Hundreds join protest against Hamas in northern Gaza
Videos and photos shared on social media late on Tuesday showed hundreds of people, mostly men, chanting 'Hamas out' and 'Hamas terrorists' in Beit Lahia, where the crowd had gathered a week after the Israeli army resumed its intense bombing of Gaza following nearly two months of a truce.
The protests took place in front of the Indonesian hospital in the northern part of the Gaza Strip.
Some protesters were seen carrying banners emblazoned with slogans including 'Stop the war' and 'We want to live in peace'.
At least one appeal to join the protest was circulating on the social media network Telegram.
'I don't know who organised the protest,' one man told Agence France-Press. 'I took part to send a message on behalf of the people: Enough with the war,' he said, adding that he had seen 'members of the Hamas security forces in civilian clothing breaking up the protest'.
Majdi, another protester who did not wish to give his full name, said the 'people are tired'.
'If Hamas leaving power in Gaza is the solution, why doesn't Hamas give up power to protect the people?' he told AFP.
Separate clips showed dozens of people in Jabalia refugee camps, in the western part of Gaza City, burning tyres and calling for the war to end.
'We want to eat,' they chanted.
Some Gaza residents said the protests could spread to other parts of the war-torn territory, whose inhabitants are exhausted and traumatised after a year and a half of conflict.
Since Hamas launched its attacks on southern Israel on 7 October, modest protests have occasionally broken out in Gaza, with demonstrators demanding an end to the war.
Many of the slogans chanted on Tuesday evoked the Bidna N'eesh ('We Want to Live') movement, which emerged during the 2019 Gaza economic protests. Those protests were violently suppressed by Hamas, which said they were orchestrated by its rival, Fatah.
Israel regularly calls for people in Gaza to mobilise against Hamas, which has been in power in the territory since 2007.
The Gaza Strip has been devastated by more than 17 months of war between Israel and Hamas, with the humanitarian situation again deteriorating after Israel blocked the passage of aid into the territory on 2 March in an attempt to force the militants to release Israeli hostages.
Since Israel resumed its military operations in Gaza, at least 792 Palestinians have been killed, according to the health ministry.
The war was sparked by the militant group's 7 October 2023 attack on Israel, which resulted in the deaths of 1,218 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures.
Israel's retaliatory military offensive has killed at least 50,021 people in Gaza, mostly civilians, according to the health ministry.
AFP contributed to this report
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
12 minutes ago
- The National
Nicola Sturgeon says monarchy 'should end soon' at book launch
The former first minister was interviewed by ex-BBC Newsnight presenter Kirsty Wark in a packed out McEwan Hall as part of the Edinburgh International Book Festival. As part of the conversation, Sturgeon reflected on her encounters with Queen Elizabeth, a woman she said she had had "huge admiration" for. But she went on to say King Charles and other members of the royal family so not have the same "mystique" as the Queen did, and so people are coming to realise the "absurdities" of the monarchy. Asked about when the monarchy should end, Sturgeon said: "I think it should end probably quite soon." READ MORE: National Library of Scotland debunks claim it 'banned' gender-critical book After a round of applause, she went on: "I think we will look back, and I don't know if this will be in 10 years or 100 years, and history will look back on the death of Queen Elizabeth as probably the beginning of the end of the monarchy because there was such a mystique around her and, with the greatest of respect to the King and the other members of the royal family, I just don't think they have that to the same extent and I think without that, what we focus more on and what we will focus more on are the absurdities of the monarchy." Sturgeon has been under the spotlight this whole week following the release of Frankly, which officially came out on Thursday but has been available in bookshops since Monday. The relationship between Sturgeon and her predecessor Alex Salmond dominated the interview, with Wark asking early on in the chat whether Sturgeon felt Salmond had ever been guilty of "coercive control". Wark claimed there had "almost been a thread of coercive control" from Salmond running through the book which she asked Sturgeon about. The former first minister replied: "I wouldn't describe it as that. "He was an incredibly strong and charismatic individual and for much of my life he was a force for good. He encouraged me to reach beyond what I would have considered my abilities to be, he pushed me on. I once said ages ago he believed in me before I believed in myself and all of that is true. I try to be true to that in the book and not to rewrite history." She went on to describe how Salmond's approval and disapproval of her impacted her greatly, something she came to realise through getting counselling. She said: "What I do think is that I realised a couple of times, even after I was first minister, that his approval mattered to me and his disapproval knocked by confidence and I think latterly, he probably played on that a little bit, but that was something I realised was there through my psychologist." Sturgeon was also heavily quizzed about her leadership around gender reform. Earlier this week Sturgeon said she should have paused gender reform legislation that was going through the Scottish Parliament towards the end of her tenure. READ MORE: SNP demand UK Government act amid Israeli E1 plan in West Bank The Gender Recognition Reform Bill would have allowed transgender people to self-identify and simplified the requirements to acquire a gender recognition certificate (GRC), before it was blocked by Westminster from becoming law. She said during the interview that one of the reasons she may not have paused was to not "give in" to transphobic people. "When it became so toxic, maybe I should have taken a step back and paused to see if we could find a less divisive way through it. Would that have worked? I don't know. "But I guess what stopped me, and I'm not saying this was the right decision, but if I look back on what stopped me at the time [...], every time I say this I get howls of derision even though I caveat it in the way I'm about to caveat it, but I don't think everyone who disagrees with me on this issue is transphobic. But this whole issue has been hijacked and weaponised by people who are transphobic. "I think I perhaps worried that to pause at the time would have been to give in to that."
Glasgow Times
22 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Israel announces West Bank settlement that ‘could imperil Palestinian state'
Palestinians and rights groups worry the move will scuttle plans for a future Palestinian state by effectively cutting the West Bank into two separate parts. The announcement comes as many countries, including Australia France, and Canada said they would recognise a Palestinian state in September. 'This reality finally buries the idea of a Palestinian state, because there is nothing to recognise and no one to recognise,' said finance minister Bezalel Smotrich during a ceremony on Thursday. 'Anyone in the world who tries today to recognise a Palestinian state — will receive an answer from us on the ground.' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has not yet publicly commented on the plan, but he has touted it in the past. Development in E1, an open tract of land east of Jerusalem, has been under consideration for more than two decades, but was frozen due to US pressure during previous administrations. On Thursday, Mr Smotrich praised President Donald Trump and US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee as 'true friends of Israel as we have never had before'. The E1 plan is expected to receive final approval August 20, capping off 20 years of bureaucratic wrangling. The planning committee on August 6 rejected all of the petitions to stop the construction filed by rights groups and activists. Israeli finance minister Bezalel Smotrich speaks to journalists during a press conference about a new settlement construction in the Israel-occupied West Bank (Ohad Zwigenberg/AP) While some bureaucratic steps remain, if the process moves quickly, infrastructure work could begin in the next few months and construction of homes could start in around a year. The approval is a 'colonial, expansionist, and racist move', Ahmed al Deek, the political adviser to the minister of Palestinian Foreign Affairs, told The Associated Press on Thursday. 'It falls within the framework of the extremist Israeli government's plans to undermine any possibility of establishing a Palestinian state on the ground, to fragment the West Bank, and to separate its southern part from the centre and the north,' Mr al Deek said. Rights groups also swiftly condemned the plan. Peace Now called it 'deadly for the future of Israel and for any chance of achieving a peaceful two-state solution' which is 'guaranteeing many more years of bloodshed'. The announcement comes as the Palestinian Authority and Arab countries condemned Mr Netanyahu's statement in an interview on Tuesday that he was 'very' attached to the vision of a 'Greater Israel'. He did not elaborate, but supporters of the idea believe that Israel should control not only the occupied West Bank but parts of Arab countries. Israel's plans to expand settlements are part of an increasingly difficult reality for Palestinians in the occupied West Bank as the world's attention focuses on Gaza. An area near Maale Adumim in the Israeli-occupied West Bank (Ohad Zwigenberg/AP) There have been marked increases in settler attacks against Palestinians, evictions from Palestinian towns and checkpoints that choke freedom of movement. There also have been several Palestinian attacks on Israelis during the course of the war. More than 700,000 Israelis now live in the occupied West Bank and east Jerusalem, territories captured by Israel in 1967 and sought by the Palestinians for a future state. The international community overwhelmingly considers Israeli settlement construction in these areas to be illegal and obstacles to peace. Israel's government is dominated by religious and ultranationalist politicians with close ties to the settlement movement. Mr Smotrich, previously a firebrand settler leader, has been granted cabinet-level authority over settlement policies and vowed to double the settler population in the West Bank. Israel captured the West Bank, east Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip in the 1967 Mideast war. The Palestinians claim all three territories for a future independent state. Israel has annexed east Jerusalem and claims it as part of its capital, which is not internationally recognised. It says the West Bank is disputed territory whose fate should be determined through negotiations, while Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005.
ITV News
32 minutes ago
- ITV News
'No casualties': GHF repeatedly denies killings on Gaza aid distribution sites
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has repeatedly denied reports of any killings on its aid distribution sites in Gaza. Since launching operations in May, GHF's large-scale distribution sites - backed by Israel and the US - have become magnets for violence. Nearly 1,400 people have died while seeking food; 859 in the vicinity of the GHF sites and 514 along the routes of food convoys, according to the latest figures from the United Nations (UN). Speaking to ITV News, GHF spokesperson Chapin Fay claims there have been no casualties on any of the group's four aid sites and claims the numbers coming from the UN are "unreliable". "We have had no casualties on our sites. We have never had any casualties except for two incidents of terrorist attacks." The UN recorded deaths are often attributed to Israeli fire - including gunshots and teargas - while the GHF has also been criticised for crowd control incidents and stampedes. Mr Fay reiterated that GHF security personnel "do not shoot at people and do not use live fire for crowd control." "They have never shot at anyone. During a war, every casualty is regrettable, but they don't happen on our sites. And there's no question people are walking sometimes too far for aid." When questioned over the deaths of people who were killed on the journey to GHF aid sites, he added: "We push the IDF to deconflict and to make the rest of Gaza outside of our sites safe. "We push for more humanitarian zones. There's no question that it's a war zone. And this is a very complex, if not the most complex, humanitarian crisis of our lifetime. And it's happening." The GHF describes its mission as "alleviating the suffering" of Gaza's population by the swift delivery of aid, ensuring the territory's population can live with "dignity". But some of those who have worked inside the operation say the reality on the ground can be dangerously disordered. last month that there is 'a whole culture of just winging it' and 'a lot of bad practice'. He recalled an evacuation where 'both of the heads of the Palestinians snapped back and then dropped' after Israeli soldiers were seen running and shouting at "two people that were dressed in regular clothing". The GHF rejected the claims at the time, describing Gaza as an "active war zone". British surgeon Nick Maynard spent four weeks working inside Nasser Hospital in Gaza. He previously told ITV News that there is a pattern of body parts being targeted by gunshots, "almost as if a game is being played".
