of Iranian-supplied drones to strike civilian targets in Ukraine, Mr McDougall asked: 'What's the legal basis for (Vladimir) Putin's war in Ukraine, if you're a fan of international law?' But Mr Mousavi insisted Iran had 'declared to the Russian side not to use our cooperation against a third party', adding the committee would have to 'ask this question to the Russian Federation'. He also asked for 'evidence' of plots to attack Iranian journalists in the UK, offering to provide members of Iran's security services to 'remove these kinds of misunderstandings'.