Democrats just got their dream candidate in North Carolina. Here are four other Senate seats likely to flip
After a long slog to pass President Donald Trump's ' One Big, Beautiful Bill,' a drawn-out fight about nominees and an impasse on how to handle the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune cut the House and Senate loose to go back to their homes and constituents.
August recesses are incredibly useful times for lawmakers because they allow them to not only sell their legislative accomplishments, but gauge what the vibe will be like in the upcoming midterm election.
But Republicans have their work cut out for them. Midterms are always a referendum on the president and how unhappy voters are with him. Just ask Bill Clinton after 1994, George W. Bush after 2006, Barack Obama after 2010 and 2014 and, well, Trump after 2018.
Each time, the party outside of the White House flipped at least one chamber.
Trump knows this, which is why he wanted Texas Republicans to redraw their congressional districts, which led Democrats in the state house to decamp to blue states like Illinois and New York.
But Democrats have a harder time flipping the Senate. For one, they have to defend Senate seats in states that Trump won in 2024, such as Michigan and Georgia. On top of that, their best shot at flipping a Senate seat is in North Carolina, which has not elected a Democrat to the Senate since 2008.
A few months ago, The Independent ranked the Senate seats most likely to flip. Since then, plenty has changed.
Democrats have coalesced around Chris Pappas in New Hampshire, while Republicans have gotten behind Scott Brown, who only won a fluke race in 2010 in Massachusetts. As a result, we're taking the Granite State off the list and replacing it with Texas, which has a chance to flip thanks to an intra-GOP blood feud.
Here are the five Senate seats most likely to turn:
1. North Carolina
Trump's feud with Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) about the One Big, Beautiful Bill's cuts to Medicaid ended in the worst way possible for Republicans: Tillis deciding to not seek re-election in a super-swingy state.
In response, Democrats got their dream candidate: former governor Roy Cooper, a popular two-term governor, who won races in 2016 and 2020 when Trump was at the top of the ticket.
The fact he also expanded Medicaid as governor with the help of Republicans offers a contrast after Trump signed steep cuts to the health care program. He's already proven to be a prolific fundraiser.
On the GOP side, Lara Trump, the president's daughter-in-law who grew up in Wilmington, passed on running. Now, Michael Whatley, the former state GOP chairman and Republican National Committee Chairman, is the presumptive nominee. So far, an Emerson College poll shows Cooper up by six points.
But as is the case in college basketball, North Carolina loves tight races.
2. Georgia
Sen. Jon Ossoff is the youngest senator and the most vulnerable incumbent Democrat, not least because he represents a state Trump won.
Republicans have put a massive target on his back. But so far, they also have a crowded primary to replace him.
Rep. Buddy Carter has jumped in, as has Rep. Mike Collins, who will occupy the more MAGA wing of the GOP, though he notably misspelled the name of his state in his announcement ad.
Derek Dooley, the former University of Tennessee head football coach and the son of University of Georgia head coach vince Dooley, also announced his run on Monday.
And a crowded primary could risk disaster if the three men spend their time attacking each other instead of the Democrat. Ossoff has a fairly prodigious war chest, raising $9.1 million last fundraising quarter.
Expect Republicans to also attack him on immigration and Israel. Ossoff voted for the Laken Riley Act, named for a University of Georgia student killed in Athens, that Collins wrote. But last week, he voted with Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on one of his resolutions to withhold arms sales to Israel.
3. Maine
On paper, Susan Collins should be the most vulnerable incumbent senator. She is the only Republican from a state Kamala Harris won. She's 72 and has voted for many of Trump's most controversial nominees like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Tulsi Gabbard.
And Trump attacked her last week.
But there's just one problem: Collins's universal name recognition in Maine and the fact she has pulled off miracle wins means few big-name Democrats have stepped up to run against her. Collins has also proven to be deft at her job.
She is chairwoman of the Appropriations Committee, meaning she can bring money back to her state, voted against confirming Pete Hegseth to lead the Pentagon and opposed the One Big, Beautiful Bill while also beefing up its rural hospital fund. Jordan Wood, a former House chief of staff, has raised a large amount of money. But for now, it's still an uphill climb for Democrats.
4. Michigan
On the Republican side, Michigan Republicans have essentially agreed to nominate former congressman Mike Rogers, who barely lost to Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich,). The real fight will be on the Democratic primary side.
Michigan, which has a large concentration of Arab-American voters, became a source of heartburn for Democrats during the war in Gaza because of Joe Biden's vocal, diplomatic and military support for Israel. Plenty of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents simply chose to sit out the race, which likely cost them the race.
Expect Israel to play a big role. Rep. Haley Stevens would start out as the establishment favorite, with the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee quietly saying she'd be the best candidate, CNN reported. But some progressives worry that she has received a large amount from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.
By contrast, Mallory McMorrow, the Democratic whip in the state senate, who occupies the lane of suburban well-educated white voters. Abdul El-Sayed, who ran for governor in 2018, will represent the progressive wing .
As is the case with Georgia, Democrats risk a primary where they cannibalize each other and risk losing a seat in a state they where a Republican hasn't won a Senate race since 1994.
5. Texas
Texas is causing the biggest headaches for Republicans.
Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) should be a shoe-in to win re-election. But Ken Paxton, the state's attorney general, announced he would run. Paxton has been under federal indictment almost as soon as he became attorney general in 2015. The Texas state house impeached him and last month, his wife, state senator Angela Paxton, announced she would divorce him on 'bibilical grounds.'
But MAGA loves him, particularly for his attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election results.
Conservatives also don't like that Cornyn negotiated a gun bill with Democrats immediately after the shooting in Uvalde in 2022. Republicans fear a Paxton victory would risk Democrats flipping a Senate seat in a place they haven't won a Senate seat since 1988.
Everything has to go right for Democrats in the Lone Star State. Whether it be Colin Allred, who lost to Ted Cruz and is deciding to run it back, or Terry Virts, a retired astronaut. But occasionally, miracles happen, even in Texas.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
After deep DOGE cuts, National Weather Service gets OK to fill up to 450 jobs
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration will hire as many as 450 people to shore up the National Weather Service after deep cuts this spring raised concern about dangerous understaffing, the Trump administration confirmed Wednesday. NOAA was granted permission to fill critical positions at its weather arm, including openings for meteorologists, hydrologists and electronics technicians, Trump administration officials said. The hirings are part of an exemption to a freeze on federal hiring in place through at least Oct. 15. NOAA declined to comment further. The planned hiring was first reported by CNN. The Department of Government Efficiency has gutted NOAA and the National Weather Service, which are key for the nation's daily weather forecasts, severe storm warnings, climate monitoring and more. Hundreds of NOAA forecasters and other employees have been cut, and NWS offices around the country have had a number of vacancies. The administration has also weighed ending the sharing of satellite data that is key to effective storm tracking and stopped tracking the cost of climate change-fueled weather disasters. Meteorologists and climate scientists have warned of consequences with fewer workers in positions that are crucial, especially as the hurricane season got underway. After deadly flash flooding that killed dozens of people in Texas last month, some local officials and Democrats suggested that the deep staffing cuts may have contributed to endangering lives, though others defended the agency's work. Experts cautiously applauded the exemption for hirings as positive news. 'While this new development is great news for the NWS and the American public, I would like to see that the hiring actions are actually underway,' said Louis Uccellini, former NOAA administrator for weather services and NWS director. The hirings are said to include the 'mission-critical field positions' that the agency announced it would hire for in June 'to further stabilize front line operations." The agency did not say at the time how many roles would be filled. ___ Alexa St. John is an Associated Press climate reporter. Follow her on X: @alexa_stjohn. Reach her at ___ ___ The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
Married immigrants trying to get green cards could be deported, new Trump-era guidance says
Immigrants who are married to U.S. citizens have long expected that they won't be deported from the country while going through the process of obtaining a green card. But new guidance from Donald Trump's administration explicitly states that immigrants seeking lawful residence through marriage can be deported, a policy that also applies to immigrants with pending requests. Immigration authorities can begin removal proceedings for immigrants who lack legal status and applied to become a lawful permanent resident through a citizen spouse, according to guidance from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services issued this month. The policy also applies to immigrants with pending green cards through other citizen family members. People who entered the country illegally aren't the only ones impacted. Under new guidance, immigrants trying to get lawful status through a spouse or family member are at risk of being deported if their visas expired, or if they are among the roughly 1 million immigrants whose temporary protected status was stripped from them under the Trump administration. Immigrants and their spouses or family members who sponsor them 'should be aware that a family-based petition accords no immigration status nor does it bar removal,' the policy states. The changes were designed to 'enhance benefit integrity and identify vetting and fraud concerns' and weed out what the agency calls 'fraudulent, frivolous, or non-meritorious' applications, according to USCIS. 'This guidance will improve USCIS' capacity to vet qualifying marriages and family relationships to ensure they are genuine, verifiable, and compliant with all applicable laws,' the agency said in a statement. Those changes, which were filed on August 1, are 'effective immediately,' according to the agency. Within the first six months of 2025, immigrants and their family members filed more than 500,000 I-130 petitions, which are the first steps in the process of obtaining legal residency through a spouse or family member. There are more than 2.4 million pending I-130 petitions, according to USCIS data. Nearly 2 million of those petitions have been pending for more than six months. It is unclear whether those petitions involve immigrants who either lost their legal status or did not have one at the time they filed their documents. Previously, USCIS would notify applicants about missing documents or issue a denial notice serving as a warning that their case could be rejected — with opportunities for redress. Now, USCIS is signaling that applicants can be immediately denied and ordered to immigrant courts instead. Outside of being born in the country, family-based immigration remains the largest and most viable path to permanent residency, accounting for nearly half of all new green card holders each year, according to USCIS data. 'This is one of the most important avenues that people have to adjust to lawful permanent status in the United States,' Elora Mukherjee, director of the Immigrants' Rights Clinic at Columbia Law School, told NBC News. Under long-established USCIS policies, 'no one expected' to be hauled into immigration court while seeking lawful status after a marriage, Mukherjee said. Now, deportation proceedings can begin 'at any point in the process' under the broad scope of the rule changes, which could 'instill fear in immigrant families, even those who are doing everything right,' according to Mukherjee. Obtaining a green card The high-profile arrest and threat of removing Columbia University student Mahmoud Khalil put intense scrutiny on whether the administration lawfully targeted a lawful permanent resident for his constitutionally protected speech. And last month, Customs and Border Protection put green card holders on notice, warning that the government 'has the authority to revoke your green card if our laws are broken and abused.' 'In addition to immigration removal proceedings, lawful permanent residents presenting at a U.S. port of entry with previous criminal convictions may be subject to mandatory detention,' the agency said. Another recent USCIS memo outlines the administration's plans to revoke citizenship from children whose parents lack permanent lawful status as well as parents who are legally in the country, including visa holders, DACA recipients and people seeking asylum. The policy appears to preempt court rulings surrounding the constitutionality of the president's executive order that unilaterally redefines who gets to be a citizen in the country at birth. That memo, from the agency's Office of the Chief Counsel, acknowledges that federal court injunctions have blocked the government from taking away birthright citizenship. But the agency 'is preparing to implement' Trump's executive order 'in the event that it is permitted to go into effect,' according to July's memo. Children of immigrants who are 'unlawfully present' will 'no longer be U.S. citizens at birth,' the agency declared. Trump's order states that children whose parents are legally present in the country on student, work and tourist visas are not eligible for citizenship USCIS, however, goes even further, outlining more than a dozen categories of immigrants whose children could lose citizenship at birth despite their parents living in the country with legal permission. That list includes immigrants who are protected against deportation for humanitarian reasons and immigrants from countries with Temporary Protected Status, among others. The 14th Amendment plainly states that 'all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.' The Supreme Court has upheld that definition to apply to all children born within the United States for more than a century. But under the terms of Trump's order, children can be denied citizenship if a mother is undocumented or is temporarily legally in the country on a visa, and if the father isn't a citizen or a lawful permanent resident. More than 150,000 newborns would be denied citizenship every year under Trump's order, according to plaintiffs challenging the president's order. A challenge over Trump's birthright citizenship order at the Supreme Court did not resolve the critical 14th Amendment questions at stake. On Wednesday, government lawyers confirmed plans to 'expeditiously' ask the Supreme Court 'to settle the lawfulness' of his birthright citizenship order later this year.
The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump calls old foe Andrew Cuomo as he considers intervening in NYC mayor's race to thwart Mamdani: report
President Donald Trump took a call with his old foe, Andrew Cuomo, as he considers intervening in New York City 's mayoral race to thwart Democratic front-runner Zohran Mamdani, according to a new report. Trump and the former New York governor, who is running as an independent after losing the Democratic primary to Mamdani, talked about the competitive race in a call made in recent weeks, The New York Times reported Wednesday, citing people briefed on the matter. It's unclear what exactly was discussed in the call or when it exactly happened. Cuomo spokesman Rich Azzopardi told The Independent, 'The Governor and the President have not spoken in some time. As far as I know, they have not discussed the race.' 'There is only one candidate in this race who can effectively defend New York values and take on Donald Trump – the one official who already has: Andrew Cuomo,' Azzopardi said. 'We'll leave the palace intrigue to the gossip mill. In the meantime, Governor Cuomo is out crisscrossing the city, speaking directly to voters about uniting to build a New New York and deliver real change and progress for all.' The Independent has reached out to the White House and Cuomo's campaign for comment. Mamdani, a democratic socialist who has promised rent freezes and free buses if elected, led by 50 percent among likely voters in a new poll. The poll conducted by Public Progress Solutions and Zenith Research last month saw Mandani with 50 percent of the vote and Cuomo with 22 percent of the vote in a five-way race. The incumbent in the race, New York City Mayor Eric Adams, who is running as an independent, trailed in fourth place with 7 percent of the vote. Mamdani polled even stronger in head-to-head race scenarios with Adams, 59 to 32 percent, and Cuomo, 52 to 40 percent. Trump had privately asked a Republican congressman and New York businessmen about who they think has the best chance of beating Mamdani, the NYT reported. He has also been briefed by pollster Mark Penn and his long-time friend, former New York City Council President Andrew Stein, on polling that showed Cuomo as a competitive candidate, according to the publication. While it's unclear if Trump would even interfere in the mayoral race, let alone back Cuomo, a potential alliance between Trump and the former governor would be surprising given their past criticisms of one another. Just this April, Cuomo vowed to stand up to 'bully' Trump in a speech in Harlem, per the New York Post. But Trump has also sparred with Mamdani. Last month, the president threatened to arrest him if he won the election and followed through on his promise to defy Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids in New York City. At the time, Mamdani said Trump's 'statements don't just represent an attack on our democracy but an attempt to send a message to every New Yorker who refuses to hide in the shadows: if you speak up, they will come for you. We will not accept this intimidation.' In response to the NYT's reporting, Mamdani told reporters Wednesday: 'Whatever Donald Trump seeks to do to influence the outcome of this election, I have more faith in New Yorkers themselves, who have shown…that they do not want to support our current president's vision of a New York City that is ripping immigrants from their homes, that is detaining New Yorkers on the basis of political expression.' 'What they want is someone who can stand up to an authoritarian administration,' Mamdani added. Cuomo's spokesman suggested Trump would be more interested in Mamdani or the other candidates in the race. 'Regarding his reported interest, it seems clear that President Trump would either prefer Mr. Mamdani, whom he refers to as a 'commie,' because he believes Mamdani would serve as a political boon to Republicans nationwide in the midterms, symbolizing what he sees as the Democratic Party's extremism,' he told The Independent. 'Alternatively, he may favor Eric Adams, who is a wholly owned subsidiary of the President. And there is already a Republican in the race, who is the nominee of President Trump's party.' Curtis Sliwa, founder of the New York City crime prevention group the Guardian Angels, is the Republican nominee for mayor.
