Mangawhai Risks $100 Million Economic Disaster If Sandspit Fails: Warning
Many in the community worry about its future as a result.
Mangawhai sandspit is described as "a hotbed of coastal management considerations" by a University of Auckland academic.
The rare landform is one of just five drumstick-shaped sandspits in New Zealand. Its sand was predominantly made hundreds of thousands of years ago from volcanic explosions in the central North Island, delivered by the Waikato River.
It's at the epicentre of competing tensions between seabed sand mining, local and central government bureaucracy, New Zealand's rarest bird, community groups, conservation, harbour health, mana whenua, population growth, tourism, recreation and development.
In the first of a two-part feature, Local Democracy Reporting Northland reporter Susan Botting looks at what sort of health report card those connected with the rare landform give it.
New Zealand's fastest-growing coastal settlement risks a more than $100 million economic disaster if Mangawhai Sandspit fails, a community leader warns.
The stark warning is from community group Mangawhai Matters member Dr Phil McDermott, a former Massey professor of resource and environmental planning.
A second breach of the sandspit where sea washed in from the Pacific Ocean would hit the economy on many fronts, he says.
McDermott was among a range of community leaders, councils, coastal experts and government organisations who raised their fears for the spit's future with Local Democracy Reporting Northland.
They have overwhelmingly given the spit's health a bare pass of C report card, pointing to a range of reasons.
Rising sea levels and intensifying storms are among the issues sounding warning bells.
McDermott said the economic hit would be from plummeting property values, disappearing tourism, and fewer visitors.
"There are so many pressures including significant development," McDermott said.
Mangawhai Matters has successfully legally challenged unfettered Mangawhai development.
The sandspit breached in 1978 after a huge storm. The resulting 600 metre channel split the three kilometre long, 3 square kilometre spit in half for more than a decade. The breach led to today's main northern harbour entrance filling up with sand as Mangawhai Harbour discharged via a new exit point to the sea. Renegade action by the local community known as "the Big Dig" opened the channel.
The blockage led to stagnating harbour water. House prices fell and properties weren't selling. Banks in some cases did not want to provide mortgage lending.
Work to open the blockage and close the breach finally started in 1991.
Mangawhai Sandspit's at the epicentre of competing tensions between seabed sand mining, local and central government bureaucracy, New Zealand's rarest bird, community groups, conservation, harbour health, mana whenua, population growth, tourism, recreation and development.
Mangawhai Matters community group chair Doug Lloyd said surveying showed the harbour and sandspit were rated the most important feature of their local area.
When Lloyd arrived in Mangawhai in 1989 there were about 600 people there.
Now there are up to 20,000 over the summer peak.
And there are more than 2000 new houses on the cards in several big developments.
Mangawhai Harbour Restoration Society (MHRS)'s Peter Wethey chairs the community group credited by many as having had a key role in the spit surviving to the degree it has.
The society runs New Zealand's only dredging operation of its type, sucking up sand blown into the sea from Mangawhai Sandspit and putting it back onto the rare coastal landform.
Wethey said the dredging was about keeping the harbour's ever-filling navigation channels open and protecting the spit with an about 800 metre long harbourside bund - effectively a man-made sand dune strip edging to protect it from future breaching.
Longtime MHRS dredge operator Mark Vercoe said the process of sustainably delivering sand from the harbour floor to the prescribed location, that continued to strengthen spit protection, was an exacting one.
Just over 5000 Kaipara District Council (KDC) Mangawhai Harbour catchment ratepayers pay $80 annually towards the society for its work.
Kaipara Mayor Craig Jepson said that money was well spent to protect the spit, echoing many in the community by saying the group had to navigate significant bureaucracy to do its work.
Jepson said he believed too much of the society's funds and time were being wasted on bureaucracy when they were better spent on taking action.
Northland Regional Council (NRC) governs consenting for the dredge's sand extraction with up to 50,000 cubic metres of sand dredgings allowed annually. More recently that quantity was not fixed but instead dependent on location and dredging depth.
Dredging must take place between April and December each year, depending on where it happens and the values of those locations - outside the fairy tern breeding season.
DoC rules on where the dredgings can go on the spit.
DoC acting operations manager - Whangārei Sarah Newman-Watt, said the Mangawhai government wildlife refuge reserve was protected for its ecological significance, particularly for its critical nesting habitat for New Zealand's fairy tern/tara-iti and northern dotterel.
She said the sandspit was the country's largest tara-iti breeding site with fewer than 45 individuals left.
Fairy Tern Trust convenor and Mangawhai property owner of three decades Heather Rogan said the spit was critical for the bird's future. It was currently home to all but one of New Zealand's tara-iti nesting sites.
University of Auckland coastal geomorphologist Professor Dr Mark Dickson said it was about how well the spit would do its job of protecting the Mangawhai community.
The work of the community was essential.
Thousands of sand dune plants, kilometres of sand fencing to trap sand, pest control work and dredgings from the harbour going onto the sandspit towards maintaining its resilience are among this work.
Dickson said the spit would undoubtedly breach again if left to its natural cycles without this community input.
"The spit's not quite holding its own. It requires quite a level of intervention," Dickson said.
Save Our Sands spokesperson Ken Rawyard gave the spit a D health report card.
He said DoC was prohibiting the re-establishment of critical vegetation cover on the spit due to concerns about the fairy tern.
Newman-Watt said this was not the case.
It was actively encouraging the re-establishment of appropriate dune vegetation - where it supported the sandspit's health and resilience and did not conflict with conservation goals.
Fairy terns needed open shell patches with very little to no vegetation for nesting.
"At known nesting sites, DoC removes or limits vegetation to preserve these rare habitat conditions," Newman-Watts said.
Mangawhai sandspit was a dynamic system that required careful, site-specific management.
NRC local coastal south councillor Rick Stolwerk acknowledged there were processes that needed to be navigated before the dredging began.
He said the spit was not faring as well as it could, but community members were doing great work.
Te Uri o Hau Environs representative Cindy Hempsall did not want to comment on Mangawhai sandspit when approached by Local Democracy Reporting Northland.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Spinoff
01-08-2025
- The Spinoff
Why I don't eat fish
Ruth Shaw is the acclaimed author of Three Wee Bookshops at the End of the World, as well as a sailor – in this essay she explains how and why she made the decision to stop eating fish. The last question I was asked during my session at the Auckland Writers Festival in May was 'What is one thing we can do to help the environment?' My answer? 'Stop eating fish.' This is easy for me to say as I have been a vegetarian for over 40 years, although I admit that while sailing the east coast of Australia, I was still catching the occasional fish to eat — and to give my shipmate, a cat named Hoffy, a fish head to chew on. Rachel Carson wrote two books that left a lasting impression on me: Silent Spring, published in 1962, and The Sea Around Us, published in 1951. Both books were controversial bestsellers that revolutionised how we thought about our environment and, more importantly, made me aware of what I was eating. In 1999 I read Cod by Mark Kurlansky. This small book about the history of cod fishing (cod was one of the most profitable and soughtt-after fish for centuries and was pushed to near extinction) would become a bestseller. Two of the cornerstones of my life have been books and the protection of our environment. When my husband Lance and I purchased our vessel Breaksea Girl and started running multi-day trips on the Fiordland coast, and down as far as the subantarctic islands, we both agreed that one of the most important decisions we could make was to have a 'no fishing' policy on board. Bill Ballantine, director of the University of Auckland's marine laboratory at Goat Island, is recognised as the founder of marine reserves in New Zealand. He established the first marine reserve at Goat Island in 1975, which was opened to the public in 1977. For Bill, the answer to protecting our underwater environment was to establish 'no take areas with full protection'. The opposition to his idea was staggering. Thankfully we now have 44 marine reserves along the coastline of Aotearoa. Before being employed by the Department of Conservation, Lance was a commercial fisherman. It was there he witnessed the decline of fish such as groper, blue cod and crayfish inside the fiords. After diving at Goat Island and seeing how the area had recovered, he too realised that the way to protect our underwater environment was through the establishment of marine reserves. In 1995 the Guardians of Fiordland Fisheries was established, later known as the Fiordland Marine Guardians. They were formerly established as an advisory group under the Fiordland (Te Moana o Atawhenua) Marine Management Act 2005. This legislation also created eight new marine reserves and other protected areas throughout Fiordland known as 'china shops' because of their delicate nature. Through their commitment to manage and protect the marine environment, the Fiordland crayfishing industry is now one of the healthiest and most sustainable in our country. But how does this lead to me stating publicly that we should stop eating fish? In the 1970s, when the commercial fishing of orange roughy started, it was believed that they only lived for 30 to 40 years. By the mid-1990s marine scientists estimated that they lived between 125 and 250 years, the longest-lived commercial fish species. They don't breed until they are between 20 and 40 years of age and, even then, not every year. By the end of the 1990s, three of the eight New Zealand orange roughy fisheries had collapsed and were closed. I was astounded. We were led to believe that it was a sustainable fishery practice, when in fact it was based on incomplete scientific information. That was when I made the decision to stop eating fish. We talk about sustainable fishing, but the orange roughy and the Atlantic northwest cod are just two examples of commercial fishing that were not sustainable. We are also faced with a decline in penguin colonies. One of the reasons they are struggling is that they no longer have access to enough food to rear their young, due to the demand of commercial fishing fleets. Combine this lack of food with loss of habitat, pollution, disease and climate change, and we can see why many of the world's penguin species are endangered, including our own yellow-eyed penguin which is considered the world's rarest. A third of the world's studied fisheries are currently pushed beyond their biological limits, according to the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. We have been fighting to SAVE THE WHALES, but what about SAVE THE KRILL? Without krill, which is being heavily overfished, a number of seabirds, whales, fish, penguins and albatross would starve. Millions of krill are scooped up from the Southern Ocean to be made into pet food, food for fish farms and health supplements. My stand not to eat fish is based on solid ground, and there is more than enough evidence to prove that we need to look after our oceans. Read Colin Butfield and David Attenborough's latest book, Ocean: Earth's Last Wilderness. Like so many of the books on our oceans, the reading is harsh and confronting. I am not saying that everyone should stop eating fish. Take, for example, communities who rely only on fish for their protein. Generally they have, or did have, low impact, traditional fishing techniques. What I would like to encourage is for more people to consider the health of our oceans which have over 80% of the world's biodiversity. Having dived in Fiordland, I have seen a world which is full of beauty, colour and life forms that could be out of a science fiction book. I have seen the stunning colour of inquisitive blue cod, witnessed the cheeky behaviour of girdled wrasse, and watched in wonder as dolphins and seals interacted with us. I want my grandchildren to witness the magic of our undersea world, and the only way I can do that is to help protect it by not eating fish. I know I have made the right decision for me.
Scoop
16-06-2025
- Scoop
Mangawhai Risks $100 Million Economic Disaster If Sandspit Fails: Warning
Article – Susan Botting – Local Democracy Reporter Mangawhai sandspit has lost more than 420,000 tonnes of its locally-unique non-replenishing sand. Many in the community worry about its future as a result. Mangawhai sandspit has recently been confirmed to have lost more than 420,000 tonnes of its locally-unique non-replenishing sand. Many in the community worry about its future as a result. Mangawhai sandspit is described as 'a hotbed of coastal management considerations' by a University of Auckland academic. The rare landform is one of just five drumstick-shaped sandspits in New Zealand. Its sand was predominantly made hundreds of thousands of years ago from volcanic explosions in the central North Island, delivered by the Waikato River. It's at the epicentre of competing tensions between seabed sand mining, local and central government bureaucracy, New Zealand's rarest bird, community groups, conservation, harbour health, mana whenua, population growth, tourism, recreation and development. In the first of a two-part feature, Local Democracy Reporting Northland reporter Susan Botting looks at what sort of health report card those connected with the rare landform give it. New Zealand's fastest-growing coastal settlement risks a more than $100 million economic disaster if Mangawhai Sandspit fails, a community leader warns. The stark warning is from community group Mangawhai Matters member Dr Phil McDermott, a former Massey professor of resource and environmental planning. A second breach of the sandspit where sea washed in from the Pacific Ocean would hit the economy on many fronts, he says. McDermott was among a range of community leaders, councils, coastal experts and government organisations who raised their fears for the spit's future with Local Democracy Reporting Northland. They have overwhelmingly given the spit's health a bare pass of C report card, pointing to a range of reasons. Rising sea levels and intensifying storms are among the issues sounding warning bells. McDermott said the economic hit would be from plummeting property values, disappearing tourism, and fewer visitors. 'There are so many pressures including significant development,' McDermott said. Mangawhai Matters has successfully legally challenged unfettered Mangawhai development. The sandspit breached in 1978 after a huge storm. The resulting 600 metre channel split the three kilometre long, 3 square kilometre spit in half for more than a decade. The breach led to today's main northern harbour entrance filling up with sand as Mangawhai Harbour discharged via a new exit point to the sea. Renegade action by the local community known as 'the Big Dig' opened the channel. The blockage led to stagnating harbour water. House prices fell and properties weren't selling. Banks in some cases did not want to provide mortgage lending. Work to open the blockage and close the breach finally started in 1991. Mangawhai Sandspit's at the epicentre of competing tensions between seabed sand mining, local and central government bureaucracy, New Zealand's rarest bird, community groups, conservation, harbour health, mana whenua, population growth, tourism, recreation and development. Mangawhai Matters community group chair Doug Lloyd said surveying showed the harbour and sandspit were rated the most important feature of their local area. When Lloyd arrived in Mangawhai in 1989 there were about 600 people there. Now there are up to 20,000 over the summer peak. And there are more than 2000 new houses on the cards in several big developments. Mangawhai Harbour Restoration Society (MHRS)'s Peter Wethey chairs the community group credited by many as having had a key role in the spit surviving to the degree it has. The society runs New Zealand's only dredging operation of its type, sucking up sand blown into the sea from Mangawhai Sandspit and putting it back onto the rare coastal landform. Wethey said the dredging was about keeping the harbour's ever-filling navigation channels open and protecting the spit with an about 800 metre long harbourside bund – effectively a man-made sand dune strip edging to protect it from future breaching. Longtime MHRS dredge operator Mark Vercoe said the process of sustainably delivering sand from the harbour floor to the prescribed location, that continued to strengthen spit protection, was an exacting one. Just over 5000 Kaipara District Council (KDC) Mangawhai Harbour catchment ratepayers pay $80 annually towards the society for its work. Kaipara Mayor Craig Jepson said that money was well spent to protect the spit, echoing many in the community by saying the group had to navigate significant bureaucracy to do its work. Jepson said he believed too much of the society's funds and time were being wasted on bureaucracy when they were better spent on taking action. Northland Regional Council (NRC) governs consenting for the dredge's sand extraction with up to 50,000 cubic metres of sand dredgings allowed annually. More recently that quantity was not fixed but instead dependent on location and dredging depth. Dredging must take place between April and December each year, depending on where it happens and the values of those locations – outside the fairy tern breeding season. DoC rules on where the dredgings can go on the spit. DoC acting operations manager – Whangārei Sarah Newman-Watt, said the Mangawhai government wildlife refuge reserve was protected for its ecological significance, particularly for its critical nesting habitat for New Zealand's fairy tern/tara-iti and northern dotterel. She said the sandspit was the country's largest tara-iti breeding site with fewer than 45 individuals left. Fairy Tern Trust convenor and Mangawhai property owner of three decades Heather Rogan said the spit was critical for the bird's future. It was currently home to all but one of New Zealand's tara-iti nesting sites. University of Auckland coastal geomorphologist Professor Dr Mark Dickson said it was about how well the spit would do its job of protecting the Mangawhai community. The work of the community was essential. Thousands of sand dune plants, kilometres of sand fencing to trap sand, pest control work and dredgings from the harbour going onto the sandspit towards maintaining its resilience are among this work. Dickson said the spit would undoubtedly breach again if left to its natural cycles without this community input. 'The spit's not quite holding its own. It requires quite a level of intervention,' Dickson said. Save Our Sands spokesperson Ken Rawyard gave the spit a D health report card. He said DoC was prohibiting the re-establishment of critical vegetation cover on the spit due to concerns about the fairy tern. Newman-Watt said this was not the case. It was actively encouraging the re-establishment of appropriate dune vegetation – where it supported the sandspit's health and resilience and did not conflict with conservation goals. Fairy terns needed open shell patches with very little to no vegetation for nesting. 'At known nesting sites, DoC removes or limits vegetation to preserve these rare habitat conditions,' Newman-Watts said. Mangawhai sandspit was a dynamic system that required careful, site-specific management. NRC local coastal south councillor Rick Stolwerk acknowledged there were processes that needed to be navigated before the dredging began. He said the spit was not faring as well as it could, but community members were doing great work. Te Uri o Hau Environs representative Cindy Hempsall did not want to comment on Mangawhai sandspit when approached by Local Democracy Reporting Northland.
Scoop
16-06-2025
- Scoop
Mangawhai Risks $100 Million Economic Disaster If Sandspit Fails: Warning
Mangawhai sandspit has recently been confirmed to have lost more than 420,000 tonnes of its locally-unique non-replenishing sand. Many in the community worry about its future as a result. Mangawhai sandspit is described as "a hotbed of coastal management considerations" by a University of Auckland academic. The rare landform is one of just five drumstick-shaped sandspits in New Zealand. Its sand was predominantly made hundreds of thousands of years ago from volcanic explosions in the central North Island, delivered by the Waikato River. It's at the epicentre of competing tensions between seabed sand mining, local and central government bureaucracy, New Zealand's rarest bird, community groups, conservation, harbour health, mana whenua, population growth, tourism, recreation and development. In the first of a two-part feature, Local Democracy Reporting Northland reporter Susan Botting looks at what sort of health report card those connected with the rare landform give it. New Zealand's fastest-growing coastal settlement risks a more than $100 million economic disaster if Mangawhai Sandspit fails, a community leader warns. The stark warning is from community group Mangawhai Matters member Dr Phil McDermott, a former Massey professor of resource and environmental planning. A second breach of the sandspit where sea washed in from the Pacific Ocean would hit the economy on many fronts, he says. McDermott was among a range of community leaders, councils, coastal experts and government organisations who raised their fears for the spit's future with Local Democracy Reporting Northland. They have overwhelmingly given the spit's health a bare pass of C report card, pointing to a range of reasons. Rising sea levels and intensifying storms are among the issues sounding warning bells. McDermott said the economic hit would be from plummeting property values, disappearing tourism, and fewer visitors. "There are so many pressures including significant development," McDermott said. Mangawhai Matters has successfully legally challenged unfettered Mangawhai development. The sandspit breached in 1978 after a huge storm. The resulting 600 metre channel split the three kilometre long, 3 square kilometre spit in half for more than a decade. The breach led to today's main northern harbour entrance filling up with sand as Mangawhai Harbour discharged via a new exit point to the sea. Renegade action by the local community known as "the Big Dig" opened the channel. The blockage led to stagnating harbour water. House prices fell and properties weren't selling. Banks in some cases did not want to provide mortgage lending. Work to open the blockage and close the breach finally started in 1991. Mangawhai Sandspit's at the epicentre of competing tensions between seabed sand mining, local and central government bureaucracy, New Zealand's rarest bird, community groups, conservation, harbour health, mana whenua, population growth, tourism, recreation and development. Mangawhai Matters community group chair Doug Lloyd said surveying showed the harbour and sandspit were rated the most important feature of their local area. When Lloyd arrived in Mangawhai in 1989 there were about 600 people there. Now there are up to 20,000 over the summer peak. And there are more than 2000 new houses on the cards in several big developments. Mangawhai Harbour Restoration Society (MHRS)'s Peter Wethey chairs the community group credited by many as having had a key role in the spit surviving to the degree it has. The society runs New Zealand's only dredging operation of its type, sucking up sand blown into the sea from Mangawhai Sandspit and putting it back onto the rare coastal landform. Wethey said the dredging was about keeping the harbour's ever-filling navigation channels open and protecting the spit with an about 800 metre long harbourside bund - effectively a man-made sand dune strip edging to protect it from future breaching. Longtime MHRS dredge operator Mark Vercoe said the process of sustainably delivering sand from the harbour floor to the prescribed location, that continued to strengthen spit protection, was an exacting one. Just over 5000 Kaipara District Council (KDC) Mangawhai Harbour catchment ratepayers pay $80 annually towards the society for its work. Kaipara Mayor Craig Jepson said that money was well spent to protect the spit, echoing many in the community by saying the group had to navigate significant bureaucracy to do its work. Jepson said he believed too much of the society's funds and time were being wasted on bureaucracy when they were better spent on taking action. Northland Regional Council (NRC) governs consenting for the dredge's sand extraction with up to 50,000 cubic metres of sand dredgings allowed annually. More recently that quantity was not fixed but instead dependent on location and dredging depth. Dredging must take place between April and December each year, depending on where it happens and the values of those locations - outside the fairy tern breeding season. DoC rules on where the dredgings can go on the spit. DoC acting operations manager - Whangārei Sarah Newman-Watt, said the Mangawhai government wildlife refuge reserve was protected for its ecological significance, particularly for its critical nesting habitat for New Zealand's fairy tern/tara-iti and northern dotterel. She said the sandspit was the country's largest tara-iti breeding site with fewer than 45 individuals left. Fairy Tern Trust convenor and Mangawhai property owner of three decades Heather Rogan said the spit was critical for the bird's future. It was currently home to all but one of New Zealand's tara-iti nesting sites. University of Auckland coastal geomorphologist Professor Dr Mark Dickson said it was about how well the spit would do its job of protecting the Mangawhai community. The work of the community was essential. Thousands of sand dune plants, kilometres of sand fencing to trap sand, pest control work and dredgings from the harbour going onto the sandspit towards maintaining its resilience are among this work. Dickson said the spit would undoubtedly breach again if left to its natural cycles without this community input. "The spit's not quite holding its own. It requires quite a level of intervention," Dickson said. Save Our Sands spokesperson Ken Rawyard gave the spit a D health report card. He said DoC was prohibiting the re-establishment of critical vegetation cover on the spit due to concerns about the fairy tern. Newman-Watt said this was not the case. It was actively encouraging the re-establishment of appropriate dune vegetation - where it supported the sandspit's health and resilience and did not conflict with conservation goals. Fairy terns needed open shell patches with very little to no vegetation for nesting. "At known nesting sites, DoC removes or limits vegetation to preserve these rare habitat conditions," Newman-Watts said. Mangawhai sandspit was a dynamic system that required careful, site-specific management. NRC local coastal south councillor Rick Stolwerk acknowledged there were processes that needed to be navigated before the dredging began. He said the spit was not faring as well as it could, but community members were doing great work. Te Uri o Hau Environs representative Cindy Hempsall did not want to comment on Mangawhai sandspit when approached by Local Democracy Reporting Northland.
