Kneeling officer clip misrepresented as footage from 'No Kings' protest
In the clip, a policeman in a helmet and face covering takes a knee . A fellow officer then follows suit. Different versions of the footage, accompanied by the claim it was filmed during the weekend of June 15, spread on Instagram, Facebook and TikTok, and was viewed tens of thousands of times.
Some of the posts reacted positively, while other users claimed it showed the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) was not taking a strong enough stance against the alleged "chaos" of the protests.
"Two LAPD officers were caught kneeling to the mob -- not to de-escalate, not to protect peace -- but to submit to an anti-American protest calling to abolish law, order, and the Constitution itself," a caption which repeatedly circulated with the clip says.
Image
Screenshot of an X post taken June 17, 2025
Image
Screenshot of a Facebook reel taken June 17, 2025
Anti-deportation protests broke out on June 6 in Los Angeles. Local officials said the demonstrations were largely peaceful and confined to a small downtown section of the city, but some protesters were seen throwing rocks and torching self-driving Waymo cars while law enforcement responded with tear gas and rubber bullets to disperse crowds.
Following a week of continued turmoil, a series of previously planned "No Kings" protests decrying presidential overreach took place across the country, including in Los Angeles.
While police were present at the June 15 demonstrations, the video of the officers kneeling to a crowd was taken more than five years ago.
the earliest available versions of the clip June 1, 2020 (archived here and here) with captions mentioning protests following the police killing of George Floyd, an unarmed Black man.
Media reported on the incident that same day, showing the scene from a different angle.
The 2020 protests focused on calls for reform of the criminal justice system's treatment of Black people and several other outlets reported on police departments performing the same kneeling gesture across the country at around the same time, attempting to show solidarity with demonstrators.
The kneeling symbol is strongly associated with advocacy against racism and police brutality after being thrust into the spotlight by former National Football League quarterback Colin Kaepernick in 2016.
Images from the 2020 protests are frequently misrepresented as legitimate footage from charged events. AFP has previously debunked misinformation around the Los Angeles protests using incorrectly labeled images and researchers said disinformation has also been amplified by foreign adversaries.
After a day of mostly calm protests on June 15, 2025, police unexpectedly began moving people away from the Los Angeles protest area, igniting confusion and anger from demonstrators. Police said a "small group of agitators" had thrown rocks, bottle and fireworks at officers, prompting the force to deploy tear gas and flash bangs to try to disperse the crowd.
Read more of AFP's reporting on misinformation in the United States here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
44 minutes ago
- LeMonde
Trump imposes 50% tariffs on Brazil, citing trial of ally Bolsonaro
US President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Wednesday, July 30, implementing an additional 40% tariff on Brazilian products, bringing the total trade duties to 50%, the White House announced. Trump had threatened Latin America's largest economy with the move as punishment for what he has termed a "witch hunt" against his far-right ally, former president Jair Bolsonaro. The announcement saw Trump make good on a threat to wield American economic might to punish Brazil – and Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes in particular – for what he has termed a "witch hunt" against former president Bolsonaro. Unlike the tariffs Trump is slapping on economies around the world, the measures against Brazil have been framed in openly political terms, sweeping aside centuries-old trade ties and a surplus that Brasília put at $284 million last year. The moves dramatically increased the pressure on Moraes, who has emerged as one of the most powerful and polarizing people in Brazil – and a consistent thorn in the far-right's side, after clashing repeatedly with Bolsonaro and others over disinformation. The Brazilian government's "politically motivated persecution, intimidation, harassment, censorship, and prosecution of (Bolsonaro) and thousands of his supporters are serious human rights abuses that have undermined the rule of law in Brazil," the White House said in a fact sheet announcing the tariffs. It also cited Brazil's "unusual and extraordinary policies and actions harming US companies, the free speech rights of US persons, US foreign policy, and the US economy," and singled out Moraes by name. It did not state what date the tariffs would come into effect, but Trump had previously cited August 1. The new duties were announced shortly after the US Treasury slapped sanctions on Moraes, which followed a similar move by the State Department earlier this month. The sanctions provoked a swift and furious response from Brasília, where Attorney General Jorge Messias slammed them as "arbitrary," "unjustifiable" and "a serious attack on the sovereignty of our country." There was no immediate reaction from Brasília to the tariffs announcement, but President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva had earlier denounced Trump's threats as "unacceptable blackmail." Bolsonaro is on trial for allegedly plotting a coup to stay in power after losing the 2022 election to leftist Lula. He risks up to 40 years in prison if convicted. Prosecutors say the plot included a plan to arrest and even assassinate Lula, his vice president Geraldo Alckmin, and Moraes. Brazil has insisted it will proceed in its prosecution of Bolsonaro, and Trump's intervention in the case has so far improved Lula's popularity, as the Brazilian leader appeals for national unity in the face of US "interference." 'Witch hunt' Both Marco Rubio, America's top diplomat, and US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent issued statements Wednesday announcing the new sanctions against Moraes. Help us improve Le Monde in English Dear reader, We'd love to hear your thoughts on Le Monde in English! Take this quick survey to help us improve it for you. Take the survey "Moraes has taken it upon himself to be judge and jury in an unlawful witch hunt against US and Brazilian citizens and companies," Bessent said. Secretary of State Rubio accused Moraes of "serious human rights abuses, including arbitrary detention involving flagrant denials of fair trial guarantees and infringing on the freedom of expression." Moraes, 56, has played a controversial role in fighting disinformation. He was an omnipresent figure during the polarizing 2022 election campaign, aggressively using his rulings to fight election disinformation on social media. That included blocking the accounts of some prominent conservative figures. Last year, he ordered the shutdown of tech titan Elon Musk's X network in Brazil for 40 days for failing to tackle the spread of disinformation shared mainly by Bolsonaro backers. Bolsonaro has called Moraes a dictator, while his son Eduardo, an MP, had lobbied for US sanctions against the "totalitarian" judge. On Wednesday Eduardo Bolsonaro said the US action was "not about revenge, it's about justice," he wrote on X. "Abuses of authority now have global consequences." The US Treasury cited the Magnitsky Act for the sanctions. It freezes US-based assets and bars travel to the country for foreign officials accused of human rights abuses or corruption. Trump's private media company has also sued Moraes over his social media-related orders.
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
Ukraine will fix anti-graft law, minister tells AFP ahead of crucial vote
President Volodymyr Zelensky changed the law that curbed the powers of anti-graft bodies after the original legislation sparked the largest public unrest since Russia's invasion more than three years ago. The law had put the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) and Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO) under the direct authority of the prosecutor general, who is appointed by the president. Critics said the move could facilitate presidential interference in corruption probes. On Thursday, the parliament is to vote on a new version, approved by the agencies, which restores their independence, but also provides for regular lie detector tests for anti-graft officials. "We anticipate the vote tomorrow. The relevant parliamentary committee has already given its approval. We are getting this fixed," Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiga told AFP in an interview. Several hundred people staged a new protest in the rain in central Kyiv on the eve of the vote to put pressure on lawmakers. "Hands off NABU and SAPO," they chanted. "I hope that things will improve somehow, but it will be almost impossible to completely restore our reputation," Olena, a 51-year-old IT worker, told AFP at the protest. Another protester, Pavlo, said however that he did not think the action "did any harm" as people were focused on the war with Russia. But he added that the law has damaged public trust in the government, which already "wasn't very high". The minister said last week's protests proved Ukraine is a democracy. "The Ukrainian authorities heard their (civil society) voices, as well as those of our partners," he declared. 'National interest' Sybiga reiterated Kyiv's commitment to fight corruption and its desire to join the European Union and NATO military alliance, "there is no alternative to this path," the minister said. "This is a principled position of President Zelenskyy and this is in our national interest." European allies had been worried that the law would undermine anti-corruption reforms key to Ukraine's bid to join the EU, but supported the new amendments. It remains to be seen whether members of the parliament, which is mostly loyal to Zelensky, will approve the new version. Commentators and Ukrainian media feared some lawmakers under potential investigation by the agencies may be reluctant to support the new bill. Thirty-one MPs have been mentioned in NABU's investigations, SAPO said in a statement on Wednesday. NABU and SAPO were created a decade ago when Ukraine undertook anti-corruption reforms after the pro-European Maidan protests, dubbed as the Revolution of Dignity. They uncovered major corruption cases, including within the presidency, parliament and judiciary. However only three out of the 10 most significant cases resulted in prison sentences, according NABU. "Hope dies last," said Olena, who took part in Wednesday's protest.
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
Ukraine will 'fix' controversial anti-graft law, FM says on eve of vote
Ukraine will fix a controversial anti-graft law that sparked protests last week, its foreign minister told AFP on Wednesday, ahead of a parliamentary vote Thursday on the amendments. President Volodymyr Zelensky changed the law that curbed the powers of anti-graft bodies after the original legislation sparked the largest public unrest since Russia 's invasion more than three years ago. The law had placed the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) and Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO) under the direct authority of the prosecutor general, who is appointed by the president. Critics said the move could facilitate presidential interference in corruption probes. Zelensky approves new bill restoring 'independence' of anti-corruption bodies after protests 01:46 The new version, approved by the agencies, restores their independence, but also provides for regular lie detector tests for anti-graft officials. "We anticipate the vote tomorrow. The relevant parliamentary committee has already given its approval. We are getting this fixed," Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiga told AFP in an interview. He reiterated Kyiv's commitment to fight corruption and its desire to join the European Union and NATO military alliance, saying "there is no alternative to this path". European allies had worried the law would undermine anti-corruption reforms key to Ukraine's bid to join the EU. Ukraine's top anti-corruption investigator said last Friday that he did not expect attempts to derail his agency's work to end despite Zelensky's U-turn. NABU director Semen Kryvonos said he was taken aback by the attempt to curtail his agency's fight against graft but did not name those who may have been behind the legislation. "Everyone united around the idea of ruining our independence," Kryvonos told Reuters in an interview in Kyiv, referring to parliament passing the controversial measures. "This was a shock for me – how much demand had built up to destroy us." It remains to be seen whether members of the parliament, which is mostly loyal to Zelensky, will approve the new version. Commentators and Ukrainian media feared some lawmakers under potential investigation by the agencies may be reluctant to support the new bill. Thirty-one MPs were mentioned in NABU's investigations, SAPO said in a statement on Wednesday.
