logo
European Union sanctions 2 Chinese banks over aid to Russia

European Union sanctions 2 Chinese banks over aid to Russia

The European Union has sanctioned two small Chinese banks in its latest
package of measures designed to hobble Russia's war machine, despite a warning from Beijing to expect consequences.
Suifenhe Rural Commercial Bank and Heihe Rural Commercial Bank, two regional lenders from cities close to China's border with Russia, were blacklisted in the 18th package of sanctions agreed on Friday morning, diplomatic sources confirmed.
The development has been weeks in the making, with Slovakia withdrawing a long-standing veto to allow the package to pass. The central European country had been blocking the move over an EU plan to stop gas imports from Russia beginning in 2028.
The move could prompt retaliation from China, which has lobbied intensely behind the scenes to get the banks removed from the package. It also comes less than a week out from a high-stakes
summit in Beijing
During a meeting with the EU's top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, this month, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi warned her 'three or four times' that there would be a response to the banks' inclusion, according to sources familiar with the exchange.
01:57
Volodymyr Zelensky accuses Chinese firms of supplying artillery and missiles to Russia
Volodymyr Zelensky accuses Chinese firms of supplying artillery and missiles to Russia
In Brussels, Chinese diplomats – including ambassador Cai Run – have held 'frank exchanges' with EU officials to try to prevent the listing, according to people involved.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Could the US and Europe go rare earth-free to escape China's magnetic pull?
Could the US and Europe go rare earth-free to escape China's magnetic pull?

South China Morning Post

time8 minutes ago

  • South China Morning Post

Could the US and Europe go rare earth-free to escape China's magnetic pull?

Rare earths are needed for everything from consumer electronics to electric vehicles, wind turbines and fighter jets – and China controls the supply chain. In the last of a four-part series, we look at how countries are looking for alternatives that could help reduce their reliance on China. Seventy years ago, the US was the world's leading producer of rare earth magnets. But by the start of this century, the country's last producers of the most powerful commercial magnets were being sold off, locking in Beijing's dominance over this critical market. In 2010, the world was reminded of the stark reality of China's control over rare earths and the production of permanent magnets after a territorial dispute with Japan led to Beijing temporarily banning rare earth exports to the country. The move sent waves of concern through the supply chain as the price of these magnets soared, leading countries to examine their reliance on Chinese minerals in certain key sectors. But strong demand for rare earth permanent magnets, which are used in everything from mobile phones, electric cars and wind turbines to defence systems, has made this difficult to achieve. In April this year, Beijing tightened its export controls on magnets and seven rare earth elements, three of which – samarium, dysprosium and terbium – are also often used to make magnets. According to a 2022 report by the US Department of Energy, America accounted for 16 per cent of total rare earth mine production in 2020, while China accounted for 60 per cent.

The US shouldn't disrespect China's right to the high seas
The US shouldn't disrespect China's right to the high seas

South China Morning Post

time38 minutes ago

  • South China Morning Post

The US shouldn't disrespect China's right to the high seas

Last month, the United States coastguard 'detected and responded to' the Chinese research vessel Xue Long 2 around 290 nautical miles north of Utqiagvik, Alaska. The US said the vessel was sailing within its 'extended continental shelf' and implied the Chinese operation was engaged in 'malign state activity'. This reveals troubling inconsistencies in the US' approach towards international maritime law, raising serious doubts about Washington's commitment to the rules-based international order it so frequently claims to champion. According to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (Unclos), waters beyond 200 nautical miles fall under the legal regime of the high seas. Article 87 of Unclos guarantees all states the freedom of navigation and marine scientific research in these areas. The Xue Long 2 , designed for polar research, was operating in accordance with this principle. Yet, the US, by invoking national security and treating the vessel as a threat, seeks to shift the burden onto China to justify lawful conduct. In 2019, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea reaffirmed that even non-physical interference with freedom of navigation or scientific research can constitute a breach of international law. The US' response to the Xue Long 2 is not just an isolated legal overreach but a symptom of a broader strategic posture that prioritises political expediency over legal consistency. Unclos permits states and competent international organisations to conduct marine scientific research on the high seas and in 'the Area' – which can be understood as the international seabed beyond national jurisdictions. Moreover, the convention makes clear that a coastal state's rights over the continental shelf shall not infringe upon other states' freedoms.

90-day extension of US-China tariff truce is likely, US Commerce Secretary Lutnick says
90-day extension of US-China tariff truce is likely, US Commerce Secretary Lutnick says

South China Morning Post

time4 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

90-day extension of US-China tariff truce is likely, US Commerce Secretary Lutnick says

A 90-day extension of a US-China tariff truce is likely, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Thursday, the most concrete signal from the US side about moving the deadline since bilateral talks concluded in Stockholm last week. 'I think we're going to leave that to the trade team and to the president to make those decisions, but it feels like likely that they're going to come to an agreement and extend that for another 90 days,' he said on Fox News when asked if the truce, which is set to expire on Tuesday, would be extended. Lutnick made similar comments last week while the talks were under way July 28 and 29, noting that a 90-day extension was a likely outcome of negotiations. But after the talks, only the Chinese side declared a consensus on extending the pause on tariff increases. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said in a CBS interview last Friday that the two sides were 'working towards' an extension. The commerce secretary spoke hours after US President Donald Trump's sweeping worldwide tariffs came into effect on Thursday, imposing at least 10 per cent on imports from about 90 countries, after multiple rounds of delays since they were first announced in April. Since April, the US has gradually increased tariffs on Chinese imports to as much as 145 per cent. In retaliation, Beijing imposed tariffs of up to 125 per cent and introduced export controls on strategic raw materials.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store