
How will Greater Bengaluru Governance Bill impact the real estate sector in the IT capital?
Instead of a single municipal body, the bill envisions the creation of multiple smaller municipal corporations, each led by an elected mayor and responsible for specific zones. These corporations will function under a central authority to ensure cohesive urban planning and infrastructure coordination across Greater Bengaluru.
This proposed redefinition of city limits for the real estate sector is expected to drive up property prices, especially in the outskirts and peri-urban regions. However, experts caution that the extent of the price increase will depend on the actual rollout of infrastructure and improvement in mobility services.
'This move will likely lead to a surge in land prices in areas newly brought under the city's jurisdiction,' said Srinivas Alavilli, a fellow at WRI India. 'Many of these locations are already witnessing speculative growth, and official inclusion could further accelerate this trend.'
He said the bill may also pave the way for developing new commercial hubs, including business parks in previously underdeveloped zones. 'Today, Bengaluru's economic activity is concentrated in a few zones—Electronic City, Whitefield, ORR, Hebbal, and industrial areas like Bommasandra and Peenya. With better governance and planning under the proposed GBA, we could see more balanced growth, easing congestion in existing business districts.'
Also Read: Bengaluru real estate: Studio apartments under ₹30,000 you should check out
Karnataka Governor Thawar Chand Gehlot has granted his assent to the landmark Greater Bengaluru Governance Bill, 2024. The legislation, aimed at restructuring the city's civic administration, proposes the division of the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) into multiple, smaller municipal corporations
The Bill proposes a decentralised and participatory model of urban governance for the Greater Bengaluru Area. It plans to set up a Greater Bengaluru Authority (GBA), which will act as a supervisory body to coordinate development and align planning across the city. The Bill also allows for the creation of up to 10 independent city corporations to improve administrative efficiency and deliver civic services more effectively to residents, urban experts told HT.com
The Greater Bengaluru Governance Bill proposes to expand the city's administrative boundaries by including nearby villages, towns, and urban areas within Bengaluru's official limits. This move aims to bring fast-growing suburbs and peri-urban regions under a single governance structure.
Instead of one large municipal body, the bill suggests creating several smaller corporations. Each corporation will manage a part of the Greater Bengaluru area (through elected Mayors) but will work under a central authority to ensure coordination.
The exact boundaries of the Greater Bengaluru Authority are yet to be defined, but it is expected to cover around 1,000 sq. km, compared to BBMP's current 700+ sq. km. Alavilli, pointed out that this expansion will likely include the merging of adjacent areas and villages into the Bengaluru metropolitan area, said experts.
"The Greater Bengaluru Authority has the potential to improve urban planning and inter-agency coordination significantly. If it lives up to its promise, it could unlock large parcels of vacant land and enable the redensification of existing areas. This, in turn, would allow the city to better leverage its metro network, improve mobility, and reduce congestion," Srikanth Viswanathan, CEO of Janaagraha, said.
Also Read: Bengaluru real estate: If your apartment's value has doubled, is it time to cash out now?
For the real estate sector, expanding Bengaluru's limits may boost property prices, especially in the outskirts. However, this must be critically assessed against actual infrastructure delivery and mobility outcomes, they add.
"Such a redefinition will naturally impact real estate. Areas surrounding Bengaluru will likely see a rise in land prices as they begin to be officially identified as part of the city. This will create a ripple effect, especially in peri-urban areas, where land values are already high in anticipation," Alavilli said.
He said that the city will likely witness new commercial hubs, such as business parks in previously underdeveloped areas. "Currently, Bengaluru's major employment zones include Electronic City, Whitefield, Outer Ring Road, Hebbal, and industrial estates like Bommasandra and Peenya. With better planning and governance under GBA, we could enable more distributed development, reducing congestion and development stress on a few zones."
Experts say that while the GBA is expected to expand Bengaluru's administrative boundaries, it simultaneously dilutes critical planning functions, particularly land use and transport integration.
"For example, areas like Whitefield were developed without proper transport planning, resulting in serious mobility challenges. Though the Bengaluru Metropolitan Land Transport Authority (BMLTA) was introduced to address such gaps, the GBA risks undermining it. Effective integration of land use and transport is fundamental to sustainable urban development. Still, that focus appears to be weakening in the proposed Act," Satya Arikutharam, former chief technical advisor to the state government, now an independent consultant, said.
BMLTA is a statutory body established to regulate and coordinate urban mobility initiatives within the Bengaluru Metropolitan Area (BMA). It aims to consolidate planning and oversight of transport policy in the region.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Constitutional validity does not mean desirability, ex-CJI Khanna tells one nation, one election panel
Former Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna has told a parliamentary committee scrutinising the simultaneous election Bill that the constitutional validity of a proposal in no way amounts to a pronouncement upon the desirability or necessity of its provisions. In his written opinion to the committee, Justice Khanna, however, said arguments related to the dilution of the country's federal structure might be raised about the constitutional amendment Bill, as he listed the various claims made supporting and criticising the concept, sources said. Most of the experts, who have shared their views with the committee headed by BJP MP P.P. Chaudhary, have rejected the charge that the proposals are unconstitutional but have flagged some issues with the current provisions of the Bill. Justice Khanna, who is scheduled to interact with the committee on Tuesday (August 19, 2025), has joined a few other former CJIs in raising concerns over the extent of power given to the Election Commission (EC) in the Bill. He said the Bill conferred "unfettered discretion" on the EC in deciding that an Assembly poll could not be conducted along with that of the Lok Sabha, and to make a recommendation to the President on these lines, the sources said. "This clause will be open to question as violating and offending the basic structure of the Constitution on the ground of being arbitrary and offending Article 14 of the Constitution," he is learnt to have said. Article 14 deals with equality before law. Indirect President's rule Justice Khanna added, "Postponement of elections by the EC may result in indirect President's rule, in other words, the Union government taking over the reins of the State government. This will be questionable judicially, as violating the federal structure envisaged by the Constitution." Commenting on various arguments related to the Bill, he said the fact that simultaneous elections were held in 1951-52, 1957, 1962 and 1967, was a "coincidence", certainly not an express or not even an implied constitutional mandate. Justice Khanna said there was a difference between "merit review" and "judicial review". When the Supreme Court or High Courts uphold constitutional validity, it was a mere affirmation of the legislative power and that the amendment or the provision was not violative of the constitutional limitations, he said. "The court decisions in no way amount to pronouncement upon the desirability or necessity of such provisions," he added. Before Justice Khanna, former CJIs D.Y. Chandrachud, J.S. Khehar, U.U. Lalit and Ranjan Gogoi have interacted with the committee members on various provisions of what is often referred to as "one nation one election" Bill. The BJP and its allies have supported the Bill, asserting that it will boost growth by cutting down on expenditure caused by the relentless poll cycle, leading to frequent deployment of security and civil officials on poll duty and the imposition of the Model Code of Conduct. The Opposition has argued that it undermines democratic principles and weakens federal structure.


Hans India
2 hours ago
- Hans India
Sri Lanka to expand free trade agreements to boost exports, foreign exchange
The Sri Lankan government plans to sign more free trade agreements (FTAs) with foreign partners to diversify its export markets and boost foreign exchange earnings, media reports said on Sunday, citing a senior official. Deputy Minister of Industry and Entrepreneurship Development Chathuranga Abeysinghe said market diversification is critical to building a competitive and resilient export sector, Xinhua News Agency reported. He noted that expanding trade partnerships will not only help diversify products but also strengthen integration into global supply chains. The government is also focused on increasing value addition and building stronger brand recognition, he said. Abeysinghe highlighted that Sri Lanka's apparel exports generated more than $5 billion in 2024. The government aims to raise that figure to $8 billion by 2030. In July, the Sri Lankan government gazetted the Presidents' Entitlements (Repeal) Bill, aiming to abolish special privileges granted to former Presidents and their widows. The bill follows cabinet approval to amend the Presidents' Entitlements Act No. 4 of 1986. The proposed changes are designed to end longstanding benefits for former presidents and their widows. Sri Lanka currently provides a range of privileges for these groups. Earlier this year, a government minister disclosed that the state spent more than Rs 1.1 billion (about $3.7 million) in 2024 on benefits for former Presidents. The move to repeal these entitlements fulfils a key pledge of the current administration. On July 22, the Cabinet of Ministers approved the publication of a draft bill to repeal the Presidents' Entitlements Act, effectively revoking special privileges granted to former Presidents and their families. The move is in line with the government's policy declaration 'Pohosath Ratak – Lassana Jeewithayak', which pledges to reduce state expenditure and promote accountability.


The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Banned but blooming: Bengaluru's endless flex problem
Religious sentiments, political rivalry, and weak laws continue to flood Bengaluru with flexes and banners despite a blanket ban, according to the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) and police. In the past 16 months - in the fiscal year 2024-25 and till date - police have filed 461 FIRs against illegal advertisements, while BBMP has removed 27,207 flexes and collected ₹4.08 lakh in fine, data reviewed by The Hindu shows. The Mahadevapura Zone tops the list with 113 FIRs under the Karnataka Open Places (Prevention of Disfigurement) Act, 1981, followed by the West Zone with 91, Yelahanka with 69, and the South Zone with 56. The Karnataka High Court imposed a blanket ban on flexes in 2018. Since then, BBMP has been clearing them and booking offenders. Still, banners pop up during religious events and political occasions. 'Supporters of politicians often put these banners up overnight for birthdays or small events. When questioned, they ask us to first remove the banners of rival politicians,' a BBMP official said. Officials admit the issue is more about competition than necessity. If one politician puts up 100 banners, rivals ensure 101 go up the next day. Such contests are common in the East and West Zones, he said. Religious programmes are another occasion when the streets are dotted with flex and banners. BBMP receives numerous requests every month for flex permissions. 'We allow them out of respect for religious sentiments, warning organisers to remove them within hours of the event. But most don't comply, and our staff clear them later,' said another officer. With limited manpower, BBMP struggles to match the pace at which banners appear overnight. Last year, BBMP floated tenders twice to outsource flex removal, but no contractor applied. Officials attribute this to fear of politicians. The civic body is now banking on a project of affixing AI-equipped cameras on official vehicles to track banners in real time. BBMP points out that politicians are justifying some banners as essential for awareness. For instance, the southern and southeastern parts of the city are dotted with banners about the e-khata drive, tied to poles and trees. The banners remain in place long after the event is over, and even though they technically qualify as advertisements, they are presented as 'development awareness' flexes. Police said the weak law makes enforcement toothless. The law prescribes a fine of less than ₹2,000 and up to six months' imprisonment, but offenders easily secure bail. 'If someone installs 20 or 30 banners, the fine is the same as for one banner,' said Deputy Commissioner of Police Akshay Hakay Machindra. 'Since the banner itself costs more than the fine, they put up more without hesitation,' he said, adding that police often join hands with BBMP to clear banners and sometimes take suo motu cases. 'But they keep coming back,' he said. Amid these concerns, officials are pinning hopes on a writ petition regarding advertisements, currently in the High Court. 'If the court pulls up politicians and orders strict action, the city may finally see fewer illegal banners,' a senior police officer said.