Prime Minister Carney in Brussels today for EU-Canada summit
BRUSSELS — Prime Minister Mark Carney is in Belgium today, where he visited a military cemetery before meeting with European Union leaders at an EU-Canada summit.
Carney said on social media Sunday that he was in Brussels to launch 'a new era of partnership' between Canada and the European Union for the benefit of workers, businesses and security 'on both sides of the Atlantic.'
Carney started the day with a visit to the Antwerp Schoonselhof Military Cemetery where 348 Canadian soldiers are buried.
Carney toured the cemetery alongside his wife, Diana Fox Carney, and Belgian prime minister Bart De Wever.
Carney also took part in a wreath-laying ceremony. Foreign affairs minister Anita Anand, national defence minister David McGuinty and Special Envoy to the European Union and Europe Stéphane Dion were also at the event.
Later, he is expected to meet with De Wever, European Council President António Costa and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.
Carney posted on social media early on Monday that he spoke with U.S. President Donald Trump overnight, noting the conversation addressed the need to de-escalate the conflict in the Middle East, their shared commitment of a stronger NATO and progress in ongoing trade talks between Canada and the United States.
At the EU-Canada summit, Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand and Defence Minister David McGuinty are expected to sign a security and defence agreement with the European bloc in what one European official described last week as one of the most ambitious deals the continent's powers have ever signed with a third country.
The security and defence agreement aims to open the door to Canada's participation in the joint purchase of weapons with European countries.
It will also lead to Canada's participation in the ReArm Europe initiative, allowing Canada to access a 150-billion-euro program for defence procurement, called Security Action for Europe.
Canada will need to sign a second agreement with the European Commission before it can take part in the program.
A government official briefing reporters on the trip said the partnership is expected to make procurement easier and more affordable, while also allowing Canada to diversify the sources of equipment.
At the EU-Canada summit, leaders are also expected to issue a joint statement to underscore a willingness for continued pressure on Russia to end its war on Ukraine, including through further sanctions, and call for an immediate and permanent ceasefire in Gaza. The joint statement is also expected to touch on climate change, trade and digital and tech policy.
Speaking to reporters Monday, De Wever said Canada's partnership with the EU is important because 'we've woken up in a world that doesn't look that friendly anymore.'
'We're living in a world where we have an imperialist power in the east who uses military force, we have a peculiar figure in the White House who is choosing the road of protectionism and even isolationism, so those who like a rules-based world, a multilateral world, should find each other's company now,' the Belgian prime minister said.
De Wever said countries will need to spend more on defense and should do so wisely by developing their industrial defense base together.
'Those countries who still like multilateralism are the countries that have to look up each other's company and make good agreements,' he said.
Leaders at the EU-Canada summit are also slated to discuss global trade and commit to working toward full ratification and implementation of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, the Canada-Europe free trade deal known as CETA.
The pact took effect provisionally in 2017, and most of its contents now apply. But all EU countries need to approve CETA before it can take full effect, with 10 members still left to ratify the deal.
Carney, Costa and von der Leyen are scheduled to hold a joint press conference in the evening.
On Tuesday, Carney travels to The Hague for the NATO summit.
The international meetings come as Canada looks to reduce its defence procurement reliance on the United States due to strained relations over tariffs and U.S. President Donald Trump's repeated talk about Canada becoming a U.S. state.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 23, 2025.
Catherine Morrison, The Canadian Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Free trade carveouts key in potential deal between U.S. and Canada: business groups
Business leaders and academics say they hope to see Canada and the U.S. maintain free trade protections for most goods once an agreement is reached, even if the negotiations can't stave off certain sectoral tariffs. Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney, right, greets President Donald Trump during the official welcome of the G7 Summit, Monday, June 16, 2025, in Kananaskis, Canada. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein) Business leaders and academics say they hope to see Canada and the U.S. maintain free trade protections for most goods once an agreement is reached, even if the negotiations can't stave off certain sectoral tariffs. It's unclear if the two countries will stick to the Aug. 1 deadline for wrapping up talks, as Prime Minister Mark Carney said Monday negotiations were in an 'intense phase' but U.S. President Donald Trump told reporters last week that Canada wasn't a priority for his administration. Whether a deal is announced Friday or later, Canadian Federation of Independent Business president Dan Kelly says his organization's members feel 'a good chunk' of trade must remain tariff-free in order for talks to be considered successful. He says it wouldn't be a win for Canada if the trade agreement ends up looking similar to the deal struck by the U.S. with the European Union on Sunday. That framework imposes a 15 per cent tariff on most goods imported into the U.S., including European automobiles, and no carveouts for key products like pharmaceuticals and steel. Kelly says Canadian business leaders will also be watching to find out what levies will remain on imports from the U.S., noting Canada's ongoing retaliatory tariffs 'are really crippling small businesses even more than the U.S. tariffs.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 29, 2025. Sammy Hudes, The Canadian Press
National Observer
2 hours ago
- National Observer
Pipelines won't unite Canada. Clean energy will
Canada doesn't need more fossil fuel infrastructure. In the wake of the Building Canada Act's adoption, pipelines and fossil fuel infrastructure are being proposed as national interest projects, even though they are costly, risky and out of step with public opinion, especially in Quebec. The province has long rejected fossil fuel supply projects and opted for a smarter future with renewable energy. Ironically enough, it is precisely here that yet another new project concept for an LNG plant is being touted. In a letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney and government ministers, more than 100 organizations illustrated how an east-west electricity grid could serve national interests by prioritizing renewable energy and Indigenous rights. This united call is aligned with Quebecers' long-standing opposition to fossil fuel proposals running through the Saint Lawrence River and their communities. In May, hundreds of groups and individuals called on federal and Quebec politicians to oppose new pipelines. Earlier this year, in February, within a week of the media's renewed interest in fossil fuel projects, such as Energy East and GNL Quebec — and following US President Donald Trump's return to the White House — a coalition of 100 Quebec organizations and experts from environment, labour, student, urban planning and academia also issued an unequivocal statement reiterating that Quebec civil society wants to maintain its long-standing opposition to fossil fuel project expansion. A Leger survey showed that, when presented with a choice between investments in renewable energy or fossil fuels, three out of four Quebecers would choose the former, further indicating that pipelines are a challenge to so-called Canadian unity. This public consensus against fossil fuel development wasn't formed lightly but rather through decades of mobilization, culminating in 2022 when Quebec adopted legislation prohibiting oil and gas exploration. This secured the province an appointment as co-president of the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance, a global group of jurisdictions committed to phasing out fossil fuels and implementing policies to do so. Any new oil and gas pipeline or facility project will face a fundamental reality: the lack of market need. Europe's demand for natural gas may already have peaked, in part due to aggressive efforts to accelerate electrification and expand renewable resources. Even without taking into account the fact that an east-west pipeline would be useless for Asian markets, with the continent's energy needs being met by a mix of renewables, electrification, efficiency and nuclear energy; Canadian gas can't compete in the Asian market dominated by the United States and Qatar. Betting, once again, on the same fossil-fuel horse might be what keeps Canada from becoming the energy superpower it could be, write Andréanne Brazeau and Charles-Édouard Têtu Building massive infrastructure to carry fossil fuels is a mistake in the face of global market volatility. Fossil fuel expansion and profiteering are primary drivers of inflation and the cost-of-living crisis. New pipelines are an investment in yesterday's energy model while the world rapidly shifts to renewables. As the global energy transition accelerates, they could easily become costly 'stranded assets.' Federal financing of the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion should serve as an example. Not only did the cost skyrocket from $4.5 billion to $34 billion to cover a fourth of the distance of a west-east project, but it is also still not achieving full capacity. Furthermore, fossil fuel pipelines are notorious for taking years before becoming operational. Trans Mountain was approved in 2019 and started transporting fuel in 2024. Projects such as Energy East and GNL Québec would not be different and aren't a 'quick fix' to uncertainty around trade. It's also important to note that even if Energy East were operational today, it could not close the capacity gap needed for full energy autonomy. Uncertain times require policy-makers to act fast, but that doesn't mean forgetting the basics of economics and business by wasting, yet again, public money in sectors that have no future. Canada should take inspiration from the European Union's response following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Launched in 2022, the REPowerEU initiative aims to stop the EU's dependence on Russian gas by investing in renewables and energy efficiency, which has already helped reduce demand for Russian gas by 18 per cent, with an aim of 26 per cent by 2030. Betting, once again, on the same fossil-fuel horse might be what keeps Canada from becoming the energy superpower it could be if it were to finally get serious about phasing out oil and gas and focus on solutions that will work in tomorrow's economy. Building a new deal of Canada's own to answer the crisis, while also answering the country's energy needs, will only work if public money supports projects aligned with our climate goals. As the US administration becomes more unpredictable in its climate and trade policies, Canada must invest in its resilience. A real nation-building project is a strong national grid that will increase our economic competitiveness, create lasting jobs, support our climate commitments and shield Canadian households from rising fossil fuel costs.
Globe and Mail
2 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
2 Top Dividend Stocks Yielding 5% or More to Buy Right Now for Passive Income
Key Points Realty Income is a high dividend payer with a long track record. Vici Properties is perhaps the safest way to bet on Las Vegas. 10 stocks we like better than Realty Income › Over time, dividends have become a smaller and smaller part of the stock market's total return, with the S&P 500 boasting an average yield of just 1.22% today, compared to 7.44% in 1950. That said, some companies still offer fat, consistently growing payouts, just like the good old days. Let's explore some reasons why Realty Income (NYSE: O) and Vici Properties (NYSE: VICI) could make fantastic long-term picks. Realty Income Corporation Real estate investment trusts (REITs) are a special type of investment that allows retail investors to benefit from the income generated from commercial real estate. But they aren't all the same. Realty Income stands out from the alternatives because of its track record of success, monthly payouts, and unique, risk-minimizing business model. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » Since going public in 1994, Realty Income has increased its dividend for 30 consecutive years. The company funds the payout with the cash generated from its portfolio of 15,600 properties spread across North America and Europe. Realty Income's business model is relatively safe because of its use of triple-net leases, which mean the tenant is responsible for building-level operating costs like tax and insurance. It also tends to focus on recession-proof tenants like grocery stores, dollar stores, and auto repair shops, although many flashier clients like casinos and IT data centers have been sprinkled into the mix to help power growth. While macroeconomic threats like high interest rates have caused Realty Income's shares to underperform in recent years, they give investors an opportunity to buy the stock for cheap and lock in a relatively high yield of 5.55% at the time of writing, which is far above the market average. Vici Properties While Realty Income features a long track record and diversification into many different industries, Vici Properties offers more concentrated exposure. The company was formed in 2017 from the spinoff of real estate assets formerly owned by Caesars Entertainment Company during its bankruptcy restructuring. It has since evolved to become a leading entertainment-focused REIT, with 93 properties across North America. While entertainment is a consumer discretionary expenditure that may drop during economic downturns, Vici manages this risk with triple-net leases and high-quality tenants like Caesars and MGM Resorts, which have stable businesses and are deeply tied to their locations. The company has often relied on leaseback sales, which are when it buys an asset (such as a Casino) from a client who needs liquidity or to free up capital for elsewhere, only to rent it back to them, giving Vici access to stable, growing revenue. Vici also offers excellent growth potential as it expands into different asset types, such as golf courses, and potentially redevelops its 33 acres of undeveloped land located near the Las Vegas Strip. With a dividend yield of 5.15%, Vici is an excellent pick for investors who prioritize passive income. But don't overlook its stock price growth potential. Shares have risen around 60% over the last five years, with a 16% rally so far in 2025. The company probably won't stay this cheap for long. Which dividend stock is right for you? Realty Income and Vici Properties are both great picks for investors who prioritize sustainable passive income for the long term. If you could only pick one, the best choice will depend on your investment goals. Realty Income is better for investors who are willing to sacrifice a little growth potential for stability. But while Vici Properties doesn't have as long a track record, it offers more room for capital appreciation. Should you invest $1,000 in Realty Income right now? Before you buy stock in Realty Income, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Realty Income wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 28, 2025
